|
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 TheTenthDoc wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:41 PolskaGora wrote:Don't know if this image has been posted yet, but I think this election is going to come down to Florida... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SlXRJ.png?1?9916) Obama's now 27K ahead in FL. Broward county reporting in, still 50% of Miami-Dade to report. And Santa Rosa, which may temper it.
Santa Rosa has population ~120000. That's not enough to temper Miami-Dade+Broward. But there might be enough scattered Romney votes across the state to force this to a recount
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting.
They have been polling people who have voted all day in all the important states. That's where they get their information. Not from votes being counted this very second.
|
United States24770 Posts
On November 07 2012 11:45 Plexa wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting. http://electoralmap.net/2012/2012final.php
Thank you; I couldn't care less about the incompetent bracketology you see on TV right now XD
On November 07 2012 11:46 Hrrrrm wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting. They have been polling people who have voted all day in all the important states. That's where they get their information. Not from votes being counted this very second.
Yes and I am not interested in that bullshit.
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting.
Fuck that WE GOTTA BE THE FIRST SITE TO CALL IT!!!!1!!
|
On November 07 2012 11:45 jpak wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:
The regulars in this thread were pretty settled weeks ago on who would win. It's sort of funny watching all these people who don't follow politics get distraught or excited or confused by it. I just lurked this thread for months now. Have a hard time trying to post, since I know jack squat when it comes to detailed economic policies, mostly.
same here, ive posted in sprinklings but ive looked at this page every single day
still not surprised at the results though
|
On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting.
This has always been the way of it, well for at least as long as I've been alive. People are too impatient to wait until the dust settles so they just call states for whoever looks ahead with a tiny fraction of the votes in.
|
On November 07 2012 11:45 Probe1 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:37 TwoToneTerran wrote:On November 07 2012 11:35 julianto wrote:On November 07 2012 11:34 Lmui wrote:
Hmm florida still has people in line waiting to vote O___O. Wow. Why did these people not mail in their votes? The vast majority of voter fraud is through miscounting Absentee ballots, it's probably the best idea not to if you want your vote to count. I find your proof lacking.
If there were hard evidence then it'd be instantly rooted, but live counting is under heavy surveillance and the staff at each polling station is usually too swamped to go fucking with ballots. It's more a logical conclusion (since voter fraud has and always will happen when there's this volume of voting).
Absentee ballots can literally just be "lost" in the mail before the election day even begins.
|
On November 07 2012 11:46 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:45 Plexa wrote:On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting. http://electoralmap.net/2012/2012final.php Thank you; I could care less about the incompetent bracketology you see on TV right now XD Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:46 Hrrrrm wrote:On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting. They have been polling people who have voted all day in all the important states. That's where they get their information. Not from votes being counted this very second. Yes and I am not interested in that bullshit.
I'm just getting all my information from this thread and the CNN election map... probably not one of the most accurate representation on what is actually going on.
|
On November 07 2012 11:46 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:40 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:39 McBengt wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:27 wozzot wrote:On November 07 2012 11:25 deus.machinarum wrote:On November 07 2012 11:22 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:21 deus.machinarum wrote:
Could somebody with insight(i.e. someone from the US ^^) explain as to why FL is always so close? Is it really just immigrants vs. retired people? (as somebody posted recently) Pretty much. Older retirees tend to lean Republican, while the non-Cuban minority groups lean mostly Democrat. Hmmmm, kay. I get minority groups leaning towards the Democrats, not entirely sure why the older generation as a whole would favor the Republicans. (NOT a pro democrat statement, just wondering) No new taxes! I want the government to keep my hands off my Medicare! Also those Dems support rights for brown people and the gays, who are obviously a threat to the social fabric of America because You're living in a fantasy if you think it's viable to close the deficit without tax increases. This sort of uneducated fundamentalism, that tax cuts are bad is what's going to destroy the economy as it gets closer to the fiscal cliff. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a report showing no correlation between tax cuts and growth. But Republicans made them withdraw the report because it disagree with their political dogma. Here's the report: http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdfPermanent tax cuts will blow up the deficit, increasing the debt in the long run. And that will be very harmful for the economy in the long run. I am reasonably sure that was sarcasm. The second paragraph is a rather obvious tell. Paralleluniverse a Romanian? What? No.
No, but I believe he said he is an economics student, which also explains the absence of a sense of humour. 
|
On November 07 2012 11:46 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:40 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:39 McBengt wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:27 wozzot wrote:On November 07 2012 11:25 deus.machinarum wrote:On November 07 2012 11:22 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:21 deus.machinarum wrote:
Could somebody with insight(i.e. someone from the US ^^) explain as to why FL is always so close? Is it really just immigrants vs. retired people? (as somebody posted recently) Pretty much. Older retirees tend to lean Republican, while the non-Cuban minority groups lean mostly Democrat. Hmmmm, kay. I get minority groups leaning towards the Democrats, not entirely sure why the older generation as a whole would favor the Republicans. (NOT a pro democrat statement, just wondering) No new taxes! I want the government to keep my hands off my Medicare! Also those Dems support rights for brown people and the gays, who are obviously a threat to the social fabric of America because You're living in a fantasy if you think it's viable to close the deficit without tax increases. This sort of uneducated fundamentalism, that tax cuts are bad is what's going to destroy the economy as it gets closer to the fiscal cliff. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a report showing no correlation between tax cuts and growth. But Republicans made them withdraw the report because it disagree with their political dogma. Here's the report: http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdfPermanent tax cuts will blow up the deficit, increasing the debt in the long run. And that will be very harmful for the economy in the long run. I am reasonably sure that was sarcasm. The second paragraph is a rather obvious tell. Paralleluniverse a Romanian? What? No.
Pretty sure you are, and that response all but confirms it.
|
On November 07 2012 11:43 Disengaged wrote:
I thought Obama had more electoral votes from the stuff I read a week or 2 ago?
The west coast hasn't closed yet. California, Washington and Oregon will probably be called as soon as they close and CA has a ton of electoral votes.
|
guys, I might have overreached a bit. I'm still gonna hold out for that win though.
shit on a brick, I woulda thought FL was a lock. Bush v. Gore 2.0 but this time we lose the recount...
|
Boehner giving a speech right now that makes it seem clear that the next four years will be another round of obstruction 
|
On November 07 2012 11:48 hacklebeast wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:46 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:40 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:39 McBengt wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:27 wozzot wrote:On November 07 2012 11:25 deus.machinarum wrote:On November 07 2012 11:22 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:21 deus.machinarum wrote:
Could somebody with insight(i.e. someone from the US ^^) explain as to why FL is always so close? Is it really just immigrants vs. retired people? (as somebody posted recently) Pretty much. Older retirees tend to lean Republican, while the non-Cuban minority groups lean mostly Democrat. Hmmmm, kay. I get minority groups leaning towards the Democrats, not entirely sure why the older generation as a whole would favor the Republicans. (NOT a pro democrat statement, just wondering) No new taxes! I want the government to keep my hands off my Medicare! Also those Dems support rights for brown people and the gays, who are obviously a threat to the social fabric of America because You're living in a fantasy if you think it's viable to close the deficit without tax increases. This sort of uneducated fundamentalism, that tax cuts are bad is what's going to destroy the economy as it gets closer to the fiscal cliff. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a report showing no correlation between tax cuts and growth. But Republicans made them withdraw the report because it disagree with their political dogma. Here's the report: http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdfPermanent tax cuts will blow up the deficit, increasing the debt in the long run. And that will be very harmful for the economy in the long run. I am reasonably sure that was sarcasm. The second paragraph is a rather obvious tell. Paralleluniverse a Romanian? What? No. Pretty sure you are, and that response all but confirms it.
I seriously have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
|
On November 07 2012 11:46 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:45 Plexa wrote:On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting. http://electoralmap.net/2012/2012final.php Thank you; I couldn't care less about the incompetent bracketology you see on TV right now XD Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:46 Hrrrrm wrote:On November 07 2012 11:44 micronesia wrote:
Is there a website that is careful about waiting until results are nearly final before 'calling' a state for a candidate? From what I've looked at so far it seems like 5 votes have been cast, 3 went to a candidate, and they call it, with 0.00001% reporting. They have been polling people who have voted all day in all the important states. That's where they get their information. Not from votes being counted this very second. Yes and I am not interested in that bullshit.
Politico's been pretty conservative in calling things. For example, as of this posting they haven't called PA yet.
|
On November 07 2012 11:49 Deathmanbob wrote:Boehner giving a speech right now that makes it seem clear that the next four years will be another round of obstruction
One can hope that hes just posturing because if he does that then getting 60 votes back in senate by 2016 and house back is a possibility.
|
On November 07 2012 11:49 Deathmanbob wrote:Boehner giving a speech right now that makes it seem clear that the next four years will be another round of obstruction
Shouldn't be surprised about that.
The rest of the country just needs to wise up to the tactic and KICK THEM OUT NEXT TIME!!
|
On November 07 2012 11:49 sc2superfan101 wrote:
guys, I might have overreached a bit. I'm still gonna hold out for that win though.
shit on a brick, I woulda thought FL was a lock. Bush v. Gore 2.0 but this time we lose the recount...
Hey thanks for admitting it, but i will hold you to that tutu picture.
|
When was the last time a Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidate lost their home states?
|
On November 07 2012 11:49 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 11:48 hacklebeast wrote:On November 07 2012 11:46 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:40 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:39 McBengt wrote:On November 07 2012 11:36 paralleluniverse wrote:On November 07 2012 11:27 wozzot wrote:On November 07 2012 11:25 deus.machinarum wrote:On November 07 2012 11:22 jpak wrote:On November 07 2012 11:21 deus.machinarum wrote:
Could somebody with insight(i.e. someone from the US ^^) explain as to why FL is always so close? Is it really just immigrants vs. retired people? (as somebody posted recently) Pretty much. Older retirees tend to lean Republican, while the non-Cuban minority groups lean mostly Democrat. Hmmmm, kay. I get minority groups leaning towards the Democrats, not entirely sure why the older generation as a whole would favor the Republicans. (NOT a pro democrat statement, just wondering) No new taxes! I want the government to keep my hands off my Medicare! Also those Dems support rights for brown people and the gays, who are obviously a threat to the social fabric of America because You're living in a fantasy if you think it's viable to close the deficit without tax increases. This sort of uneducated fundamentalism, that tax cuts are bad is what's going to destroy the economy as it gets closer to the fiscal cliff. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a report showing no correlation between tax cuts and growth. But Republicans made them withdraw the report because it disagree with their political dogma. Here's the report: http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdfPermanent tax cuts will blow up the deficit, increasing the debt in the long run. And that will be very harmful for the economy in the long run. I am reasonably sure that was sarcasm. The second paragraph is a rather obvious tell. Paralleluniverse a Romanian? What? No. Pretty sure you are, and that response all but confirms it. I seriously have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
Romanians cannot detect sarcasm
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
106
5797
5053
1998
EPT
