On July 11 2013 03:28 Maeldun wrote: Given that the whole prosecution is being thwarted by a single witness, does anyone feel that John Good is lying?
I chuckle inside every time a witness comes up to the stand, raises their right hand and promises, in front of God, that they will tell the truth.
Would you put yourself at risk of going to prison for your neighbors? Especially since there's no way he could know what the other neighbors saw, what evidence the police would find, and so on. He might be mistaken in what he saw but it's pretty silly to suggest he'd be lying unless you know something we don't.
Right on. There's nothing wrong with being mistaken, but I highly doubt that he's lying.
On July 11 2013 03:40 BigFan wrote: O'Mara is laughing internally. Look at his face lol
I saw that lol you could tell he was holding it back
ya, I was laughing at the prosecutor argument of sleeping on the floor and saying you should bend your hand to take a shot at someone and able to do it in any position etc...
they are backdooring information about zimmerman's character through this witness. if i were the prosecutor i would ask to admit prior criminal history, etc. they are trying to show zimmerman is a lawful, non-confrontational person.
On July 11 2013 03:40 dAPhREAk wrote: i love this guy. "anything is possible, but that doesnt make it plausible."
Can't watch at work. What was that in response to?
He was asking if George Zimmerman could have awkwardly bent his wrist to shoot the gun in a different way than a normal 90 degree angle shot and then he laid on the ground demonstrating it...it just looked ridiculous and there's no reason to believe that given the circumstances George would have consciously decided to bend his wrist that way to take a shot in a different way for no apparent reason.
On July 11 2013 03:57 Kaitlin wrote: So, they called this burglary victim, but stopped short of her interaction with GZ ?
I'm sure there must be a reason for it. That or maybe she volunteered for it or something.
Well, it seems they wanted her as a witness, but there must be some shit they don't want to come out, therefore they didn't open the door to it and immediately objected "outside the scope" when prosecutor asked about her interaction with GZ. What's the history with this witness ?
On July 11 2013 03:57 Kaitlin wrote: So, they called this burglary victim, but stopped short of her interaction with GZ ?
they are tricky facts. on one hand, shows he is involved with protecting the community. on the other hand, it shows he was a a wannabe cop and these "fucking punks" always get away--although they were caught in this case, and then released because they are minors.
On July 11 2013 04:02 Kaitlin wrote: I didn't tweet. Those must have been my 4 month old making those tweets.
You need a 3rd layer of password protection to keep that from happening. You'll also have to have your grandma around to testify that it was actually the baby that tweeted it, or it will be inadmissible.
EPT
