EPTthe actions will not be tolerated and further aggression will be fully retaliated.
North Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
the actions will not be tolerated and further aggression will be fully retaliated. | ||
|
Z3kk
4099 Posts
| ||
Milkis
5003 Posts
[03:07:14] <MrHoon> there is an official word!! [03:07:34] <MrHoon> "we cannot forgive this act" [03:07:58] <Milkis> "we will respond forcefully if there are additional provocations" [03:07:44] <MrHoon> "North Korea must answer to their act" | ||
|
Ricjames
Czech Republic1047 Posts
NK is totally fucked, they almost have nothing to eat and they have nothing to lose. Basically it all comes up to their leader Kim Chong Il, his descendant and commanders go crazy and decide to make huge mess in desperate try to gain. He and his commanders could be escaping and leading war from "safe place" (i guess hidden somewhere in China). People would not be told this of course and war propaganda would be very strong over there. Kim Chong Il already has a lot of hidden money and secret tunels and ways ready for his escape. I hope it will not come to this, but considering all the non-sense that goes on in NK, everything could happen - unfortunately. | ||
|
Kishkumen
United States650 Posts
My hope is that no further conflict will come from this incident, and that in a few days, SK will express their just anger at the North, but will likely leave it at that. After that, I hope China will finally get fed up with cleaning up NK's messes and will finally give them an ultimatum to stop this dangerous aggression. I think that's the best case scenario; no further conflict, but serious consequences for NK from the international community, especially China. | ||
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
| ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
 | ||
|
Funnytoss
Taiwan1471 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:08 Bshad wrote: Nah dude I dont thing NK knows as well as anyone, why dont you send them a letter or something, for all we know your supreme knowledge can save someone. I'm simply noting that this is a significant change away from the way they typically stage provocations against South Korea, and that's a disturbing development. No need to be a smartass. If you simply misinterpreted my remarks, then I apologize for not making it clearer. | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
| ||
|
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
I hope this does ends asap, this is very bad for the korean people. | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
|
CNugent
Korea (South)15 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:08 Z3kk wrote: I've told that NK is so poor that it simply has to rely on methods such as these in which it threatens force and demands that others give it money/supplies in return for not initiating war/violence. Is this true? It seems to me that such behavior can only be self-destructive, as it brings international reprisals and a generally negative image. Totally true. They don't even have enough oil to get their stupid aiplanes' engines work. Just like Boxer spends all his mineral producing marines, NK spends all its money producing nukes. | ||
|
ComusLoM
Norway3547 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:10 konadora wrote: MBC hasn't said ANYTHING about N.Korea naval ships advancing afaik Well thank god for that. When I read it my heart just started pumping. I hate citizen journalism. | ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:01 Benshin88 wrote: There are only about 50,000 US troops stationed in SK. It's actually a common misunderstanding. The Korean border is largerly maintained by SK. They have about 700000 active soldiers. SK has the 3rd largest army in the world when you count the reserves. I think it's slightly less than 50,000 yet that is a VERY high amount of troops for US when we are talking PROTECTION and not being actually aggressive. I never meant to imply that SK was reliant completely on the US, but they would expect heavy, heavy US backing if any actual war were to occur. | ||
|
Benshin88
United States183 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:09 infinitestory wrote: According to stream chat, the twitter is unreliable and MBC has said nothing about a fleet. I second that... I'm listening to an MBC stream as we speak The whole country would freak out if this happened. IE some people will start booking flights out of SK to avoid war. | ||
|
dasRentier
Hong Kong6 Posts
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/9218848.stm | ||
|
Pax
United States175 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:00 BraveGhost wrote: It might be ridiculously one-sided as in ... North Korea would have no chance of surviving any kind of war. However, they would not leave much of South Korea if any behind them, even without using nuclear bombs, there is surely enough artillery/bombs/missiles/etc to take out most of South Korea with them, when you mix in their nuclear capacity(even at a small level nuclear power is devastating, see WW2 for examples). I don't think this is a simple problem, where you can just be like, cut it out or I'm gonna declare war on you. Certainly, if the N. Koreans were capable of a Nazi-style blitzkreig. However, I doubt N. Korean forces have the mobility of the early Nazi forces. And then when you take into account the superpowers that lie in direct proximity to the region (China, Japan, Russia), you come to realize that within days, if not hours, the N. Koreans would find themselves in the very uncomfortable position of fighting a multi-front defense with every other major superpower following quickly behind. | ||
|
Z3kk
4099 Posts
| ||
|
Bshad
120 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:10 Pika Chu wrote: This is very bad news, has anyone any idea of what NK's motives are? They can't just attack out of the sudden. I hope this does ends asap, this is very bad for the korean people. Its funny that in 34 pages pretty much noone talked about cause of attack and noone really gives a shit. Everyone is just happy for getting a chance to poke NK with a stick and say "Bad NK!". | ||
|
CNugent
Korea (South)15 Posts
| ||
| ||
