• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:36
CEST 08:36
KST 15:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 2313Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Grand Finals ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot BW General Discussion BSL Season 23 Syncronization issues and can't find games
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27!
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9314 users

If you're seeing this topic then another mass shooting hap…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 335 336 337 338 339 891 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
GreenManalishi
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada834 Posts
January 03 2013 22:31 GMT
#6721
On January 04 2013 06:05 StarStrider wrote:
With 2 exceptions, in the past 50 years every single mass shooting (4+ people dead) has taken place within a gun free zone. This should tell us something.

That correlation doesn't imply causation?
fight_or_flight
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States3988 Posts
January 04 2013 12:04 GMT
#6722
Here's an important point to consider in any gun debate involving the recent mass shootings.

Do you really want chat rooms?
Joedaddy
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1948 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-04 12:21:17
January 04 2013 12:20 GMT
#6723
On January 04 2013 21:04 fight_or_flight wrote:
Here's an important point to consider in any gun debate involving the recent mass shootings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZPS7AdgNgE


I'm a little dense, so please forgive me. I don't understand how a video that raises conspiracy theory-esque speculation about the number of shooters involved is an important point to consider. Whether there was 1 shooter or 20, I don't understand how it affects the gun debate and the recent shootings. Can you please explain it to me?
I might be the minority on TL, but TL is the minority everywhere else.
StarStrider
Profile Joined August 2011
United States689 Posts
January 05 2013 02:56 GMT
#6724
On January 04 2013 07:31 GreenManalishi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2013 06:05 StarStrider wrote:
With 2 exceptions, in the past 50 years every single mass shooting (4+ people dead) has taken place within a gun free zone. This should tell us something.

That correlation doesn't imply causation?


Surely you're not arguing that it is mere coincidence?
Spontaneous Pneumothorax sucks, please keep MVP sC in your thoughts. sC fighting! 힘내세요
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24799 Posts
January 05 2013 02:58 GMT
#6725
On January 05 2013 11:56 StarStrider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2013 07:31 GreenManalishi wrote:
On January 04 2013 06:05 StarStrider wrote:
With 2 exceptions, in the past 50 years every single mass shooting (4+ people dead) has taken place within a gun free zone. This should tell us something.

That correlation doesn't imply causation?


Surely you're not arguing that it is mere coincidence?

Well you were implying more than what you said... that it should 'tell us something.' The obvious implication is that gun free zones attract mass shootings and thus we should not have gun free zones. Of course, it is actually much more complicated than that.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 03:01:18
January 05 2013 03:00 GMT
#6726
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.

Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14210 Posts
January 05 2013 03:06 GMT
#6727
Please don't introduce shady conspiracy laden videos that don't pertain at all to the discussion at hand. At the very best its only just making you look bad.

Statistics are in the end just evidence and not definite proof. That being said though you can't just cast one off beacuse there isn't anything to contradict it.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 03:22:34
January 05 2013 03:21 GMT
#6728
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
January 05 2013 03:42 GMT
#6729
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?
dude bro.
Mentalizor
Profile Joined January 2011
Denmark1596 Posts
January 05 2013 03:48 GMT
#6730
...every time I see this thread the same thoughts go through my mind:
1: Why is this thread still running?
2: Oh, look... people are actually not just bashing. There is a ton of great points from both sides
3: Oh nvm... 'merica-bashing, stubborness and general internet lingo is cruising on...

Usually, I would just tap into another thread... But this time I just felt I had to address it... It's cool when you can discuss things... But man, there's a lot of bashing - from both sides...
(yಠ,ಠ)y - Y U NO ALL IN? - rtsAlaran: " I somehow sit inside the bus.Hot_Bit giving me a massage"
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
January 05 2013 04:47 GMT
#6731
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24799 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 04:49:11
January 05 2013 04:48 GMT
#6732
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 04:54:01
January 05 2013 04:51 GMT
#6733
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24799 Posts
January 05 2013 04:58 GMT
#6734
On January 05 2013 13:51 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.

Yea gun free zones have exceptions such as police officers, but the gun free zones near me don't have any guns that I'm aware of.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
iplayBANJO
Profile Joined September 2010
United States129 Posts
January 05 2013 04:59 GMT
#6735
On January 05 2013 12:48 Mentalizor wrote:
...every time I see this thread the same thoughts go through my mind:
1: Why is this thread still running?
2: Oh, look... people are actually not just bashing. There is a ton of great points from both sides
3: Oh nvm... 'merica-bashing, stubborness and general internet lingo is cruising on...

Usually, I would just tap into another thread... But this time I just felt I had to address it... It's cool when you can discuss things... But man, there's a lot of bashing - from both sides...


There's always a lot of meaningless insults floating around internet discussions. This particular discussion though has a high enough percentage of thoughtful, or at least sincere discussion that I keep coming back to it. As far as stubbornness is concerned, you should never expect people to be flexible in their beliefs. No one here is expecting to change anyone else's mind, just hoping both to better understand opposing viewpoints and illuminate their own as not being ignorant or irrelevant.

I will say however, that the frequency with which people use YouTube videos to voice their own opinions is a little disturbing. If I can't properly summarize a point, then I probably don't understand it well enough to formulate a decent enough argument to add to the ongoing discussion. Although there have only been a few in the last couple of pages, I personally am a little disappointed every time I see a YouTube box loading here.

On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?


I think the only official "gun free zones" in the United States are public schools. There's exceptions made for on-duty law enforcement and other properly certified security employees, but it's the only example I know of where the majority of individuals, who are otherwise legally permitted to carry firearms, are not allowed to do so. It's my understanding that the media's labeling of other areas where it is often asked of people to not carry firearms, it is not a legal obligation. Some places of business have policies about open carry and will not allow you to enter based on it being private property, and news programs may label them as "gun free zones" even when they are not.

The real interesting part of these gun free zones is the radius outside actual school property that is still considered a school zone, and is thus "gun free". I believe it has been ruled that individuals living within the school zone still maintain their constitutional right to own a firearm, but apparently lose their right to carry it; as carrying it into or out of their place of residence becomes an illegal activity.

Again though, all of this is from research done out of personal curiosity revolving around discussions I have at gun ranges. I am in no way an expert on any of this, and might be completely misinformed or mistaken.
"So you think you know stuff about things? Well, I will see your stuff about things, and raise you things about stuff."
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 05:04:48
January 05 2013 05:02 GMT
#6736
On January 05 2013 13:58 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:51 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.

Yea gun free zones have exceptions such as police officers, but the gun free zones near me don't have any guns that I'm aware of.

So some zones has exceptions, some have not, interesting.
And for the record; I've only been in two gun free zones ever, so my experience should be considered limited.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24799 Posts
January 05 2013 05:03 GMT
#6737
On January 05 2013 14:02 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:58 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:51 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Are you sure? I know of gun free zones that has armed guards and metal detectors and such around the or close to the gun free zone? Or am i totally wrong here. To me it would be more risky shooting people close to those who are trained for this kind of situation compared to just go to some random place with "regular" random people.

Yea gun free zones have exceptions such as police officers, but the gun free zones near me don't have any guns that I'm aware of.

So some zones has exceptions, some have not, interesting.

No, the rules are the same for all of them. The question is whether or not personnel that meet the exceptions actually are on premises.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
January 05 2013 05:36 GMT
#6738
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

Pretty much, even if it isn't a murder suicide thing people who have the intention to use firearms in gun free zones are going to use them regardless of any laws, signs, or prayers. It does nothing to fix the problem and is not a rational idea considering the current situation in america.

On January 05 2013 13:59 iplayBANJO wrote:
I will say however, that the frequency with which people use YouTube videos to voice their own opinions is a little disturbing. If I can't properly summarize a point, then I probably don't understand it well enough to formulate a decent enough argument to add to the ongoing discussion. Although there have only been a few in the last couple of pages, I personally am a little disappointed every time I see a YouTube box loading here.


Yes... I hate those posts. Whether it's due to sheer laziness or inability to articulate your actual opinions, people are going to assume the latter and ignore "your thoughts".
dude bro.
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-05 05:57:57
January 05 2013 05:56 GMT
#6739
On January 05 2013 13:48 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 05 2013 13:47 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:42 heliusx wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:21 Integra wrote:
On January 05 2013 12:00 Rassy wrote:
My first guess is that people who are going for a mass shooting, are going to crowded places.
My second guess is that crowded places are often gun free zones.


ya, Gun free zones, or zones with exercised gun control are put in places where the damage or chance of shootings is considered as high. Locations with high density of people in a small area, like schools, or locations witch contains high valuable objects, like banks. If someone would want to kill allot of people or steal something with the help of weapons then this are the places they would go to. And they would do this regardless if it was a gun free zone or not.


So what's the point of a gun free zone again?

If the topic still is suicidal mass shooting, It prolly has very little effect since the culprit who kills himself afterwards won't worry too much about any law he might brake. I mean you can't exactly sentence him to death since... he is already dead.

It is possible that a reason why mass shooters are attracted to gun free zones is because they know the odds of someone getting in their way are small. In other words, it's possible having no crowded place where it's unlikely to encounter an opponent with a comparable weapon would reduce attempts at mass shootings. On the other hand, it's difficult to prove this one way or the other due to confounding variables.

Armed civilians are actually a better deterrent. A shooter can quickly scan a crowd, spot the security, and either shoot them first, or try to avoid them. Civilians armed with concealed weapons are much harder to spot, and thus harder to counter.

Even if that doesn't turn out to be a big deal, any deterrent has to be better than no deterrent, right? Every gun-free zone I've ever seen, save for the DMV, had either no armed guards, or far too few to really cover the whole zone.
Who called in the fleet?
Destine3
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States12 Posts
January 05 2013 06:13 GMT
#6740
i hate to see people use the phrase "ITS IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS!" Cause they KNOW that is like that so the British wouldnt come into our houses and kill us (along with wild bear... -_-) some hundred years ago. It is obvious that times has changed and the laws should flex along with it.
Nothing like a little failure to sharpen your aim.
Prev 1 335 336 337 338 339 891 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft856
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 3699
Soma 966
actioN 615
ggaemo 544
Barracks 238
Stork 237
PianO 130
Mong 48
Noble 9
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm236
League of Legends
JimRising 573
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr57
Other Games
summit1g9275
PiGStarcraft274
Maynarde188
Sick177
Livibee118
ArmadaUGS73
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick459
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 312
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2320
League of Legends
• Lourlo1076
Upcoming Events
GSL
1h 24m
Yamato Cup
8h 24m
BSL Open Qualifier
12h 24m
BSL Open Qualifier
12h 24m
OSC
16h 24m
Replay Cast
17h 24m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 3h
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
1d 4h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 9h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Online Event
6 days
FEL
6 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.