EPTWorld Chess Championship 2013 - Page 75
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Chess discussion continues here | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
mdb
Bulgaria4059 Posts
| ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
Its only chance is the passed pawn. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18421 Posts
On November 21 2013 20:46 Ketch wrote: Yeah computer evaluations do not display risk properly somehow well since computers play without error in the later stages I don't think they'd have to value risk properly, no? (Sorry, this was just my opinion - I dont want to start on the computer vs human thing!!!) Also note I am only talking about the later stages here! | ||
|
Hryul
Austria2609 Posts
| ||
|
Malli
Germany138 Posts
| ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 21 2013 20:51 Hryul wrote: Carlsen got balls of steel to play the pawn b3 on the queen's side. Seems like he is confident in his position despite his inactive knight. I think he likes the idea of getting his white bishop to f5 which controls the queening square if anand plays f6 met with g6 ... Bf5 | ||
|
NovaTheFeared
United States7223 Posts
On November 21 2013 20:52 Plexa wrote: I think he likes the idea of getting his white bishop to f5 which controls the queening square if anand plays f6 met with g6 ... Bf5 I hope that's why he went into the tank to check that fully. He's in time trouble and can't afford another 20m think. | ||
|
Kabras
Romania3508 Posts
 . | ||
|
Hryul
Austria2609 Posts
On November 21 2013 20:52 Plexa wrote: I think he likes the idea of getting his white bishop to f5 which controls the queening square if anand plays f6 met with g6 ... Bf5 I like the idea but I can't see it happening in the near future. Two pieces control f5 atm and g6xf5 would open the g line for white. Edit: assuming a knight/bishop trade beforehand. Further edit: I don't think white f6 is that good of an idea. the answer g6 limits both the white bishop and knight. I don't see any obvious good fields after f6g6. but maybe Anand shows something smart with it. | ||
|
Taekwon
United States8155 Posts
| ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
On November 21 2013 20:57 NovaTheFeared wrote: I hope that's why he went into the tank to check that fully. He's in time trouble and can't afford another 20m think. He can think in Anand's time anyway also. That's always something that is a bit disregarded imho | ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 21 2013 21:01 Hryul wrote: I like the idea but I can't see it happening in the near future. Two pieces control f5 atm and g6xf5 would open the g line for white. Edit: assuming a knight/bishop trade beforehand. Further edit: I don't think white f6 is that good of an idea. the answer g6 limits both the white bishop and knight. I don't see any obvious good fields after f6g6. but maybe Anand shows something smart with it. Yeah I agree. f6 seems like a scary idea, but it seems to throw any attacking ideas white has away after being met with g6. Nh5 seems like a better idea. | ||
|
NovaTheFeared
United States7223 Posts
| ||
|
Arevall
Sweden1133 Posts
 | ||
|
Fishgle
United States2174 Posts
then again, i know very little about chess. | ||
|
hypercube
Hungary2735 Posts
On November 21 2013 20:41 Plexa wrote: At the risk of violating my own mod note... it's this kind of position which nicely illustrates the difference between computer and human chess all the engines are saying this is a drawish position but there looks to be so many interesting human lines because the drawn lines require perfect play. 0.00 doesn't necessarily mean drawish. It just means the engine can't prove an advantage for one side or another. It might mean that the positions at the end of the analysis are approximately equal, but still rich in possibilities. And of course the engine could be just plain wrong. | ||
|
Pik
Germany176 Posts
| ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
| ||
| ||
