• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:36
CEST 06:36
KST 13:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task25[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview19herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025)17Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure6
Community News
[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage1EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)9Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results212025 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers)14
StarCraft 2
General
Interview with oPZesty on Cheeseadelphia/Coaching herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025) DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview Power Rank: October 2018 Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) Last Chance Qualifiers for OlimoLeague 2024 Winter $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task [ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] RO20 Group Stage [BSL20] RO20 Group A - Sunday 20:00 CET [ASL19] Semifinal B
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16928 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 197

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 195 196 197 198 199 4969 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 14 2018 23:56 GMT
#3921
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24634 Posts
May 15 2018 00:00 GMT
#3922
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35118 Posts
May 15 2018 00:02 GMT
#3923
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23010 Posts
May 15 2018 00:04 GMT
#3924
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.


Perhaps a visualization would help.

Palestinians are being pushed toward a cliff and whether they are being born faster than they are dying on the trail is somewhat irrelevant to whether they are being pushed toward extermination with no alternative on the table.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12062 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:23:22
May 15 2018 00:18 GMT
#3925
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24634 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:33:14
May 15 2018 00:32 GMT
#3926
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...

I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:37:53
May 15 2018 00:36 GMT
#3927
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12062 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:47:26
May 15 2018 00:43 GMT
#3928
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...

I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable.


Ren says that he must be missing something because the Palestinians are clearly at fault in the general situation. I'm being helpful online and telling him what he's missing, which is that the position that Israel is justified in its actions these days by notions like self-defense or moral clarity is ludicrous.

You summon the image of those bloodthirsty sets of Palestinians trying to murder the Israelis and forcing them to react to counter this line of argument, and my counter to that is that if they're too far away from them for rubber bullets to be effective and therefore the israeli forces *need* to use sniper rifles and live ammunition to have any impact, then those palestinian protesters by definition aren't really the imminent threat that they're claimed to be in the image you and Israel were presenting.
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35118 Posts
May 15 2018 01:06 GMT
#3929
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 01:14:46
May 15 2018 01:14 GMT
#3930
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.

I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated.
nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23010 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 01:48:50
May 15 2018 01:46 GMT
#3931
On May 15 2018 10:14 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.

I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated.
nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.


Do you consider the Holocaust ethnic cleansing or genocide? Presuming this definitively puts you in the 'it was ethnic cleansing not genocide" of the tribes here before European colonizers.

*probably not reading this since he muted me
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42292 Posts
May 15 2018 02:17 GMT
#3932
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

The hypothetical that Israel would be the victim of genocide if it were weak does not excuse the actual, that Israel is committing a genocide.

You don't get to bulldoze Palestinian settlements on the basis of "well they started it seventy years ago".
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Rebs
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Pakistan10726 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 02:24:58
May 15 2018 02:18 GMT
#3933
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...



I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable



So then heres a question. What if those fences have been put up illegally and the fences they are busting through are not actually recognized by anyone (except the US now I presume) as Israels territory?

You dont need me to source this for you, just google Isreal, fence and encroachment and you will be inundated with literature covering this going back 20 years.

I also like the the phrasing "after being told not to" its literally the identical sort of phrasing that propped up during the defense of apartheid regimes in some of the interview and docs of footage going back to that era from White South Africans. I am not suggesting thats how you meant it btw, just as something to think about.

All of this not withstanding ofcourse the obviously pointed out fact, that dudes with cleavers, hatchets and literally driven to the edge of madness are 0 threat to snipers and automatic weapons.

KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42292 Posts
May 15 2018 02:19 GMT
#3934
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Your argument appears to be that you can kill any number fewer than the sustainable reproductive output of the group and be in the clear for genocide.

I'm not sure that's where you wanted to go but it's where you ended up.

These are people, it's not livestock management. Get a grip.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35118 Posts
May 15 2018 02:20 GMT
#3935
On May 15 2018 10:14 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.

I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated.
nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.

We have the benefit of hindsight to know what happened to the Native Americans. Regardless, not genociding them and performing widespread ethnic cleansing is nothing to pat the country on the back about."Congrats on not being 100% total evil."

You have provided no proof that Israel will stop taking more and more land from the Palestinians. We have a repeated loop of a) take land b) kill people who try and fight back, justifying it as defense.

Eventually, we'll get to the point where there is nowhere left for the Palestinians left to go in Palestine. From there it's:

a) Isreal continues its pattern of behavior and completes the genocide
b) decides to stop for... reasons?

You need to prove that those reasons or decisions exist. Nothing that I know of does so. Either way, Isreal is a total assbag in this situation and the varying degrees of which is out of whack with the reaction that it gets.
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24634 Posts
May 15 2018 02:43 GMT
#3936
On May 15 2018 11:18 Rebs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...



I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable



So then heres a question. What if those fences have been put up illegally and the fences they are busting through are not actually recognized by anyone (except the US now I presume) as Israels territory?

You dont need me to source this for you, just google Isreal, fence and encroachment and you will be inundated with literature covering this going back 20 years.

I also like the the phrasing "after being told not to" its literally the identical sort of phrasing that propped up during the defense of apartheid regimes in some of the interview and docs of footage going back to that era from White South Africans. I am not suggesting thats how you meant it btw, just as something to think about.

All of this not withstanding ofcourse the obviously pointed out fact, that dudes with cleavers, hatchets and literally driven to the edge of madness are 0 threat to snipers and automatic weapons.


Oh I agree 100% that you need to take into account the whole picture on not just the isolated incident. Israel and its neighbors have both done horrible things and neither is innocent overall. And lately the USA has been doing more harm than good. Recall that I originally reacted to the leading question of why people got killed today. You can blame everything bad that happens over there as due to the past decades (or thousands of years) of actions on behalf of Israel, the Palestinians, the USA, and others, or you can acknowledge that a large group of people tried to break through the heavily armed border. That doesn't excuse the snipers' commanders and political leaders from creating this type of a situation, but it does directly answer why people died today.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12062 Posts
May 15 2018 02:48 GMT
#3937
My intent in asking him why he thought people got killed today was to get either a self-defense or a moral clarity answer cause I didn't know which one he would give and they elicit different arguments in response.
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 13:52:53
May 15 2018 03:07 GMT
#3938
Hundreds arrested as activists pick up where Martin Luther King left off

Hundreds of low-wage workers, faith leaders, civil rights organizers and liberal activists were arrested in demonstrations in Washington and outside statehouses across the US on Monday as they resumed the work Martin Luther King left unfinished.

Fifty years after King launched the Poor People’s Campaign against economic inequality, militarism and racial injustice, demonstrators revived that fight, kicking off 40 days of nonviolent action.

The new effort, The Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, is being led by co-chairs William Barber, a pastor at Greenleaf Christian Church in Goldsboro, North Carolina, and Liz Theoharis, an ordained minister and anti-poverty campaigner from New York City.

In Washington, the group gathered on the lawn outside the US Capitol to hear Barber declare: “Something’s wrong in America.”

Their action on Monday, Barber continued, was not just a commemoration of King’s anti-poverty efforts, it was a new call-to-arms.

“We are here to have a reconsecration and a re-engagement because you do not commemorate the death of [a] prophet,” Barber said, his voice building as he spoke. “You go to where they were killed, reach down in the blood, pick up your baton and carry it the next round of the way. Now who’s ready?”

Source

When I read the first half of the headline, I thought I was reading about Russia.

Seriously, why isn't this all over the news like the Russian protests? Hundreds of arrests...
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11328 Posts
May 15 2018 03:19 GMT
#3939
On May 15 2018 02:00 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:53 Plansix wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:26 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:15 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Step one is to stop all international support of Israeli actions. Make them a pariah like south africa was during apartheid. Actively boycott Israeli goods, boycott artists who perform in israel, boycott sporting events taking place in israel, boycott matches against israeli teams, boycott any politician who supports their actions. Finding a lasting solution, that is truly difficult and I can't say I have one, but unless you actually want Israel to eventually cleanse and occupy all of palestine, anything short of this is enabling them.

There's validity to the argument that 'hey but to do this and be logically consistent you have to boycott china too because their treatment of tibet is just as bad', the difference is that China does not depend upon external support to behave the way Israel does.


If this is what you are hoping for, you may as well hope for a meteor shower to selectively strike Israeli targets. It won't happen. If you let yourself entertain ideas where the US cuts support for Israel, you aren't being productive. You are describing the most ethical outcome, but that isn't really that hard to determine and we already know it isn't what will happen.

Is it that you actually see some sort of post-zionist America? Based on what you are saying, you are just (understandably) really mad about the situation. It's not that you actually think what you describe will happen. Am I wrong?

If someone asked you to place a $1,000 bet on whether what you described would happen or not, would you take that bet?

Folks also need to remember there are over 4 million Palestinians in Israel. Relocation is about as realistic as the US suddenly dropping support for Israel.


4 million is huge, but not impossible. It is just a huge task. I don't think US support for Israel even compares. You are saying something really, really costly and really, really huge is the same as something impossible.

We are an amazingly resourceful and capable people. We could do it if the will was there. We can do anything. If the entire middle east, with financial support from other major world countries, all agreed to just find places for palestinians, it would happen.

Israel has been trying to force them to leave for decades. They won’t. That isn’t going to change without bloodshed. And considering the current stance of refugees in the US and EU, no one is going to accept them anyways.

Also, that is almost half the population of Sweden. It isn’t a huge task. It would be the single largest relocation of a human population in modern history. Maybe all of history.

Huge, but not impossible. 900,000 Jews exited North Africa and the Arab countries. Some 600,000 went to Israel, and 235,000 went to France. Places like Algeria went from 140,000 Jews to 1000 twenty-four years later to much pretty much none at all today. It's not impossible to leave: my people were chased up and down Europe for most of our history until we switched continents.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23010 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 04:37:34
May 15 2018 04:25 GMT
#3940
On May 15 2018 12:19 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 02:00 Plansix wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:53 Plansix wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:26 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:15 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Step one is to stop all international support of Israeli actions. Make them a pariah like south africa was during apartheid. Actively boycott Israeli goods, boycott artists who perform in israel, boycott sporting events taking place in israel, boycott matches against israeli teams, boycott any politician who supports their actions. Finding a lasting solution, that is truly difficult and I can't say I have one, but unless you actually want Israel to eventually cleanse and occupy all of palestine, anything short of this is enabling them.

There's validity to the argument that 'hey but to do this and be logically consistent you have to boycott china too because their treatment of tibet is just as bad', the difference is that China does not depend upon external support to behave the way Israel does.


If this is what you are hoping for, you may as well hope for a meteor shower to selectively strike Israeli targets. It won't happen. If you let yourself entertain ideas where the US cuts support for Israel, you aren't being productive. You are describing the most ethical outcome, but that isn't really that hard to determine and we already know it isn't what will happen.

Is it that you actually see some sort of post-zionist America? Based on what you are saying, you are just (understandably) really mad about the situation. It's not that you actually think what you describe will happen. Am I wrong?

If someone asked you to place a $1,000 bet on whether what you described would happen or not, would you take that bet?

Folks also need to remember there are over 4 million Palestinians in Israel. Relocation is about as realistic as the US suddenly dropping support for Israel.


4 million is huge, but not impossible. It is just a huge task. I don't think US support for Israel even compares. You are saying something really, really costly and really, really huge is the same as something impossible.

We are an amazingly resourceful and capable people. We could do it if the will was there. We can do anything. If the entire middle east, with financial support from other major world countries, all agreed to just find places for palestinians, it would happen.

Israel has been trying to force them to leave for decades. They won’t. That isn’t going to change without bloodshed. And considering the current stance of refugees in the US and EU, no one is going to accept them anyways.

Also, that is almost half the population of Sweden. It isn’t a huge task. It would be the single largest relocation of a human population in modern history. Maybe all of history.

Huge, but not impossible. 900,000 Jews exited North Africa and the Arab countries. Some 600,000 went to Israel, and 235,000 went to France. Places like Algeria went from 140,000 Jews to 1000 twenty-four years later to much pretty much none at all today. It's not impossible to leave: my people were chased up and down Europe for most of our history until we switched continents.


Are you seriously citing that as an example of the plausibility without connecting any of the morality?

"Well we could just do what the Nazi's did and then ban them from having human rights and they'll mostly leave on their own accord"

Of course that would still require that the US offer Palestinians a country with the threat of total annihilation for anyone who threatens their survival and hundreds of billions in funding.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 195 196 197 198 199 4969 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft653
PartinGtheBigBoy 319
RuFF_SC2 152
ProTech79
EnDerr 8
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5287
Sea 4800
Britney 3476
Horang2 2381
PianO 721
Mini 378
Leta 156
Sharp 54
Noble 48
Pusan 15
[ Show more ]
Icarus 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever381
League of Legends
JimRising 710
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King386
amsayoshi94
Other Games
ViBE207
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1043
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta132
• practicex 49
• Adnapsc2 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki24
• Diggity4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4653
• Stunt315
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
24m
BeSt vs Soulkey
AllThingsProtoss
6h 24m
Road to EWC
9h 24m
BSL: ProLeague
13h 24m
Cross vs TT1
spx vs Hawk
JDConan vs TBD
Wardi Open
1d 6h
SOOP
2 days
NightMare vs Wayne
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
3 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
GSL Code S
4 days
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
Online Event
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
2025 GSL S1
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.