US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2375
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
pmh
1352 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
Non-voters and anti-two partyers could theoretically be prompted to vote for Trump upon seeing rioting, but that seems extraordinarily unlikely on balance. | ||
stilt
France2749 Posts
An imperialism which is showing by the random manifestations outside usa on this subject or the fact french society is now perceived firstly by racial and community struggle rather than social one. And ofc this agenda is pushed by self rightous bourgeois who want to keep their social privelege by pushing this identitary and borderline fascist agenda, some of them would even taught me how to do an insurrection while they prolly never did a strike on their life, ridiculous. I mean, look at you all, you are pretty excited, want to do a revolution but if I ask for exemple GH "do you think lbm is gonna make a future without racial tensions in 40 or 50 years ?" The honest answer would be no, you know perfectly it won't stop the mechanics. In order to do so, it will need to do a social and economical revolution that nobody at the top want. And the solution of reinforcing the militia aspect of police by making it even more communitary will only reinforce violence as this militia culture is already one of the main factor of violence. Because black people will remain poor which'll make their integration to society harder (competition for ressources, alternative/illegal activities are bound to happen) and there will still be poor white people (yes yes, it's not fake news, I can assure you there are white people who are actually poors, in France and in usa too !) will have this silly mentality of "yes were are poors but at least we aren't blacks !". That's the sad thing about the racists, most of them are not benifiting economically of the system will still support it against another racial group. The people who should allied hate each other, some poors admire Trump, a moronic billionaire while other admire Beyonce, a supercifical billionaire, in the end, any of them don't risk to cause any change, american society is as solid and locked as 1984's one. If I am not mistaken, most of the black people voted for Biden, considering how lurkewarn "the dangerous radical" (according to some) aka Sanders already is, it says a lot. It says a lot when journalists of the washington post are supporting it too, the elites are not threatened. Now, what would happen if lbm was attacking wall street which is the core of the problem, or Havard ? These priveleged intellectuals give the justification for all these shits ? Or the medias possessed by the oligarchs ? Or the law firms and other lobbyists which are paralyzing democracy too ? If that was the case, i am pretty sure those journalists which love to take into pity black ppl (you know, the sort of pity who stole all the dignity of those who are being pitied) would do a Zola. This french writer who illustrates himself in favor of Dreyfus, unfairly accused of treachery by the french army because he was jew, and who wrote Germinal which depicts the sad condition of the miners. A nice guy isn't it ? But once the people of Paris rebelled, what did he do ? Obviously, he called for slaughters and was very happy of the 20000 workers killed, "now they learnt their lessons and will behave". I guess in good faith, some of you might think it could lighten up the carceral system but usa is the country which leads the most ferocious war of all against the poors and deshumanize them to the max, a necessary oppression to justify while most have nothing while Bezos has everything. (Just saw a report on Angola in which the prison make the prisonners do a rodeo to entairtain the public, that's nothing but barbary) It's actually depressing to see, such a energy wasted to actually maintain the exact same economical and societal system But hey, if it helps you to feel good, why not, it cost even less than charity. | ||
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
On June 03 2020 20:09 stilt wrote: It's weird, reading this would almost make me think that liberal democract which legitimates us foreign and cultural imperialism actually doesn't work :o An imperialism which is showing by the random manifestations outside usa on this subject or the fact french society is now perceived firstly by racial and community struggle rather than social one. And ofc this agenda is pushed by self rightous bourgeois who want to keep their social privelege by pushing this identitary and borderline fascist agenda, some of them would even taught me how to do an insurrection while they prolly never did a strike on their life, ridiculous. I mean, look at you all, you are pretty excited, want to do a revolution but if I ask for exemple GH "do you think lbm is gonna make a future without racial tensions in 40 or 50 years ?" The honest answer would be no, you know perfectly it won't stop the mechanics. In order to do so, it will need to do a social and economical revolution that nobody at the top want. And the solution of reinforcing the militia aspect of police by making it even more communitary will only reinforce violence as this militia culture is already one of the main factor of violence. Because black people will remain poor which'll make their integration to society harder (competition for ressources, alternative/illegal activities are bound to happen) and there will still be poor white people (yes yes, it's not fake news, I can assure you there are white people who are actually poors, in France and in usa too !) will have this silly mentality of "yes were are poors but at least we aren't blacks !". That's the sad thing about the racists, most of them are not benifiting economically of the system will still support it against another racial group. The people who should allied hate each other, some poors admire Trump, a moronic billionaire while other admire Beyonce, a supercifical billionaire, in the end, any of them don't risk to cause any change, american society is as solid and locked as 1984's one. If I am not mistaken, most of the black people voted for Biden, considering how lurkewarn "the dangerous radical" (according to some) aka Sanders already is, it says a lot. It says a lot when journalists of the washington post are supporting it too, the elites are not threatened. Now, what would happen if lbm was attacking wall street which is the core of the problem, or Havard ? These priveleged intellectuals give the justification for all these shits ? Or the medias possessed by the oligarchs ? Or the law firms and other lobbyists which are paralyzing democracy too ? If that was the case, i am pretty sure those journalists which love to take into pity black ppl (you know, the sort of pity who stole all the dignity of those who are being pitied) would do a Zola. This french writer who illustrates himself in favor of Dreyfus, unfairly accused of treachery by the french army because he was jew, and who wrote Germinal which depicts the sad condition of the miners. A nice guy isn't it ? But once the people of Paris rebelled, what did he do ? Obviously, he called for slaughters and was very happy of the 20000 workers killed, "now they learnt their lessons and will behave". I guess in good faith, some of you might think it could lighten up the carceral system but usa is the country which leads the most ferocious war of all against the poors and deshumanize them to the max, a necessary oppression to justify while most have nothing while Bezos has everything. (Just saw a report on Angola in which the prison make the prisonners do a rodeo to entairtain the public, that's nothing but barbary) It's actually depressing to see, such a energy wasted to actually maintain the exact same economical and societal system But hey, if it helps you to feel good, why not, it cost even less than charity. so what's the solution? You see fit to condescend to basically every stakeholder in this, but offer nothing in the way of a constructive solution. (and cut the "you do it because it feels good" nonsense, we all post here/engage in public discourse because it feels good in one way or another) | ||
pmh
1352 Posts
| ||
Artisreal
Germany9235 Posts
On June 03 2020 19:59 pmh wrote: Its not about wanting to help or not,at least not for me. Its about understanding what is happening in the greater sceme of things. Green horizons is heavily polarizing. It is understandable from an ideological point of vieuw but looking at it from a pragmatic point of vieuw the conclusion has to be that it doesnt help either,at least not in the short run. On the contrary,such an extreme position pushes people in the centre towards the other end. I honestly whish that it didnt but the reality is that it does.Which is why the whole situation is so sad. Personally i would be all in favor of a sanders style revolution,but the reality is that if it doesnt succeed you will end up on the exact other end of the spectrum. Right now i dont see how it can work but maybe it can work in the long run. A heavily polarized society in the months before the election is trumps dream,its the only way he can hope to win with the current economic situation. But i have to agree,a centrist position does not make the situation better either even though at least it wouldnt make it worse in the short run. Maybe its already to late and things have to get worse first before things can become better. In that way the polarization helps the protesters as well,but only in the long run and only after it first has gotten worse. In the end maybe thats the only way to achieve real change,but it will take a long time. The status quo is utterly polarizing. Let's add dangerous and atagonizing for POCs to that. Have you ever lived in a country where you were unsure to get about unscathed if you went for something quotidian as a SIMPLE JOG? How did that feel? Damn. | ||
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
On June 03 2020 20:19 pmh wrote: @farvacola: I dont know,maybe you are right. Its all a bit speculative but i honestly think that without social unrest trump would not stand a chance in november. Then the focus would be all on how he did handle covid and the economic situation. I still wouldnt give trump over 50% chance to win but i do think he now has a better chance then before the unrest. For this i do not blame the protesters btw,not even the slightest. People are rightfully very angry and at one point emotions take over. Then there is all the media which influences people and which makes it even worse. Maybe the protesters can "win",but for many people it does become a choice between 2 more or less extreme positions which is a bit risky. (and just to be clear:personally i do not see the vieuwpoint of the protestors as an extreme vieuwpoint,on the contrary i think it is a very reasonable and centric point of vieuw. but there is many people who will see it as an extreme point of vieuw and/or who will frame it as an extreme point of vieuw with an emphasisis on the looting and lack of law and order). Cnn has been doing a remarkable good job in the coverage of the protests btw,with an emphasisis on the peacefull protests while comdeming the looting. Several democratic governors have done so as well which does give hope for a good outcome. But i would imagine fox and all report on it from a different point of vieuw,we will just have to wait and see what happens in november. Fair enough, but here's a different take. Hilary lost in part because she took for granted some of the most reliable Democratic voting blocs, black folk included. Biden is now forced to recognize that he needs to offer up something real to those blocs, and in doing so, he bridges the electoral gap that got Trump elected. Not a guaranteed future by any means, but that sequence has a good chance of playing out imo, and protests only make it more likely. The ball is in Biden's court, as terrifying as that is lol. If he picks Stacey Abrams for VP, I give him good odds. | ||
MWY
Germany284 Posts
On June 03 2020 18:02 GreenHorizons wrote: Long story short, while SPD and centrists were playing nice with the nazis banking on process and institutions, communists and antifa's early manifestations were outlawed and suppressed. When the economy collapsed and no one was able to offer adequate relief Hitler capitalized and his brownshirts suppressed the remaining resistance in the street. Hitler's appointed chancellor. Calls to dissolve the Reichstag, there's the famous fire. Hitler blames communists and has them all rounded up and many executed. With SPD being the farthest left party still legal/viable they failed to stop the Enabling Act giving Hitler legitimacy and then he has them arrested, banished, killed, etc anyway. A lot of that happened in the span of about 3 months btw EDIT: I feel like SPD KPD drama is both out of my depth and a bit in the weeds here. EDIT2: Honest question: Do people not know the "first they came for" quote starts with communists over there too? In the long UK version Jewish people are 4th/penultimate! A lot of socialdemocrats died trying to fight Hitler and intentionally put their lifes on the line to stop him/fight him. This is really insulting to all those people and terribly wrong and just speaks to how you either not know or bend history to fit your political agenda. It's almost trump-esque to say that they were the key to hitler's power because they died trying to prevent him but didn't succeed. | ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On June 03 2020 20:49 MWY wrote: A lot of socialdemocrats died trying to fight Hitler and intentionally put their lifes on the line to stop him/fight him. This is really insulting to all those people and terribly wrong and just speaks to how you either not know or bend history to fit your political agenda. It's almost trump-esque to say that they were the key to hitler's power because they died trying to prevent him but didn't succeed. Sorry to burst your bubble but I was also taught that social democrats did help Hitler gain power. The way we were taught it happened was due to social democrats not wanting antifacist to gain more power since antifa was considered communist, and the Nazi party (who claimed they were socialist) along with socialist democrats both took part in having antifa lose power. Now I’m not saying socialist democrats didn’t try to stop it, but they did help solidify Nazis to gain more power over antifa. | ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8983 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
thePunGun
598 Posts
On June 03 2020 21:21 ShoCkeyy wrote: Sorry to burst your bubble but I was also taught that social democrats did help Hitler gain power. The way we were taught it happened was due to social democrats not wanting antifacist to gain more power since antifa was considered communist, and the Nazi party (who claimed they were socialist) along with socialist democrats both took part in having antifa lose power. Now I’m not saying socialist democrats didn’t try to stop it, but they did help solidify Nazis to gain more power over antifa. Well, if you're making false and inaccurate statements, you'll have to at least point to the source, which came up with this nonsense. Unless of course you've just pulled it out of your ass, because it sure as F smells like that. | ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On June 03 2020 21:29 thePunGun wrote: Well, if you're making false and inaccurate statements, you'll have to at least point to the source, which came up with this nonsense. Unless of course you've just pulled it out of your ass, because it sure as F smells like that. How about you teach me instead of talking out of your ass too? I said this was how it was taught to me, when? Idk it was like more than 15 years ago. Nothing online is going to prove my point, but there’s a few articles that state the SPD did nothing for a couple years, which led to the rise of Nazis... https://www.facinghistory.org/weimar-republic-fragility-democracy/readings/choices-and-consequences Unwilling to confront the challenge of dealing with the great depression the Social Democrats stayed out of the government. Their decision allowed the erosion of legislative government to take place in the period from 1930-1932 seriously weakening the Weimar Republic and contributing to its failure. Am I wrong? Sure, but I was just stating that I learned that SPD also didn’t like communists, which aligned with early Nazi propaganda- against communist. Edit: I may also be mixing things up, but either way, if I’m wrong please just show me why I’m wrong it’s better than just telling me I’m wrong, I like learning. As I mentioned I’m just stating how I was taught in school, maybe this is why we have a fuck ton of Americans who think socialism is bad? | ||
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States23224 Posts
On June 03 2020 20:49 MWY wrote: A lot of socialdemocrats died trying to fight Hitler and intentionally put their lifes on the line to stop him/fight him. This is really insulting to all those people and terribly wrong and just speaks to how you either not know or bend history to fit your political agenda. It's almost trump-esque to say that they were the key to hitler's power because they died trying to prevent him but didn't succeed. I fully expect for Democrats to tell stories of their heroism standing up to Trump in the future too. Prolly turn Pelosi into Joan of arc if we let em. On June 03 2020 22:08 farvacola wrote: Yo GH, way too many of the reading lists for folks interested in black suffrage do not include The Souls of Black Folk, but I don’t wanna step in to those posts obtrusively. What do? If you're getting people to read a book you're having more success than me lol. Pick a quote and spend 3 years trying to get people to reconcile that maybe? (I'm being jovial if that's not coming across in text) EDIT: I personally think Du Bois is a good place to start but I'd suggest Black Reconstruction in America to my point about history | ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8983 Posts
| ||
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
On June 03 2020 22:01 ShoCkeyy wrote: How about you teach me instead of talking out of your ass too? I said this was how it was taught to me, when? Idk it was like more than 15 years ago. Nothing online is going to prove my point, but there’s a few articles that state the SPD did nothing for a couple years, which led to the rise of Nazis... https://www.facinghistory.org/weimar-republic-fragility-democracy/readings/choices-and-consequences Am I wrong? Sure, but I was just stating that I learned that SPD also didn’t like communists, which aligned with early Nazi propaganda- against communist. Edit: I may also be mixing things up, but either way, if I’m wrong please just show me why I’m wrong it’s better than just telling me I’m wrong, I like learning. As I mentioned I’m just stating how I was taught in school, maybe this is why we have a fuck ton of Americans who think socialism is bad? While this is slightly off topic, if doing nothing is now considered as helping Hitler, the whole Europe helped him by not invading earlier. If I remember Rise&Fall of the Third Reich correctly, social democrats got pushed out of the government because the people felt (wrongly) that the gov had given up on the military during the first ww. If you add that to the great depression + the communist menace, you get people voting for Hitler. Feel free to correct me as it's been a long time. | ||
Silvanel
Poland4728 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States23224 Posts
On June 03 2020 23:01 Silvanel wrote: If You want to blame someone other then rightwing for hitlers rise to power go for German corporations. Thyssen, IG Farben, Krupp all showered NSDAP with money. The US and corporations like Ford were big supporters/inspirations of nazis too. I've posted the picture of Henry Ford being awarded the highest award Nazis had for foreigners for his service to the third reich + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
On June 03 2020 23:05 GreenHorizons wrote: The US and corporations like Ford were big supporters/inspirations of nazis too. I've posted the picture of Henry Ford being awarded the highest award Nazis had for foreigners for his service to the third reich + Show Spoiler + ![]() You'll notice the impressive composition of that photograph. Despite what your eyes tell you, all 3 of them are on the far right. Ahem. I'll see myself out. | ||
| ||