EPTUK Politics Mega-thread - Page 486
| Forum Index > General Forum |
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note. Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon. All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting. https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk | ||
KwarK
United States42906 Posts
| ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
| ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On March 06 2019 05:22 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's Sky News. They are usually sensationalist. What does 80% to 90% of ALL tariffs on imports even mean? By volume, by monetary value, by categories, and by how much of each? No tariffs on food entirely, whilst keeping as high a possible on pharmaceuticals for instance? Wouldn't suprise me though. Afterall the Conservatives are salivating at the chance to destroy British agricultural industries for the sake of poorly regulated American agricultural imports. 90% of total imported goods will have no tarrifs the 10% will be protected areas such as cars, food | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On March 06 2019 06:00 Dangermousecatdog wrote: And what does 90% of total imported goods actually mean? You just repeated the tweet. Why would cars be protected? Food? Well, I guess the cost of food will go up. Wouldn't hurt me much, but it'll hurt the poor. Article says" According to government sources the 10-20% of more sensitive items which will retain their protection includes cars, beef, lamb, dairy and some lines of textiles." | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9674 Posts
On March 12 2019 22:22 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: So this makes a hard Brexit inevitable now, correct? That or the PM resigning... https://twitter.com/skydavidblevins/status/1105458007616430080 I can't see tweets when I'm at work but if this deal fails then the most likely course of action is a long delay (6 months to a year) followed by further negotiations and then an orderly Brexit. I really don't see a no-deal situation being allowed to happen. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On March 12 2019 22:34 Jockmcplop wrote: I can't see tweets when I'm at work but if this deal fails then the most likely course of action is a long delay (6 months to a year) followed by further negotiations and then an orderly Brexit. I really don't see a no-deal situation being allowed to happen. It says: DUP sources: “The party cannot support the Prime Minister’s deal in tonight’s vote.” #Brexit I mean they were the main reason she still had support and stayed in power right? So if they don't support her new agreements, or whatever it was. She is powerless, no? Hasn't the EU stated they will only support extension if the terms are agreed upon, well that ship has sailed apparently. | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9674 Posts
On March 12 2019 22:37 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: It says: I mean they were the main reason she still had support and stayed in power right? So if they don't support her new agreements, or whatever it was. She is powerless, no? To force her to resign they would have to withdraw their confidence and supply agreement, and this falls way short of that. I don't think they would ever even do that considering the risk that Corbyn would end up in power. She might well end up having to resign. Its difficult to know where the chips will fall. I think much will depend on the numbers in the vote later. | ||
|
Yurie
11875 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21761 Posts
On March 12 2019 22:22 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Didn't the DUP also vote against it last time, only to then support her in a vote of no confidence?So this makes a hard Brexit inevitable now, correct? That or the PM resigning... https://twitter.com/skydavidblevins/status/1105458007616430080 | ||
|
Longshank
1648 Posts
On March 13 2019 00:32 Gorsameth wrote: Didn't the DUP also vote against it last time, only to then support her in a vote of no confidence? Yep they did. Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling are already talking about when to hold a third vote on the deal. This isn't over for May even if her deal is defeated tonight. | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9674 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21761 Posts
On March 13 2019 00:58 Longshank wrote: Because the third time voting for the same deal people will vote different... because this one is really the last last chance pinky promise.Yep they did. Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling are already talking about when to hold a third vote on the deal. This isn't over for May even if her deal is defeated tonight. Just so dumb.... | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
| ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On March 13 2019 04:41 Zaros wrote: May needs to resign now, this is a total shambles and she needs to take responsibility. Isn't the only reason she's still PM because nobody else wants to be responsible for this Brexit fiasco | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On March 13 2019 04:43 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Isn't the only reason she's still PM because nobody else wants to be responsible for this Brexit fiasco This is bollocks. Boris, Gove, Raab, Hunt, Javid, Truss, Rudd and many others would all jump at the chance to take over even now. This noone wants to take over is spin from May's team | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6229 Posts
| ||
| ||
