EPThttp://mit.zenfs.com/102/2011/03/image_large.jpg
Any code breakers in TL? - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Ygz
England370 Posts
http://mit.zenfs.com/102/2011/03/image_large.jpg | ||
|
Vansetsu
United States1454 Posts
| ||
|
Tufas
Austria2259 Posts
 But in all seriousness, I doubt that anyone of us mortals can break the code (if there is one) without some more information. But as there is no more information and even the FBI could not solve it (I guess they are well equipped ? ) - we cant either. | ||
|
NEcropath
United States223 Posts
. . .Actually I'll be surprised if the people at UnFiction don't crack this within a week. | ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
| ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:00 Ygz wrote: The pair of characters 'SE' and 'BE' come up quite frequently through out this note. http://mit.zenfs.com/102/2011/03/image_large.jpg Maybe SE or BE = space? So many letters without any spaces, I think he might be using a code for spaces. | ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
| ||
|
andiCR
Costa Rica2273 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ALPNTE GLSE - SE ERTE VLSE MTSE-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE PNRTRSEONDRSEWLDNCBE NWLDXLRCMSPNEWLDSTSmE BULMTGTUNSENCBEX (MENSASTENMUNARSE) KLSE-LKSTE-TR SE-TRSE-MKSEN-MRSE (SAEGNSESENMBSE) NMNLCBRNSEPTEZNTEWSRCBK | ||
|
BlackMagister
United States5834 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:06 Vansetsu wrote: One thing that throws me off a little, if the poor guy who was murdered wrote encrypted notes like this since a young age, shouldn't there be other encrypted writings of his somewhere which might show patterns he used or some clue as to how he encrypted his messages? Just a thought. Yeah the FBI article is very sparse on details so we don't know the reason. It could be because he burns or throws away his old notes. | ||
|
andiCR
Costa Rica2273 Posts
| ||
|
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
(TFNQCMSP SOLE MRDELUSE TOTE WLDNWLDNCBE) (194 WLD’S NCBE) (TRFXC) edit: I am fairly sure this is polyalphabetic like has been suggested NCBE occurs way too frequently for it to not be a single letter or a specific word E for sure is not even a letter perse. It occurs way too frequently, at 18% in parenthetical parts excluding the original that was really off in terms of the rest of the letter. I am ignoring the first couple of lines for now, to be honest, and focusing on the parenthetical parts up until line 12. N occurs about the same amount E itself should ~11%, but I am suspicious it might not be E. this is what I am focusing on. Any corrections/differences ? (TFXLF TCXLNCBE) (NOPFSE NLSRE NCBE) (TENE TFRNE NCBRTSE NCBE ING) (FLRSE PRSE ONDE71 NCBE) (CDNSEPRSE ONSDE 74 NCBE) (PRTSE PRSE ONREDE 75 NCBE) (TFNQCMSP SOLE MRDELUSE TOTE WLDNWLDNCBE) (194 WLD’S NCBE) (TRFXC) | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:20 never_toss wrote: hmm.. someone should transcribe the message. Here´s a part of the second image (the NOTES one) + Show Spoiler + ALPNTE GLSE - SE ERTE VLSE MTSE-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE PNRTRSEONDRSEWLDNCBE NWLDXLRCMSPNEWLDSTSmE BULMTGTUNSENCBEX (MENSASTENMUNARSE) KLSE-LKSTE-TR SE-TRSE-MKSEN-MRSE (SAEGNSESENMBSE) NMNLCBRNSEPTEZNTEWSRCBK The first page is in the post right after the OP, if anyone can check it to see if I missed something. | ||
|
shabinka
United States469 Posts
| ||
|
Hittegods
Stockholm4641 Posts
| ||
|
smokeyhoodoo
United States1021 Posts
No it isn't. We use the Latin alphabet, the language itself is Germanic. | ||
|
IamBach
United States1059 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:32 smokeyhoodoo wrote: No it isn't. We use the Latin alphabet, the language itself is Germanic. Im pretty sure thats what he meant, just english LANGUAGE was implied. In regards to the OP, I am surprised nobody on TL has answered it yet. We already know we are the smartest and the best, lets prove it to the FBI. | ||
|
Sworn
Canada920 Posts
| ||
| ||
