Scientists go below Absolute Zero - Page 11
Forum Index > General Forum |
Note from micronesia: please read the thread before making comments about how we have just turned physics on its head. | ||
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
adiga
495 Posts
| ||
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On January 09 2013 08:57 Luepert wrote: Doesnt volume vary with temperature? 0 temperature= zero volume. And now negative temperature, I feel like negative volume is a good way to make a black hole or something lol. This is actually mentioned specifically on the wikipedia page for Charle's Law. Not the part about black holes, but the implication of absolute zero in the discussion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles's_law | ||
adiga
495 Posts
On January 09 2013 08:57 Luepert wrote: Doesnt volume vary with temperature? 0 temperature= zero volume. And now negative temperature, I feel like negative volume is a good way to make a black hole or something lol. Yeah but they are locking the atoms at their spots so volume doesn't change. And that's why the temperature drops bellow zero. | ||
The_Masked_Shrimp
425 Posts
On January 09 2013 23:15 adiga wrote: Yeah but they are locking the atoms at their spots so volume doesn't change. And that's why the temperature drops bellow zero. perfect gas equation is only good for academic pruposes, you get additionnal terms when you want more accuracy, hence it's not 0 | ||
Setev
Malaysia390 Posts
On January 06 2013 00:41 micronesia wrote: We have been able to get negative temperatures since before this paper.... it is just the first time it was done with a gas, I believe. The common understanding of temperature that it is a measure of the speed of the motion of molecules in a system, while useful, is not accurate. You can actually define temperature using this formula: 1/T = dS/dU where S is entropy and U is internal energy. Temperature therefore has to do with how a change in internal energy relates to a change in entropy. For normal systems (positive Kelvin temperatures) increasing energy of a system will increase entropy (this is very important for studying the Carnot Cycle). For systems where the opposite happens (negative temperature), the object will give off heat to any system it comes into thermal equilibrium with. A few cases: System A System B Result Warm Hot Heat flows from hot to warm; temperatures equalize Negative Warm Heat flows from negative temperature system to warm system Negative Very Hot Heat flows from negative temperature system to hot system Another example where you can get negative temperature: Place a 2-state paramagnet into a magnetic field such that the dipoles align. Then, reverse the magnetic field polarity. OK, from an equation perspective, T = temperature, de = change in Entropy, dE = change in Internal Energy. So from micronesia's passage, 1/T = de/dE. If de approaches 0, and dE approaches Infinity (as stated in a negative T system), how is T negative? 1/T will be approaching zero Kelvin, because 0/Infinity = 0. T will then be near infinity Kelvin. How come the temperature derived from this equation can be below 0 K? It'd be great if someone can elaborate... | ||
gyth
657 Posts
If de approaches 0, and dE approaches Infinity For this material adding energy decreases the entropy, that is why de/dE is negative. | ||
Setev
Malaysia390 Posts
On January 10 2013 02:28 gyth wrote: For this material adding energy decreases the entropy, that is why de/dE is negative. Oh yeah, thanks for correcting that. Forgot my basics...makes sense now =D | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On January 10 2013 02:15 Setev wrote: OK, from an equation perspective, T = temperature, de = change in Entropy, dE = change in Internal Energy. So from micronesia's passage, 1/T = de/dE. If de approaches 0, and dE approaches Infinity (as stated in a negative T system), how is T negative? 1/T will be approaching zero Kelvin, because 0/Infinity = 0. T will then be near infinity Kelvin. How come the temperature derived from this equation can be below 0 K? It'd be great if someone can elaborate... However, we would usually use U for internal energy to differentiate from the total system energy and S for entropy, since 'e' usually refers to an electron or the charge of that electron. Energy in this process and in others can appear in various forms; internal energy is just one of them. | ||
setey1
1 Post
If I touched something that was the coldest we've "achieved" previously, which I understand is slightly above absolute zero, It would feel very cold. If I touched something that was actually absolute zero, It would feel slightly colder. If I touched this new "negative temperature"... It would feel even colder still? Not quite, when the temperature goes below absolute zero, it would actually feel extremely hot. hotter than any positive temperature. so assuming that it didn't cause permanent damage to your hand, it would still be extremely painful :D | ||
Fenris420
Sweden213 Posts
| ||
Fusa
Canada148 Posts
On January 18 2013 00:37 Fenris420 wrote: Have I understood this correctly by saying it is not hacking, but clever use of game mechanics? As in we abuse the definition of temperature rather than actually making something colder. The problem is the natural definition we all grow up to love and know "temperature". We think of it as cold and hot, that's it but much like many others have said there is another definition which involves entropy. So a negative temperature would be hotter ( only if "you" touched it ) | ||
| ||