|
For a limited time only, I will offer my services of analysing your handwriting to tell you things about yourself you didn't know before. I have been taking courses in handwriting analysis and am eager to test my skills.
What I require is: A scan of any kind of writing you've done... About a page worth, that could be school notes, or a short story you wrote, or anything, just as long as there's a decent amount of it.
The first acceptable scan posted I will analyse and after that, if I'm still bored, I'll pick and choose between what's posted.
Cheers,
EDIT: As an example of writing analysis I've done before... The following:
+ Show Spoiler +![[image loading]](http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/8213/chemnotesvc4.jpg) [17:03] Steph: sent. [17:03] Ed: :o [17:04] Ed: see, you can even see the writing on the other side (y) [17:04] Ed: scanners are good [17:04] Steph: you should see the notes with just calculations on it [17:04] Ed: Okay, time to analyse your writing  [17:05] Steph: is my writing ...glorious?? [17:08] Steph: no response.. [17:08] Steph: hahhha [17:08] Ed: yes [17:08] Ed: I'm just [17:08] Ed: writing up my analysis [17:08] Ed: be patient [17:09] Steph: what analysis.. [17:11] Ed: You mostly print, except for the occasional random two letters. This says you play by nobody's rules, not even your own. the crosses of the t's, and f's, are light... That means you're suttle and appreciate working for what you like, explaining your love of British comedy, and your devotion to your garden despite its tragedies. Your writing is long and spacey, which means you like your space in life, and in a King size bed, you'd still manage to spread yourself over the whole thing and insist there wasn't room for anyone else. Your capitals are often made of two seperate lines, this means when no one is home, you like to dance around in your underwear. Your writing is often above the blue guideline, which means you think you're above the people around you, ie your stupid classmates. [17:13] Steph: Hahahhahhahhha [17:13] Steph: where did you come up with this eh [17:14] Ed: from my brain :O [17:14] Steph: pshh [17:14] Ed: where I come up with everything I do and say
|
If I had a scanner you'd probably find out about that time I raped and killed a man.
oh shi-
|
|
|
I once killed hookers with a woman who used a netgun to keep them from running from the plank of wood that I wielded.
|
|
|
Insufficient data, Chezinu. Sorry.
|
Is this enough? It's the only scan I have at the moment, if it isn't I'll scan something better. ;p
+ Show Spoiler +
|
you posted the wrong link, you need to get the link of the actual picture
anyway this should make it work:
|
I know the "but" got cut off, but hopefully this is good enough. I'm genuinely curious ^_^
+ Show Spoiler +
Edit: shit, a page's worth? Somehow skimmed over that, sorry. I'll go find something then, brb.
|
maybe if you knew how to spell analyze correctly
|
On November 30 2008 08:29 Frits wrote:
you posted the wrong link, you need to get the link of the actual picture
yarr, thanks. I realized I pasted the wrong link when I refreshed the webpage and realized the pic was taking just a tad bit too long to load.
|
Capital H the - doesn't connect to both of the vertical lines = you murdered somebody. Sorry.
|
Well Darko beat me out, but hopefully I can be one of the guys you pick and choose if you feel like it? ^_^
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Darko, I'm looking for notes more like this:
+ Show Spoiler +
Falcynn, yours is acceptable and I will begin analysis. Please be patient while I post.
|
On November 30 2008 08:32 ish0wstopper wrote:
maybe if you knew how to spell analyze correctly
Actually, he spelt it correctly...
|
+ Show Spoiler +
not mine but i'm interested in what it says about this person tell me if the sample is big enough
edit: no idea why imgshack keeps resizing the image.. what a stupid host, tiny pic'd now
|
I don't have a scanner ;_;
|
do me do me
![[image loading]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/plasmabot/essay2.jpg)
this is from 2-3 years ago but my handwriting should still be about the same
|
On November 30 2008 08:37 Falcynn wrote:Well Darko beat me out, but hopefully I can be one of the guys you pick and choose if you feel like it? ^_^ + Show Spoiler +
Falcynn, much like our caveman ancestors of old, you prefer not the elegance of cursive writing, but the raw brutal force of the printed letter. This indicates a predisposition toward all things untamed and taboo, such as male to male anal sex. This is further indicated by your typical avoidance of the lines. While sometimes you write your letters connected to lines, more often they stay directly above and between them. This is a clue that you do not respect the lines (or taboos) of society and prefer to ignore them completely. When you come in contact with them, it is purely a coincidence of them coinciding with your goals for rough, male on male anal sex.
Another thing that dominates your overall writing style, is the thickness of your printed letters. This is generally caused by a use of excessive force when pressing your pen or pencil to the paper. The obvious conclusion of this is, of course, a continued theme of primitive caveman like tendencies which lead to a desire of toughness, and roughness, particularly in male on male anal sex. However, to your benefit, this means that the roughness is probably exerted by yourself, unto your partner, wherein you are the one exerting the force into his supple anus.
In addition to this, we see an excess of straight lines, even in letters that should normally by curved. For instance, your s's and e's seem to be more of a mechanical series of straight lines than the curves that they should be. This implies a conscious level of homophobia, or denial of your subconscious urges. You demand to only show others that you are as straight as an arrow, but to the keen observer, you are as queer as only rough male on male anal sex could exemplify.
Furthermore, your writing is not uniform in the way that it leans. That is, sometimes it leans left, sometimes it leans right, and sometimes it is very centred and tall. This describes that you are a desperate man, and despite your preference for male on male anal sex, you advertise to the world that really, any partner will do, so long as it's mostly human.
This concludes my first analysis of writing. I hope you have learned a lot about yourself, Falcynn, and I am possibly willing to do another if I see one that looks particularly interesting.
Cheers,
|
|
|
Belgium6766 Posts
|
|
|
Somehow I'm glad my work was neglected.
|
lol... elaborate set up but it made me laugh anyway.
|
ROOOFFFFFFLLLLL
wow that was fucking gold, and i was about to post mine hahaha. good thing i didn't =)
|
|
|
|
|
On November 30 2008 08:58 Chef wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2008 08:37 Falcynn wrote:Well Darko beat me out, but hopefully I can be one of the guys you pick and choose if you feel like it? ^_^ + Show Spoiler + Falcynn, much like our caveman ancestors of old, you prefer not the elegance of cursive writing, but the raw brutal force of the printed letter. This indicates a predisposition toward all things untamed and taboo, such as male to male anal sex. This is further indicated by your typical avoidance of the lines. While sometimes you write your letters connected to lines, more often they stay directly above and between them. This is a clue that you do not respect the lines (or taboos) of society and prefer to ignore them completely. When you come in contact with them, it is purely a coincidence of them coinciding with your goals for rough, male on male anal sex. Another thing that dominates your overall writing style, is the thickness of your printed letters. This is generally caused by a use of excessive force when pressing your pen or pencil to the paper. The obvious conclusion of this is, of course, a continued theme of primitive caveman like tendencies which lead to a desire of toughness, and roughness, particularly in male on male anal sex. However, to your benefit, this means that the roughness is probably exerted by yourself, unto your partner, wherein you are the one exerting the force into his supple anus. In addition to this, we see and excess of straight lines, even in letters that should normally by curved. For instance, your s's and e's seem to be more of a mechanical series of straight lines than the curves that they should be. This implies a conscious level of homophobia, or denial of your subconscious urges. You demand to only show others that you are as straight as an arrow, but to the keen observer, you are as queer as only rough male on male anal sex could exemplify. Furthermore, your writing is not uniform in the way that it leans. That is, sometimes it leans left, sometimes it leans right, and sometimes it is very centred and tall. This describes that you are a desperate man, and despite your preference for male on male anal sex, you advertise to the world that really, any partner will do, so long as it's mostly human. This concludes my first analysis of writing. I hope you have learned a lot about yourself, Falcynn, and I am possibly willing to do another if I see one that looks particularly interesting. Cheers,
Oh man that is hilarious. Good thread Chef haha
|
You're a robot 
|
God, I feel so owned right now 
Well, not so much owned, mostly just disappointed that I won't have my handwriting seriously analyzed.
...this wasn't serious right?
+ Show Spoiler +
|
haha wow very interesting analysations
|
On November 30 2008 09:13 Falcynn wrote:God, I feel so owned right now Well, not so much owned, mostly just disappointed that I won't have my handwriting seriously analyzed. ...this wasn't serious right? + Show Spoiler +
It's okay. I still <3 you Falcynn. I won't judge you.
|
He sure did have a thorough ANALysis done on his writing...
|
|
|
1584 Posts
Haha oh wow, that was some real baller right there.
|
hahahahaahha, =( I laughed so hard at Chef's ANALization. =D
|
On November 30 2008 08:32 ish0wstopper wrote:
maybe if you knew how to spell analyze correctly
PS: Hey, idiot, not everyone spells it the American way.
|
All I can say is.. wow.
ish0wstopper there is more than one way to spell things. Canadians tend to know both spellings (American and Canadian). Lucky us.
|
On November 30 2008 09:13 Falcynn wrote:God, I feel so owned right now Well, not so much owned, mostly just disappointed that I won't have my handwriting seriously analyzed. ...this wasn't serious right? + Show Spoiler +
There is no such thing as a serious analyzing of handwriting dude, it's all a bunch of bullshit lol.
|
On November 30 2008 09:34 Frits wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2008 09:13 Falcynn wrote:God, I feel so owned right now Well, not so much owned, mostly just disappointed that I won't have my handwriting seriously analyzed. ...this wasn't serious right? + Show Spoiler + There is no such thing as a serious analyzing of handwriting dude, it's all a bunch of bullshit lol. Yeah, at first I was disappointed because I was hoping for some sort of Tarot card/palm reading gimmick thing.
but then this is probably better
|
Graphology doesn't work but thanks for the effort.
Validity
Although graphology had some early support in the scientific community such as Fluckinger, Tripp & Weinberg(1961) [48] , Lockowandte (1976) [49] and Nevo(1986) [50], the results of most of the recent surveys on the ability for graphology to access personality and job performance have been negative [51]. Graphology is primarily used as a recruiting tool to screen candidates during the evaluation process. Many studies have been conducted to assess its effectiveness to predict personality and job performance. Recent studies testing the validity of using handwriting for predicting personality traits have been consistently negative [50], the results of most of the recent surveys on the ability for graphology to access personality and job performance have been negative as well [51]. Here are some of the specific results for the personality tests:
Graphologists were unable to predict scores on the Eysenck personality questionnaire using writing samples from the same people[2]
Graphologists were unable to predict scores on the Myers-Briggs test using writing samples from the same people[52]
Using meta-analysis drawn from over 200 studies, graphologists were generally unable to predict any kind of personality trait on any personality test[53]
Graphologists didn't do better to assess job performance:
Professional graphologists using handwriting analysis were just as ineffective as lay people at predicting performance[54]
A broad literature screen done by King and Koehler confirmed dozens of studies showing the mechanical aspects of graphology (slant, slope, etc.) are essentially worthless predictors of job performance.[51]
The best way to summarize the appeal that graphology has despite the complete lack of empirical evidence has been put up by Dr Rowan Bayne, a British psychologist who wrote several studies on graphology: "It's very seductive because at a very crude level someone who is neat and well behaved tends to have neat handwriting" and then added that the practice was "useless... absolutely hopeless".[55]. It is also worth noting that the British Psychological Society for example ranks graphology alongside astrology - giving them both "zero validity"[55].
Overall, despite a few studies that support handwriting analysis, such as Crumbaugh & Stockholm [56], the large majority of studies such as Ben-Shakar, Bar-Hillel, Blum, Ben-Abba, & Flug [57] and many others indicate overwhelming evidence against its predictive validity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphology#Validity
|
|
|
|
|
On November 30 2008 09:44 Schnake wrote:Graphology doesn't work but thanks for the effort.
Validity
Although graphology had some early support in the scientific community such as Fluckinger, Tripp & Weinberg(1961) [48] , Lockowandte (1976) [49] and Nevo(1986) [50], the results of most of the recent surveys on the ability for graphology to access personality and job performance have been negative [51]. Graphology is primarily used as a recruiting tool to screen candidates during the evaluation process. Many studies have been conducted to assess its effectiveness to predict personality and job performance. Recent studies testing the validity of using handwriting for predicting personality traits have been consistently negative [50], the results of most of the recent surveys on the ability for graphology to access personality and job performance have been negative as well [51]. Here are some of the specific results for the personality tests:
Graphologists were unable to predict scores on the Eysenck personality questionnaire using writing samples from the same people[2]
Graphologists were unable to predict scores on the Myers-Briggs test using writing samples from the same people[52]
Using meta-analysis drawn from over 200 studies, graphologists were generally unable to predict any kind of personality trait on any personality test[53]
Graphologists didn't do better to assess job performance:
Professional graphologists using handwriting analysis were just as ineffective as lay people at predicting performance[54]
A broad literature screen done by King and Koehler confirmed dozens of studies showing the mechanical aspects of graphology (slant, slope, etc.) are essentially worthless predictors of job performance.[51]
The best way to summarize the appeal that graphology has despite the complete lack of empirical evidence has been put up by Dr Rowan Bayne, a British psychologist who wrote several studies on graphology: "It's very seductive because at a very crude level someone who is neat and well behaved tends to have neat handwriting" and then added that the practice was "useless... absolutely hopeless".[55]. It is also worth noting that the British Psychological Society for example ranks graphology alongside astrology - giving them both "zero validity"[55].
Overall, despite a few studies that support handwriting analysis, such as Crumbaugh & Stockholm [56], the large majority of studies such as Ben-Shakar, Bar-Hillel, Blum, Ben-Abba, & Flug [57] and many others indicate overwhelming evidence against its predictive validity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphology#Validity
![[image loading]](http://www.forumammo.com/cpg/albums/userpics/10063/Blank-Picard_Facepalm.jpg)
maybe you should read the thread
|
|
|
Best troll ever  Well played, sir.
|
that was impressive.
art right there, pure art
|
|
|
I laughed until I cried. I was buying the whole handwriting analysis thing too.
|
I write in all caps except for the occasional vowel or nonspoken letter. I know there is some sunbconscious pattern to it but I just never bothered to figure it out.
|
|
|
16953 Posts
Ooh, I want this too...but I won't be able to have it for a while since I'm still away for the holidays. I should have something by Monday, though, if you're still doing it by then.
|
More stupidity. Wow, you would think we were turning into, you know.
|
Falcynn writes exactly like my vietnamese friend, like exactly. That's crazy.
PS- I know this is bullshit, but if anyone cares here is how I write:
![[image loading]](http://i36.tinypic.com/118kiz5.jpg)
don't mind the doodles on the right. I don't even know what they are.
|
I guess you learned something about your vietnamese friend today then.
|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
On November 30 2008 08:50 exalted wrote:
do me do me
Apparently Falcynn would like to.
+ Show Spoiler +ROFL, 10/10 troll attempt, I so did NOT see this coming... well played Chef
|
On November 30 2008 11:05 Showtime! wrote:
More stupidity. Wow, you would think we were turning into, you know.
Be the change you want to see If you want to see a bunch of bitchy non-contributing posts, then keep going.
Edit: Why does everyone's scanner is this thread suck dick? lol... Seriously...
|
Falcynn this thread is going to haunt you in so many threads in the future its not even funny, oh wait yes it is.
|
|
|
On November 30 2008 09:00 Falcynn wrote:
...wait
wat?
He's obviously calling you a guy who loves it in the backdoor... I hope he's wrong o-o.
EDIT: I'll do it right after I download my printer drivers. All I can do is print. After I get the drivers, then I'll be happy to give you a writing sample so you can troll me =P.
|
On November 30 2008 11:09 Chef wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2008 11:05 Showtime! wrote:
More stupidity. Wow, you would think we were turning into, you know. Be the change you want to see If you want to see a bunch of bitchy non-contributing posts, then keep going. Edit: Why does everyone's scanner is this thread suck dick? lol... Seriously...
Well, you know.. I learned from the Master, + Show Spoiler +.
Snap.
|
|
|
On November 30 2008 11:06 CharlieMurphy wrote:Falcynn writes exactly like my vietnamese friend, like exactly. That's crazy. PS- I know this is bullshit, but if anyone cares here is how I write: don't mind the doodles on the right. I don't even know what they are.
Awaiting chef analysis.
|
|
|
On November 30 2008 08:58 Chef wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2008 08:37 Falcynn wrote:Well Darko beat me out, but hopefully I can be one of the guys you pick and choose if you feel like it? ^_^ + Show Spoiler + Falcynn, much like our caveman ancestors of old, you prefer not the elegance of cursive writing, but the raw brutal force of the printed letter. This indicates a predisposition toward all things untamed and taboo, such as male to male anal sex. This is further indicated by your typical avoidance of the lines. While sometimes you write your letters connected to lines, more often they stay directly above and between them. This is a clue that you do not respect the lines (or taboos) of society and prefer to ignore them completely. When you come in contact with them, it is purely a coincidence of them coinciding with your goals for rough, male on male anal sex. Another thing that dominates your overall writing style, is the thickness of your printed letters. This is generally caused by a use of excessive force when pressing your pen or pencil to the paper. The obvious conclusion of this is, of course, a continued theme of primitive caveman like tendencies which lead to a desire of toughness, and roughness, particularly in male on male anal sex. However, to your benefit, this means that the roughness is probably exerted by yourself, unto your partner, wherein you are the one exerting the force into his supple anus. In addition to this, we see an excess of straight lines, even in letters that should normally by curved. For instance, your s's and e's seem to be more of a mechanical series of straight lines than the curves that they should be. This implies a conscious level of homophobia, or denial of your subconscious urges. You demand to only show others that you are as straight as an arrow, but to the keen observer, you are as queer as only rough male on male anal sex could exemplify. Furthermore, your writing is not uniform in the way that it leans. That is, sometimes it leans left, sometimes it leans right, and sometimes it is very centred and tall. This describes that you are a desperate man, and despite your preference for male on male anal sex, you advertise to the world that really, any partner will do, so long as it's mostly human. This concludes my first analysis of writing. I hope you have learned a lot about yourself, Falcynn, and I am possibly willing to do another if I see one that looks particularly interesting. Cheers,
Ohhh man, I just can't stop laughing. About 10 mins now, my sides hurt, that is such pure gold.
PS: Falcynn don't feel bad, if I had a scanner I would have been suckered the exact same way.
|
|
|
rofl the people around me are looking at me weird, like "why the hell is this guy laughing at a monitor by himself" weird. i knew there was something fishy about the "sample" analysis, but this is just....hahaha
|
Okay =D. Time to see how well I can be humiliated.
|
I thought the first post's example gave it away
|
On November 30 2008 13:44 whatusername wrote:
I thought the first post's example gave it away He didn't post the example until after I was pwned.
If he had posted that example earlier I think everyone would've been suspicious.
|
|
|
Omg, this reminds me of literature in high school. ^^ This is such a good troll.
|
funniest shit ever. I literally cannot stop laughing.
I will remember this troll for years to come.
|
|
|
this caugh me off-guard, 10/10 funnier than every blog, thread i'd read and i been lurking here for almost 5 years
|
From the topic name I expected a very boring thread... I WUS WRONG :D
|
Canada7170 Posts
Thanks for the analysis. Explains a lot.
|
Fluckinger? Tripp & Weinberg? Lockowandte? these sound like fake names..
|
|
|
Sadly I know you poeple think that my typing is bad. But i swear to you my handwriting is like i have Parkinson or something it's pure chicken starch only a few people can read it and most of the time i can't.
Photo of old HS us hist notes
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think that pick-up line works on most girls chef.
|
....... Allow me to anal… o.O
|
|
|
haha, Chef strikes again with another awesome thread. post another food blog soon btw!
|
iNfeRnaL
Germany1908 Posts
Kefka I just made the same damn screenshot.
Rofl.
|
It's not like he put a random number of periods in front of his topic...it's obviously done on purpose
Or was that done by a mod?
|
Definitely a mod-edit.
I won't allow you to anal, sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
I rofled after reading your ANALysis of Falcynn's writing.
ahahahaha
|
i can just lol:
EDIT: 
+ Show Spoiler +On November 30 2008 19:15 kefkalives wrote:I love this site.
|
On November 30 2008 12:30 anch wrote:have fun reading, btw its not my writing or essay + Show Spoiler +
LOL THIS IS ALMOST AS GOOD AS THE TROLL ROFL
|
|
|
....... Allow me to anal…
This is what shows up on the side. Lawl.
|
intrigue
Washington, D.C9933 Posts
|
On November 30 2008 19:15 kefkalives wrote:I love this site.
So true.
|
I knew something was different, hahahaha
|
Northern Ireland22208 Posts
ffs I thought I was first to spot that
|
Hong Kong20321 Posts
ANALANANALNALA :D:D:D:D
nice work chef
rofl
and whoever edited title
|
lmao you know that shit is funny when Nazgul and his giant helmet feels the need to make a lol post.
|
On November 30 2008 23:24 intrigue wrote:
can we get pix of steph
I don't see why not.
I would approve of the thread title change, but the spelling of analyse was changed
|
|
|
On December 01 2008 03:37 HeadBangaa wrote:
Yeah he fixed it.
Just bite the pillow, sweetie.
|
Alright, who changed the title?
|
United States7166 Posts
|
|
|
Allow me to anal...
teeheehee.
|
haha This thread alone shows you totally deserved that name change Chef!
|
lol stephen dion for the epic lose
|
LOL allow me to anal.....
|
On December 01 2008 03:49 Zelniq wrote:my bets are on Sonuvbob
|
title is so misleading on the left side
"....Allow me to anal..."
I was even afraid of clicking
|
|
|
On December 01 2008 07:48 Leath wrote:
title is so misleading on the left side
"....Allow me to anal..."
I was even afraid of clicking
and yet you did
interesting...
|
wait so do u also analyze wat we write about as well?
|
United States17042 Posts
On December 02 2008 05:28 R3condite wrote:
wait so do u also analyze wat we write about as well?
read the thread. I think we're done here xD
|
|
|
lol i should've read the whole thread before i posted. nice one.
|
|
|
LOLLLLLLLLLL its so subtle but its there
|
Lol I read allow me to anal...
|
Bumping, this was such a great thread.
Also for the people unaware of this thread.
|
You win 3 internetz
User was warned for this post
|
On November 30 2008 08:50 exalted wrote:do me do me this is from 2-3 years ago but my handwriting should still be about the same
I know what you are from your handwriting
INTP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTP
spacing between words is big which means introvert
you have the N n and the high upper zone which means intuitive
you have straight up and down letters which means tough minded
and your y loops are that of a prober
basically the best personality for innovation
|
lol, in the sidebar this shows as "allow me to anal..."
thats kinda the only reason i came to this thread
i am disappoint.
|
|
|
|
|
On September 17 2010 15:19 Subversion wrote:lol, in the sidebar this shows as "allow me to anal..." thats kinda the only reason i came to this thread i am disappoint.
Clearly you didn't read the thread then lol. Not disappointing at all
|
On September 17 2010 15:22 Hesmyrr wrote:
Probably intentional :p
LOL yeah I don't remember the "......" (i forgot what these are called and i'm too lazy to look it up) before the title.
|
Canada8029 Posts
Pretty sure the periods at the start of the title were from a mod edit after the big reveal.
|
....... Allow me to anal…
what
|
Hahaha I forgot about this thread, such a funny/great thread!
|
Haha, I like how the plot unfolds in this thread.
|
This thread is simply golden, things like this make me wish I learned of TL sooner... did Falcynn ever live this down? And btw Falcynn having read the whole thread I was impressed with how well you took it, everone can learn from your example.
|
I normally hate trolling, but I have to admit the wordplay plus the way the thread unfolded were fantastic. Ranks right up there with Darrell Hammond and "therapist" from SNL. Oh, and "An album cover" also, which is similar to this one!
P.S. "The pen is mightier"
|
agree that this legendary thread needed a bump, to good to disapear!!!
|
I have probably never laughed this hard in my life
well played!
|
handwriting analysis is unscientific and simply doesn't work....
standard pseudo-science for ppl who belive everything...
|
Lets just go ahead and bump everythread in the hall of fame. This one did make me laugh tho lol
|
On September 17 2010 20:12 kickinhead wrote:
handwriting analysis is unscientific and simply doesn't work....
standard pseudo-science for ppl who belive everything...
Read the thread
|
On September 17 2010 20:12 kickinhead wrote:
handwriting analysis is unscientific and simply doesn't work....
standard pseudo-science for ppl who belive everything...
hahahaha. did you even read the thread?
|
Hahahhaa....top class thread.
As an aside, Hans Scheike, legendary leader of a Swedish spanking-sect [sic], started his career as - you guessed it - a graphologist!
|
I can't be the only one who wondered what all the dots in the beginning were for unless it was to make the thread title read: "allow me to anal"
|
ahaha how did i miss this thread?
|
Dear son. Ofcourse I allow you to anal.
gl
|
On September 17 2010 20:23 Ghostcom wrote:
I can't be the only one who wondered what all the dots in the beginning were for unless it was to make the thread title read: "allow me to anal"
read thread
|
I laughed so hard when i read this thread, good bump IMO.
|
Anyone else notice if you look at the forum tabs on the left
General
Tea Party wins primary
............allow me to anal
|
On September 17 2010 20:48 Slardarxt wrote:
Anyone else notice if you look at the forum tabs on the left
General
Tea Party wins primary
............allow me to anal
Yeah that freaked me out and seems to be on purpose. EWWW
|
This thread looks like its called "allow me to anal" in the little preview box lolol
my handwriting sucks
|
oh god, this thread is awesome.
|
On September 17 2010 20:29 asdfVSqwert wrote:
Dear son. Ofcourse I allow you to anal.
gl
what??
|
Holy crap, I missed this thread the first time around, rofl.
Chef, that was pure gold. Goddamn.
|
This thread is full of win haha (:
|
u put periods on ur title so u can make analysis into anal nice attempt at being funny
|
On September 18 2010 10:47 GiantEnemyCrab wrote:
u put periods on ur title so u can make analysis into anal nice attempt at being funny
Hi, you're new around here aren't you?
Should probably shut up then. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3818/analyzethisbe8.png)
![[image loading]](http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/4522/nothandwrittenfn4.png)
![[image loading]](http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/8874/treediagram2fa9.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b239/Falcynn/img017.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b239/Falcynn/img018.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/8373/writing22qo9.png)
![[image loading]](http://i33.tinypic.com/2mh652f.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/2711/img002yd4.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l241/mmrk923/WritingSample.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v290/CustomLover/DSC03264.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c79/bonjordo/Allowmeto.png)
![[image loading]](http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/6702/lollh1.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Stephane_dion_rally_head.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp241/PeanutSC/PC030013.jpg)
