EPTThe TL Debate Thread - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:26 Souma wrote: Won't the speeches be a bit redundant then? It might be better to do two prop, two opp for the first batch then two prop, two opp for the second batch so speeches won't be as redundant and you can get more rebuttal that way. Hmm. Good point. I'll let the first debate go as it is first, and we'll see how everything turns out. Thanks for the feedback though, may implement it in the next debate  | ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:29 Chairman Ray wrote: Btw what sort of motions will there be? Will they require any spec knowledge? Motions won't be specific to certain countries like the economic policies in Mongolia, just some general topics and topics inspired from international headlines. | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Possibly the most interesting debate I've ever seen :D Recommended watch. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:44 Souma wrote: I suppose if we're going to do this in block form, maybe each team should get together and split up the talking points with each person focusing on one-two points each. Redundancy would be bad for both speakers and readers. =s Yeah this was what I had in mind. | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:33 Souma wrote: Best topic: http://www.parlidebate.com/recordings.php?id=244 Possibly the most interesting debate I've ever seen :D Recommended watch. Dang, makes me want to participate as well, that's awesome ^^ I wonder whether it would be possible for laypeople to participate in a future debate unless parli has too many confusing rules. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:48 Souma wrote: Another question: Is it okay for the proposition to define the range of the motion? For instance, if the motion is, "ban child labor," can the proposition specify whether we want to ban child labor throughout the world or to ban child labor in developing countries only? Given the likely uninteresting nature of a debate being argued on two different interpretations, resolution specificity should be made crystal clear. | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:52 Souma wrote: Yeah, I was just thinking if the proposition was allowed to define the terms then we'd just PM the opposition members with the updated motion. Hmm yes. I'll include this in the briefing when teams are settled. | ||
|
Luepert
United States1934 Posts
| ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 15:59 Souma wrote: This might be a lot more convenient if all the debaters + Azera were to get into an IRC channel, so we wouldn't have to mass PM each other haha. We could use IRC for quick fire! | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
That would actually be an awesome idea. So like right after the posts go up, everyone goes into the IRC for quickfire? | ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 16:04 Shady Sands wrote: That would actually be an awesome idea. So like right after the posts go up, everyone goes into the IRC for quickfire? Yes that could work, maybe between the first and second set of speeches? | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
On September 04 2012 16:08 Souma wrote: Only problem is it would be hard to get all nine people online at the same time for that, and too many people chatting at the same time would be chaos anyway. If we do quick fire it should probably be 1 on 1. 2 on 2? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On September 04 2012 16:08 Souma wrote: Only problem is it would be hard to get all nine people online at the same time for that, and too many people chatting at the same time would be chaos anyway. If we do quick fire it should probably be 1 on 1. The getting everyone on at once thing is actually a non-trivial problem, even if we end up using just people in PST through EST. People have work and school schedules that can get in the way. | ||
| ||
