EPTMen's Fashion Thread - Page 72
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
| ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
On October 10 2012 13:02 andyrau wrote: actually aldens are pretty much at the same price as AE barring the latter's sales. a difference of 50-100 dollars isn't much considering both cost anywhere between 200-400, and 500-600 for cordovans. They're both mid-tier, quality leather goods. speaking of cordovan shoes, I don't own it but the difference between it and saddle/bridle leather is night and day. The artisan shoes you linked look amazing but they're seriously out of most of our budgets. just like these ;o; http://www.grenson.co.uk/en_us/shop/0007-25742 Was certainly referring to sales. All of my AEs were bought on sales, as they happen so frequently. Haven't heard much about Alden sales, except occasional seconds. | ||
|
Serthius
Samoa226 Posts
On October 10 2012 07:31 StateofReverie wrote: The sneakers are like the 2nd to last part that I notice on MEN. Women's shoe wear is a completely different matter.... If clothing is an art, why spend the most money on the piece that is going to be seen the least? Shoes make the man. You'll look better in a cheap H&M suit and a pair of quality shoes than you will in a Ralph Lauren suit and cheap crappy shoes. | ||
|
Signet
United States1718 Posts
On October 10 2012 13:17 Blisse wrote: How do you guys feel about hoodies? I'm just a student so I mix and match hoodies for the most part. Saw some really nice clothes the time I went to the States, but I'm Canadian so clothes are more expensive and less varied with less brand selection. American Apparel makes a pretty good hoodie. You can order their most stylish version in the Teamliquid store! | ||
|
SiroKO
France721 Posts
I'm not sure why, maybe because it creates a clear distinction between the upper-part and the lower-part of the body while suggerating the aesthetic parts of the men body... While when the t-shirt/polo is not tucked in, I think most men look kind of shapeless... I know that 2-3 few years ago I used to consider people with their t-shirt tucked in as dorks, so, I'm not sure what to do now, some opinions on this trend ? | ||
|
StateofReverie
United States633 Posts
On October 10 2012 14:26 Aerisky wrote: Ah gotcha, thanks :D Hm, how often do you tend to wear one article of clothing? Since I had never been particularly fashion-conscious, I tend to find a piece of outerwear that I like a lot and end up wearing it for a very long time alone. If I wore a piece of clothing every other day, I doubt anything could last for that many years (right?)...on the other end of the spectrum I was thinking maybe some of you guys own many articles of clothing, so over such a time period maybe you don't wear it too much? If I dont't workout or don't sweat or do much in the clothes, than I will fold it up and wear it for another day. Currently my hugo boss hoodie that I was showing off in a picture in an earlier post is something that I ABSOLUTELY LOVE wearing. I probably wear that once a day at least for sittings at a time. As long as theres no food stains on it and it doesn't smell, Im ok with wearing it stil | ||
|
dgsdm
198 Posts
On October 10 2012 23:16 SiroKO wrote: As I turned 23, I'm more and more thinking that men with pectorals muscle and decent shoulder width look much better with their t-shirt/polo tucked inside their pants (and a classy belt). I'm not sure why, maybe because it creates a clear distinction between the upper-part and the lower-part of the body while suggerating the aesthetic parts of the men body... While when the t-shirt/polo is not tucked in, I think most men look kind of shapeless... I know that 2-3 few years ago I used to consider people with their t-shirt tucked in as dorks, so, I'm not sure what to do now, some opinions on this trend ? You should tuck in dress shirts but I don't think you should tuck in t-shirts or polos. On October 10 2012 23:03 Signet wrote: American Apparel makes a pretty good hoodie. You can order their most stylish version in the Teamliquid store! Also American Apparel hoodies are great imo. | ||
|
KvltMan
Sweden1609 Posts
| ||
|
StateofReverie
United States633 Posts
On October 11 2012 05:01 KvltMan wrote: Can anyone recommend any good stores in the Shanghai-area? Looking for both menswear and the more casual style of clothing! Im sure you can find some european designer clothing stores if you go into the nice part of the city | ||
|
DragoonPK
3259 Posts
| ||
|
puppykiller
United States3128 Posts
Race: White Hair: Dark Brown Height: 5'7 Age: 20 Build: Lean, Broad Shoulders Income: None, but decent savings and can make others buy a few things for me Personality: Marlo Stanfield (and no I'm not exaggerating, I have extremely high confidence and I've trained myself to show no tells) I do not want people to miss perceive my being withdrawn as rooting from social awkwardness. I need a build that will make others assume that I am intelligent. | ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
Also you want...to look more intelligent and outgoing, or...? I feel like that's all things that are assumed from body language rather than clothes | ||
|
puppykiller
United States3128 Posts
http://www.twitch.tv/puppykiller3/b/335489770 | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44328 Posts
On October 10 2012 23:16 SiroKO wrote: As I turned 23, I'm more and more thinking that men with pectorals muscle and decent shoulder width look much better with their t-shirt/polo tucked inside their pants (and a classy belt). I'm not sure why, maybe because it creates a clear distinction between the upper-part and the lower-part of the body while suggerating the aesthetic parts of the men body... While when the t-shirt/polo is not tucked in, I think most men look kind of shapeless... I know that 2-3 few years ago I used to consider people with their t-shirt tucked in as dorks, so, I'm not sure what to do now, some opinions on this trend ? I understand what you mean about shapelessness, but I think that you can get a better, more form-fitting shirt in that case. Perhaps one that's slimmer and doesn't have a very loose, open bottom. As someone who wears polos and dress shirts all the time for my various jobs (e.g. teaching tennis at a country club, working in schools and tutoring centers as a substitute teacher and tutor), the majority of my wardrobe (pretty much everything that isn't StarCraft or Rutgers-related) is clothes like these. I think the vast majority of people look like slobs when their dress shirts aren't tucked in, and I think tucking in a polo (unless it's required for work) comes off as way too uptight and even over-the-top nerdy. I think, for the vast majority of the time (regardless of your build): dress shirts need to be tucked in (with a belt, obviously), and polos should be kept untucked. | ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
@Siroko I'd never tuck in a tshirt though ? | ||
|
Diglett
600 Posts
if you like that style go for it. but it's dadcore -_- | ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
I mean there's some shirts that should absolutely, but its not always necessary to tuck in an OCBD... how are you defining dress shirt here? Just a button up shirt or specifically 2plys or similar, or...? Polos...I need to wear them untucked because I they're a bit loose on me, they actually give me a better looking torso loose lol. | ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
go fucking wild | ||
|
dgsdm
198 Posts
| ||
| ||
