|
|
On November 07 2012 11:42 McBengt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:40 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:39 McBengt wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:27 wozzot wrote:On November 07 2012 11:25 deus.machinarum wrote:On November 07 2012 11:22 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:21 deus.machinarum wrote:
Could somebody with insight(i.e. someone from the US ^^) explain as to why FL is always so close? Is it really just immigrants vs. retired people? (as somebody posted recently) Pretty much. Older retirees tend to lean Republican, while the non-Cuban minority groups lean mostly Democrat. Hmmmm, kay. I get minority groups leaning towards the Democrats, not entirely sure why the older generation as a whole would favor the Republicans. (NOT a pro democrat statement, just wondering) No new taxes! I want the government to keep my hands off my Medicare! Also those Dems support rights for brown people and the gays, who are obviously a threat to the social fabric of America because You're living in a fantasy if you think it's viable to close the deficit without tax increases. This sort of uneducated fundamentalism, that tax cuts are bad is what's going to destroy the economy as it gets closer to the fiscal cliff. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a report showing no correlation between tax cuts and growth. But Republicans made them withdraw the report because it disagree with their political dogma. Here's the report: http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdfPermanent tax cuts will blow up the deficit, increasing the debt in the long run. And that will be very harmful for the economy in the long run. I am reasonably sure that was sarcasm. The second paragraph is a rather obvious tell. Paralleluniverse a Romanian? I must admit, I have not the faintest fucking clue what that means.
Romanians cannot detect sarcasm
|
I thought Obama had more electoral votes from the stuff I read a week or 2 ago?
|
The regulars in this thread were pretty settled weeks ago on who would win. It's sort of funny watching all these people who don't follow politics get distraught or excited or confused by it.
|
Betting firming up on Obama winning Florida. He is at 1.25 now compared to Romney easing out to 3.5. So Obama now a very strong favourite to win Florida.
|
On November 07 2012 11:41 PolskaGora wrote:Don't know if this image has been posted yet, but I think this election is going to come down to Florida... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SlXRJ.png?1?9916)
Doubt it. It looks like Obama is going to get Ohio, NH, Wisconsin, and Colorado, and that should lock up the election for him.
|
North Carolina was lost clearly by Obama. He lest Wake County and that cannot be made up!
|
On November 07 2012 11:39 jpak wrote:
And... Fox News just declared that Murdock lost to Donnelly in Indiana.
WOOT! I voted for Donnelly!
|
United States24633 Posts
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting.
|
On November 07 2012 11:41 PolskaGora wrote:Don't know if this image has been posted yet, but I think this election is going to come down to Florida...
Obama's now 27K ahead in FL. Broward county reporting in, still 50% of Miami-Dade to report. And Santa Rosa, which may temper it.
|
On November 07 2012 11:37 TwoToneTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:35 julianto wrote:On November 07 2012 11:34 Lmui wrote:
Hmm florida still has people in line waiting to vote O___O. Wow. Why did these people not mail in their votes? The vast majority of voter fraud is through miscounting Absentee ballots, it's probably the best idea not to if you want your vote to count.
I find your proof lacking.
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting.
http://electoralmap.net/2012/2012final.php
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
The regulars in this thread were pretty settled weeks ago on who would win. It's sort of funny watching all these people who don't follow politics get distraught or excited or confused by it.
I'm just here for the Senate elections 
Well and to see xdaunt finally admit the harsh truth.
|
I wish Dexter would just sneak up behind me with a syringe. When I come to, it'll all be over.
|
On November 07 2012 11:40 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:38 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 Hrrrrm wrote:On November 07 2012 11:34 Lmui wrote:
Hmm florida still has people in line waiting to vote O___O. Wow. There was an 8 hour wait in Pembroke Pines(Broward County) at 6 o'clock. Why didn't these people vote in advance and use the drop boxes? Isn't that more a system problem? If they can't handle the number of people voting, seems to be the onous is on those administrating it. There's some serious problems if there are 8 hour waits and people still voting while they're counting
Florida state and local government administration is proof in the pudding that many states and their according regional identifications have repeatedly shown themselves unable to perform basic government functions competently. As I've said before, Florida is terribly corrupt as well. Look at the trend among southern states. It isn't an isolated occurrence.
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
The regulars in this thread were pretty settled weeks ago on who would win. It's sort of funny watching all these people who don't follow politics get distraught or excited or confused by it.
I just lurked this thread for months now. Have a hard time trying to post, since I know jack squat when it comes to detailed economic policies, mostly.
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting.
Thats because those states arent competitive. If the state is actually competitive they will wait to call it.
|
On November 07 2012 11:43 forgottendreams wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:39 jpak wrote:
And... Fox News just declared that Murdock lost to Donnelly in Indiana. What a waste. Some joke in a suit unseats a foreign policy god and then loses.
welcome to the tea party, ruining conservatives since 2010
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On November 07 2012 11:44 radiatoren wrote:
North Carolina was lost clearly by Obama. He lest Wake County and that cannot be made up!
not so sure. precincts are not lining up with population. wake county is about 30% reporting with more urban areas left to go
|
On November 07 2012 11:40 jpak wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:39 McBengt wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:27 wozzot wrote:On November 07 2012 11:25 deus.machinarum wrote:On November 07 2012 11:22 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:21 deus.machinarum wrote:
Could somebody with insight(i.e. someone from the US ^^) explain as to why FL is always so close? Is it really just immigrants vs. retired people? (as somebody posted recently) Pretty much. Older retirees tend to lean Republican, while the non-Cuban minority groups lean mostly Democrat. Hmmmm, kay. I get minority groups leaning towards the Democrats, not entirely sure why the older generation as a whole would favor the Republicans. (NOT a pro democrat statement, just wondering) No new taxes! I want the government to keep my hands off my Medicare! Also those Dems support rights for brown people and the gays, who are obviously a threat to the social fabric of America because You're living in a fantasy if you think it's viable to close the deficit without tax increases. This sort of uneducated fundamentalism, that tax cuts are bad is what's going to destroy the economy as it gets closer to the fiscal cliff. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a report showing no correlation between tax cuts and growth. But Republicans made them withdraw the report because it disagree with their political dogma. Here's the report: http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdfPermanent tax cuts will blow up the deficit, increasing the debt in the long run. And that will be very harmful for the economy in the long run. I am reasonably sure that was sarcasm. The second paragraph is a rather obvious tell. Paralleluniverse a Romanian?
What? No.
|
On November 07 2012 11:42 Deathmanbob wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:41 PolskaGora wrote:Don't know if this image has been posted yet, but I think this election is going to come down to Florida... this election is not coming down to florida, its all about OH. When obama wins OH its gg no re
Well, so far so good, Obama has a lead of 52-46 as of right now with about 30% of precincts reporting. Hopefully that's statistically significant enough to hope that Obama's going to win it over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
