|
gg ez discussion will not be continued in GD following this post |
This post was removed?
I don't understand how anything they did was worth a 3 day ban. I think it's funny if NA had stricter chat rules though.
|
On May 23 2015 20:06 Ansibled wrote:This post was removed? I don't understand how anything they did was worth a 3 day ban. I think it's funny if NA had stricter chat rules though.
If they tested strict rules in eurotoxin land, nobody would be able to get into a game. 
|
euros use slurs only as an ironic reference to americans its not the same
if you really want to insult someone you call them boosted
|
LOL
Edit: Oh it wasn't Amin, great ban though. People can photoshop it too, still there's like no way to tell what you can banned for.
|
So should I not write anything at all ingame anymore,since u can get banned for kinda everything?
|
I'm getting triggered by these bans.
|
this guy didnt even write anything offensive doesnt look system even takes that into account lol, considering people report for anything nowadays(didnt give blue, kill steal etc) im convinced soon somebody will post a card with just ggwp in their chat log.
|
I don't know why people are so surprised that there needs to be some finetuning for a new system. That's completely expected. They will adjust the system and it will be fine.
|
Australia18228 Posts
From Lyte's post (if I understood it correctly), reporting triggers the system to look into past games for toxic behaviour/chat and bans according to those. But the report card only shows logs from the reported game, so the players could be toxic even if they weren't in that particular game
|
then the question is how many of reports he got are for mild things like in this chat log and how many for true offensive stuff , also where is the ban for the guy whos threatening to afk
|
|
|
to be fair i think timing abilities should be a bannable offence. Because theres no difference between timing them in chat or just using software to do that.
|
is the system already working on euw or still NA only?
|
|
|
Can now confirm, Mundo with Face of the Mountain is insane with Cinderhulk. 500 damage shield on Vayne with a midlane Lulu was nothing short of hilarious.
|
Pretty fun on other tanky junglers also, and makes taxing a non-issue
|
Yeah FaceOTM mundo is super fun. The shield on your carries is amazing, especially with only 60s cooldown. Also, you can drop down below 25% HP pretty safely, then shield yourself and take advantage of the 10% bonus healing from defense tree.
|
face of the mountain is op on everyone who would buy warmogs - its simply superior nearly all the time
|
On May 23 2015 22:25 Prog wrote:
I don't know why people are so surprised that there needs to be some finetuning for a new system. That's completely expected. They will adjust the system and it will be fine.
It's not finetuning, it's overhauling
Why they are deploying a system that issues 14 day bans right off the bat for shit like this baffles me. It's pretty stupid to the extent that I have a friend that now just feeds and if anyone calls him out, flaming or not, he reports them due to the rather likely chance they would get banned, and the satisfaction of seeing the ban report keeps him going.
What's wrong with the system:
-14 day/perm bans, no grey area, in a new system bound to have issues.
-"GG easy" is possibly weighted the same as calling someone the n-word.
-Promotes other forms of toxic activity while killing in-game communication.
-Dragging out games that are obvious losses because everyone is afraid to say "ff pls" or "game is over, 30/0 mid and jg" (more of an issue in lower elos), adding toxicity
-No idea what is considered bannable besides the obvious offensive language.
-Getting banned for non-toxic and possibly friendly language anyways.
-Giving me a bigger reason to troll your promos
You can't finetune this shit, not with what we know about the system. The lack of transparency is another kick in the nuts. Sure, you could argue that if you said the specifics, people might try to bypass the system, but the pros outweigh the cons.
|
I don't know if it's EUW or something, but I've had semi-regular occurrences with Braum where autoing doesn't add a stack to a target. Q seems to always do it, and it never happens on the first stack being applied, but after a Q/auto, having the second auto not apply a stack happened already 6 times in 2 games.
That's pretty new too, the last 2 days, and I've been spamming Braum for a couple weeks already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
