• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:47
CEST 01:47
KST 08:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 533 users

A Beginner's Guide to HS Terms

Forum Index > Hearthstone General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
Hayl_Storm
Profile Joined April 2011
The Shire633 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-07 18:32:40
December 26 2013 00:13 GMT
#1
2013 WCS Europe

Contents



Preface


Deck Archetypes

General Terms

Fancier Concepts


Preface

by Hayl_Storm

Hey Hearthstone forum! The one person who reads the credits at the bottom of our articles already knows this but I am one of the editors who helps behind the scenes here. When we -- the Hearthstone team -- write our guides and articles we do so assuming that many people are new to the online card game genre. That said, it is not possible to define every term in the context of each article: this post will hopefully clear up some commonly used terms you may encounter.

Below you will find a list of terms from other TCGs (trading card games) that have been around for awhile and that you may bump into while reading posts here. The first two sections -- Deck Archetypes and General Terms -- are fairly self explanatory. The final section on more advanced concepts is more focus on explaining the ideas that have been around for awhile but don’t fit into the other two groups. Where General Terms mostly pertains to the cards themselves, Advanced Concepts concerns itself more with how the game is actually played.

Disclaimer: I've played Magic: the Gathering for basically ever. Most terms were defined by this game so there may be some allusions: though we will hopefully make them clear.

Deck Archetypes


- Aggro: The deck that seeks to take initiative and close out the game. This archetype is obviously well established and pretty straight forward. One distinction we have to make, however, is that Aggro does not always mean fast or swarm style. "Stompy" or "Big Aggro" are slower decks that still fit into this category: their goal is to set up in the early game and then play bigger than average threats through the rest of the game. Chillwind Yeti is a good example of a “Big Aggro” type of card because he will usually be the biggest body on turn 4.

- Control: Another well established deck already in Hearthstone. The control deck plans to survive and win out with a smaller number of more powerful threats in the late game. You are a Control Deck if you only play Ragnaros/Ysera/Lord Jaraxxus as win conditions and the rest of your game is just surviving until one of these big threats can win the game for you. In the beginning of Hearthstone there was a bit of confusion surrounding this archetype as it was often confused with the next category.

- Midrange: Many of the decks which get classified as "Control Decks" are actually Midrange. To be fair, the line is not hard and fast; however, there are still some distinctions to be drawn. A midrange deck is characterized by trying to gain incremental value on every play: a prime example would be Argent Commander or the buffing creatures. If your deck is built to play solidly throughout the game and bury your opponent in incremental advantage, you have a Midrange deck. The defining aspect of a Midrange deck is that it has to play Control vs. Aggro and Aggro vs. Control if it wants to be successful.
** Aside: Some of the confusion between Control and Midrange is that the midrange deck will often try to “control” the board with bigger creatures/better value spells. This will be elaborated later, but just because you are playing a controlling role in one game does not make you a Control Deck.


- Combo: This is the hardest category to build because true combos are hard to find as game designers usually kill them before the game launches. Hunter OTK is the best known Combo Deck we have had to date. Hunter OTK is the less frustrating of the two true Combo branches: interactive and non-interactive. Non-interactive combo is something I would be surprised to ever see in Hearthstone but -- in the interest of fully covering the topic -- it would be described as "do x+y+z and you win the game." It may seem like Hunter OTK is like this, but since your opponent does actually have ways to stop you if they set up for your big turn, it is still an interactive combo: Taunts or Ice Block for example usually prevent this combo from winning outright.
** Another aside: Based on how Hearthstone is designed -- with no real to act on your opponent’s turn -- I don't think any broken/non-interactive combo will make it past R&D. They exist in some Magic formats but only because the combo player has to determine when it's safe to make their play because their opponent may always have counterspells etc.


- Aggro-control: This is an archetype more possible in Hearthstone than Magic because of how combat interactions work. An Aggro-control deck will revolve around smaller threats but locking your opponent out quickly. These decks will be slower than pure aggro, but will have more game against a wider variety of decks. I can see weapon based classes fitting this role most easily: they can attack with creatures and control the board with their weapons. Most of the decks being classified as “Board Control” are variations on the Aggro-control theme: their goal is to control the board and lock out the opponent while getting progressively better trades.


- Tempo: Tempo is one of the hardest archetypes to build. Tempo is a non-conventional archetype in that it mostly does away with Card Advantage. The goal of Tempo is to get one or two fast threats out -- Mana Wyrm being the perfect example -- and then prevent your opponent stopping it for the rest of the game. Tempo cards are often things like Freezing Trap or Frost Nova, these cards will never gain Card Advantage, but if you only need to buy your Mana Wyrm an extra turn or two then it’s fine. The ideal form of a Tempo Deck would be composed of creatures Mana Wyrm/Faerie Dragon/King Mukla and then be filled with spells like Sap/Counterspell/Conceal/or Frost Nova.

General Terms


- Board Wipes: Cards like Flamestrike or Holy Nova that deal damage to multiple targets. Many Hearthstone discussions use the term AOE which -- while not inherently wrong -- does not apply to TCGs as well as it does to Starcraft because the "area" concept is a bit weird. One could make a case for calling Cone of Cold or Explosive Shot AOE, but they are better described as having splash damage or being “multitarget removal”.

- Bounce: The term for "return a creature to its owner’s hand". This is very common in Tempo decks but do note, this is Card Disadvantage. Bouncing is far worse than killing a creature because they get to keep their card: be careful building with these.

- Burn: "Deal x damage to y." Fairly straightforward, we just have a word for it. Also see, "burning them out" or "reach": these are things an aggro deck would do if they get you close to dead and then finish you off.

- Cantrip: Anything that has the text "draw a card". These cards are obviously good because they replace themselves; therefore, gaining card advantage off of them is fairly straightforward as you are already "card neutral" if you will.

- Clock: This is term is rarer but is an important concept nonetheless. The "clock" your threats represent is how fast you can kill your opponent if unanswered. On an empty board and at 12 health, an Argent Commander is a 3 turn clock. This is most important to Aggro and Tempo decks, but a Control may consider it in the context of "what kind of clock/how much pressure am I under?"

- Curve: or Mana Curve, how your spells look when you sort by mana cost. This is most important to aggro decks, but each archetype has its own type of curves: Aggro will tend to be short and high whereas Control will be longer with more top end.

- Filtering: Filtering is going through some portion of your deck and picking what you need now. Similar to cantripping, this is card neutral, but you can gain an incremental advantage by getting the right card if you do this right. This is a very powerful effect for Combo decks and some Control decks. An example would be Tracking.

- Going Off: A Combo deck "goes off" on the turn they kill you. This one is fairly straightforward.

- Mulligan: The process of replacing certain cards in your initial starting hand.

- Ping: An action where you deal only a single point of damage to a single target -- Mage Power or Shiv -- to finish it off, let a weaker minion trade with it, or kill a low health high attack minion.

- Ramp: Ramping is the process of using a card to gain resources in the future. This is mainly the function of Druid cards and can be built into a strategy of its own. The function of ramping will allow you to play more -- or larger -- threats faster than may be anticipated. The Coin is -- in essence -- a one off ramp spell.

- Synergy: First of all, this is not synonymous with combo. A "combo" is something that will win the game when it hits -- Hunter OTK for example -- a synergy is a set of cards that work together to be bigger than the sum of their parts: an Enrage minion plus Cruel Taskmaster for example. This is a subtle difference but it's important.

- Top Deck: This term comes in a two forms: either getting a Top Deck, or playing off the top. It originates from physical card games and refers to the top card on your deck. When you "need a Top Deck xxxxx" or your opponent "got the perfect top deck" it means that the situation on board swung because of the card that was just drawn. When you are "playing off the top", you are playing with no cards in your hand and are relying on whatever your top card is to make plays.

Fancier Concepts


- Beatdown vs. Control: This is one of the most important concepts in 1v1 TCGS and you should read this: Who's the Beatdown, by Mike Flores

This article is relevant to almost any type of gamer, but in essence it states that in every matchup there is a Beatdown and a Control player. This is what was referring to above when discussing the Midrange archetype. It doesn't matter if you are control in 99% of your match ups, sometimes when decks line up you have to be the Beatdown in order to win. To elaborate upon the Midrange comment, it is called Midrange because these decks are built to be between Beatdown and Control in most match ups and pick whichever is appropriate.

- The Vanilla Test: A cool test that Magic players use. It states that "if this rules text was blank, how is this card?" Monk alluded to it in the second trends article with Shattered Sun Cleric, and this is the perfect example: a 3/3 for 3 is perfectly fine, and in the cases where the rules box is not blank? that is pure upside. This test also works in reverse: that Ancient Watcher is a 4/5 for 2 is too good, so we expect a downside.

- Card Advantage: This is a very commonly discussed term, but it is not always properly described. The most controversial example is Novice Engineer. When you cast this card, you get a 1 for 1: you get one card of value -- through the cantrip -- for the one card you used to cast it. This is a reasonable baseline for the Novice, but does not make it great on its own. The reason why Card Advantage is a bit weird right now is because the "Value of a Card" is not yet an established in Hearthstone. In my opinion, a 1/2 on its own is not worth a card; therefore, to be able to trade up or get additional value out of the Novice to call it a 2 for 1. Azure Drake on the other hand, is a "straight up" 2 for 1 because it replaces itself and you get a big body on the field from it. Casting Flamestrike to remove two of your opponent’s minions is the cleanest example of a 2 for 1 that exists in Hearthstone and should be the standard for explaining this concept to new players: you cast one card to undo what your opponent did with two cards.

A common misconception of Card Advantage is using it to describe “cards in hand” or “minions on the battlefield”. The correct way to think about Card Advantage is to image a scoreboard where players are scoring points for being more efficient with their resources in card form. The central tenet of Card Advantage is that cards are a resource, just like Mana Crystals or life. A player is winning in terms of Card Advantage if and only if they are being more efficient with this resource.

- Expected Value: Expected Value is a term used across many games but is most common in Poker. Expected Value is a property of a play that can be calculated by considering the average outcome of any play or series of plays. Most often, Expected Value is calculated in reference of what percent chance a play gives you to win the game: here is an example.

If you are a Mage and you have only draw step left to win the game -- by virtue of Ice Block -- and three cards left in your deck -- which you know to be Pyroblast, Fireball, and Leper Gnome -- the Expected Value of making a play resulting in putting your opponent with 6 life is 66% whereas a play resulting in your opponent going to 10 life is only 33%.

Writers: Hayl_Storm
Graphics: shiroiusagi
Editors: Hayl_Storm
Editor@TL_Hayl // Return of the (Marine)King
monk
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States8476 Posts
December 26 2013 20:01 GMT
#2
The banner is so cute.
Moderator
gingerfluffmuff
Profile Joined January 2011
Austria4570 Posts
December 26 2013 20:22 GMT
#3
Very handy for the average HS noob like myself. well done mate
・゚✧:・゚+..。✧・゚:・..。 ✧・゚ :・゚ ゜・:・ ✧・゚:・゚:.。 ✧・゚ SPARKULING *・゜・:・゚✧:・゚✧。゚+..。 ✧・゚: ✧・゚:・゜・:・゚✧::・・:・゚・゚
Trump
Profile Joined April 2010
United States350 Posts
December 26 2013 20:30 GMT
#4
Ping!
Friendship is Magic! <3
Nibbler89
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
884 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-26 21:01:29
December 26 2013 21:00 GMT
#5
On December 27 2013 05:30 Trump wrote:
Ping!

Top Deck. The Dream.
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-26 21:44:09
December 26 2013 21:42 GMT
#6
Ramp?
(I'd also include the term "token", it's used a lot)
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
gereffi
Profile Joined December 2013
United States4 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-26 22:02:48
December 26 2013 21:50 GMT
#7
This is a good list. For Magic player, there are other words synonymous with board wipes, like sweepers and wraths. I'd add a little bit to the cantrip definition. Usually cards that are considered to trip are those that replace themselves as soon as their played, like Novice Engineer, but not like Loot Hoarder.

We also use ping to describe one damage of burn, shock for two damage, and bolt for three damage. Not too sure on whether or not the Hearthstone community uses these terms though.

I'm not sure about your classification of aggro and tempo. Aggro decks are supposed to be the beatdown, and they don't really care about having more card advantage. Sure, that doesn't always mean swarm decks, but it does mean being proactive most of the time. As far as Hearthstone goes, the only cards that I would think of as good in tempo decks but not in aggro decks would be Counterspell and Mirror Image, because they allow your minions to get in while the opponent has to focus on other things. I also think that Chillwind Yeti is a perfect example of a midranged beater.
Ketch
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands7285 Posts
December 26 2013 22:11 GMT
#8
I kinda expected a list with acronyms as well such as SSC = Shattered Sun Cleric and such ... but this is informative too
Hayl_Storm
Profile Joined April 2011
The Shire633 Posts
December 26 2013 22:20 GMT
#9
This is a good list. For Magic player, there are other words synonymous with board wipes, like sweepers and wraths. I'd add a little bit to the cantrip definition. Usually cards that are considered to trip are those that replace themselves as soon as their played, like Novice Engineer, but not like Loot Hoarder.

We also use ping to describe one damage of burn, shock for two damage, and bolt for three damage. Not too sure on whether or not the Hearthstone community uses these terms though.

Board Wipes versus Wraths or Sweepers was something we talked a lot about and Wrath didn't seem to fit and Board Wipe was the more intuitive of the two left. Shock and bolt both had the same problem as Wraths in that Magic players would understand immediately but they don't correlate to anything in HS really. Ping makes sense and we missed that
+ Show Spoiler +

I also think that Chillwind Yeti is a perfect example of a midranged beater.

Not sure if I agree with this one: think Thragtusk versus Deadbridge Goliath.
Editor@TL_Hayl // Return of the (Marine)King
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
December 26 2013 22:40 GMT
#10
I suppose this is useful. The expected value explanation is a bit off but for the rest it's fine although it's a bit magic oriented. The archetype classification in general is quite useless I think and only leads to bad tendencies often like quotes as 'control > aggro > combo > control' and what not.
asaed
Profile Joined September 2011
United States1412 Posts
December 26 2013 23:35 GMT
#11
Thanks for this! Great info on TL as usual :D
Galatians 2:20
MrSandman
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Australia188 Posts
December 27 2013 00:51 GMT
#12
Just read the linked article and found it really interesting. Even though the cards are old and the strategies for each deck a little beyond me the principles and example cards are very very important, especially for me personally as I usually run a mid range wlock or shaman deck.
TeamLiquid: Teaching trolls latin since 2002 || Before every post ask yourself, how would I feel if someone else said it? ||
Tal
Profile Blog Joined May 2004
United Kingdom1015 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-27 01:29:45
December 27 2013 01:29 GMT
#13
Nicely written, and really helpful. I agree that it might also be nice to add some of the common acronyms, like SSC, RNG, and MTG, so we have everything in one place.

There are a few terms which come from people needing to announce them in real life (in Magic), so while they're not strictly necessary it's helpful to know them, as they get used from time to time.

"I swing for 6" = I attack with my creatures for a total of six damage.
"I ping that creature" = I use a spell or ability to kill that (relatively small) creature.
It is what you read when you don't have to that determines what you will be when you can't help it.
CutieBK
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Sweden227 Posts
December 27 2013 11:23 GMT
#14
This is very nice! Thanks for the effort
mostlyharmless
Profile Joined May 2010
3 Posts
December 27 2013 15:06 GMT
#15
Very nice.

I have a suggestion/request to make to the Hearthstone team here at teamliquid. Would it be possible to rewrite or adapt the linked article (Who's the Beatdown, by Mike Flores) but with Hearthstone cards and examples so it is easier to follow (obviously giving the proper credit and referencing the original article). For those of us who have never played MTG it is not straight forward to follow the examples. I have come across this article many times when reading about Hearthstone and since you guys have some of the best Hearthstone articles on the web I am sure you would do a great job. It could become a classic on the Hearthstone web "literature" like the previous article seems to have become for MTG.

In any case, thanks for all the work you guys are doing.

Hayl_Storm
Profile Joined April 2011
The Shire633 Posts
December 27 2013 15:13 GMT
#16
On December 28 2013 00:06 mostlyharmless wrote:
Very nice.

I have a suggestion/request to make to the Hearthstone team here at teamliquid. Would it be possible to rewrite or adapt the linked article (Who's the Beatdown, by Mike Flores) but with Hearthstone cards and examples so it is easier to follow (obviously giving the proper credit and referencing the original article). For those of us who have never played MTG it is not straight forward to follow the examples. I have come across this article many times when reading about Hearthstone and since you guys have some of the best Hearthstone articles on the web I am sure you would do a great job. It could become a classic on the Hearthstone web "literature" like the previous article seems to have become for MTG.

In any case, thanks for all the work you guys are doing.



I don't really know who we'd have to talk to about that article but I really like the idea.
Editor@TL_Hayl // Return of the (Marine)King
Figgy
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada1788 Posts
December 27 2013 15:19 GMT
#17
On December 27 2013 06:42 figq wrote:
Ramp?
(I'd also include the term "token", it's used a lot)


I thought of this immediately.

The OP doesn't play Druid, it seems!

Or hates green cards.
Bug Fixes Fixed an issue where, when facing a SlayerS terran, completing a hatchery would cause a medivac and 8 marines to randomly spawn nearby and attack it.
Hayl_Storm
Profile Joined April 2011
The Shire633 Posts
December 27 2013 19:42 GMT
#18
There are going to be some updates coming soon to include some of the terms we missed the first time. We're leaving out token though because it doesn't really make sense in Hearthstone. In Magic, a token is handled differently by the rules and mechanics of the game. In Hearthstone, however, they just make a new card when a "token" would be spawned: an example being that you can bounce a totem etc. So really you never get a token in the MTG sense but rather get a new card named Stoneclaw Totem.

That's just the line we're taking for it.
Editor@TL_Hayl // Return of the (Marine)King
CooDu
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Australia899 Posts
January 15 2014 13:48 GMT
#19
Nice guide, a must read if you are new to the game. Can't wait for more community content.
Just a simple guy, going wherever this journey takes me.
PonceDeLEGABE
Profile Joined March 2011
United States117 Posts
January 15 2014 22:42 GMT
#20
Thank you for the guide Hayl_storm. A lot of terminology that i didn't even come across when i played TCG's back then.
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft314
UpATreeSC 170
ROOTCatZ 102
Livibee 101
ProTech64
JuggernautJason53
StarCraft: Brood War
MaD[AoV]63
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm113
League of Legends
JimRising 296
Counter-Strike
summit1g9637
tarik_tv3045
Fnx 2199
taco 806
flusha328
sgares211
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King130
Other Games
Grubby1988
shahzam861
Maynarde131
ZombieGrub47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick49821
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta37
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 31
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1448
• TFBlade991
• Stunt287
Other Games
• Shiphtur1064
• WagamamaTV228
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
13m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10h 13m
WardiTV European League
16h 13m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d
The PondCast
1d 10h
WardiTV European League
1d 12h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.