i dont need a wiki about the movie man....ive seen it like 12 times, i already know everything about it
President Obama Re-Elected - Page 849
Forum Index > General Forum |
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here. The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301 | ||
Deathmanbob
United States2356 Posts
i dont need a wiki about the movie man....ive seen it like 12 times, i already know everything about it | ||
killerdog
Denmark6522 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:25 Toxi78 wrote: where can you get an online stream of this? i have one translated to french but i'd rather listen to them directly, the double voice is making my brains explode. i am sorry if this was asked before :s http://edition.cnn.com/election/2012/debates/second-presidential-debate?hpt=hp_c1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19970268 | ||
HellRoxYa
Sweden1614 Posts
Edit: Stream link http://new.livestream.com/USElection2012/events/1598521 | ||
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:23 ZeaL. wrote: Fast & Furious had nothing to do with that question. It was like he was hoping for something tangentially related to start hammering Obama on it. Republicans are obsessed with fast and furious. You don't know how many times I've heard the idiots talking about how it was Obamas plan to use that as an excuse to ban guns. That's why he brought it up, to stroke stupid peoples heads. | ||
ey215
United States546 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:26 BluePanther wrote: LOL, Obama's favorability line just tanked. That was ugly. | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:25 Quintum_ wrote: Every President does. Look at all the Presidents before and after and it almost looks like you are looking at two different people. I mean the job just seem to add so many years to your face. George W. Bush looked like a pile of shit after his presidency. | ||
Sermokala
United States13736 Posts
| ||
PresenceSc2
Australia4032 Posts
| ||
Ventris
Germany1226 Posts
| ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:24 xDaunt wrote: Bad answer by Romney overall. 4-2-3 Obama. Sorry, was at the gym - your previous scorings were 2 numbers, why is it 3 now? | ||
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
| ||
dragoon
United States695 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:23 Leporello wrote: Romney's answers regarding his tax policies were disgusting. This is a completely dishonest man. He says in one sentence he's just reducing rates across the board, then he says he's just reducing taxes for middle income -- he's not going to give the rich tax cuts, oh no, "I counter that with deductions". But the woman who asked the question named some of those deductions in her question -- things like the Tax Benefits for Education deductions. The woman's question contained more specifics regarding these deductions than Romney's answer!!! Barack counters by asking Romney, where is the math -- how do you pay for these across-the-board tax cuts, and how are they not a tax cut for the rich? He comes back with more simplistic lies -- I'm just cutting taxes for middle class families. No specifics, just a simple lie. Republicans really've shown the concept of governance is just a game to them by electing Mitt Romney as their candidate. This is a true do-anything, say-anything SOB. This is a man who can not answer simple questions with any specifics, no matter how hard pressed into doing so. He wants to cut the Estate Tax, and he'll look at all of us and say he isn't planning to cut taxes for the rich. He can not represent his own policies truthfully -- he contradicts himself in a matter of seconds. Most Republicans will admit to their "trickle down" policies, Mitt Romney instead just pretends to be something else. Does this not disgust his own base??? No, they apparently like seeing their policies misrepresented as something almost progressive. The guy is a true snake who really has appealed to the sound-bite generation in this debate. His whole answer on economic policy was "Don't look at my specifics, just let me tell you I'm not cutting taxes disproportionately for the wealthiest and will somehow pay for the decreased revenue by closing loopholes that don't exist." A lot of these tax deductions that Romney is going to close aren't even for the wealthy. The tax benefits for education are something completely designed to help the lower and middle class, and those are deductions that Romney has targeted for closing. The lady even mentioned it in her question, and he just completely ignores it and talks about the middle class. TL;DR The truth is Romney's tax cuts will benefit the wealthy, and will result in much less revenue for the government, increasing deficits. The few deductions Romney has admitted to targeting for closing are deductions that are useful for all Americans in all tax brackets. Everything Romney said tonight about his tax policies was a complete, total, shameless fucking lie. romney's tax cuts will benefit the wealthy? it seems to me like you got a pretty fucking skewed idea of what wealthy is. he wants to help the small business' that the US depends on because they're failing. thats a fact, smalls business around the world would go out of business before you could blink if obama implemented HIS tax plan. its not romney thats the "complete, total, shameless, fucking lie its obama. | ||
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
| ||
-_-Quails
Australia796 Posts
| ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:27 JinDesu wrote: Sorry, was at the gym - your previous scorings were 2 numbers, why is it 3 now? I'm scoring ties this time because it is a lot easier to keep track of each topic. | ||
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
I'm hoping Seamus still gets a mention. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
| ||
Sermokala
United States13736 Posts
On October 17 2012 11:27 JinDesu wrote: Sorry, was at the gym - your previous scorings were 2 numbers, why is it 3 now? Its been that kind of debate. a lot of ties really in this debate. questions are shitty or they really never get around to answering them. | ||
| ||