• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:43
CEST 10:43
KST 17:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
GSTL Returns in 2026!32Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-611
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) GSTL Returns in 2026! SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! Protoss AoE skill expression Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 538 Media Blackout The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch
Brood War
General
Best Games Kespa era [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 BW General Discussion ASL22 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread The Letting Off Steam Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Chinese Gen Z: Between Dream…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5915 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 197

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 195 196 197 198 199 5911 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 14 2018 23:56 GMT
#3921
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24790 Posts
May 15 2018 00:00 GMT
#3922
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
May 15 2018 00:02 GMT
#3923
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24251 Posts
May 15 2018 00:04 GMT
#3924
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.


Perhaps a visualization would help.

Palestinians are being pushed toward a cliff and whether they are being born faster than they are dying on the trail is somewhat irrelevant to whether they are being pushed toward extermination with no alternative on the table.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12501 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:23:22
May 15 2018 00:18 GMT
#3925
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...
No will to live, no wish to die
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24790 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:33:14
May 15 2018 00:32 GMT
#3926
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...

I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:37:53
May 15 2018 00:36 GMT
#3927
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12501 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 00:47:26
May 15 2018 00:43 GMT
#3928
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...

I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable.


Ren says that he must be missing something because the Palestinians are clearly at fault in the general situation. I'm being helpful online and telling him what he's missing, which is that the position that Israel is justified in its actions these days by notions like self-defense or moral clarity is ludicrous.

You summon the image of those bloodthirsty sets of Palestinians trying to murder the Israelis and forcing them to react to counter this line of argument, and my counter to that is that if they're too far away from them for rubber bullets to be effective and therefore the israeli forces *need* to use sniper rifles and live ammunition to have any impact, then those palestinian protesters by definition aren't really the imminent threat that they're claimed to be in the image you and Israel were presenting.
No will to live, no wish to die
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
May 15 2018 01:06 GMT
#3929
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 01:14:46
May 15 2018 01:14 GMT
#3930
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.

I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated.
nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24251 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 01:48:50
May 15 2018 01:46 GMT
#3931
On May 15 2018 10:14 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.

I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated.
nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.


Do you consider the Holocaust ethnic cleansing or genocide? Presuming this definitively puts you in the 'it was ethnic cleansing not genocide" of the tribes here before European colonizers.

*probably not reading this since he muted me
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44241 Posts
May 15 2018 02:17 GMT
#3932
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

The hypothetical that Israel would be the victim of genocide if it were weak does not excuse the actual, that Israel is committing a genocide.

You don't get to bulldoze Palestinian settlements on the basis of "well they started it seventy years ago".
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Rebs
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Pakistan10726 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 02:24:58
May 15 2018 02:18 GMT
#3933
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...



I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable



So then heres a question. What if those fences have been put up illegally and the fences they are busting through are not actually recognized by anyone (except the US now I presume) as Israels territory?

You dont need me to source this for you, just google Isreal, fence and encroachment and you will be inundated with literature covering this going back 20 years.

I also like the the phrasing "after being told not to" its literally the identical sort of phrasing that propped up during the defense of apartheid regimes in some of the interview and docs of footage going back to that era from White South Africans. I am not suggesting thats how you meant it btw, just as something to think about.

All of this not withstanding ofcourse the obviously pointed out fact, that dudes with cleavers, hatchets and literally driven to the edge of madness are 0 threat to snipers and automatic weapons.

KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44241 Posts
May 15 2018 02:19 GMT
#3934
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Your argument appears to be that you can kill any number fewer than the sustainable reproductive output of the group and be in the clear for genocide.

I'm not sure that's where you wanted to go but it's where you ended up.

These are people, it's not livestock management. Get a grip.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
May 15 2018 02:20 GMT
#3935
On May 15 2018 10:14 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:
There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway.

On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel

If they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories

In what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way.

My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak?

Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner.

I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using.

ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important.

Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide.

Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."


what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group"
if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.

Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.

until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide.
so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide.
it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.

At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.

I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated.
nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.

We have the benefit of hindsight to know what happened to the Native Americans. Regardless, not genociding them and performing widespread ethnic cleansing is nothing to pat the country on the back about."Congrats on not being 100% total evil."

You have provided no proof that Israel will stop taking more and more land from the Palestinians. We have a repeated loop of a) take land b) kill people who try and fight back, justifying it as defense.

Eventually, we'll get to the point where there is nowhere left for the Palestinians left to go in Palestine. From there it's:

a) Isreal continues its pattern of behavior and completes the genocide
b) decides to stop for... reasons?

You need to prove that those reasons or decisions exist. Nothing that I know of does so. Either way, Isreal is a total assbag in this situation and the varying degrees of which is out of whack with the reaction that it gets.
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24790 Posts
May 15 2018 02:43 GMT
#3936
On May 15 2018 11:18 Rebs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:
Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.


Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today?

Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.


Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.

Found that one in the NY Times:

„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."

You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...



I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable



So then heres a question. What if those fences have been put up illegally and the fences they are busting through are not actually recognized by anyone (except the US now I presume) as Israels territory?

You dont need me to source this for you, just google Isreal, fence and encroachment and you will be inundated with literature covering this going back 20 years.

I also like the the phrasing "after being told not to" its literally the identical sort of phrasing that propped up during the defense of apartheid regimes in some of the interview and docs of footage going back to that era from White South Africans. I am not suggesting thats how you meant it btw, just as something to think about.

All of this not withstanding ofcourse the obviously pointed out fact, that dudes with cleavers, hatchets and literally driven to the edge of madness are 0 threat to snipers and automatic weapons.


Oh I agree 100% that you need to take into account the whole picture on not just the isolated incident. Israel and its neighbors have both done horrible things and neither is innocent overall. And lately the USA has been doing more harm than good. Recall that I originally reacted to the leading question of why people got killed today. You can blame everything bad that happens over there as due to the past decades (or thousands of years) of actions on behalf of Israel, the Palestinians, the USA, and others, or you can acknowledge that a large group of people tried to break through the heavily armed border. That doesn't excuse the snipers' commanders and political leaders from creating this type of a situation, but it does directly answer why people died today.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12501 Posts
May 15 2018 02:48 GMT
#3937
My intent in asking him why he thought people got killed today was to get either a self-defense or a moral clarity answer cause I didn't know which one he would give and they elicit different arguments in response.
No will to live, no wish to die
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 13:52:53
May 15 2018 03:07 GMT
#3938
Hundreds arrested as activists pick up where Martin Luther King left off

Hundreds of low-wage workers, faith leaders, civil rights organizers and liberal activists were arrested in demonstrations in Washington and outside statehouses across the US on Monday as they resumed the work Martin Luther King left unfinished.

Fifty years after King launched the Poor People’s Campaign against economic inequality, militarism and racial injustice, demonstrators revived that fight, kicking off 40 days of nonviolent action.

The new effort, The Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, is being led by co-chairs William Barber, a pastor at Greenleaf Christian Church in Goldsboro, North Carolina, and Liz Theoharis, an ordained minister and anti-poverty campaigner from New York City.

In Washington, the group gathered on the lawn outside the US Capitol to hear Barber declare: “Something’s wrong in America.”

Their action on Monday, Barber continued, was not just a commemoration of King’s anti-poverty efforts, it was a new call-to-arms.

“We are here to have a reconsecration and a re-engagement because you do not commemorate the death of [a] prophet,” Barber said, his voice building as he spoke. “You go to where they were killed, reach down in the blood, pick up your baton and carry it the next round of the way. Now who’s ready?”

Source

When I read the first half of the headline, I thought I was reading about Russia.

Seriously, why isn't this all over the news like the Russian protests? Hundreds of arrests...
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11593 Posts
May 15 2018 03:19 GMT
#3939
On May 15 2018 02:00 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:53 Plansix wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:26 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:15 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Step one is to stop all international support of Israeli actions. Make them a pariah like south africa was during apartheid. Actively boycott Israeli goods, boycott artists who perform in israel, boycott sporting events taking place in israel, boycott matches against israeli teams, boycott any politician who supports their actions. Finding a lasting solution, that is truly difficult and I can't say I have one, but unless you actually want Israel to eventually cleanse and occupy all of palestine, anything short of this is enabling them.

There's validity to the argument that 'hey but to do this and be logically consistent you have to boycott china too because their treatment of tibet is just as bad', the difference is that China does not depend upon external support to behave the way Israel does.


If this is what you are hoping for, you may as well hope for a meteor shower to selectively strike Israeli targets. It won't happen. If you let yourself entertain ideas where the US cuts support for Israel, you aren't being productive. You are describing the most ethical outcome, but that isn't really that hard to determine and we already know it isn't what will happen.

Is it that you actually see some sort of post-zionist America? Based on what you are saying, you are just (understandably) really mad about the situation. It's not that you actually think what you describe will happen. Am I wrong?

If someone asked you to place a $1,000 bet on whether what you described would happen or not, would you take that bet?

Folks also need to remember there are over 4 million Palestinians in Israel. Relocation is about as realistic as the US suddenly dropping support for Israel.


4 million is huge, but not impossible. It is just a huge task. I don't think US support for Israel even compares. You are saying something really, really costly and really, really huge is the same as something impossible.

We are an amazingly resourceful and capable people. We could do it if the will was there. We can do anything. If the entire middle east, with financial support from other major world countries, all agreed to just find places for palestinians, it would happen.

Israel has been trying to force them to leave for decades. They won’t. That isn’t going to change without bloodshed. And considering the current stance of refugees in the US and EU, no one is going to accept them anyways.

Also, that is almost half the population of Sweden. It isn’t a huge task. It would be the single largest relocation of a human population in modern history. Maybe all of history.

Huge, but not impossible. 900,000 Jews exited North Africa and the Arab countries. Some 600,000 went to Israel, and 235,000 went to France. Places like Algeria went from 140,000 Jews to 1000 twenty-four years later to much pretty much none at all today. It's not impossible to leave: my people were chased up and down Europe for most of our history until we switched continents.
Moderator5000 of our finest Taliban warriors have been released! Rise up my brothers. Mashalla! al-Donald ibn-Frederick al-Masih allows it.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24251 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-15 04:37:34
May 15 2018 04:25 GMT
#3940
On May 15 2018 12:19 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2018 02:00 Plansix wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:53 Plansix wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:26 Mohdoo wrote:
On May 15 2018 01:15 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Step one is to stop all international support of Israeli actions. Make them a pariah like south africa was during apartheid. Actively boycott Israeli goods, boycott artists who perform in israel, boycott sporting events taking place in israel, boycott matches against israeli teams, boycott any politician who supports their actions. Finding a lasting solution, that is truly difficult and I can't say I have one, but unless you actually want Israel to eventually cleanse and occupy all of palestine, anything short of this is enabling them.

There's validity to the argument that 'hey but to do this and be logically consistent you have to boycott china too because their treatment of tibet is just as bad', the difference is that China does not depend upon external support to behave the way Israel does.


If this is what you are hoping for, you may as well hope for a meteor shower to selectively strike Israeli targets. It won't happen. If you let yourself entertain ideas where the US cuts support for Israel, you aren't being productive. You are describing the most ethical outcome, but that isn't really that hard to determine and we already know it isn't what will happen.

Is it that you actually see some sort of post-zionist America? Based on what you are saying, you are just (understandably) really mad about the situation. It's not that you actually think what you describe will happen. Am I wrong?

If someone asked you to place a $1,000 bet on whether what you described would happen or not, would you take that bet?

Folks also need to remember there are over 4 million Palestinians in Israel. Relocation is about as realistic as the US suddenly dropping support for Israel.


4 million is huge, but not impossible. It is just a huge task. I don't think US support for Israel even compares. You are saying something really, really costly and really, really huge is the same as something impossible.

We are an amazingly resourceful and capable people. We could do it if the will was there. We can do anything. If the entire middle east, with financial support from other major world countries, all agreed to just find places for palestinians, it would happen.

Israel has been trying to force them to leave for decades. They won’t. That isn’t going to change without bloodshed. And considering the current stance of refugees in the US and EU, no one is going to accept them anyways.

Also, that is almost half the population of Sweden. It isn’t a huge task. It would be the single largest relocation of a human population in modern history. Maybe all of history.

Huge, but not impossible. 900,000 Jews exited North Africa and the Arab countries. Some 600,000 went to Israel, and 235,000 went to France. Places like Algeria went from 140,000 Jews to 1000 twenty-four years later to much pretty much none at all today. It's not impossible to leave: my people were chased up and down Europe for most of our history until we switched continents.


Are you seriously citing that as an example of the plausibility without connecting any of the morality?

"Well we could just do what the Nazi's did and then ban them from having human rights and they'll mostly leave on their own accord"

Of course that would still require that the US offer Palestinians a country with the threat of total annihilation for anyone who threatens their survival and hundreds of billions in funding.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 195 196 197 198 199 5911 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech87
Has 61
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 355
Soma 315
Leta 186
Hyuk 156
Bale 64
Sharp 30
NotJumperer 4
Dota 2
The International68025
singsing3249
Fuzer 322
League of Legends
JimRising 557
Counter-Strike
byalli801
zeus1
Other Games
summit1g7034
WinterStarcraft544
Happy305
ROOTCatZ86
Mew2King64
Trikslyr22
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick536
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH264
• StrangeGG 35
• LUISG 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1460
League of Legends
• Jankos1325
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
1h 17m
PiG Sty Festival
3h 17m
herO vs Krystianer
Solar vs Cure
IPSL
7h 17m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 1h
PiG Sty Festival
1d 3h
Maru vs Shameless
Reynor vs TriGGeR
IPSL
1d 7h
OSC
1d 15h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Rush vs Hm
Bisu vs Shuttle
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
The Patches Monday
2 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
CSLAN 4
RSL Revival: Season 6
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
META DYMY #4
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.