EPTLies of Fahrenheit 9/11 - Page 7
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 04:12 JudasT wrote: Sorry, I think he deserves the qualification of idiot for all the things he've said and done. And the world will be safer bc the simple theory of "LESS WAR = SAFER". Why the world rescuer is not going to Somalia where millions of people are dying ?, or why he don't help to solve the palestinan/Israel situation ? it should be easy to a man who decides to invade countries... I hope he puts his ass out of the white house in the next elections, and it doesn't matter the name of the new president bc he'll be better for the human being.  The book is Farenheit 451 (200 pages, read it !), ... a world where culture and human rights dissapear bc all the books get burned by a hitlerian dictator like Bush... More terrorists = world less safe. Current US Mission = stop terrorism. We tried to help in Somalia and it didn't go well. We tried that, but even with Bill Clinton, our most pro-palestinian president ever, the Palestinians would accept the amazingly generous offer presented to them. We could invade other countries, but our resources are too streched right now and we could only choose one, so why not Iraq, which has tons of symblic value. Kerry will not be better than Bush. Bush will not destroy culture, stop coming up with stupid bullshit. | ||
|
JudasT
Spain2226 Posts
| ||
|
Yuljan
2196 Posts
More War = more terrorist = world less safe | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 07:19 JudasT wrote: USA was very happy with Saddam few years ago, and helped him to get the power. I don't know how some people can understand and defend this way of doing things... it's all about money and gas, nothing else, period. We helped im get to power when we wanted someone who could fight Iran. I think it was a shitty idea but at the time who knew? I can defend this way of doing things because it can work, as opposed to doing nothing. Show me how. | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 07:20 Yuljan wrote: Iraq wasnt a terrorist producing country until the US invaded. More War = more terrorist = world less safe Saddam Hussien. More War = Less Terrorists = World Less Safe | ||
|
Yuljan
2196 Posts
| ||
|
JudasT
Spain2226 Posts
... the thing is that nobody can do nothing, but re-electing Bush won't help to smooth things ... oh wait, you can do something: DO NOT VOTE for him  | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 07:28 Yuljan wrote: Saddam Hussein didnt help terrorist, because they hated him like they hate the saudia arabian government. You have no clue what you are talking about. | ||
|
Yuljan
2196 Posts
| ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 07:30 JudasT wrote: Why do the US wanted to fight Iran ? think on that... why the US want to control everything ? it's all about money and gas again ... the thing is that nobody can do nothing, but re-electing Bush won't help to smooth things ... oh wait, you can do something: DO NOT VOTE for him At the time the US saw Iran as a greater threat than Saddam. Evidence of war for oil theory please? Not voting for Bush isn't smart. | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
| ||
|
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On June 27 2004 19:22 pfff wrote: im completely fed up with threads like this cuz it seems like all the non-progressives are like 10 years older and A LOT better educated and informed then the conservatives, but there was one thing that made me sick. SICKOFLIFE, you are constantly babbling about how religious you are, but you still support bush. i mean, what kind of a ridiculous contradiction is that? really, me, as a religion-hater, understands more about it then you, you are a clueless brainwashed baby. Yeah... I never said I really liked Bush, but I did say that I hated Kerry. Being that, if I was 18 and voting, I only have two people to choose from, I'd pick Bush over Kerry. On another note, instead of just saying I somehow contradict myself, please explain how I do so--considering the fact you don't know the first thing about my beliefs (not enough to say I contradict myself). | ||
|
JudasT
Spain2226 Posts
On June 28 2004 07:50 x[ReaPeR]x wrote: At the time the US saw Iran as a greater threat than Saddam. Evidence of war for oil theory please? Not voting for Bush isn't smart. Evidence of mass weapons in Irak plz ? US shouldn't try to rule the world, and should keep pointed to it's own threads Result of the decisions of Bush: DEATH Why is smart vote for Bush ? do you like violence ? I'm not trying to convince anybody, this is just my point of view ! GL | ||
|
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
On June 28 2004 01:55 x[ReaPeR]x wrote: This one is more damning for Moore than the one Excalibur posted. Nice of you to post it. What Excal posted is not damaging at all. It is the perfect example of the empty, fluffed up, divisive crap that americans get fead on a regular bases. | ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 09:02 TeCh)PsylO wrote: What Excal posted is not damaging at all. It is the perfect example of the empty, fluffed up, divisive crap that americans get fead on a regular bases. The one Excalibur posted is also pretty true. | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On June 28 2004 08:29 JudasT wrote: Evidence of mass weapons in Irak plz ? US shouldn't try to rule the world, and should keep pointed to it's own threads Result of the decisions of Bush: DEATH Why is smart vote for Bush ? do you like violence ? I'm not trying to convince anybody, this is just my point of view ! GLSarin and Mustard gas we found. Where did Jordanian terrorists get their weapons. Even UN says that WMD might have been shipped out and that Saddam was uncoopretive with inspectors. I've said this so many times. Then who should? (Not the UN) Also result of Bush decisions, victory against terrorism, hope for people of Iraq and Afghanistan. If it kills terrorists, then yes I like violence, compared to the alternative (more terrorism). | ||
|
JudasT
Spain2226 Posts
Victory against terrorism ? what are you talking about ? Bush wide opened the door to the terrorism with his terrorist policy, this is clear. And the hope for the Iraq and Afghanistan people, now ? no more hope for the victims of the war... just death. Your final answer is great: "If it kills terrorists, then yes I like violence, compared to the alternative (more terrorism)"... summary of your vote intention, no more argues, I understand | ||
| ||
