• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:29
CET 21:29
KST 05:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) RSL Offline FInals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion Which season is the best in ASL? Data analysis on 70 million replays BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Big Programming Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1528 users

President Obama Re-Elected - Page 463

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 461 462 463 464 465 1504 Next
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here.

The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
September 07 2012 18:25 GMT
#9241
On September 07 2012 23:09 xDaunt wrote:
I agree with Peggy Noonan's take on the convention.

On Obama:

Show nested quote +
Barack Obama is deeply overexposed and often boring. He never seems to be saying what he's thinking. His speech Thursday was weirdly anticlimactic. There's too much buildup, the crowd was tired, it all felt flat. He was somber, and his message was essentially banal: We've done better than you think. Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?

There were many straw men. There were phrases like "the shadow of a shuttered steel mill," which he considers writerly. But they sound empty and practiced now, like something you've heard in a commercial or an advertising campaign.

It was stale and empty. He's out of juice.


On the tone of the convention and the delegates:

Show nested quote +
Beneath the funny hats, the sweet-faced delegates, the handsome speakers and the babies waving flags there was something disquieting. All three days were marked by a kind of soft, distracted extremism. It was unshowy and unobnoxious but also unsettling.

There was the relentless emphasis on Government as Community, as the thing that gives us spirit and makes us whole. But government isn't what you love if you're American, America is what you love. Government is what you have, need and hire. Its most essential duties—especially when it is bankrupt—involve defending rights and safety, not imposing views and values. We already have values. Democrats and Republicans don't see all this the same way, and that's fine—that's what national politics is, the working out of this dispute in one direction or another every few years. But the Democrats convened in Charlotte seemed more extreme on the point, more accepting of the idea of government as the center of national life, than ever, at least to me.

The fight over including a single mention of God in the platform—that was extreme. The original removal of the single mention by the platform committee—extreme. The huge "No!" vote on restoring the mention of God, and including the administration's own stand on Jerusalem—that wasn't liberal, it was extreme. Comparing the Republicans to Nazis—extreme. The almost complete absence of a call to help education by facing down the powers that throw our least defended children under the school bus—this was extreme, not mainstream.


On Fluke (just because I don't think this woman can ever get enough scorn):

Show nested quote +
The sheer strangeness of all the talk about abortion, abortion, contraception, contraception. I am old enough to know a wedge issue when I see one, but I've never seen a great party build its entire public persona around one. Big speeches from the heads of Planned Parenthood and NARAL, HHS Secretary and abortion enthusiast Kathleen Sebelius and, of course, Sandra Fluke.

"Republicans shut me out of a hearing on contraception," Ms. Fluke said. But why would anyone have included a Georgetown law student who never worked her way onto the national stage until she was plucked, by the left, as a personable victim? What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool.

And she was one of the great faces of the party in Charlotte. That is extreme. Childish, too.


Here's the most important part that dovetails with the "poisoning the well" conversation that we have had on and off in this thread:

Show nested quote +
Something else, and it had to do with tone. I remember the Republicans in Tampa bashing the president, hard, but not the entire Democratic Party. In Charlotte they bashed Mitt Romney, but they bashed the Republican Party harder. If this doesn't strike you as somewhat unsettling, then you must want another four years of all war all the time between the parties. I don't think the American people want that. Because, actually, they're not extreme.


And finally, on Slick Willy:

Show nested quote +
Bill Clinton is The Master. That is stipulated. Almost everyone in the media was over the moon about his speech. It was a shrewd and superb moment of political generosity, his hauling into town to make the case, but it was a hack speech. It was the speech of a highly gifted apparatchik. All great partisan speeches include some hard and uncomfortable truths, but Mr. Clinton offered none. He knows better than so much of what he said. In real life he makes insightful statements on the debt, the deficit and the real threat they pose. He knows more about the need for and impediments to public-school reform than half the reformers do. He knows exactly why both parties can't reach agreement in Washington, and what each has done wrong along the way. But Wednesday night he stuck to fluid fictions and clever cases. It was smaller than Bill Clinton is.

Still, he gave the president one great political gift: He put Medicaid on the table. He put it right there next to the pepper shaker and said Look at that! People talk Medicare and Social Security, but, as Mr. Clinton noted, more than half of Medicaid is spent on nursing-home care for seniors and on those with disabilities such as Down syndrome and autism. Will it be cut?
....
Romney-Ryan take note: this will arrive as an issue.


Ultimately, she predicts a dead-cat bounce for Obama just like the one that Romney got. Most of the article is above, but you can read the rest here.


The fact that she considers anything in the Democratic party "extreme" or "extremism" questions the validity of anything she writes. There is nothing extreme about the Democratic party or anything they're doing or saying.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 07 2012 18:30 GMT
#9242
Booing God isn't extreme?
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-07 18:37:33
September 07 2012 18:37 GMT
#9243
On September 08 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:
Booing God isn't extreme?

Not really. 15% of Americans don't believe in God. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion_in_the_United_States

And most atheists are Democrats.
Leporello
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2845 Posts
September 07 2012 18:38 GMT
#9244
This just in: Democrats booed God. xDaunt reports, we roll our eyes.

The fact is some Democrats booed the inclusion of religious language into the platform. This was not universal, and they were obviously not booing the Supreme Being himself, but rather His inclusion in our political matters. Nothing extreme about that all, and isn't even representative of what most people were doing.

"Booing God" is offensive coming from you, xDaunt, because we all know you're not that stupid.
Big water
Leporello
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2845 Posts
September 07 2012 18:43 GMT
#9245


"Republicans shut me out of a hearing on contraception," Ms. Fluke said. But why would anyone have included a Georgetown law student who never worked her way onto the national stage until she was plucked, by the left, as a personable victim? What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool.


Republicans just refuse to understand that Ms. Fluke is their creation as much as anyone else's.

Even in this, she completely misrepresents Ms. Fluke's position.

The entire point of Ms. Fluke's testimony was that contraception is not just about birth control. It is a health issue that some women depend on, with or without sex, for their various needs.

She calls Rush Limbaugh a "bully" while simultaneously making the same stupid insinuation that Rush made, completely ignoring the basic fundamental point Ms. Fluke was making -- contraception is medicine in some cases.

Ridiculously stupid and dishonest of Peggy Noonan, but for her, about par.
Big water
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
September 07 2012 18:47 GMT
#9246
is peggy noonan a new star now or something. lol
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Leporello
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2845 Posts
September 07 2012 18:52 GMT
#9247
Also, I have to admit that Obama's speech was a bit below his average, although I think Michelle and Bill more than made up for it. There wasn't much more for Obama to do than ask for more time, which he did.

Overall, I was very pleased with the Convention. I think we addressed the Republican talking-points directly, and with a better sense of maturity. We kept our slogans focused on our own message and ideas, instead of just making everything a childish mockery. In this basic regard, the RNC got stomped.
Big water
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
September 07 2012 18:53 GMT
#9248
On September 08 2012 02:42 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 01:59 xDaunt wrote:
Unless war with Iran breaks out, nothing is going to happen economy-wise until after the election. Businesses are going to sit on their capital reserves until then.

This is just nonsense. It's a familiar Republican story though. But where's the evidence for it?

Businesses don't just sit on their hands and do nothing leading up to a election. The amount of things that businesses produce is based on demand. Businesses also do not suddenly cease all investment in the face of policy uncertainty.

There is always uncertainty.

In fact, virtually all of the finance taught in university is about business decision making in the face of uncertainty, and there are a wide variety of methods to help businesses decide on project investments in the face of uncertainty: NPV, scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, IRR, etc. Moreover, models used for investing on the financial markets, e.g. hedging strategies, risk neutral pricing, etc., are all about uncertainty. There is nothing more uncertain and harder to predict than the stock market, with so many of these kinds of math tools used widely by businesses for investment on the stock markets, you think they're spooked to the point of paralysis by policy uncertainty?

You're right that businesses will sit on their capital reserves, but that's mainly because of a lack of aggregate demand, not because of uncertainty caused by an election.

I'll try to write you a better response later. But the short answer is that uncertainty can be accounted for with something like NPV but not eliminated. An NPV analysis in an environment with low uncertainty may be positive (make the investment) while the same analysis in an environment with high uncertainty might be negative. Also, an NPV analysis would be more harmed by uncertainty for longer term projects than shorter term ones. Riskier projects would also be harmed as risk premiums (presumably) increase.

So you can certainly have projects that get dumped or scaled down because the added risk of policy uncertainty makes the reward not worth it.
ECHOZs
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States499 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-07 18:56:27
September 07 2012 18:55 GMT
#9249
On September 08 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:
Booing God isn't extreme?

God shouldn't have a place in politics to begin with.
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-07 19:01:09
September 07 2012 18:58 GMT
#9250
On September 08 2012 03:53 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 02:42 paralleluniverse wrote:
On September 08 2012 01:59 xDaunt wrote:
Unless war with Iran breaks out, nothing is going to happen economy-wise until after the election. Businesses are going to sit on their capital reserves until then.

This is just nonsense. It's a familiar Republican story though. But where's the evidence for it?

Businesses don't just sit on their hands and do nothing leading up to a election. The amount of things that businesses produce is based on demand. Businesses also do not suddenly cease all investment in the face of policy uncertainty.

There is always uncertainty.

In fact, virtually all of the finance taught in university is about business decision making in the face of uncertainty, and there are a wide variety of methods to help businesses decide on project investments in the face of uncertainty: NPV, scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, IRR, etc. Moreover, models used for investing on the financial markets, e.g. hedging strategies, risk neutral pricing, etc., are all about uncertainty. There is nothing more uncertain and harder to predict than the stock market, with so many of these kinds of math tools used widely by businesses for investment on the stock markets, you think they're spooked to the point of paralysis by policy uncertainty?

You're right that businesses will sit on their capital reserves, but that's mainly because of a lack of aggregate demand, not because of uncertainty caused by an election.

I'll try to write you a better response later. But the short answer is that uncertainty can be accounted for with something like NPV but not eliminated. An NPV analysis in an environment with low uncertainty may be positive (make the investment) while the same analysis in an environment with high uncertainty might be negative. Also, an NPV analysis would be more harmed by uncertainty for longer term projects than shorter term ones. Riskier projects would also be harmed as risk premiums (presumably) increase.

So you can certainly have projects that get dumped or scaled down because the added risk of policy uncertainty makes the reward not worth it.

Yes, the greater the uncertainty, the harder it is to approve an investment under NPV. But Fed rates are at the zero lower bound, so the rate at which businesses can borrow money is cheap, hence the hurdle rate to making an investment is low.

The point is that businesses have always had the tools and knowledge to make investment choices under uncertainty. I haven't seen evidence saying that policy uncertainty, to the extent that it's above its normal level, is having any significant impact on holding investments back.
Focuspants
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada780 Posts
September 07 2012 19:00 GMT
#9251
The Democrats did something so EXTREME by trying to keep a separation of church and state... oh wait...
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-07 19:04:02
September 07 2012 19:03 GMT
#9252
On September 08 2012 03:52 Leporello wrote:
Also, I have to admit that Obama's speech was a bit below his average, although I think Michelle and Bill more than made up for it. There wasn't much more for Obama to do than ask for more time, which he did.

Overall, I was very pleased with the Convention. I think we addressed the Republican talking-points directly, and with a better sense of maturity. We kept our slogans focused on our own message and ideas, instead of just making everything a childish mockery. In this basic regard, the RNC got stomped.

I'm not pleased at all with Obama's speech. I'm sure most people realized, I'm one of Obama's bigger supporters in this thread, but I found his speech quite pathetic: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=330491&currentpage=461#9215

Clinton was the highlight.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18840 Posts
September 07 2012 19:08 GMT
#9253
On September 08 2012 04:03 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 03:52 Leporello wrote:
Also, I have to admit that Obama's speech was a bit below his average, although I think Michelle and Bill more than made up for it. There wasn't much more for Obama to do than ask for more time, which he did.

Overall, I was very pleased with the Convention. I think we addressed the Republican talking-points directly, and with a better sense of maturity. We kept our slogans focused on our own message and ideas, instead of just making everything a childish mockery. In this basic regard, the RNC got stomped.

I'm not pleased at all with Obama's speech. I'm sure most people realized, I'm one of Obama's bigger supporters in this thread, but I found his speech quite pathetic: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=330491&currentpage=461#9215

Clinton was the highlight.

While I certainly think Clinton's speech was by far the best of the convention, I thought Obama's focus on this election being a choice as opposed to a referendum was a good piece of rhetoric. That does not totally excuse his lack of specificity, but I do not think the speech was utter crap.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-07 20:00:06
September 07 2012 19:59 GMT
#9254
On September 08 2012 04:08 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 04:03 paralleluniverse wrote:
On September 08 2012 03:52 Leporello wrote:
Also, I have to admit that Obama's speech was a bit below his average, although I think Michelle and Bill more than made up for it. There wasn't much more for Obama to do than ask for more time, which he did.

Overall, I was very pleased with the Convention. I think we addressed the Republican talking-points directly, and with a better sense of maturity. We kept our slogans focused on our own message and ideas, instead of just making everything a childish mockery. In this basic regard, the RNC got stomped.

I'm not pleased at all with Obama's speech. I'm sure most people realized, I'm one of Obama's bigger supporters in this thread, but I found his speech quite pathetic: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=330491&currentpage=461#9215

Clinton was the highlight.

While I certainly think Clinton's speech was by far the best of the convention, I thought Obama's focus on this election being a choice as opposed to a referendum was a good piece of rhetoric. That does not totally excuse his lack of specificity, but I do not think the speech was utter crap.

ahah, someone's reading 538 :p
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 07 2012 20:30 GMT
#9255
Nothing particularly impressive about the DNC, but when their competition is the RNC... well, yeah.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
ey215
Profile Joined June 2010
United States546 Posts
September 07 2012 20:39 GMT
#9256
On September 08 2012 03:25 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2012 23:09 xDaunt wrote:
I agree with Peggy Noonan's take on the convention.

On Obama:

Barack Obama is deeply overexposed and often boring. He never seems to be saying what he's thinking. His speech Thursday was weirdly anticlimactic. There's too much buildup, the crowd was tired, it all felt flat. He was somber, and his message was essentially banal: We've done better than you think. Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?

There were many straw men. There were phrases like "the shadow of a shuttered steel mill," which he considers writerly. But they sound empty and practiced now, like something you've heard in a commercial or an advertising campaign.

It was stale and empty. He's out of juice.


On the tone of the convention and the delegates:

Beneath the funny hats, the sweet-faced delegates, the handsome speakers and the babies waving flags there was something disquieting. All three days were marked by a kind of soft, distracted extremism. It was unshowy and unobnoxious but also unsettling.

There was the relentless emphasis on Government as Community, as the thing that gives us spirit and makes us whole. But government isn't what you love if you're American, America is what you love. Government is what you have, need and hire. Its most essential duties—especially when it is bankrupt—involve defending rights and safety, not imposing views and values. We already have values. Democrats and Republicans don't see all this the same way, and that's fine—that's what national politics is, the working out of this dispute in one direction or another every few years. But the Democrats convened in Charlotte seemed more extreme on the point, more accepting of the idea of government as the center of national life, than ever, at least to me.

The fight over including a single mention of God in the platform—that was extreme. The original removal of the single mention by the platform committee—extreme. The huge "No!" vote on restoring the mention of God, and including the administration's own stand on Jerusalem—that wasn't liberal, it was extreme. Comparing the Republicans to Nazis—extreme. The almost complete absence of a call to help education by facing down the powers that throw our least defended children under the school bus—this was extreme, not mainstream.


On Fluke (just because I don't think this woman can ever get enough scorn):

The sheer strangeness of all the talk about abortion, abortion, contraception, contraception. I am old enough to know a wedge issue when I see one, but I've never seen a great party build its entire public persona around one. Big speeches from the heads of Planned Parenthood and NARAL, HHS Secretary and abortion enthusiast Kathleen Sebelius and, of course, Sandra Fluke.

"Republicans shut me out of a hearing on contraception," Ms. Fluke said. But why would anyone have included a Georgetown law student who never worked her way onto the national stage until she was plucked, by the left, as a personable victim? What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool.

And she was one of the great faces of the party in Charlotte. That is extreme. Childish, too.


Here's the most important part that dovetails with the "poisoning the well" conversation that we have had on and off in this thread:

Something else, and it had to do with tone. I remember the Republicans in Tampa bashing the president, hard, but not the entire Democratic Party. In Charlotte they bashed Mitt Romney, but they bashed the Republican Party harder. If this doesn't strike you as somewhat unsettling, then you must want another four years of all war all the time between the parties. I don't think the American people want that. Because, actually, they're not extreme.


And finally, on Slick Willy:

Bill Clinton is The Master. That is stipulated. Almost everyone in the media was over the moon about his speech. It was a shrewd and superb moment of political generosity, his hauling into town to make the case, but it was a hack speech. It was the speech of a highly gifted apparatchik. All great partisan speeches include some hard and uncomfortable truths, but Mr. Clinton offered none. He knows better than so much of what he said. In real life he makes insightful statements on the debt, the deficit and the real threat they pose. He knows more about the need for and impediments to public-school reform than half the reformers do. He knows exactly why both parties can't reach agreement in Washington, and what each has done wrong along the way. But Wednesday night he stuck to fluid fictions and clever cases. It was smaller than Bill Clinton is.

Still, he gave the president one great political gift: He put Medicaid on the table. He put it right there next to the pepper shaker and said Look at that! People talk Medicare and Social Security, but, as Mr. Clinton noted, more than half of Medicaid is spent on nursing-home care for seniors and on those with disabilities such as Down syndrome and autism. Will it be cut?
....
Romney-Ryan take note: this will arrive as an issue.


Ultimately, she predicts a dead-cat bounce for Obama just like the one that Romney got. Most of the article is above, but you can read the rest here.


The fact that she considers anything in the Democratic party "extreme" or "extremism" questions the validity of anything she writes. There is nothing extreme about the Democratic party or anything they're doing or saying.


Except for the platform's stance on abortion:

The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay


Which means government funded abortion with no restrictions. A departure from previous DNC platforms that stated that abortion should be, "Legal, safe, and rare".

Now let's look at the polling. 20% say abortion should be illegal under any circumstance, 25% legal under any circumstance and 52% legal under only certain circumstances (Source).

By definition, among the American electorate, BOTH parties platform stance on abortion is extreme.
Defacer
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada5052 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-07 20:45:45
September 07 2012 20:43 GMT
#9257
I'm one of the defenders of the speech. I'm trying to think of what other card he could have played.

While it didn't infuse the political discourse with details of his current or future policies --something which is desperately needed and Bill Clinton incredibly well -- it was still a solid convention speech, better than Romneys, and appropriate for the occasion. Whether this is a good idea tactically is a tough call -- Obama may be relying too much on the debates as a platform to scrutinize and justify his opponents and his own policies. But it did reinforce that Romney and Obama's economic plans are radically different.

Last week I said he had Obama would have to somehow inspire people, yet respond to the criticism and talking points of the RNC without appearing defensive, or like a whiner. I'm not sure how it would played to viewers at home or independent if Obama spend the bulk of his convention speech on wonkery. Would it have made him look weak? Cold? Technical? I mean, it's a huge coup to have Bill Clinton defend and validate your policies and ideas. Does he have to?

What impressed me was his ability to address the RNC stereotype of him as some kind of 'cold-blooded' (Ryan's words), out-of-touch, self-aggrandizing, blue sky bureaucrat, with an remarkably compelling and elegant transformation of the theme of Hope and Change, by turning it into a story about how Americans have been then true agents of hope and change, not him. It was like a half time speech -- "You're the reason we have saved the auto industry!" etc.

It's was obvious that those platitudes of Obama being grounded and caring about average Americans is not lip service. That he actually does read 10 letters from Americans everyday and takes their hardship seriously.

After that speech, I don't think anyone could accuse Obama of not understanding or empathizing average Americans, or taking extreme pride in middle-class achievement without looking extremely delusional or petty. If Romney or his surrogates attempt to assasinate Obama's character, they will lose (in fact, Karl Rove has admitted as much).

Obama is gambling that he can win a debate on the economy. That despite it's slow improvement, it's still way better than in Sept 2008 when the banking system collapsed and people were losing 40 to 50% of the net worth over the course of two months. And that his strategy to improve the economy simply is more comprehensive and less crazy than Romney's.

The debates will be interesting, that's for sure.



Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
September 07 2012 20:49 GMT
#9258
On September 08 2012 05:39 ey215 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 03:25 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On September 07 2012 23:09 xDaunt wrote:
I agree with Peggy Noonan's take on the convention.

On Obama:

Barack Obama is deeply overexposed and often boring. He never seems to be saying what he's thinking. His speech Thursday was weirdly anticlimactic. There's too much buildup, the crowd was tired, it all felt flat. He was somber, and his message was essentially banal: We've done better than you think. Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?

There were many straw men. There were phrases like "the shadow of a shuttered steel mill," which he considers writerly. But they sound empty and practiced now, like something you've heard in a commercial or an advertising campaign.

It was stale and empty. He's out of juice.


On the tone of the convention and the delegates:

Beneath the funny hats, the sweet-faced delegates, the handsome speakers and the babies waving flags there was something disquieting. All three days were marked by a kind of soft, distracted extremism. It was unshowy and unobnoxious but also unsettling.

There was the relentless emphasis on Government as Community, as the thing that gives us spirit and makes us whole. But government isn't what you love if you're American, America is what you love. Government is what you have, need and hire. Its most essential duties—especially when it is bankrupt—involve defending rights and safety, not imposing views and values. We already have values. Democrats and Republicans don't see all this the same way, and that's fine—that's what national politics is, the working out of this dispute in one direction or another every few years. But the Democrats convened in Charlotte seemed more extreme on the point, more accepting of the idea of government as the center of national life, than ever, at least to me.

The fight over including a single mention of God in the platform—that was extreme. The original removal of the single mention by the platform committee—extreme. The huge "No!" vote on restoring the mention of God, and including the administration's own stand on Jerusalem—that wasn't liberal, it was extreme. Comparing the Republicans to Nazis—extreme. The almost complete absence of a call to help education by facing down the powers that throw our least defended children under the school bus—this was extreme, not mainstream.


On Fluke (just because I don't think this woman can ever get enough scorn):

The sheer strangeness of all the talk about abortion, abortion, contraception, contraception. I am old enough to know a wedge issue when I see one, but I've never seen a great party build its entire public persona around one. Big speeches from the heads of Planned Parenthood and NARAL, HHS Secretary and abortion enthusiast Kathleen Sebelius and, of course, Sandra Fluke.

"Republicans shut me out of a hearing on contraception," Ms. Fluke said. But why would anyone have included a Georgetown law student who never worked her way onto the national stage until she was plucked, by the left, as a personable victim? What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool.

And she was one of the great faces of the party in Charlotte. That is extreme. Childish, too.


Here's the most important part that dovetails with the "poisoning the well" conversation that we have had on and off in this thread:

Something else, and it had to do with tone. I remember the Republicans in Tampa bashing the president, hard, but not the entire Democratic Party. In Charlotte they bashed Mitt Romney, but they bashed the Republican Party harder. If this doesn't strike you as somewhat unsettling, then you must want another four years of all war all the time between the parties. I don't think the American people want that. Because, actually, they're not extreme.


And finally, on Slick Willy:

Bill Clinton is The Master. That is stipulated. Almost everyone in the media was over the moon about his speech. It was a shrewd and superb moment of political generosity, his hauling into town to make the case, but it was a hack speech. It was the speech of a highly gifted apparatchik. All great partisan speeches include some hard and uncomfortable truths, but Mr. Clinton offered none. He knows better than so much of what he said. In real life he makes insightful statements on the debt, the deficit and the real threat they pose. He knows more about the need for and impediments to public-school reform than half the reformers do. He knows exactly why both parties can't reach agreement in Washington, and what each has done wrong along the way. But Wednesday night he stuck to fluid fictions and clever cases. It was smaller than Bill Clinton is.

Still, he gave the president one great political gift: He put Medicaid on the table. He put it right there next to the pepper shaker and said Look at that! People talk Medicare and Social Security, but, as Mr. Clinton noted, more than half of Medicaid is spent on nursing-home care for seniors and on those with disabilities such as Down syndrome and autism. Will it be cut?
....
Romney-Ryan take note: this will arrive as an issue.


Ultimately, she predicts a dead-cat bounce for Obama just like the one that Romney got. Most of the article is above, but you can read the rest here.


The fact that she considers anything in the Democratic party "extreme" or "extremism" questions the validity of anything she writes. There is nothing extreme about the Democratic party or anything they're doing or saying.


Except for the platform's stance on abortion:

Show nested quote +
The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay


Which means government funded abortion with no restrictions. A departure from previous DNC platforms that stated that abortion should be, "Legal, safe, and rare".

Now let's look at the polling. 20% say abortion should be illegal under any circumstance, 25% legal under any circumstance and 52% legal under only certain circumstances (Source).

By definition, among the American electorate, BOTH parties platform stance on abortion is extreme.


Am I missing something? Where does it say 'no restrictions'?
Writer
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18840 Posts
September 07 2012 20:52 GMT
#9259
On September 08 2012 04:59 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 04:08 farvacola wrote:
On September 08 2012 04:03 paralleluniverse wrote:
On September 08 2012 03:52 Leporello wrote:
Also, I have to admit that Obama's speech was a bit below his average, although I think Michelle and Bill more than made up for it. There wasn't much more for Obama to do than ask for more time, which he did.

Overall, I was very pleased with the Convention. I think we addressed the Republican talking-points directly, and with a better sense of maturity. We kept our slogans focused on our own message and ideas, instead of just making everything a childish mockery. In this basic regard, the RNC got stomped.

I'm not pleased at all with Obama's speech. I'm sure most people realized, I'm one of Obama's bigger supporters in this thread, but I found his speech quite pathetic: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=330491&currentpage=461#9215

Clinton was the highlight.

While I certainly think Clinton's speech was by far the best of the convention, I thought Obama's focus on this election being a choice as opposed to a referendum was a good piece of rhetoric. That does not totally excuse his lack of specificity, but I do not think the speech was utter crap.

ahah, someone's reading 538 :p

I so envy Nate Silver, I'd love to have his job. He basically gets paid to write exactly what I think, and it bothers me to no end lol.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
jdsowa
Profile Joined March 2011
405 Posts
September 07 2012 20:55 GMT
#9260
Peggy Noonan is a moderate Republican. That's why she's allowed to write for the NYT. She's been critical of the Tea Party folks. Romney's more her speed.

Paul Krugman is a liberal liberal. You'll never catch him criticizing any liberals, because he's an unthinking loyal team player.
Prev 1 461 462 463 464 465 1504 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 31m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 574
IndyStarCraft 148
Railgan 124
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 14689
Calm 2584
Shuttle 585
Larva 233
firebathero 168
Dewaltoss 120
Dota 2
420jenkins391
capcasts61
Counter-Strike
fl0m5833
chrisJcsgo59
kRYSTAL_24
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu371
Khaldor141
Other Games
Grubby4241
Beastyqt758
RotterdaM146
C9.Mang0132
Sick131
ArmadaUGS107
QueenE69
Mew2King64
Trikslyr59
ViBE11
Organizations
Other Games
Algost 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 51
• Reevou 10
• Dystopia_ 1
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 17
• FirePhoenix13
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV624
• lizZardDota262
League of Legends
• TFBlade804
Other Games
• imaqtpie992
• Shiphtur220
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 31m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 6h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 13h
WardiTV 2025
1d 15h
SC Evo League
1d 16h
BSL 21
1d 23h
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
OSC
2 days
Solar vs Creator
ByuN vs Gerald
Percival vs Babymarine
Moja vs Krystianer
EnDerr vs ForJumy
sebesdes vs Nicoract
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV 2025
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
2 days
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
PiGosaur Monday
5 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
WardiTV 2025
6 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-30
RSL Revival: Season 3
Light HT

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
Kuram Kup
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.