|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving."
what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.
|
United States24578 Posts
On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote: Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.
Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today? Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.
|
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it.
|
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group.
Perhaps a visualization would help.
Palestinians are being pushed toward a cliff and whether they are being born faster than they are dying on the trail is somewhat irrelevant to whether they are being pushed toward extermination with no alternative on the table.
|
On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote: Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.
Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today? Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful.
Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle.
Found that one in the NY Times:
„Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs."
You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point...
|
United States24578 Posts
On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote: Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.
Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today? Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful. Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle. Found that one in the NY Times: „Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs." You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point... I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable.
|
On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it. until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide. so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide. it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death.
|
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote: Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.
Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today? Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful. Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle. Found that one in the NY Times: „Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs." You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point... I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable.
Ren says that he must be missing something because the Palestinians are clearly at fault in the general situation. I'm being helpful online and telling him what he's missing, which is that the position that Israel is justified in its actions these days by notions like self-defense or moral clarity is ludicrous.
You summon the image of those bloodthirsty sets of Palestinians trying to murder the Israelis and forcing them to react to counter this line of argument, and my counter to that is that if they're too far away from them for rubber bullets to be effective and therefore the israeli forces *need* to use sniper rifles and live ammunition to have any impact, then those palestinian protesters by definition aren't really the imminent threat that they're claimed to be in the image you and Israel were presenting.
|
On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it. until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide. so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide. it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death. At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching.
|
On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it. until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide. so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide. it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death. At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching. I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated. nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.
|
On May 15 2018 10:14 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it. until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide. so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide. it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death. At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching. I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated. nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers.
Do you consider the Holocaust ethnic cleansing or genocide? Presuming this definitively puts you in the 'it was ethnic cleansing not genocide" of the tribes here before European colonizers.
*probably not reading this since he muted me
|
United States41984 Posts
On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. The hypothetical that Israel would be the victim of genocide if it were weak does not excuse the actual, that Israel is committing a genocide.
You don't get to bulldoze Palestinian settlements on the basis of "well they started it seventy years ago".
|
On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote: Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.
Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today? Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful. Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle. Found that one in the NY Times: „Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs." You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point... I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable
So then heres a question. What if those fences have been put up illegally and the fences they are busting through are not actually recognized by anyone (except the US now I presume) as Israels territory?
You dont need me to source this for you, just google Isreal, fence and encroachment and you will be inundated with literature covering this going back 20 years.
I also like the the phrasing "after being told not to" its literally the identical sort of phrasing that propped up during the defense of apartheid regimes in some of the interview and docs of footage going back to that era from White South Africans. I am not suggesting thats how you meant it btw, just as something to think about.
All of this not withstanding ofcourse the obviously pointed out fact, that dudes with cleavers, hatchets and literally driven to the edge of madness are 0 threat to snipers and automatic weapons.
|
United States41984 Posts
On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Your argument appears to be that you can kill any number fewer than the sustainable reproductive output of the group and be in the clear for genocide.
I'm not sure that's where you wanted to go but it's where you ended up.
These are people, it's not livestock management. Get a grip.
|
On May 15 2018 10:14 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 10:06 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 09:36 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 09:02 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:56 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:47 Gahlo wrote:On May 15 2018 08:43 zlefin wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 Gahlo wrote:There's also the fact that he's Jewish, which probably inclines him to side with Israel anyway. On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote:Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_IsraelIf they ever lose a war, it becomes a war of annihilation. Yet, when they win wars, Palestine continues to exist. In 1997, there were 2.8 million people in Palestinian territories. In 2017, 5 million people. So, where's the genocide? The population nearly doubled in 20 years. You can go back further, to a UN estimate of 44k live births per year in 1950-1955 which is now at 144k live births per year in 2010-15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territoriesIn what world is it genocide or ethnic cleansing when the population keeps getting larger? Be glad that Israel is the one with the power and the rest of the civilized world should ensure that it stays that way. My goal is for genocide to not exist. Israel is committing genocide right now. Does Israel need to commit genocide to not be weak? Reproduction rates grows in places that are less developed and lowers in places that are more developed. Counting heads doesn't matter when they are all getting backed into a corner. I question your use of the term "genocide" and ask for the exact definition you're using. ethnic cleansing perhaps, but genocide does not seem apt. I know some people's use of the terms conflates the two, but I feel the distinction is very important. Genocide is destruction of a group. Ethnic cleansing is expulsion of a group from an area, often by force. The Palestinians a) don't want to leave and b) have nowhere to go even if they wanted to. So at this point, no, it's genocide. Israel doesn't get to go "oops, we tried to ethnically cleanse them and accidentally commited genocide. Their fault for not leaving." what is happening does not match the definition you provided. "destruction of a group" if Israel were committing genocide, the number of palestinians would not be increasing at such a rapid rate. I see no sign of the palestinians being destroyed as a group. Because, as I said, they are being cornered. Palestine has been shrinking over the years. Eventually you'll get to a point where there is nowhere left in Palestine for Palestinians to go. Then you can have your big display of genocide and it'll be too late to do anything about it. until that eventually though, it's ethnic cleansing, not genocide. so it's inapt to say they're committing genocide. it's also entirely an assumption on your part that it will reach a point where every bit of the land will be forbidden to palestinians and they would be faced with death. At what point do you think Israel will stop? Because the Palestinians aren't leaving and Israel keeps encroaching. I don't know when; but I don't need to, as the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, the existence of various native american reservations is an indicator that it's possible for a people to be compressed into an area, cleansed otu of others, while not being completely obliterated. nor have you provided any decent counter to the point about population numbers. We have the benefit of hindsight to know what happened to the Native Americans. Regardless, not genociding them and performing widespread ethnic cleansing is nothing to pat the country on the back about."Congrats on not being 100% total evil."
You have provided no proof that Israel will stop taking more and more land from the Palestinians. We have a repeated loop of a) take land b) kill people who try and fight back, justifying it as defense.
Eventually, we'll get to the point where there is nowhere left for the Palestinians left to go in Palestine. From there it's:
a) Isreal continues its pattern of behavior and completes the genocide b) decides to stop for... reasons?
You need to prove that those reasons or decisions exist. Nothing that I know of does so. Either way, Isreal is a total assbag in this situation and the varying degrees of which is out of whack with the reaction that it gets.
|
United States24578 Posts
On May 15 2018 11:18 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 09:32 micronesia wrote:On May 15 2018 09:18 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 09:00 micronesia wrote:On May 15 2018 08:45 Nebuchad wrote:On May 15 2018 08:36 RenSC2 wrote: Okay, I must be missing something here. The leadership of the Palestinians literally wants to commit genocide on the Israelis. It's a stated goal. So all of you guys screaming about genocide are taking the wrong side. We already know what happens when Israel is in a weak state. They get attacked. They've been attacked repeatedly throughout their history.
Hey Ren, why do you think people got killed today? Perhaps media reporting isn't doing the truth justice, but my read right now is that protesters were cutting the fence into Israel and then invading, getting shot in the process. If someone can reasonably source better facts that would probably be helpful. Self-defense arguments work better when the defense doesn't use a sniper rifle. Found that one in the NY Times: „Israel has used rubber bullets as a deterrent, but military officials say they are effective only at short range. Israel says its soldiers are allowed to use live ammunition as a last resort and are instructed to aim at people’s ankles or legs." You know, that situation of last resort where the guy is too far away from you for rubber bullets. It's like they're openly trolling you at this point... I agree the logic behind that policy about what ammo to use when doesn't really make sense. On the other hand, you seem to be ignoring the fact that large groups of people, some of whom have been quoted as saying they are going to slaughter Israelis, are attempting to break into Israel. So to answer your question, the short answer as to why most of those people got killed today, is because they tried to bust through a military checkpoint into another nation after being told not to. That doesn't tell the whole story, but it seems to me to point out why your original question towards RenSC2 was not really reasonable So then heres a question. What if those fences have been put up illegally and the fences they are busting through are not actually recognized by anyone (except the US now I presume) as Israels territory? You dont need me to source this for you, just google Isreal, fence and encroachment and you will be inundated with literature covering this going back 20 years. I also like the the phrasing "after being told not to" its literally the identical sort of phrasing that propped up during the defense of apartheid regimes in some of the interview and docs of footage going back to that era from White South Africans. I am not suggesting thats how you meant it btw, just as something to think about. All of this not withstanding ofcourse the obviously pointed out fact, that dudes with cleavers, hatchets and literally driven to the edge of madness are 0 threat to snipers and automatic weapons. Oh I agree 100% that you need to take into account the whole picture on not just the isolated incident. Israel and its neighbors have both done horrible things and neither is innocent overall. And lately the USA has been doing more harm than good. Recall that I originally reacted to the leading question of why people got killed today. You can blame everything bad that happens over there as due to the past decades (or thousands of years) of actions on behalf of Israel, the Palestinians, the USA, and others, or you can acknowledge that a large group of people tried to break through the heavily armed border. That doesn't excuse the snipers' commanders and political leaders from creating this type of a situation, but it does directly answer why people died today.
|
My intent in asking him why he thought people got killed today was to get either a self-defense or a moral clarity answer cause I didn't know which one he would give and they elicit different arguments in response.
|
Hundreds arrested as activists pick up where Martin Luther King left off
Hundreds of low-wage workers, faith leaders, civil rights organizers and liberal activists were arrested in demonstrations in Washington and outside statehouses across the US on Monday as they resumed the work Martin Luther King left unfinished.
Fifty years after King launched the Poor People’s Campaign against economic inequality, militarism and racial injustice, demonstrators revived that fight, kicking off 40 days of nonviolent action.
The new effort, The Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, is being led by co-chairs William Barber, a pastor at Greenleaf Christian Church in Goldsboro, North Carolina, and Liz Theoharis, an ordained minister and anti-poverty campaigner from New York City.
In Washington, the group gathered on the lawn outside the US Capitol to hear Barber declare: “Something’s wrong in America.”
Their action on Monday, Barber continued, was not just a commemoration of King’s anti-poverty efforts, it was a new call-to-arms.
“We are here to have a reconsecration and a re-engagement because you do not commemorate the death of [a] prophet,” Barber said, his voice building as he spoke. “You go to where they were killed, reach down in the blood, pick up your baton and carry it the next round of the way. Now who’s ready?” Source
When I read the first half of the headline, I thought I was reading about Russia.
Seriously, why isn't this all over the news like the Russian protests? Hundreds of arrests...
|
Canada11278 Posts
On May 15 2018 02:00 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:On May 15 2018 01:53 Plansix wrote:On May 15 2018 01:26 Mohdoo wrote:On May 15 2018 01:15 Liquid`Drone wrote: Step one is to stop all international support of Israeli actions. Make them a pariah like south africa was during apartheid. Actively boycott Israeli goods, boycott artists who perform in israel, boycott sporting events taking place in israel, boycott matches against israeli teams, boycott any politician who supports their actions. Finding a lasting solution, that is truly difficult and I can't say I have one, but unless you actually want Israel to eventually cleanse and occupy all of palestine, anything short of this is enabling them.
There's validity to the argument that 'hey but to do this and be logically consistent you have to boycott china too because their treatment of tibet is just as bad', the difference is that China does not depend upon external support to behave the way Israel does. If this is what you are hoping for, you may as well hope for a meteor shower to selectively strike Israeli targets. It won't happen. If you let yourself entertain ideas where the US cuts support for Israel, you aren't being productive. You are describing the most ethical outcome, but that isn't really that hard to determine and we already know it isn't what will happen. Is it that you actually see some sort of post-zionist America? Based on what you are saying, you are just (understandably) really mad about the situation. It's not that you actually think what you describe will happen. Am I wrong? If someone asked you to place a $1,000 bet on whether what you described would happen or not, would you take that bet? Folks also need to remember there are over 4 million Palestinians in Israel. Relocation is about as realistic as the US suddenly dropping support for Israel. 4 million is huge, but not impossible. It is just a huge task. I don't think US support for Israel even compares. You are saying something really, really costly and really, really huge is the same as something impossible. We are an amazingly resourceful and capable people. We could do it if the will was there. We can do anything. If the entire middle east, with financial support from other major world countries, all agreed to just find places for palestinians, it would happen. Israel has been trying to force them to leave for decades. They won’t. That isn’t going to change without bloodshed. And considering the current stance of refugees in the US and EU, no one is going to accept them anyways. Also, that is almost half the population of Sweden. It isn’t a huge task. It would be the single largest relocation of a human population in modern history. Maybe all of history. Huge, but not impossible. 900,000 Jews exited North Africa and the Arab countries. Some 600,000 went to Israel, and 235,000 went to France. Places like Algeria went from 140,000 Jews to 1000 twenty-four years later to much pretty much none at all today. It's not impossible to leave: my people were chased up and down Europe for most of our history until we switched continents.
|
On May 15 2018 12:19 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2018 02:00 Plansix wrote:On May 15 2018 01:56 Mohdoo wrote:On May 15 2018 01:53 Plansix wrote:On May 15 2018 01:26 Mohdoo wrote:On May 15 2018 01:15 Liquid`Drone wrote: Step one is to stop all international support of Israeli actions. Make them a pariah like south africa was during apartheid. Actively boycott Israeli goods, boycott artists who perform in israel, boycott sporting events taking place in israel, boycott matches against israeli teams, boycott any politician who supports their actions. Finding a lasting solution, that is truly difficult and I can't say I have one, but unless you actually want Israel to eventually cleanse and occupy all of palestine, anything short of this is enabling them.
There's validity to the argument that 'hey but to do this and be logically consistent you have to boycott china too because their treatment of tibet is just as bad', the difference is that China does not depend upon external support to behave the way Israel does. If this is what you are hoping for, you may as well hope for a meteor shower to selectively strike Israeli targets. It won't happen. If you let yourself entertain ideas where the US cuts support for Israel, you aren't being productive. You are describing the most ethical outcome, but that isn't really that hard to determine and we already know it isn't what will happen. Is it that you actually see some sort of post-zionist America? Based on what you are saying, you are just (understandably) really mad about the situation. It's not that you actually think what you describe will happen. Am I wrong? If someone asked you to place a $1,000 bet on whether what you described would happen or not, would you take that bet? Folks also need to remember there are over 4 million Palestinians in Israel. Relocation is about as realistic as the US suddenly dropping support for Israel. 4 million is huge, but not impossible. It is just a huge task. I don't think US support for Israel even compares. You are saying something really, really costly and really, really huge is the same as something impossible. We are an amazingly resourceful and capable people. We could do it if the will was there. We can do anything. If the entire middle east, with financial support from other major world countries, all agreed to just find places for palestinians, it would happen. Israel has been trying to force them to leave for decades. They won’t. That isn’t going to change without bloodshed. And considering the current stance of refugees in the US and EU, no one is going to accept them anyways. Also, that is almost half the population of Sweden. It isn’t a huge task. It would be the single largest relocation of a human population in modern history. Maybe all of history. Huge, but not impossible. 900,000 Jews exited North Africa and the Arab countries. Some 600,000 went to Israel, and 235,000 went to France. Places like Algeria went from 140,000 Jews to 1000 twenty-four years later to much pretty much none at all today. It's not impossible to leave: my people were chased up and down Europe for most of our history until we switched continents.
Are you seriously citing that as an example of the plausibility without connecting any of the morality?
"Well we could just do what the Nazi's did and then ban them from having human rights and they'll mostly leave on their own accord"
Of course that would still require that the US offer Palestinians a country with the threat of total annihilation for anyone who threatens their survival and hundreds of billions in funding.
|
|
|
|