EPT[Patch 4.21] Rek'Sai General Discussion - Page 109
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Starting Page 94 spamming will in GD will be warned, please don't post for the sake of post count. Keep it civil. Please take website feedback to http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/website-feedback/ | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
|
turamn
United States1374 Posts
| ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
That being said, I felt like he was a bit underrated... his ult is still amazing, and it pretty much always will be. | ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
Do i suck at rules as well? | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
 Yoonjae "Rush" Lee - Jungle Xian "XiaoWeiXiao" Yu - Mid Lane Apollo "WizFujiin" Price - AD Carry Adrian "Adrian" Ma - Support Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong - Top LaneAren't you allowed two foreigners? That'd be Impact and Rush. XWX is exempt, thus doesn't count. Wiz and Adrian are NA. Works out to me. | ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On January 08 2015 03:59 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote: How in the world can Impact join Impulse and play in starting roster when they already have foreigner and exempt-foreigner? Do i suck at rules as well? since wx already has a split under his belt he is exception to rule so they can get 2. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
Maybe he's improved, and I don't want to shit on the team before they even play, but ugh. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
On January 08 2015 04:02 TheYango wrote: That's not how the exemption rules work as written. Or how I read it. O_o It must be legal if they brought him on but uh... | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
As written, the original Riot post only says that if you have TWO OR MORE exempts, you can't add a non-exempt. However, if you have ONE exempt, you can still add two non-exempts. This is confusing because most peoples' original interpretation was more along the lines of "you can have two or more exempts--but as soon as you add a non-exempt, they start to count toward your foreigner total", which isn't the case. In short, exempt non-residents only count against your foreigner total if you have two or more. A single exempt non-resident effectively only counts as a resident player, so you CAN add 2 non-residents. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On January 08 2015 04:01 NeoIllusions wrote: Yoonjae "Rush" Lee - Jungle Xian "XiaoWeiXiao" Yu - Mid Lane Apollo "WizFujiin" Price - AD Carry Adrian "Adrian" Ma - Support Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong - Top LaneAren't you allowed two foreigners? That'd be Impact and Rush. XWX is exempt, thus doesn't count. Wiz and Adrian are NA. Works out to me. You're allowed 2 foreigners + 3 natives afaik. Not 2+1+2. On January 08 2015 04:09 TheYango wrote: I just re-read the rules. Apparently this is legal. As written, the original Riot post only says that if you have TWO OR MORE exempts, you can't add a non-exempt. However, if you have ONE exempt, you can still add two non-exempts. This is confusing because most peoples' original interpretation was more along the lines of "you can have two or more exempts--but as soon as you add a non-exempt, they start to count toward your foreigner total", which isn't the case. In short, exempt non-residents only count against your foreigner total if you have two or more. A single exempt non-resident effectively only counts as a resident player, so you CAN add 2 non-residents. That's cute. God bless rules. Also, apparently, Wizfujin is Apollo now, so wei2coolman's dream is reality now :> | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
i.e. 3 excempt = ok, 2 excempt + 1 new = not ok it was pretty clear when they posted the scenarios. I don't really care for the rule anyway so w/e if they are bending it. Here are some examples of impermissible roster changes: Team is starting three exempt non-residents and two residents. Team wants to replace one exempt non-resident with one non-exempt non-resident. The team cannot do this - However, they can replace the exempt non-resident with another exempt non-resident or a resident. Team has five exempt non-residents, and wants to replace one of them with a non-exempt non-resident player. The team cannot do this - if a team has two or more exempt non-residents, they cannot add an additional non-exempt non-resident. how is the bolded less of a problem than what is happening??? I mean if you support reigon lock that is unlike me. http://na.lolesports.com/articles/interregional-movement-and-expansion-tournament | ||
|
Lost My Will To Live
Botswana601 Posts
On January 08 2015 04:03 red_ wrote: Wizfujin tho... Maybe he's improved, and I don't want to shit on the team before they even play, but ugh. To be fair, he should have less pressure on him since he doesn't have to play with scrubs like Innox and Snoopeh. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On January 08 2015 04:10 Slusher wrote: I was under the impression that exempt players count vs. new players i.e. 3 excempt = ok, 2 excempt + 1 new = not ok it was pretty clear when they posted the scenarios. I don't really care for the rule anyway so w/e if they are bending it. It figures that Riot provided 7 examples in the original press release, but NONE of them actually cover the borderline case of a team having one exempt non-resident trying to add 2 non-exempt non-residents--which is actually the only confusing case at all for the new rules. All their examples are like 3+2 or 4+1+1, or other cases that are not really confusing, but the actually confusing case of 2+1+2 doesn't get clarified. | ||
|
Kotfluegel
Germany49 Posts
On January 08 2015 04:11 Lost My Will To Live wrote: To be fair, he should have less pressure on him since he doesn't have to play with scrubs like Innox and Snoopeh. yellowpete is not wizfujin | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
Lost My Will To Live
Botswana601 Posts
My apologies. I'll replace those two players with an even deadlier combination of Daydreamin and NintendudeX | ||
| ||
