That police officer is a total tool. If he was in charge of an assault would he say "Well that guy should not have had such a punchable face". I agree with most of what people here have been saying, but i just cant shake how disgusted i am with that police officer.
well, maybe one argument for a negative correlation between revealiness of clothing and the risk of getting sexually assaulted would be that a significant proportion of rapists dont rape because of a random, unexpected horniness but plan it beforehand. and if a potential rapist is out there, looking for victims, he might be attracted in particular to those women who seem insecure and weak. dressing in a way that creates attention always makes a girl look more confident and secure than dressing like a shy little something.
in general, i think most people think that rapes emerge out of random horniness, but most rapes emerge either from a plan or from chance. if there is a chance to rape a women without having to fear being caught makes men´s true character come out. for example rape in war.
so i´ll side with those who demand statistical proof of that theory before discussing its moral implications.
I'm astonished at the lack of people's ability to go to wikipedia in this thread.
So, with regards to the "70%" know their victims, wikipedia at least cites this for a US statistic: "Over two thirds of all rapes occur in someone's home. 31% occur in the perpetrators' homes, 27% in the victims' homes and 10% in homes shared by the victim and perpetrator. 7% occur at parties, 7% in vehicles, 4% outdoors and 2% in bars". I cite this because it's kind of more relevant--a person is not forced into a home. They plan to go to a person's home. And going to someone's home really implies more knowledge about someone than if, say, women were all raped at parties ("yeah, I knew him because I met him ONE time at this bar").
I don't have a citation for these, but at my university the health department at least advertise that 90% of all campus rapes occur when assailant, victim or both have been using alcohol, and cite some study of "3303 urine samples collected from women who believed they were raped after being drugged 61.3 % positive for some substance with 67.0% alcohol 30.3% marijuana."
So really, instead of saying "oh yeah it makes sense", half of an effort on wikipedia really suggests two things: 1) provocative dressing does not really encourage it. Vast majority rapes occur at a person's home or a party (presumably in a home of some sort) and most women say they knew the assailant beforehand (again from wikipedia). You're inside someone's home: maybe you are dressed like a slut, but you really shouldn't blame the victim for perhaps dressing slutty if they are in a home of someone they know and (hypothetically) trust. 2) alcohol is largest contributing factor to rape attempts/successful rapes.
So really, instead of saying "oh yeah it makes sense", half of an effort on wikipedia really suggests two things: 1) provocative dressing does not really encourage it. Vast majority rapes occur at a person's home or a party (presumably in a home of some sort) and most women say they knew the assailant beforehand (again from wikipedia). You're inside someone's home: maybe you are dressed like a slut, but you really shouldn't blame the victim for perhaps dressing slutty if they are in a home of someone they know and (hypothetically) trust. 2) alcohol is largest contributing factor to rape attempts/successful rapes.
This is a useful contribution to the thread. But it is important to remember what is really at stake here. The issue being protested is not whether the policeman made an accurate statement about how one can reduce the risk of being raped. I think it is very likely that the protesters also believe that dress can be a factor.
The issue is the insensitivity it displays towards the victim. If he had read the studies you quote and said "Women who want to avoid being raped should avoid drinking alcohol" the issue would be exactly the same.
According to a Manitoba judge, not only is it intuitive that promiscuous attire leads to rape - but it is a compelling enough force to reduce the sentence for the rapist. This decision is from February, 2011.
"A legal expert says a Manitoba judge's comment during a rape sentencing that "sex was in the air" is a troubling legal throwback.
Justice Robert Dewar of Queen's Bench Court made the remark when he gave a man a two-year conditional sentence which allows him to remain free in the community.
The judge also pointed to the way the victim and her friend were dressed — tube tops, no bras, high heels — and noted they were wearing plenty of makeup..."
"...Rhodes pleaded not guilty at his trial on the basis he thought the woman had consented. Dewar rejected that defence in convicting him, but said he could consider some of that argument during sentencing.
“This is a different case than one where there is no perceived invitation,” said Dewar. “This is a case of misunderstood signals and inconsiderate behaviour.”
Dewar said he didn’t want to be seen as blaming the victim but that all of the factors in the case had to be viewed to assess “moral blame worthiness.""
Edit: I should probably mention that this case is being appealed; probably for the best.
I believe the vast majority of police officers are total idiots, so arguing about a statement they made, whether right or wrong, is laughable.
But for the sake of argument, i'm gonna assume his statement "women shouldn't dress like such sluts and they complain about being raped" stems from his inner frustrations. His history of violence (natural from the profession he chose) coupled with his mediocre IQ and the fact that his primal animalistic brain takes priority over this intelligent side, leads me to believe he actually lusts deep down to "force his way" upon some hot, slutty girls he would normally never have acces to, being the lowly person that he is in society.
What do i think about this particular subject? While i don't approve of rape, some sluts simply have it coming for them sometimes. Let's not glorify women and say they are pure, innocent creatures who deserve only affection. I'm sure many of these girls, if they were put in a position of power and raw strength compared to men, they would abuse the hell out of us.
tl;dr skip to the story below
P.S. Funny story. One night i had some girl alone over my place. She ended up smoking a lot of weed and passed out almost completely (was maybe 10% conscious). I tried to make her feel comfortable, carried her to bed cuz she obviously wasn't feeling well, gave her a light massage etc.
But then i started getting a little bit horny. So i said, ahh what the hell. Fucked the shit out of her while she was 90% unconscious (this was basically our first date).
Now before you think i'm a despicable person, she did text me a few days later and said "had fun the other night. thanks for "raping" me :p". I later ended up in a relationship with her, rofl.
Would you guys consider what i did to her a criminal act of rape?
On April 05 2011 03:49 AlexDeLarge wrote: I believe the vast majority of police officers are total idiots, so arguing about a statement they made, whether right or wrong, is laughable.
But for the sake of argument, i'm gonna assume his statement "women shouldn't dress like such sluts and they complain about being raped" stems from his inner frustrations. His history of violence (natural from the profession he chose) coupled with his mediocre IQ and the fact that his primal animalistic brain takes priority over this intelligent side, leads me to believe he actually lusts deep down to "force his way" upon some hot, slutty girls he would normally never have acces to, being the lowly person that he is in society.
What do i think about this particular subject? While i don't approve of rape, some sluts simply have it coming for them sometimes. Let's not glorify women and say they are pure, innocent creatures who deserve only affection. I'm sure many of these girls, if they were put in a position of power and raw strength compared to men, they would abuse the hell out of us.
tl;dr skip to the story below
P.S. Funny story. One night i had some girl alone over my place. She ended up smoking a lot of weed and passed out almost completely (was maybe 10% conscious). I tried to make her feel comfortable, carried her to bed cuz she obviously wasn't feeling well, gave her a light massage etc.
But then i started getting a little bit horny. So i said, ahh what the hell. Fucked the shit out of her while she was 90% unconscious (this was basically our first date).
Now before you think i'm a despicable person, she did text me a few days later and said "had fun the other night. thanks for "raping" me :p". I later ended up in a relationship with her, rofl.
Would you guys consider what i did to her a criminal act of rape?
It was very close to being a criminal act of rape - she would have 100% won in court if she had pressed charges.
So, with regards to the "70%" know their victims, wikipedia at least cites this for a US statistic: "Over two thirds of all rapes occur in someone's home. 31% occur in the perpetrators' homes, 27% in the victims' homes and 10% in homes shared by the victim and perpetrator. 7% occur at parties, 7% in vehicles, 4% outdoors and 2% in bars". I cite this because it's kind of more relevant--a person is not forced into a home. They plan to go to a person's home. And going to someone's home really implies more knowledge about someone than if, say, women were all raped at parties ("yeah, I knew him because I met him ONE time at this bar").
1) provocative dressing does not really encourage it. Vast majority rapes occur at a person's home or a party (presumably in a home of some sort) and most women say they knew the assailant beforehand (again from wikipedia). You're inside someone's home: maybe you are dressed like a slut, but you really shouldn't blame the victim for perhaps dressing slutty if they are in a home of someone they know and (hypothetically) trust. 2) alcohol is largest contributing factor to rape attempts/successful rapes.
1) ok if we accept that 70% are known by the attacker and say that dress is not a factor what about the 30%? Are they not important?
2) Ok lets say alcohol is the largest factor in attempts. That says nothing about why the person targeted someone (perhaps partly because of how they dressed) it only tells us how they tried to accomplish it.
I don't really agree with either of these statements.
1. I can't see how any level of horniness could bring on rape.
2. A girl that dresses like a slut may get more attention, but that's about all.
1. By itself no add in alcohol or drugs and perhaps
2. More attention of a certain nature? Perhaps attention of someone inclined to be a rapist?
On April 05 2011 03:49 AlexDeLarge wrote: I believe the vast majority of police officers are total idiots, so arguing about a statement they made, whether right or wrong, is laughable.
But for the sake of argument, i'm gonna assume his statement "women shouldn't dress like such sluts and they complain about being raped" stems from his inner frustrations. His history of violence (natural from the profession he chose) coupled with his mediocre IQ and the fact that his primal animalistic brain takes priority over this intelligent side, leads me to believe he actually lusts deep down to "force his way" upon some hot, slutty girls he would normally never have acces to, being the lowly person that he is in society.
What do i think about this particular subject? While i don't approve of rape, some sluts simply have it coming for them sometimes. Let's not glorify women and say they are pure, innocent creatures who deserve only affection. I'm sure many of these girls, if they were put in a position of power and raw strength compared to men, they would abuse the hell out of us.
tl;dr skip to the story below
P.S. Funny story. One night i had some girl alone over my place. She ended up smoking a lot of weed and passed out almost completely (was maybe 10% conscious). I tried to make her feel comfortable, carried her to bed cuz she obviously wasn't feeling well, gave her a light massage etc.
But then i started getting a little bit horny. So i said, ahh what the hell. Fucked the shit out of her while she was 90% unconscious (this was basically our first date).
Now before you think i'm a despicable person, she did text me a few days later and said "had fun the other night. thanks for "raping" me :p". I later ended up in a relationship with her, rofl.
Would you guys consider what i did to her a criminal act of rape?
First of all that wasn't what the officer said at all. He didn't say they shouldn't complain about rape if they dress like sluts. He said that not dressing slutty would reduce their risk of rape.
And yes, you did rape her. If she pressed the issue you would be in some serious trouble.
lol idk if "horny guys will rape" was a troll or not
do you guys think to-be-rapists walk down the street and rate women 1-10, then when they find a 10 they say imma rape her? that's retarded, rape is not based on sexual attraction.
On April 05 2011 03:49 AlexDeLarge wrote: I believe the vast majority of police officers are total idiots, so arguing about a statement they made, whether right or wrong, is laughable.
But for the sake of argument, i'm gonna assume his statement "women shouldn't dress like such sluts and they complain about being raped" stems from his inner frustrations. His history of violence (natural from the profession he chose) coupled with his mediocre IQ and the fact that his primal animalistic brain takes priority over this intelligent side, leads me to believe he actually lusts deep down to "force his way" upon some hot, slutty girls he would normally never have acces to, being the lowly person that he is in society.
Now this is just psychoanalysis, even if you did know the guy, this would be a silly statement to make, not even offensive, just far fetched grabbing.
What do i think about this particular subject? While i don't approve of rape, some sluts simply have it coming for them sometimes. Let's not glorify women and say they are pure, innocent creatures who deserve only affection. I'm sure many of these girls, if they were put in a position of power and raw strength compared to men, they would abuse the hell out of us.
True, a factor in that rape happens mostly one way might be just pure physical strength.
P.S. Funny story. One night i had some girl alone over my place. She ended up smoking a lot of weed and passed out almost completely (was maybe 10% conscious). I tried to make her feel comfortable, carried her to bed cuz she obviously wasn't feeling well, gave her a light massage etc.
But then i started getting a little bit horny. So i said, ahh what the hell. Fucked the shit out of her while she was 90% unconscious (this was basically our first date).
Now before you think i'm a despicable person, she did text me a few days later and said "had fun the other night. thanks for "raping" me :p". I later ended up in a relationship with her, rofl.
Well, good for you that it went that way, not something you could know in advance, you could have yourself an angry woman and possible legal difficulties.
Would you guys consider what i did to her a criminal act of rape?
Yes, but it didn't matter apparently.
Not all people mind to be raped. From a simple point of view, I wouldn't mind to be fed a spiked drink and then raped while being unconscious, after all, I don't notice it, right? Just don't get me any STD's.
Though I appreciate the idea that not many people view this matter in such a simple way. Like my ex told me 'You either don't cheat on me, or you do cheat on me but be pro enough to make sure I don't find out, either's cool with me.'
On April 05 2011 03:54 Gene wrote: lol idk if "horny guys will rape" was a troll or not
do you guys think to-be-rapists walk down the street and rate women 1-10, then when they find a 10 they say imma rape her? that's retarded, rape is not based on sexual attraction.
which also lends itself to saying provocative attire is irrelevant when talking about rape