Also, I love how they raided his house before the sun was even up. Someone even filmed it. Dude has been scum for decades so hopefully he ends up behind bars where he belongs.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1062
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Also, I love how they raided his house before the sun was even up. Someone even filmed it. Dude has been scum for decades so hopefully he ends up behind bars where he belongs. | ||
SenorChang
Australia4729 Posts
On January 25 2019 21:47 On_Slaught wrote: Stone is a big piece because he, combined with that other conspiracy dude, is the link between the campaign and insider knowledge of the hack. He's an important piece of the conspiracy. Also, I love how they raided his house before the sun was even up. Someone even filmed it. Dude has been scum for decades so hopefully he ends up behind bars where he belongs. https://twitter.com/politvidchannel/status/1088777038368989185 1) his charges relate to Assange and wikileaks, someone I still highly regard and an organisation that deserves far more credit (and used to when it was a darling of the left - but it honestly transcends sides) 2) CNN is somehow at his residency as he's getting arrested 3) fuck this shit it stinks to high heaven | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9353 Posts
On January 25 2019 21:52 SenorChang wrote: 1) his charges relate to Assange and wikileaks, someone I still highly regard and an organisation that deserves far more credit (and used to when it was a darling of the left - but it honestly transcends sides) 2) CNN is somehow at his residency as he's getting arrested 3) fuck this shit it stinks to high heaven If Wikileaks believed their own rhetoric they would come clean and expose the corruption in the Trump regime. Principles about information being in the public domain are only worth something if they apply equally to everyone. | ||
![]()
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
On January 25 2019 21:52 SenorChang wrote: 1) his charges relate to Assange and wikileaks, someone I still highly regard and an organisation that deserves far more credit (and used to when it was a darling of the left - but it honestly transcends sides) 2) CNN is somehow at his residency as he's getting arrested 3) fuck this shit it stinks to high heaven CNN probably sent people to everyone relevant to the Russia investigation. Its not terribly hard to do for a network as large as CNN, the Grand Jury convened yesterday so they 100% knew something was about to happen. | ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5694707-Stone-Indictment-012419.html False testimony and witness tampering, looks like he's fucked | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21391 Posts
On January 25 2019 21:52 SenorChang wrote: Once Wikileaks might have been, but any noble cause they had has long since been subverted. 1) his charges relate to Assange and wikileaks, someone I still highly regard and an organisation that deserves far more credit (and used to when it was a darling of the left - but it honestly transcends sides) 2) CNN is somehow at his residency as he's getting arrested 3) fuck this shit it stinks to high heaven On January 25 2019 22:29 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: As so often, the cover-up is going to get you harder then the actual crime (If Stone himself even engaged in any).Stone's indictment https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5694707-Stone-Indictment-012419.html False testimony and witness tampering, looks like he's fucked | ||
![]()
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
| ||
Excludos
Norway7969 Posts
| ||
BlueStar
Bulgaria1162 Posts
On January 25 2019 22:37 Excludos wrote: If you still hold Wikileaks to high regards you have not been paying attention. They've been outed as a Russian controlled faction several times. They don't care about open and public information as much as they care about hurting Russia's enemies by leaking their secret information let's get back to 1969 and start a witch hunt over again? :D MAGA ROFL P.S. today many people are - If they are not with us, they are against us => russians! | ||
farvacola
United States18819 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
EDIT: 1969 witch hunt? What da fuk u talk’n bout? | ||
Aldehyde
Sweden939 Posts
On January 25 2019 22:46 BlueStar wrote: let's get back to 1969 and start a witch hunt over again? :D MAGA ROFL P.S. today many people are - If they are not with us, they are against with us => russians! It's probably a bit more nuanced than Wikileaks being fully Russian controlled but they're definitely used by Russia to leak the information in a way that makes it slightly more credible than if released directly by the Kremlin. Wikileaks just might not give so much of a shit about the source of the information in the political sense. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
Excludos
Norway7969 Posts
On January 25 2019 22:46 BlueStar wrote: let's get back to 1969 and start a witch hunt over again? :D MAGA ROFL P.S. today many people are - If they are not with us, they are against us => russians! I don't understand what any of the words you just wrote actually means when combined in the order that you just did.. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42024 Posts
On January 25 2019 22:46 BlueStar wrote: let's get back to 1969 and start a witch hunt over again? :D MAGA ROFL P.S. today many people are - If they are not with us, they are against us => russians! There is evidence against these conspirators. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21391 Posts
On January 25 2019 23:20 Excludos wrote: He is accusing us of McCarthyism I assume. Making up Russian accusations to discredit our enemy's.I don't understand what any of the words you just wrote actually means when combined in the order that you just did.. But as Kwark said, that accusation ignores the laundry list of evidence of these things being real. | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On January 25 2019 23:32 Gorsameth wrote: He is accusing us of McCarthyism I assume. Making up Russian accusations to discredit our enemy's. But as Kwark said, that accusation ignores the laundry list of evidence of these things being real. McCarthy and this bullshit was during the 1950s, so he missed by over a decade if that is his complaint. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
| ||