• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:52
CEST 01:52
KST 08:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time EWC 2025 details: $700k total prize; GSL, DH Dallas confirmed Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BITCOIN RECOVERY EXPERT | LOST RECOVERY MASTERS BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 656 users

Community Feedback Update - July 31st - Page 21

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
427 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 Next All
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 08 2015 18:18 GMT
#401
What did they say, they wanna remove the mechanics? Or will zerg get auto inject?
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-08 18:44:00
August 08 2015 18:43 GMT
#402
On August 09 2015 03:18 The_Red_Viper wrote:
What did they say, they wanna remove the mechanics? Or will zerg get auto inject?


auto inject with 2 larva
no mule
no chrono


zerg will be very weak on the ealry game, hellbat push would be way to strong + banshee or Liberator
terran will be very weak latter in the game, no parade push no more miracles but they can just make more workers and turtle a bit more and then push
protoss has weaker ealry game but they have BS defense with PO....


So baisically zerg and terran gets alot more weaker... zerg the most since they will die to 5 min pushes and they wont have timings.

I suspect they will give 3 larva or they will buff roaches/zerlings/queens
"The Fractured but Whole"
pmp10
Profile Joined April 2012
3318 Posts
August 08 2015 18:46 GMT
#403
On August 09 2015 01:55 digmouse wrote:
David Kim said on the Gamescom stream that the next balance update will be focusing on the macro mechanics, likely starting with removing them.

Great.
So it's Dawn of War all over again.
This will help kill the competitive scene far faster than any balance issues at launch of LotV.
Deathstar
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
9150 Posts
August 08 2015 19:00 GMT
#404
Yeah this is going to be big. I'm pretty hyped for the new vision.
rip passion
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15952 Posts
August 08 2015 19:03 GMT
#405
On August 09 2015 03:46 pmp10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2015 01:55 digmouse wrote:
David Kim said on the Gamescom stream that the next balance update will be focusing on the macro mechanics, likely starting with removing them.

Great.
So it's Dawn of War all over again.
This will help kill the competitive scene far faster than any balance issues at launch of LotV.

67% of people want the macro mechanics to stay; he still removes them.
Why bother with doing community updates when he doesn't listen to the community anyway.
My only hope for sc2 right now is that most people boycott LotV and continue playing HotS to force blizzard to switch tournaments back to it.
LotV is doomed to fail. It neither appeals to casual gamers because of the added speed in building up and taking bases nor to hardcore competitive gamers because of the easier macro mechanics.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Lunareste
Profile Joined July 2011
United States3596 Posts
August 08 2015 19:05 GMT
#406
On August 09 2015 03:46 pmp10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2015 01:55 digmouse wrote:
David Kim said on the Gamescom stream that the next balance update will be focusing on the macro mechanics, likely starting with removing them.

Great.
So it's Dawn of War all over again.
This will help kill the competitive scene far faster than any balance issues at launch of LotV.


Do you really believe that Larva Inject and MULE are what makes competitive Starcraft so great? Of the three macro boosters, Chrono is the only one that's interesting in the slightest as far as strategy. As cool as it is to see Soo be slightly better at injects than everyone else, I think it would be more interesting to see APM being used to drop MULEs be used to create better army positioning on the map or more harassment.

There are a ton of very tangible (harder to max out) and subtle (more incentive to fight skirmishes) benefits to removing macro mechanics and there is reason to believe that the game as a whole can greatly benefit.

But more importantly, a change to the macro mechanics also leads to believe that there could possibly be even more important design changes down the line that would come as a result of changed balance and gameplay.

For example, if Terran cannot use MULE to stablize after early game Protoss harassment via Adepts and Oracles, would those units need to lose their anti-light attack? Would SCV health need to be buffed?

Another example, if we can assume that Zerg's ability to reproduce units is drastically nerfed without a significant amount of macro hatcheries, what buffs can we finally see to Hydralisk health or armor? Would it be possible for us to remove the Roach?

Regardless of actual outcome, there can be significant changes to unit interaction if each of the races cannot produce so many units as such a high speed. In any case we really lose nothing by testing out these changes, and we potentially have a very high amount to gain by this change.
KT FlaSh FOREVER
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-08 19:09:55
August 08 2015 19:09 GMT
#407
On August 09 2015 04:03 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2015 03:46 pmp10 wrote:
On August 09 2015 01:55 digmouse wrote:
David Kim said on the Gamescom stream that the next balance update will be focusing on the macro mechanics, likely starting with removing them.

Great.
So it's Dawn of War all over again.
This will help kill the competitive scene far faster than any balance issues at launch of LotV.

67% of people want the macro mechanics to stay; he still removes them.
Why bother with doing community updates when he doesn't listen to the community anyway.
My only hope for sc2 right now is that most people boycott LotV and continue playing HotS to force blizzard to switch tournaments back to it.
LotV is doomed to fail. It neither appeals to casual gamers because of the added speed in building up and taking bases nor to hardcore competitive gamers because of the easier macro mechanics.


Yeah cuz macro is so intersting and takes so much skill and chooice.
Not really....

Most terrans are upset cuz their OP MULE is gone.
"The Fractured but Whole"
TheWinks
Profile Joined July 2011
United States572 Posts
August 08 2015 19:19 GMT
#408
David Kim on macro mechanics:

For the multiplayer beta balance I just wanted to talk about two main things. The first is the macro mechanics being cut, something that we’ve been discussing with our community over the last week or so. I’d first like to thank everyone for giving us the feedback on both the pros and cons of potentially cutting this mechanic. And what we’ve kind of decided internally is we’d like to really try out in the next balance update how the game plays if we were to remove these macro mechanics from the game. And the reason for that is because we can theorycraft all day, but it’s really difficult to figure out the exact and specific reasons why these mechanics are good or bad for the game so we really want to identify those things. And the one other thing that I’d like to point out, as many of you guys in the community have pointed out also, is we have increased the difficulty of not just the micro in the game but also the macro as well. So because of things like resource changes now you have to spread out your bases and expand more aggressively which means you have to manage multiple bases at once. And not only that, because of how the resourcing actually works in legacy of the void you gotta check back at each of those locations and manage the probes and worker lines a lot more efficiently as well. Our current thinking is that because we made it a little more difficult on this side, even if we take away a little bit from the macro mechanics we wonder if end result is that it’s a very skillful macro experience for players.
rockslave
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Brazil318 Posts
August 08 2015 19:46 GMT
#409
On August 09 2015 04:19 TheWinks wrote:
David Kim on macro mechanics:

For the multiplayer beta balance I just wanted to talk about two main things. The first is the macro mechanics being cut, something that we’ve been discussing with our community over the last week or so. I’d first like to thank everyone for giving us the feedback on both the pros and cons of potentially cutting this mechanic. And what we’ve kind of decided internally is we’d like to really try out in the next balance update how the game plays if we were to remove these macro mechanics from the game. And the reason for that is because we can theorycraft all day, but it’s really difficult to figure out the exact and specific reasons why these mechanics are good or bad for the game so we really want to identify those things. And the one other thing that I’d like to point out, as many of you guys in the community have pointed out also, is we have increased the difficulty of not just the micro in the game but also the macro as well. So because of things like resource changes now you have to spread out your bases and expand more aggressively which means you have to manage multiple bases at once. And not only that, because of how the resourcing actually works in legacy of the void you gotta check back at each of those locations and manage the probes and worker lines a lot more efficiently as well. Our current thinking is that because we made it a little more difficult on this side, even if we take away a little bit from the macro mechanics we wonder if end result is that it’s a very skillful macro experience for players.


Awesome! Testing is what the beta is for.
What qxc said.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15952 Posts
August 08 2015 19:51 GMT
#410
On August 09 2015 04:19 TheWinks wrote:
David Kim on macro mechanics:

For the multiplayer beta balance I just wanted to talk about two main things. The first is the macro mechanics being cut, something that we’ve been discussing with our community over the last week or so. I’d first like to thank everyone for giving us the feedback on both the pros and cons of potentially cutting this mechanic. And what we’ve kind of decided internally is we’d like to really try out in the next balance update how the game plays if we were to remove these macro mechanics from the game. And the reason for that is because we can theorycraft all day, but it’s really difficult to figure out the exact and specific reasons why these mechanics are good or bad for the game so we really want to identify those things. And the one other thing that I’d like to point out, as many of you guys in the community have pointed out also, is we have increased the difficulty of not just the micro in the game but also the macro as well. So because of things like resource changes now you have to spread out your bases and expand more aggressively which means you have to manage multiple bases at once. And not only that, because of how the resourcing actually works in legacy of the void you gotta check back at each of those locations and manage the probes and worker lines a lot more efficiently as well. Our current thinking is that because we made it a little more difficult on this side, even if we take away a little bit from the macro mechanics we wonder if end result is that it’s a very skillful macro experience for players.

the biggest issues I see with it are that it might require complete rebalancing of the units from the races, especially zergs. At this point in the beta I'm not sure this is the right thing to do especially considering there are so many other problems right now.
Also it is a massive buff to scan.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
August 08 2015 19:58 GMT
#411
On August 09 2015 04:51 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2015 04:19 TheWinks wrote:
David Kim on macro mechanics:

For the multiplayer beta balance I just wanted to talk about two main things. The first is the macro mechanics being cut, something that we’ve been discussing with our community over the last week or so. I’d first like to thank everyone for giving us the feedback on both the pros and cons of potentially cutting this mechanic. And what we’ve kind of decided internally is we’d like to really try out in the next balance update how the game plays if we were to remove these macro mechanics from the game. And the reason for that is because we can theorycraft all day, but it’s really difficult to figure out the exact and specific reasons why these mechanics are good or bad for the game so we really want to identify those things. And the one other thing that I’d like to point out, as many of you guys in the community have pointed out also, is we have increased the difficulty of not just the micro in the game but also the macro as well. So because of things like resource changes now you have to spread out your bases and expand more aggressively which means you have to manage multiple bases at once. And not only that, because of how the resourcing actually works in legacy of the void you gotta check back at each of those locations and manage the probes and worker lines a lot more efficiently as well. Our current thinking is that because we made it a little more difficult on this side, even if we take away a little bit from the macro mechanics we wonder if end result is that it’s a very skillful macro experience for players.

the biggest issues I see with it are that it might require complete rebalancing of the units from the races, especially zergs. At this point in the beta I'm not sure this is the right thing to do especially considering there are so many other problems right now.
Also it is a massive buff to scan.



They can nerf scan and buff zerg same with other races.
There are ways to balance.

Its drastic ? Yes !
It is good ? Hell yeah !

Will get more players, no more abusable MULE, no more insta remax unless you have 8 - 9 hatches, less protoss all ins.
"The Fractured but Whole"
DeadByDawn
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom476 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-08 20:09:49
August 08 2015 20:05 GMT
#412
Isn't this game supposed to release this year? The rebalancing of units that will result from this is going to make LotV really rocky when it does release, as I do not think that they will have time based on their trajectory so far.

But I will trade the Mule hammer for stopping Zerg's insta-remaxing. Now what about warp ins - remove Warpgates and buff basic units (but nerf Adepts). After all what is Warpgate if not a macro booster.
Everlong
Profile Joined April 2010
Czech Republic1973 Posts
August 08 2015 20:25 GMT
#413
It's funny, I remember so many people were screaming they want the macro mechanics to be removed.
Synastren
Profile Joined May 2014
United States31 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-08 20:43:19
August 08 2015 20:41 GMT
#414
On August 09 2015 04:19 TheWinks wrote:
David Kim on macro mechanics:

For the multiplayer beta balance I just wanted to talk about two main things. The first is the macro mechanics being cut, something that we’ve been discussing with our community over the last week or so. I’d first like to thank everyone for giving us the feedback on both the pros and cons of potentially cutting this mechanic. And what we’ve kind of decided internally is we’d like to really try out in the next balance update how the game plays if we were to remove these macro mechanics from the game. And the reason for that is because we can theorycraft all day, but it’s really difficult to figure out the exact and specific reasons why these mechanics are good or bad for the game so we really want to identify those things. And the one other thing that I’d like to point out, as many of you guys in the community have pointed out also, is we have increased the difficulty of not just the micro in the game but also the macro as well. ...


And yet theorycrafting was sufficient cause for jettisoning the community submitted economic changes.

edit: Formatting the quote a bit more.
RIP ZeeZ
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
August 08 2015 20:56 GMT
#415
Community submitted economic changes? What are you referring to?
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Synastren
Profile Joined May 2014
United States31 Posts
August 08 2015 21:14 GMT
#416
On August 09 2015 05:56 mishimaBeef wrote:
Community submitted economic changes? What are you referring to?

The big community suggestion for alternative economic models that did away with worker pairing. Blizzard's response was essentially "We don't feel like that would develop the game as we think it should be developed, so we're not going to try it." Their explanation for cutting macro mechanics is "We don't feel like we can come to a good conclusion regarding these mechanics without trying them ingame, so we're going to try it."
RIP ZeeZ
shid0x
Profile Joined July 2012
Korea (South)5014 Posts
August 08 2015 21:24 GMT
#417
Option 2:
Cut chrono
Cut mule
Spawn larva is autocast by default, but spawn only 2 larva


Litterally the most retarded thing i've ever heard since wol beta, who in blizzard did think of this ?

Because macro mechanics are an area that’s difficult to do, and not many people can really tell how well someone is doing it, we’ve been exploring potentially cutting them or making them less important.

This wont bring more twitch viewers, really.


I'm all for a warp in nerf but 16 sec might be a bit much.
RIP MKP
Roblin
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden948 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-08 21:57:31
August 08 2015 21:32 GMT
#418
On August 09 2015 05:41 Synastren wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2015 04:19 TheWinks wrote:
David Kim on macro mechanics:

For the multiplayer beta balance I just wanted to talk about two main things. The first is the macro mechanics being cut, something that we’ve been discussing with our community over the last week or so. I’d first like to thank everyone for giving us the feedback on both the pros and cons of potentially cutting this mechanic. And what we’ve kind of decided internally is we’d like to really try out in the next balance update how the game plays if we were to remove these macro mechanics from the game. And the reason for that is because we can theorycraft all day, but it’s really difficult to figure out the exact and specific reasons why these mechanics are good or bad for the game so we really want to identify those things. And the one other thing that I’d like to point out, as many of you guys in the community have pointed out also, is we have increased the difficulty of not just the micro in the game but also the macro as well. ...


And yet theorycrafting was sufficient cause for jettisoning the community submitted economic changes.

edit: Formatting the quote a bit more.


there were showmatch tournaments played using various "community submitted economic changes" and blizz playtested internally, they came to the conclusion that those economic models are not drastic enough and/or didn't do enough that lotv model didn't already do.

perhaps some theorycrafting was involved too but their reasons for not going with community eco models were certainly not just theorycrafting.

source: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/18183849206


words words words...

Community resourcing model suggestion
We also watched show matches, tried games ourselves, and we agree with the majority of you guys that it’s too similar to Heart of the Swarm. But we wanted to comment again on this because it’s still a topic discussed by some.
Just to reiterate once more, we’re not looking to make minor tweaks in this area. We’re looking for a big change that will make sure that players will spread out their expansions at a much faster rate than they do in Heart of the Swarm.
Currently, the resourcing model that we’re testing in the beta is doing a very good job of this.

...words words words


edit addition instead of double-post:
On August 09 2015 06:24 shid0x wrote:
Show nested quote +
Option 2:
Cut chrono
Cut mule
Spawn larva is autocast by default, but spawn only 2 larva


Litterally the most retarded thing i've ever heard since wol beta, who in blizzard did think of this ?


you are walking a fine line between rhetorical question and ad hominem, if the entirety of your comment can be summed up as an insult, then you simply shouldn't post it at all.
in situations like this, you should present your argument for why it is "the most retarded thing you've ever heard". you might find that giving actual explanations is significantly more difficult than spouting rhetorical questions that does nothing for the discussion.


Show nested quote +
Because macro mechanics are an area that’s difficult to do, and not many people can really tell how well someone is doing it, we’ve been exploring potentially cutting them or making them less important.

This wont bring more twitch viewers, really.
...


why do people automatically assume the changes are to increase twitch popularity? this particular change is to make your skillfulness be more visible primarily to your opponent and secondarily to yourself, the observers/viewers is a tertiary party that happen to benefit from such a change, twitch viewers is not the targeted audience so I don't see why "This won't bring more twitch viewers, really" is in any way a relevant comment.

edit 2: while randomly browsing wikipedia I found the name of the specific logical fallacy you are committing! :D
Argumentum ad lapidem
I'm better today than I was yesterday!
TheWinks
Profile Joined July 2011
United States572 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-08 22:01:37
August 08 2015 22:01 GMT
#419
On August 09 2015 06:32 Roblin wrote:
perhaps some theorycrafting was involved too but their reasons for not going with community eco models were certainly not just theorycrafting.

HotS and LotV are different games and the importance of those models weren't the specific models, but rather the general idea behind them. They justified not giving something like it a try on beta because of their internal testing. Here, they are admitting that their internal testing is inadequate for a change of this magnitude.
TelecoM
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States10673 Posts
August 08 2015 22:29 GMT
#420
I will be the happiest man alive if they cut all macro mechanics.

SC2BW Here we come.

This should have been done 5 years ago, everyone who is mad get over it please....and all Oldschool bw players rejoice for this great change!
AKA: TelecoM[WHITE] Protoss fighting
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 8m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 181
Dota 2
monkeys_forever642
League of Legends
Grubby4259
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2481
flusha462
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King177
AZ_Axe133
Liquid`Ken43
Other Games
tarik_tv19146
summit1g11470
gofns9396
C9.Mang0215
ViBE162
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick757
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 72
• RyuSc2 44
• davetesta37
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 35
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota23010
League of Legends
• Doublelift4751
Other Games
• imaqtpie962
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
10h 8m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14h 8m
CSO Cup
16h 8m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18h 8m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 9h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 14h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 18h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.