|
On September 23 2011 08:41 unichan wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2011 07:44 MoonBear wrote:Just out of interest, I decided to do a simple analysis on the popularity of some of TL's biggest Threads. I complied 3 statistics: View, Posts and Views per Posts. Let's call the third statistic the Intertia Ratio, or IR. The IR is interesting because it shows how "bothered" people are to post in a thread, or how much they care about the thread. The lower the number, the more likely people are to be bothered to post in the thread and contribute. You can also think of it as a measure of the thread's productivity. This was all correct as of 0715 KST 23rd September 2011. I've only included LoL General Discussion Threads since the subforum was created. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/kns0o.jpg) Some interesting observations: - Despite being a reasonably young sub-forum, the General Discussion Threads combined rival many of the other established threads on TL.
- The people in the LoL Threads tend to be more engaged with the threads they read compared to other parts of TL, as it takes less views on average before someone contributes.
- Every 6 months, we probably produce more content than the entirety of most threads on TL.
- The people in this sub-forum really like LoL. Like, [insert your choice of expletive/surprise], we like really like LoL.
i really like my kmd As do I.
|
On September 23 2011 09:10 Two_DoWn wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2011 08:41 unichan wrote:On September 23 2011 07:44 MoonBear wrote:Just out of interest, I decided to do a simple analysis on the popularity of some of TL's biggest Threads. I complied 3 statistics: View, Posts and Views per Posts. Let's call the third statistic the Intertia Ratio, or IR. The IR is interesting because it shows how "bothered" people are to post in a thread, or how much they care about the thread. The lower the number, the more likely people are to be bothered to post in the thread and contribute. You can also think of it as a measure of the thread's productivity. This was all correct as of 0715 KST 23rd September 2011. I've only included LoL General Discussion Threads since the subforum was created. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/kns0o.jpg) Some interesting observations: - Despite being a reasonably young sub-forum, the General Discussion Threads combined rival many of the other established threads on TL.
- The people in the LoL Threads tend to be more engaged with the threads they read compared to other parts of TL, as it takes less views on average before someone contributes.
- Every 6 months, we probably produce more content than the entirety of most threads on TL.
- The people in this sub-forum really like LoL. Like, [insert your choice of expletive/surprise], we like really like LoL.
i really like my kmd As do I. well i post in it more!
|
In games when you don't have a jungler (which is common pre-30) wouldn't it be best to have 1 top, 2 middle and 2 bottom to have better dragon control. For some reason it's always been natural for two to go top instead of middle probably because of how long the path is for top. I guess at lower levels players don't always take advantage of dragon being open for the taking anyways.
|
What I found when leveling up (very recently) is that you could solo dragons if you are able to at any point, no one has any map awareness (unless it's a smurf) at all, no one has wards. If you go missing from your double lane, then it might get called by the enemy, but they'd do absolutely nothing about it anyway, so you could be in your jungle, their jungle, killing dragon or killing baron, probably no one would care to find out untill a turret goes down.
And I was ofc the same, simply because I knew nothing about it. At that point it was more about figuring out wth is this cool champ the enemy's got that gets me killed so damn easily.
|
The speed of some of the old GD threads probably had an interesting effect on the IR value; I know there's multiple times where I would make a post, see a few new posts made as I was typing mine, and then respond to those. So multiple posts for 1 view. That doesn't seem to happen as much with the spread out content though(apparently Wukong Patch OP though, sub 40 IR sup son LoL forum es #1 hue).
|
back to elo hell.
my team: first pick ramus. me udyr jungle and my bro morgana mid. last 2 picks guy says he plays soraka np, the other goes to choose AP SHACO!
the sadest game of my life. just raping face from top gp and mid katarina. rammus didnt help but to kill steal. im 0 1 6. keep teling botom to stop pushing so i could gank. shaco @ 20 mins void staff and boots1. soraka 0 fukin wards. they did dragon without she even noticing until i asked her to cv it (was warding top and mid brushes hoping suport would ward it).
got to loose 0 5 6. my bro morgana 6 1 2 and ramus 2 1 2 (he was fukin useless). bottom summed 0 7. and i get acused of feeding and being useless. LOL!
ranked badies so worst than normal badies. how the hell can i carry these guys?
|
Dominion, stuck at loading screen... how sad.
|
On September 23 2011 10:05 misirlou wrote: back to elo hell.
my team: first pick ramus. me udyr jungle and my bro morgana mid. last 2 picks guy says he plays soraka np, the other goes to choose AP SHACO!
the sadest game of my life. just raping face from top gp and mid katarina. rammus didnt help but to kill steal. im 0 1 6. keep teling botom to stop pushing so i could gank. shaco @ 20 mins void staff and boots1. soraka 0 fukin wards. they did dragon without she even noticing until i asked her to cv it (was warding top and mid brushes hoping suport would ward it).
got to loose 0 5 6. my bro morgana 6 1 2 and ramus 2 1 2 (he was fukin useless). bottom summed 0 7. and i get acused of feeding and being useless. LOL!
ranked badies so worst than normal badies. how the hell can i carry these guys?
Wrong thread.
|
On September 23 2011 07:44 MoonBear wrote:Just out of interest, I decided to do a simple analysis on the popularity of some of TL's biggest Threads. I complied 3 statistics: View, Posts and Views per Posts. Let's call the third statistic the Intertia Ratio, or IR. The IR is interesting because it shows how "bothered" people are to post in a thread, or how much they care about the thread. The lower the number, the more likely people are to be bothered to post in the thread and contribute. You can also think of it as a measure of the thread's productivity. This was all correct as of 0715 KST 23rd September 2011. I've only included LoL General Discussion Threads since the subforum was created. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/kns0o.jpg) Some interesting observations: - Despite being a reasonably young sub-forum, the General Discussion Threads combined rival many of the other established threads on TL.
- The people in the LoL Threads tend to be more engaged with the threads they read compared to other parts of TL, as it takes less views on average before someone contributes.
- Every 6 months, we probably produce more content than the entirety of most threads on TL.
- The people in this sub-forum really like LoL. Like, [insert your choice of expletive/surprise], we like really like LoL.
You never included the very first LoL thread that I made! That shit got huge!
|
^ that was over 1k pages wasn't it? o.o or almost.. I forget.
edit: nvm that's Uta's.
|
Now break all those threads down by posters...
|
and rank each post on helpfulness, clarity and wit...
|
Lol, well somehow i got up to 1350 ELO, scared to queue up for more matches.
Not because i am bad, because of the apparent ELO Hell in that range.
|
There was some discussion earlier as to the order of picks in normal draft. Is it possible that its based on the order people join the game lobby?
|
On September 23 2011 11:18 57 Corvette wrote: Lol, well somehow i got up to 1350 ELO, scared to queue up for more matches.
Not because i am bad, because of the apparent ELO Hell in that range.
Haha it's awful.. as you can see from my SS like a page ago, 12-1300s so bad (myself included, I had no clue how to adapt to 4v5 as AP taric lol)
edit: I'm at 1344 right now. Maybe we can duo queue later :D
|
On September 23 2011 11:18 Treadmill wrote: There was some discussion earlier as to the order of picks in normal draft. Is it possible that its based on the order people join the game lobby?
Then the person who invited should be the captain which isn't the case.
|
On September 23 2011 11:18 57 Corvette wrote: Lol, well somehow i got up to 1350 ELO, scared to queue up for more matches.
Not because i am bad, because of the apparent ELO Hell in that range. im entirely convinced by now elo hell is when you are at the correct elo but think you are at the incorrect elo. Luck can only delay you, nobody gets 'stuck' if they belong in higher elo. I had a parade of leavers getting out of 1400s but although it made my returns disproportionate to my effort, that kind of thing can't somehow lock you into an elo range.
|
On September 23 2011 11:40 UniversalSnip wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2011 11:18 57 Corvette wrote: Lol, well somehow i got up to 1350 ELO, scared to queue up for more matches.
Not because i am bad, because of the apparent ELO Hell in that range. im entirely convinced by now elo hell is when you are at the correct elo but think you are at the incorrect elo. Luck can only delay you, nobody gets 'stuck' if they belong in higher elo. I had a parade of leavers getting out of 1400s but although it made my returns disproportionate to my effort, that kind of thing can't somehow lock you into an elo range. You will eventually climb to where you should be, but the clusterfuck that is the current low elo range makes that process generally take longer.
|
On September 23 2011 11:27 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2011 11:18 Treadmill wrote: There was some discussion earlier as to the order of picks in normal draft. Is it possible that its based on the order people join the game lobby? Then the person who invited should be the captain which isn't the case. I mean the order people get to the actual bans/picks screen. Because I usually insta-join when the "match found" thing comes up, and I'm often one of the earlier picks - but when I go and get a glass of water or something and join later I'll usually end up as last pick.
edit: wait nevermind. That doesn't make any god damned sense. Oh well.
|
Marshall Islands3404 Posts
•Pre-made Queues: If you’re active in pre-made Queue play, you’ve noticed individual Elo tracking and Ladders aren’t the best way to track how a pre-made group ranks against other groups. In Season Two, we’re going to dramatically improve the way we display and track this information. As such, we’re going to be resetting pre-made Elo at the start of Season Two to make way for some changes!
lol gtsrs and ruken raped son, get those goofy pictures off general discussion
|
|
|
|