|
gg ez discussion will not be continued in GD following this post |
On May 24 2015 05:28 Volband wrote: Oh man, I hope Riot gonna smack all those gg ez kids. Reading all the QQ about why they get punished is like a cookie rain for me. not sure whos sadder those who write gg ez after game or you getting butthurt over it so much that you think ban is appropriate penalty
|
On May 24 2015 04:05 wei2coolman wrote: The only great thing about the new system is less riven, shaco, yi and vayne players. I can now report every single one of these players, and chances are they're toxic in chat. Watch dat 15% riven playrate drop in the next couple of weeks. QQ thread is that way. =]
<====
|
On May 24 2015 05:53 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 04:05 wei2coolman wrote: The only great thing about the new system is less riven, shaco, yi and vayne players. I can now report every single one of these players, and chances are they're toxic in chat. Watch dat 15% riven playrate drop in the next couple of weeks. QQ thread is that way. =] <==== Reported. Enjoy your 2 week ban-cation. Courtesy of Riot.
|
On May 24 2015 05:55 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 05:53 Gahlo wrote:On May 24 2015 04:05 wei2coolman wrote: The only great thing about the new system is less riven, shaco, yi and vayne players. I can now report every single one of these players, and chances are they're toxic in chat. Watch dat 15% riven playrate drop in the next couple of weeks. QQ thread is that way. =] <==== Reported. Enjoy your 2 week ban-cation. Courtesy of Riot. Aha! You've triggered my Santa Baron trap card!
|
This system is actually god awful. It's only matter of time till people realize it.
Now people going to ping the fuck out when they get annoyed. Pretty sure getting pinged till game ends is worse than getting flamed.
|
|
On May 24 2015 06:07 Mensol wrote: This system is actually god awful. It's only matter of time till people realize it.
Now people going to ping the fuck out when they get annoyed. Pretty sure getting pinged till game ends is worse than getting flamed.
Spamming pings does nothing to me since I don't play with the sound on.
I tend to listen to music while I play or listen to streams in the background.
|
On May 24 2015 05:53 kongoline wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 05:28 Volband wrote: Oh man, I hope Riot gonna smack all those gg ez kids. Reading all the QQ about why they get punished is like a cookie rain for me. not sure whos sadder those who write gg ez after game or you getting butthurt over it so much that you think ban is appropriate penalty Probably the ones who either feel the need to overcompensate by saying gg ez, or simply get enjoyment from disrespecting others.
Oh, wait, maybe it's me for wanting those scums to be smacked. Man, glad to see the liquidlegends community is promoting asshats with full force!
|
The opinions of one person = the entire liquidlegends community? :O
I like the new system currently, I haven't been chat restricted ever, so I'm likely to not get punished by the new system either.
|
My opinion is still that the people I've seen complaining about this are probably people who deserve to be banned and are secretly worried about that.
|
On May 24 2015 07:13 Ketara wrote: My opinion is still that the people I've seen complaining about this are probably people who deserve to be banned and are secretly worried about that.
Quoted for truth. Every time I see someone argueing against 'anti-toxic' measures, be it tribunal or that stuff on the LoL forums where people whine about their bans and Lyte proceeds to lay the smack down they either turn out to be asshats or I get the creeping suspicion they are. God forbid we'd be held to some standards.
|
On May 24 2015 07:48 Kaethis wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 07:13 Ketara wrote: My opinion is still that the people I've seen complaining about this are probably people who deserve to be banned and are secretly worried about that. Quoted for truth. Every time I see someone argueing against 'anti-toxic' measures, be it tribunal or that stuff on the LoL forums where people whine about their bans and Lyte proceeds to lay the smack down they either turn out to be asshats or I get the creeping suspicion they are. God forbid we'd be held to some standards. Oh boy. Orwell was only 31 years off with 1984. Can't wait for all this doublespeak in chat.
|
At some point people should be able to talk without constantly worrying about being chat banned. It'll get interesting if passive aggressive language becomes bannable, because it's widely used even up through the challenger ladder.
|
United States15536 Posts
On May 24 2015 07:56 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 07:48 Kaethis wrote:On May 24 2015 07:13 Ketara wrote: My opinion is still that the people I've seen complaining about this are probably people who deserve to be banned and are secretly worried about that. Quoted for truth. Every time I see someone argueing against 'anti-toxic' measures, be it tribunal or that stuff on the LoL forums where people whine about their bans and Lyte proceeds to lay the smack down they either turn out to be asshats or I get the creeping suspicion they are. God forbid we'd be held to some standards. Oh boy. Orwell was only 31 years off with 1984. Can't wait for all this doublespeak in chat.
lol
As always in discussions of freedom of speech, you are free to say whatever.
You just aren't free from consequences.
Startling for the internet, I know, but that's the way it goes I guess.
|
On May 24 2015 08:12 AsmodeusXI wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 07:56 wei2coolman wrote:On May 24 2015 07:48 Kaethis wrote:On May 24 2015 07:13 Ketara wrote: My opinion is still that the people I've seen complaining about this are probably people who deserve to be banned and are secretly worried about that. Quoted for truth. Every time I see someone argueing against 'anti-toxic' measures, be it tribunal or that stuff on the LoL forums where people whine about their bans and Lyte proceeds to lay the smack down they either turn out to be asshats or I get the creeping suspicion they are. God forbid we'd be held to some standards. Oh boy. Orwell was only 31 years off with 1984. Can't wait for all this doublespeak in chat. lol As always in discussions of freedom of speech, you are free to say whatever. You just aren't free from consequences. Startling for the internet, I know, but that's the way it goes I guess. Sorry I rather have a range of interactions with human beings.
I mean, if you're afraid of getting your feelings hurt go to disneyland.
|
Yeah it's not a freedom of speech thing even a little bit wei.
|
On May 24 2015 08:17 Ketara wrote: Yeah it's not a freedom of speech thing even a little bit wei. Not saying it is. But, I prefer my range of interactions with human beings to include things other than, mute, or overly pandering kindergarten teacher.
|
On May 24 2015 08:19 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 08:17 Ketara wrote: Yeah it's not a freedom of speech thing even a little bit wei. Not saying it is. But, I prefer my range of interactions with human beings to include things other than, mute, or overly pandering kindergarten teacher.
Boy is it easy to argue against strawmen.
|
On May 24 2015 07:56 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 07:48 Kaethis wrote:On May 24 2015 07:13 Ketara wrote: My opinion is still that the people I've seen complaining about this are probably people who deserve to be banned and are secretly worried about that. Quoted for truth. Every time I see someone argueing against 'anti-toxic' measures, be it tribunal or that stuff on the LoL forums where people whine about their bans and Lyte proceeds to lay the smack down they either turn out to be asshats or I get the creeping suspicion they are. God forbid we'd be held to some standards. Oh boy. Orwell was only 31 years off with 1984. Can't wait for all this doublespeak in chat.
Judging by this quote you havn't even read Orwell let alone understood him.
|
On May 24 2015 05:22 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 05:07 Jek wrote:On May 24 2015 04:41 AsnSensation wrote: How do you guys play against strong top champions like rengar or riven who like to take ignite to "cheese" a lvl 2-3 kill instead of tp but your own jungler doesn't want to punish that? I guess letting the wave push to your own side in case there was a bad trade (best case forcing the ignite) and then recalling so you can still pick up the farm with a tp back to tower. Go Ignite(or exhaust)/TP and out-cheese them. Smite teleport. Get level 2 off camp. Teleport back into lane with level advantage. Shove hard, get to level 3 when they're only level 2. Congrats you've just avoided the level 2-3 cheesem Shoving hard that early without Flash is sort of suicidal, since most junglers will be in the vicinity around your level 3.
Even then they will still have a window where they are level 2 and 3 at the same time as you are and you're vulnerable as fuck since you have a blank summoner(s) [even TP is on cooldown]. By going Ignite(exhaust)/TP you do a camp and TP to lane with a smidge more experience and significantly more potions so you can trade as often as possible and go hard on your small level 2 or 3 window to cheese them out of the lane. Abuse your TP and threat of an equal offensive summoner to keep an experience advantage, fuck your team and instead fuck your cheesedog lane opponent with your teleports.
Either go ham flashless or play passive and scale.
|
|
|
|