• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:31
CEST 18:31
KST 01:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll6Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL How to choose the right travel agency for trips? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 803 users

If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting hap…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 335 336 337 338 339 891 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
GreenManalishi
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada834 Posts
January 03 2013 22:31 GMT
#6721
On January 04 2013 06:05 StarStrider wrote:
With 2 exceptions, in the past 50 years every single mass shooting (4+ people dead) has taken place within a gun free zone. This should tell us something.

That correlation doesn't imply causation?
fight_or_flight
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States3988 Posts
January 04 2013 12:04 GMT
#6722
Here's an important point to consider in any gun debate involving the recent mass shootings.

Do you really want chat rooms?
Joedaddy
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1948 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-04 12:21:17
January 04 2013 12:20 GMT
#6723
On January 04 2013 21:04 fight_or_flight wrote:
Here's an important point to consider in any gun debate involving the recent mass shootings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZPS7AdgNgE


I'm a little dense, so please forgive me. I don't understand how a video that raises conspiracy theory-esque speculation about the number of shooters involved is an important point to consider. Whether there was 1 shooter or 20, I don't understand how it affects the gun debate and the recent shootings. Can you please explain it to me?
I might be the minority on TL, but TL is the minority everywhere else.
StarStrider
Profile Joined August 2011
United States689 Posts
January 05 2013 02:56 GMT
#6724
On January 04 2013 07:31 GreenManalishi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2013 06:05 StarStrider wrote:
With 2 exceptions, in the past 50 years every single mass shooting (4+ people dead) has taken place within a gun free zone. This should tell us something.

That correlation doesn't imply causation?


Surely you're not arguing that it is mere coincidence?
Spontaneous Pneumothorax sucks, please keep MVP sC in your thoughts. sC fighting! 힘내세요
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24673 Posts
January 05 2013 02:58 GMT
#6725
On January 05 2013 11:56 StarStrider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2013 07:31 GreenManalishi wrote:
On January 04 2013 06:05 StarStrider wrote:
With 2 exceptions, in the past 50 years every single mass shooting (4+ people dead) has taken place within a gun free zone. This should tell us something.

That correlation doesn't imply causation?


Surely you're not arguing that it is mere coincidence?

Well you were implying more than what you said... that it should 'tell us something.' The obvious implication is that gun free zones attract mass shootings and thus we should not have gun free zones. Of course, it is actually much more complicated than that.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 03:01:18
January 05 2013 03:00 GMT
#6726
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.

Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13909 Posts
January 05 2013 03:06 GMT
#6727
Please don't introduce shady conspiracy laden videos that don't pertain at all to the discussion at hand. At the very best its only just making you look bad.

Statistics are in the end just evidence and not definite proof. That being said though you can't just cast one off beacuse there isn't anything to contradict it.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 03:22:34
January 05 2013 03:21 GMT
#6728
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
January 05 2013 03:42 GMT
#6729
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?
dude bro.
Mentalizor
Profile Joined January 2011
Denmark1596 Posts
January 05 2013 03:48 GMT
#6730
...every time I see this thread the same thoughts go through my mind:
1: Why is this thread still running?
2: Oh, look... people are actually not just bashing. There is a ton of great points from both sides
3: Oh nvm... 'merica-bashing, stubborness and general internet lingo is cruising on...

Usually, I would just tap into another thread... But this time I just felt I had to address it... It's cool when you can discuss things... But man, there's a lot of bashing - from both sides...
(yಠ,ಠ)y - Y U NO ALL IN? - rtsAlaran: " I somehow sit inside the bus.Hot_Bit giving me a massage"
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
January 05 2013 04:47 GMT
#6731
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24673 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 04:49:11
January 05 2013 04:48 GMT
#6732
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 04:54:01
January 05 2013 04:51 GMT
#6733
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24673 Posts
January 05 2013 04:58 GMT
#6734
On January 05 2013 13:51 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.

Yea gun free zones have exceptions such as police officers, but the gun free zones near me don't have any guns that I'm aware of.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
iplayBANJO
Profile Joined September 2010
United States129 Posts
January 05 2013 04:59 GMT
#6735
On January 05 2013 12:48 Mentalizor wrote:
...every time I see this thread the same thoughts go through my mind:
1: Why is this thread still running?
2: Oh, look... people are actually not just bashing. There is a ton of great points from both sides
3: Oh nvm... 'merica-bashing, stubborness and general internet lingo is cruising on...

Usually, I would just tap into another thread... But this time I just felt I had to address it... It's cool when you can discuss things... But man, there's a lot of bashing - from both sides...


There's always a lot of meaningless insults floating around internet discussions. This particular discussion though has a high enough percentage of thoughtful, or at least sincere discussion that I keep coming back to it. As far as stubbornness is concerned, you should never expect people to be flexible in their beliefs. No one here is expecting to change anyone else's mind, just hoping both to better understand opposing viewpoints and illuminate their own as not being ignorant or irrelevant.

I will say however, that the frequency with which people use YouTube videos to voice their own opinions is a little disturbing. If I can't properly summarize a point, then I probably don't understand it well enough to formulate a decent enough argument to add to the ongoing discussion. Although there have only been a few in the last couple of pages, I personally am a little disappointed every time I see a YouTube box loading here.

On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?


I think the only official "gun free zones" in the United States are public schools. There's exceptions made for on-duty law enforcement and other properly certified security employees, but it's the only example I know of where the majority of individuals, who are otherwise legally permitted to carry firearms, are not allowed to do so. It's my understanding that the media's labeling of other areas where it is often asked of people to not carry firearms, it is not a legal obligation. Some places of business have policies about open carry and will not allow you to enter based on it being private property, and news programs may label them as "gun free zones" even when they are not.

The real interesting part of these gun free zones is the radius outside actual school property that is still considered a school zone, and is thus "gun free". I believe it has been ruled that individuals living within the school zone still maintain their constitutional right to own a firearm, but apparently lose their right to carry it; as carrying it into or out of their place of residence becomes an illegal activity.

Again though, all of this is from research done out of personal curiosity revolving around discussions I have at gun ranges. I am in no way an expert on any of this, and might be completely misinformed or mistaken.
"So you think you know stuff about things? Well, I will see your stuff about things, and raise you things about stuff."
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 05:04:48
January 05 2013 05:02 GMT
#6736
On January 05 2013 13:58 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:51 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.

Yea gun free zones have exceptions such as police officers, but the gun free zones near me don't have any guns that I'm aware of.

So some zones has exceptions, some have not, interesting.
And for the record; I've only been in two gun free zones ever, so my experience should be considered limited.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24673 Posts
January 05 2013 05:03 GMT
#6737
On January 05 2013 14:02 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:58 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:51 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.

Yea gun free zones have exceptions such as police officers, but the gun free zones near me don't have any guns that I'm aware of.

So some zones has exceptions, some have not, interesting.

No, the rules are the same for all of them. The question is whether or not personnel that meet the exceptions actually are on premises.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
January 05 2013 05:36 GMT
#6738
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

Pretty much, even if it isn't a murder suicide thing people who have the intention to use firearms in gun free zones are going to use them regardless of any laws, signs, or prayers. It does nothing to fix the problem and is not a rational idea considering the current situation in america.

On January 05 2013 13:59 iplayBANJO wrote:
I will say however, that the frequency with which people use YouTube videos to voice their own opinions is a little disturbing. If I can't properly summarize a point, then I probably don't understand it well enough to formulate a decent enough argument to add to the ongoing discussion. Although there have only been a few in the last couple of pages, I personally am a little disappointed every time I see a YouTube box loading here.


Yes... I hate those posts. Whether it's due to sheer laziness or inability to articulate your actual opinions, people are going to assume the latter and ignore "your thoughts".
dude bro.
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 05:57:57
January 05 2013 05:56 GMT
#6739
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Armed civilians are actually a better deterrent. A shooter can quickly scan a crowd, spot the security, and either shoot them first, or try to avoid them. Civilians armed with concealed weapons are much harder to spot, and thus harder to counter.

Even if that doesn't turn out to be a big deal, any deterrent has to be better than no deterrent, right? Every gun-free zone I've ever seen, save for the DMV, had either no armed guards, or far too few to really cover the whole zone.
Who called in the fleet?
Destine3
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States12 Posts
January 05 2013 06:13 GMT
#6740
i hate to see people use the phrase "ITS IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS!" Cause they KNOW that is like that so the British wouldnt come into our houses and kill us (along with wild bear... -_-) some hundred years ago. It is obvious that times has changed and the laws should flex along with it.
Nothing like a little failure to sharpen your aim.
Prev 1 335 336 337 338 339 891 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 4
Mixu vs HiGhDrALIVE!
Gerald vs ArT
goblin vs MaNa
Jumy vs YoungYakov
WardiTV321
IndyStarCraft 117
TKL 111
Liquipedia
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill Weekly #218
CranKy Ducklings151
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 493
IndyStarCraft 111
TKL 101
mcanning 98
UpATreeSC 37
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 34704
Sea 2730
EffOrt 1971
Larva 1796
firebathero 828
Stork 544
Mini 389
actioN 243
Light 205
Snow 185
[ Show more ]
Zeus 169
PianO 149
Sharp 132
sSak 81
sas.Sziky 63
ToSsGirL 61
Hyun 56
Shine 53
Backho 42
TY 32
Rush 22
scan(afreeca) 20
Terrorterran 16
IntoTheRainbow 11
Yoon 8
Hm[arnc] 8
Noble 6
Stormgate
NightEnD12
Dota 2
Gorgc9854
qojqva2322
Counter-Strike
markeloff526
sgares483
pashabiceps304
edward34
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King63
Other Games
FrodaN1676
hiko1154
Beastyqt530
ceh9350
Lowko297
RotterdaM238
Fuzer 209
KnowMe131
QueenE75
Pyrionflax73
Trikslyr65
Skadoodle40
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2964
StarCraft 2
angryscii 18
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH183
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1418
League of Legends
• Nemesis4868
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 29m
OSC
7h 29m
Epic.LAN
19h 29m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 17h
Epic.LAN
1d 19h
CSO Contender
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Esports World Cup
4 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.