EPT[LCS] Fantasy - Page 77
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
At least the sig is factually correct. | ||
|
greathuntpormo
Lithuania4 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
greathuntpormo
Lithuania4 Posts
User was banned for this post. | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
It only indicates "on average how good were your opponents the week you played vs them" so someone with a very low pts against score in the league got super lucky and was massively boosted, whereas the person with the highest means they played against their opponents on strong weeks. Combined with your head-to-head score vs your total pts score I guess you could construct a fraud ranking of people who didn't deserve their placement or got unlucked into a bad placement | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
On March 23 2016 01:08 Zess wrote: What's the point of the "points against" column? There's nothing you can do about your opponent's draft's performance on any given week so it's not like you can really deny them from getting points. It only indicates "on average how good were your opponents the week you played vs them" so someone with a very low pts against score in the league got super lucky and was massively boosted, whereas the person with the highest means they played against their opponents on strong weeks. Combined with your head-to-head score vs your total pts score I guess you could construct a fraud ranking of people who didn't deserve their placement or got unlucked into a bad placement Y, I did exactly that in first season to show how im the unluckiest person ever. But now I'm just last every season so idc. | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
On March 23 2016 01:30 AlterKot wrote: Y, I did exactly that in first season to show how im the unluckiest person ever. But now I'm just last every season so idc. I think consistently being unlucky is the same thing as being bad  | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35160 Posts
On March 23 2016 01:08 Zess wrote: What's the point of the "points against" column? There's nothing you can do about your opponent's draft's performance on any given week so it's not like you can really deny them from getting points. It only indicates "on average how good were your opponents the week you played vs them" so someone with a very low pts against score in the league got super lucky and was massively boosted, whereas the person with the highest means they played against their opponents on strong weeks. Combined with your head-to-head score vs your total pts score I guess you could construct a fraud ranking of people who didn't deserve their placement or got unlucked into a bad placement I think it's supposed to be the 4th tiebreaker, to just end things. | ||
|
dsyxelic
United States1417 Posts
man as someone who really enjoys fantasy sports im so bummed. they could do so much more. also the scoring is lomo. wtf is ignore the first 2 games? why not just divide by 3 for NA and divide by 2 for EU? sounds pretty consistent? though i'll give them props on giving at least an option this time despite it not being that great of a choice.. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35160 Posts
On May 25 2016 10:13 dsyxelic wrote: http://www.lolesports.com/en_US/articles/fantasy-lcs-changes-2016-summer-split man as someone who really enjoys fantasy sports im so bummed. they could do so much more. also the scoring is lomo. wtf is ignore the first 2 games? why not just divide by 3 for NA and divide by 2 for EU? sounds pretty consistent? though i'll give them props on giving at least an option this time despite it not being that great of a choice.. Because NA players well by default be more consistent if you average game scores, which is better in fantasy. | ||
|
dsyxelic
United States1417 Posts
On May 25 2016 16:55 Gahlo wrote: Because NA players well by default be more consistent if you average game scores, which is better in fantasy. for the top picks yes but for my lower picks i'd rather have higher variance. also having the option doesn't hurt anybody and not hard at all to implement. 3rd game of NA not counting just feels bad. especially because many of them will be series deciders. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35160 Posts
| ||
|
dsyxelic
United States1417 Posts
On May 25 2016 17:10 Gahlo wrote: Anybody sufficiently low enough for that won't be on a team anyway. depends. in one of my leagues OG/NRG were good examples where some games they would pop off and most games they would just have mediocre to very low points. also my latter points still stand. completely eliminating a game feels bad and game 3 of bo3's are usually some of the more exciting games. to have that game not count at all sucks. the option is not hard at all to implement. what would be really great is if they could just make more things able to be customized like other fantasy sport games. im glad they at least started to move in that direction albeit pretty slowly. | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
|
Baffels
United States1486 Posts
Setup a league for this summer. Will be trying out first 2 games format, unless a majority would like to do best game. | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
I don't have high expectations for them coming out of the gate. | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
http://fantasy.lolesports.com/share/join/league/1117211/imIQ4AnXI0M4Qp3Ojdwi Draft would be Wednesday at 9 PM EST if it fills in time. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35160 Posts
| ||
| ||
