EPThttp://d122.com/murdermystery/
Any code breakers in TL? - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
andiCR
Costa Rica2273 Posts
http://d122.com/murdermystery/ | ||
|
P3T3R
Canada87 Posts
| ||
|
Slithe
United States985 Posts
| ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
TOTE WLDNWLDNCBE The 2 L's could possibly be C's. If you take a look at earlier in that line where it has the LUSE The L is pretty well defined, same with the last line where it has 194WL So I'm thinking those two are C's or at the very least the first one is a C and the second one could be an L. | ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:41 Slithe wrote: I find it really hard to believe that the FBI would not be able to at least roughly decipher this if it's some variety of substitution cipher. They've had so much time to work on it. I wonder if the victim was autistic, they see the world differently from other people, probably one of the reasons he wrote encrypted notes to himself. | ||
|
Icx
Belgium853 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:41 Slithe wrote: I find it really hard to believe that the FBI would not be able to at least roughly decipher this if it's some variety of substitution cipher. They've had so much time to work on it. Well the question is, how much effort did they actually put into this? In the case that it's actually real, and decipherable, and they had put a full team of their best people on it for 12 years, I guess they would have done it by now. But imo (and this is just pure speculation), this was probably a case that was on the backburner, and they probably didn't invest that much resources into it, because they probably have more serious things going on (things that actually matter in terms of state security and such). This seems to me more of a "with the amount of resources we can put into this it's just not really possible to do this in a reasonable amount of time So making this public actually has better chances" situation then a "we just can't do this in any way". | ||
|
Zim23
United States1681 Posts
| ||
|
Ygz
England370 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:43 kOre wrote: The second last line where it has TOTE WLDNWLDNCBE The 2 L's could possibly be C's. If you take a look at earlier in that line where it has the LUSE The L is pretty well defined, same with the last line where it has 194WL So I'm thinking those two are C's or at the very least the first one is a C and the second one could be an L. They look like L's to me, his prior C's are quite defined, there's no ambiguity that I can find. | ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:43 kOre wrote: The second last line where it has TOTE WLDNWLDNCBE The 2 L's could possibly be C's. If you take a look at earlier in that line where it has the LUSE The L is pretty well defined, same with the last line where it has 194WL So I'm thinking those two are C's or at the very least the first one is a C and the second one could be an L. Very good point, he tends to write the L's with the top tip arching to the left. Those two have the top tip arching to the right (i'm looking at these letters with 4x magnification). However his C's look well defined to me. hmm. Perhaps the L's with the right arching have a different meaning than the ones with the left arching? Or maybe they are C's, lol | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
I agree leto | ||
|
Ichabod
United States1659 Posts
| ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:51 LetoAtreides82 wrote: Very good point, he tends to write the L's with the top tip arching to the left. Those two have the top tip arching to the right. However his C's look well defined to me. hmm. Perhaps the L's with the right arching have a different meaning than the ones with the left arching? Or maybe they are C's, lol Yeah ... about that lol, makes this code breaking so much harder ... especially if the L's with right arches have different meanings ... | ||
|
QuestGerm
United States18 Posts
| ||
|
Robellicose
England245 Posts
| ||
|
Monsen
Germany2548 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:53 kOre wrote: Yeah ... about that lol, makes this code breaking so much harder ... especially if the L's with right arches have different meanings ... Yea and now after looking at it with inverted colors and 5x magnification, I'm pretty sure they aren't C's because his C's have a well-defined curve, while the two L's in question have straighter strokes. The only thing I can think of at the moment is that either it's just an L with a right arch on it for a different meaning, or perhaps it's just a symbol he invented. | ||
|
Ygz
England370 Posts
TRFXL7 That L could possibly pass for a C. Notice that the diagonal of the letter X follows closely to the angle of the following L. | ||
|
AntiMetric
Australia4 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:38 never_toss wrote: just a link to a page that discusses the issue http://d122.com/murdermystery/ The man who wrote that blog also attempted to type up the codes. I think he's done a pretty good job: Edit: Text format is better Note 1: (MNDMXNEARSE-N-STA-KNARE) *TFRNENPINSENPBSERCBBNSENPRSEINC PRSENMRSEOPREHLDULDNCBE(TFXLFTCXLULBE) AL-PRPPITXLYPPIYNCBEMGKSEINLDRCBRNSEPRSE WLDRCBRNSENTSGNENTXSE-CRSLE-CITRSEWLDNCBE ALWLPNCBETSMELRSERLSEURGLSNEASNWLDNCBE (NOPFSENLSRENCBE)NTEGDDMNSENCURERCBRNE (TENETFRNENCBRTSENCBEINC) (FLRSEPRSEONDE71NCBE) (CDNSEPRSEONSFE74NCBE) (PR+SEPRSEONREDE75NCBE) (TFNRCMSPSOLEMRDELUSETOTEWLDNINLDNCBE) (194WLD'SNCBE)(TRFXL) Note 2: ALPNTE GLSE-SE ER+E VLSEMTSE-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE PNTRTRSEONPRSEWLDNCBE NWLDXLRCMSPNEWLDSTSMEXL DVLMT6TUNSE NCBEC (MUNSAISTENMUNARSE) KLSE-LRSTE-TRSE-TRSE-MKSEN-MRSE (SAE6NSESENMBSE) NMNRCBRNSEP+E2PTEWSRCBRNSE 26MLSE74SPRKSE29KENOSOLE173R7RSE 356LECLGSEUUNUTREDKRSEPSESHLE 6S1MTCSEHTLSENCUTCTRSNMRE 99.84.B2UNEPLSENCRSEAOLTSENSKSENRSE NSREOUSEPUTSEWLDUCBE(3XORL) DNMSENRSEIN2NTRLERCBRNSENTSRCRBNE LSPNSENGSPSEMKSERBSENCBEAVXLR HMCRENMRESCBE 1/2MUNDDLSE D-W-M-YHIL XDRLX | ||
|
UpHeaVaL
Canada57 Posts
| ||
| ||
