EPTkeep it up tl!
The Rainbow TL-logo - Page 25
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
shawster
Canada2485 Posts
keep it up tl! | ||
|
Puph
Canada635 Posts
| ||
|
Klondikebar
United States2227 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:26 Qwyn wrote: I told you I was bound to come under fire. What exactly are you getting at here? Are you telling me that I have no grounds to think what I think? "You really don't understand evolution if you think it makes stuff bad at survival..." What? It doesn't matter whether or not I enjoy having sex with a man, I would still be choosing to do it. Is that a harsh viewpoint? Abso-fucking-lutely. Is it still the one I ascribe to? Yes. Psychologically, most behaviors are learned. But there are grounds to think either way. Your viewpoint isn't "harsh." It's just ignorant. You're clinging to something science has long debunked and you're oddly proud of it. Whatever, I don't have time for you anymore. I'm gonna go paint my asscheeks rainbow and moon a chik-fil-a. | ||
|
A Wet Shamwow
United States1590 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:31 Klondikebar wrote: Your viewpoint isn't "harsh." It's just ignorant. You're clinging to something science has long debunked and you're oddly proud of it. Whatever, I don't have time for you anymore. I'm gonna go paint my asscheeks rainbow and moon a chik-fil-a. Like "evolution" intended.  | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13959 Posts
On June 24 2013 22:21 Sedzz wrote: TLO and Snute got engaged. Wait seriously? I honestly dont kno if you trolling or being serious | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13959 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:23 SgtCoDFish wrote: Go and find any thread that mentions Scarlett and the way she's treated by some people. You have your answer. This | ||
|
Iyerbeth
England2410 Posts
Do you apply the same rigorous standards of darwinian natural selection to all aspects of your life, or just when it suits you? Even Dawkins stated he wouldn't want to live in such a society and he's about the biggest proponent of evolution you'll find. | ||
|
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:26 Julmust wrote: QWYN Hi. I posed a challenge in one of my previous posts that you chose to ignore (but you answerd my other post that was RIGHT beneath that one, guess you missed it) Can you honestly say that you can "control" the kind of women (assuming youre male) youre attracted to? If so, prove it by writing down what you find LEAST attractive with a woman and then go date women like that. If attraction is a choice you should just be able to find the least attractive feat of these women the most attractive. Right? (oh and addition; these are the only women you may date from now on) Much of attraction is still a learned behavior. Assuming I am male, yes...And there are so many components to attraction that "writing down the kind of women" I am attracted to is of little use. I guarantee you that things like weight, mindset, intelligence, - play far more into what kind of woman I am attracted to than the color of her hair, skin, or eyes, or shape of her features. "If attraction is a choice you should just be able to find the least attractive feat of these women the most attractive..." If I thought about it enough, created a fetish, was exposed predominantly to something most would find unattractive from a young age, or had a particular predisposition yes...But a predisposition is not the same as being "genetically wired to hold a specific sexual preference." Your last sentence is just an attack. If I choose to date someone, no matter who it is, I choose to date them. I could go out with the fattest, most overweight man or woman on earth and regardless of whether it is right or wrong, or whether I am programmed to do so or not, it is still my choice and I have the power to refuse to do so. I just happened to think that many cases of homosexual behavior are learned behaviors clashing with biological drive. Is that necessarily the right opinion? No. But neither is the predominant viewpoint here. | ||
Pholon
Netherlands6142 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:18 Qwyn wrote: I am heterosexual. I think sexual preference is controllable. I am open to being proven wrong. If not, then there is still the grounds of an evolutionary anomaly. I told you, I simply disagree with your viewpoint. I know that by expressing myself like this I am bound to come under fire. How do you feel about left-handed people | ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:33 Cricketer12 wrote: Wait seriously? I honestly dont kno if you trolling or being serious Its true, MaddeLisk was just providing a smokescreen for Snute while he bonded with TLO, now they are the most adorable couple in esports. | ||
|
Shodaa
Canada404 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:21 Qwyn wrote: I could choose to be a gay for a day, yes. I'd prefer not to. So could you. I could chose to have sex with a man, but that won't make me gay, because I have no attraction/feeling or sexual urge toward man. | ||
|
Taosu
Ukraine1074 Posts
Maybe he has good parents. One can however choose to be homosexual. People (especially children with their fragile minds and lack of firm ideals) having their faces pressed against lots of rainbow stuff and creatures of arbitrary gender around may think "Oh, what if I am actually special? Oh, they say it's ok. Oh, they say I was born this way. I should give this a try." | ||
|
Headshot
United States1656 Posts
Anyways, here's for a TL LoL team! On June 25 2013 01:36 Taosu wrote:One can however choose to be homosexual. People (especially children with their fragile minds and lack of firm ideals) having their faces pressed against lots of rainbow stuff and creatures of arbitrary gender around may think "Oh, what if I am actually special? Oh, they say it's ok. Oh, they say I was born this way. I should give this a try." I.. I can't tell if this is supposed to be a joke, or not. | ||
|
Darkong
United Kingdom418 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:26 Qwyn wrote: I told you I was bound to come under fire. What exactly are you getting at here? Are you telling me that I have no grounds to think what I think? "You really don't understand evolution if you think it makes stuff bad at survival..." What? It doesn't matter whether or not I enjoy having sex with a man, I would still be choosing to do it. Is that a harsh viewpoint? Abso-fucking-lutely. Is it still the one I ascribe to? Yes. Psychologically, most behaviors are learned. But there are grounds to think either way. The idea that people have any concious control over their sexual orientation was debunked back in the 70s. Please go educate yourself before you spout more offensive drivel: http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientation.aspx | ||
|
quirinus
Croatia2489 Posts
1. THIS IS OUR HOUSE
| ||
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
|
Twiggs
United States600 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollingsworth_v._Perry https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S. v Windsor - Defense of Marriage Act&oq=U.S. v Windsor - Defense of Marriage Act&aqs=chrome.0.57.342j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Anyways these are monumental decisions and I don't know which way I lean which I'm sure their are a lot of people out their like me. | ||
|
datcirclejerk
89 Posts
| ||
|
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:35 Iyerbeth wrote: I find myself with a question about the people claiming that if sex isn't for reproduction then it is wrong because it is 'against the designof evolution' or whatever. Do you apply the same rigorous standards of darwinian natural selection to all aspects of your life, or just when it suits you? Even Dawkins stated he wouldn't want to live in such a society and he's about the biggest proponent of evolution you'll find. ... I said that the primary purpose of sex is reproduction. All mammals on earth use sex as a means of reproduction. Humans are unique on this earth, but why should that change the purpose of sex? That purpose dictates the vast majority of the world's sexual preference. It might be a harsh viewpoint, but it doesn't make it any less valid. I have been saying over and over again that any biological programming or learned behavior is overshadowed by choice... | ||
|
RockIronrod
Australia1369 Posts
On June 25 2013 01:30 shawster wrote: the fact that people are saying that equality is political shows how close minded certain individuals are keep it up tl! If it involves making a change, it is by definition political. I mean, I agree with TL and support gay marriage, but you're inferring an objective right and wrong in a completely subjective forum, that being society. Society is what we make of it, and that includes "equality" and who deserves it. Thinking that you are definitively right is a trap both sides of the debate fall in to. Just remember that as sure as you are in your opinion, so is the other side, and as dumb and wrong as you picture them, they're seeing the exact same thing in you. On June 25 2013 01:38 datcirclejerk wrote: Moments like this make my name very fitting. Never really saw the point of threads that go 50 pages with 95% of posts saying the same thing. Guess it makes people feel good, fitting in, being compassionate and such. That is my major problem with this thread. Instead of just banning the assholes or warning them for knocking the thread off topic, they keep them around and tout them as some example about how ignorant everyone who disagrees with them is. | ||
| ||
