EPThttp://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_flexes_muscles_on_benchmarks-news-4201.php
Samsung Galaxy S3 - Page 10
| Forum Index > General Forum |
disciple
9070 Posts
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_flexes_muscles_on_benchmarks-news-4201.php | ||
|
Regime
Australia185 Posts
| ||
|
Copymizer
Denmark2105 Posts
| ||
|
Quasimoto3000
United States471 Posts
| ||
Daigomi
South Africa4316 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/danfamdsc01388-1335956307.jpg) Also: ![[image loading]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/gsiii-vs-htc.jpg) | ||
|
Shinobi1982
1605 Posts
| ||
|
pewpew415
United States48 Posts
| ||
|
Daudr
Sweden275 Posts
On May 04 2012 05:26 YourOldBuddy wrote: Nokia was fully into making dual cores before they took the MS pill. Its a wonderfull phone they killed called N9. Multi-cores isn't really needed if you have a well-optimized OS, like Windows Phone. With the exception of perhaps "high-end" mobile gaming. The N9 was a damn fine phone though. | ||
|
Radioman
Canada904 Posts
On May 04 2012 06:06 windzor wrote: 4.8" screen means it wont sell as good as the S2. People don't want that big screens. When do they learn?  Which people are you talking about exactly? Just from your own book of facts? The screen is bigger yes, but the actual phone itself isn't that much larger. The bezzle has been reduced on the top and bottom. | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
On May 04 2012 06:38 pewpew415 wrote: Does anyone else not like the trend of every android phone have gigantic screens. I got my galaxys2 a few months ago and coming from a blackberry it feels gigantic just to have in my pocket. Having high end specs are great but I feel like android vendors are neglecting the simple things like the size of the phone and battery life. Not all phones are doing this. The superphones are, but it's the nature of a superphone to be big on everything possible. There are many androids that have smaller screens, and they continue to come out. | ||
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
On May 04 2012 06:33 Daigomi wrote: Thought this was a pretty cool picture: Also: wtf, the home button looks so damn small. | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
| ||
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
Specs are nice but who cares, every half decent phone is pretty fast these days unless Android still needs spec brute forcing to run smoothly (doubt it, HTC One X is pretty smooth). Does it really matter what score in get in X, Y, and Z benchmark if it can do X, Y, and Z quickly and smoothly? I'm kind of glad we've beaten the spec wanking out of most of the PC enthusiast market and I hope the same happens here. | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
On May 04 2012 09:23 Womwomwom wrote: The hardware button is horrible. Its like a massive shift backwards in term of usability. Though as I predicted, there's no way the phone is going to be bezel-less, it'd be close to impossible to use. Excuse me? How is having a hardware button a shift backwards? If you mean you prefer to have a bunch of soft capacity keys, then no thanks. I really like having one physical button that I always know is there. | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
On May 04 2012 09:29 Firebolt145 wrote: Excuse me? How is having a hardware button a shift backwards? If you mean you prefer to have a bunch of soft capacity keys, then no thanks. I really like having one physical button that I always know is there. There's nothing wrong with having a physical home button but the problem with the S3 button is that it's so small it doesn't make sense. | ||
|
T0fuuu
Australia2275 Posts
| ||
|
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
Edit: I'm still rather confused over the OLED choice besides the fact Samsung needs people to test it out before it ends up in larger displays...it offers literally nothing besides really nice blacks, which is not too useful in a mobile phone to be honest. I actually think the smartest thing HTC has done is not jump on the OLED hype/spec train and kept with a really damned good LCD panel. | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
On May 04 2012 09:31 skyR wrote: There's nothing wrong with having a physical home button but the problem with the S3 button is that it's so small it doesn't make sense. Ah fair enough, can't comment on that since I haven't actually had it in my hand. | ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On May 04 2012 09:32 Firebolt145 wrote: Ah fair enough, can't comment on that since I haven't actually had it in my hand. Just look at the pictures where the hand is, or even compare it to the S2 beside it. There are also a lot of hands-on videos on theverge.com and engadget.com. The button is certainly big enough for me, and I actually prefer it this way. It all boils down to personal preference. After going from the iPhone 3GS to a Galaxy Note, the 3GS just feels like a cheap toy to me. I'd personally say anything larger than the Note would be too big, but anything under 4" is just too small for my taste. I will be picking up either the S3 or the iPhone 5. Let's see what Apple has to offer. | ||
|
Minzy
Australia387 Posts
| ||
| ||
