• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:38
CET 11:38
KST 19:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets0$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)12Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1822
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list? Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns Spontaneous hotkey change zerg Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) WardiTV Winter Cup WardiTV Mondays SC2 AI Tournament 2026
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
Potential ASL qualifier breakthroughs? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Data analysis on 70 million replays
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2405 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 787

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 785 786 787 788 789 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
October 25 2016 15:07 GMT
#15721
On October 25 2016 23:44 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 23:40 Hhanh00 wrote:
On October 25 2016 23:26 Manit0u wrote:
On October 25 2016 22:59 Acrofales wrote:
Lol. Travis, were you expecting this? :D


Hehe. I guess that no one could've predicted that

Also, I've learned today that JVM has full support for dynamic typing, TCO and other funky shit - just not for Java


JVM has no support for TCO. In Scala, TRE is done by the compiler but does not cover mutual recursion. That's why there are trampolines in scalaz.


But from what I've read most of the recursion in scala is translated into loops anyway.

Only a subset of all recursive functions can be translated into loops. If Scala is good at this translation, it will convert a large portion of that subset, but sometimes it's straight up impossible.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Hhanh00
Profile Joined May 2016
34 Posts
October 25 2016 15:12 GMT
#15722
You need to annotate your function as @tailrec and the compiler will do TRE if possible. If not, it produces a compilation error. Essentially, TRE turns the recursion into a loop (i.e. a goto).
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17596 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 15:43:35
October 25 2016 15:22 GMT
#15723
On October 25 2016 23:27 travis wrote:
lol no this is great, love the participation.

I'll post the "hard" exercise that was included since you guys seem to enjoy this. I haven't tried it yet, I might this weekend but now I have to study for my calc 2 exam until friday.


Hard exercise:

Your method parameter is an array of ints. The method is a boolean. The goal is to look at the ints and see if you could possibly return 2 arrays from it, both having the same "total" within it.

For example if you were passed {2, 2} it would be true. {2, 3, 2, 3} would be true. {2, 3} would be false. {5, 2, 3} would be true. {5, 2, 4} would be false. {2, 6, 2, 2} would be true. Etc. Have fun!


Oh and it's supposed to use recursion, so no loops. You can make a recursive helper method, though.


You mean something like that?


public static void main (String[] args) {
import java.util.Arrays;

int[] testArr = {5, 2, 3};
int[] testArr2 = {5, 1, 4};
int[] testArr3 = {5, 1, 2};
String t1 = Arrays.toString(testArr);
String t2 = Arrays.toString(testArr2);
String t3 = Arrays.toString(testArr3);

System.out.println("Can"
+ (canSplit(testArr, new int[testArr.length], 0) ? " " : "'t ")
+ "split "
+ t1
);
System.out.println("Can"
+ (canSplit(testArr2, new int[testArr2.length], 0) ? " " : "'t ")
+ "split "
+ t2
);
System.out.println("Can"
+ (canSplit(testArr3, new int[testArr3.length], 0) ? " " : "'t ")
+ "split "
+ t3
);
}

public static int arraySum(int[] arr, int idx, int sum) {
if (idx == arr.length) {
return sum;
}

return arraySum(arr, idx + 1, sum + arr[idx]);
}

public static Boolean arrayCompare(int[] a, int[] b) {
return arraySum(a, 0, 0) == arraySum(b, 0, 0);
}

public static Boolean canSplit(int[] a, int[] b, int idx) {
if (idx == 0 && arraySum(a, 0, 0) % 2 != 0) {
return false;
}

if (idx == a.length) {
return false;
}

if (arrayCompare(a, b)) {
return true;
}

b[idx] = a[idx];
a[idx] = 0;

return canSplit(a, b, idx + 1);
}


Sorry if the code is a bit crap. I've had to google how to write HelloWorld in Java today

Edit: I guess that my solution is wrong, but I don't have any more heart to deal with Java bullshit today
I know you have to add highest and lowest and compare them with the rest etc. but I've no brain left for that.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18179 Posts
October 25 2016 15:35 GMT
#15724
On October 26 2016 00:22 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2016 23:27 travis wrote:
lol no this is great, love the participation.

I'll post the "hard" exercise that was included since you guys seem to enjoy this. I haven't tried it yet, I might this weekend but now I have to study for my calc 2 exam until friday.


Hard exercise:

Your method parameter is an array of ints. The method is a boolean. The goal is to look at the ints and see if you could possibly return 2 arrays from it, both having the same "total" within it.

For example if you were passed {2, 2} it would be true. {2, 3, 2, 3} would be true. {2, 3} would be false. {5, 2, 3} would be true. {5, 2, 4} would be false. {2, 6, 2, 2} would be true. Etc. Have fun!


Oh and it's supposed to use recursion, so no loops. You can make a recursive helper method, though.


You mean something like that?


public static void main (String[] args) {
import java.util.Arrays;

int[] testArr = {5, 2, 3};
int[] testArr2 = {5, 1, 4};
int[] testArr3 = {5, 1, 2};
String t1 = Arrays.toString(testArr);
String t2 = Arrays.toString(testArr2);
String t3 = Arrays.toString(testArr3);

System.out.println("Can"
+ (canSplit(testArr, new int[testArr.length], 0) ? " " : "'t ")
+ "split "
+ t1
);
System.out.println("Can"
+ (canSplit(testArr2, new int[testArr2.length], 0) ? " " : "'t ")
+ "split "
+ t2
);
System.out.println("Can"
+ (canSplit(testArr3, new int[testArr3.length], 0) ? " " : "'t ")
+ "split "
+ t3
);

}

public static int arraySum(int[] arr, int idx, int sum) {
if (idx == arr.length) {
return sum;
}

return arraySum(arr, idx + 1, sum + arr[idx]);
}

public static Boolean arrayCompare(int[] a, int[] b) {
return arraySum(a, 0, 0) == arraySum(b, 0, 0);
}

public static Boolean canSplit(int[] a, int[] b, int idx) {
if (idx == a.length) {
return false;
}

if (arrayCompare(a, b)) {
return true;
}

b[idx] = a[idx];
a[idx] = 0;

return canSplit(a, b, idx + 1);
}


Sorry if the code is a bit crap. I've had to google how to write HelloWorld in Java today

Don't think this works. It wouldn't work on his test array [2, 6, 2, 2], which is supposed to return true. Simply splitting the array was my first thought too, but you have to go through all permutations.

Anyway, the first thing I'd do is simply sum the initial array. If it's odd, it's impossible. After that, some type of dynamic programming is needed. It's been a while since I had to do assignments like this, but I will play with it. It's pretty easy to find a terrible solution, but my gut says it should be easy to find one in O(n^2) or so.
Nesserev
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium2760 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 15:52:45
October 25 2016 15:40 GMT
#15725
--- Nuked ---
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18179 Posts
October 25 2016 15:51 GMT
#15726
Yeah, but that is the trivial solution in O(2^n) time, or am I missing something?
raNazUra
Profile Joined December 2012
United States10 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 15:56:04
October 25 2016 15:54 GMT
#15727
On October 25 2016 23:27 travis wrote:
lol no this is great, love the participation.

I'll post the "hard" exercise that was included since you guys seem to enjoy this. I haven't tried it yet, I might this weekend but now I have to study for my calc 2 exam until friday.


Hard exercise:

Your method parameter is an array of ints. The method is a boolean. The goal is to look at the ints and see if you could possibly return 2 arrays from it, both having the same "total" within it.

For example if you were passed {2, 2} it would be true. {2, 3, 2, 3} would be true. {2, 3} would be false. {5, 2, 3} would be true. {5, 2, 4} would be false. {2, 6, 2, 2} would be true. Etc. Have fun!


Oh and it's supposed to use recursion, so no loops. You can make a recursive helper method, though.


Wooo exponential time! Also I'm stealing arraySum from Manitou since I don't want to write it:


public static bool subsetMatch(int[] arr) {
if (arr.length < 2) {
return false;
}
ArrayList<int> subset1 = new ArrayList<int>();
ArrayList<int> subset2 = new ArrayList<int>();
return subsetMatchHelper(arr, 0, subset1, subset2);
}

public static bool subsetMatchHelper(int[] arr, index, ArrayList<int> subset1, ArrayList<int> subset2) {
if (arr.length == index) {
return arraySum(subset1, 0, 0) == arraySum(subset2, 0, 0);
}
else {
return (subsetMatchHelper(arr, index + 1, subset1.add(arr[index]), subset2) ||
subsetMatchHelper(arr, index + 1, subset1, subset2.add(arr[index]));
}
}


I'm pretty confident that this is actually incorrect, since my subsets' .add calls will be modifying themselves, which will muck up the other call. But this is the logic that you want.

On another note, the problem as stated is actually ambiguous, we just make an assumption about it. It isn't clear whether or not the two subsets must union to the whole set, or if you can ignore numbers.

EDIT: Acrofales, I'm pretty sure that if you're using recursion, the only solution is the 2^n solution. I haven't thought about whether you can use DP to make this polynomial, though it is suspiciously similar to the NP-hard subset sum problem, so I'm not 100% sure you can.
Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 16:16:24
October 25 2016 16:12 GMT
#15728
On October 26 2016 00:40 Nesserev wrote:
This is quite trivial in Haskell via backtracking.
+ Show Spoiler [old solution] +
f :: [Int] -> Bool
f [] = True -- is this the intended behavior?
f xs = f_internal xs [] []

f_internal :: [Int] -> [Int] -> [Int] -> Bool
f_internal [] ys zs = sum ys == sum zs
f_internal (x:xs) ys zs = f_internal xs (x:ys) zs || f_internal xs ys (x:zs)


+ Show Spoiler [unit tests] +


import Test.HUnit


testFinternal = TestCase (do
-- base case
assertBool "" (f_internal [] [] []
assertBool "" (f_internal [] [4] [2,2]
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [] [1] []
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [] [2,7] [3,2,1]
-- success
assertBool "" (f_internal [1] [3] [4]
assertBool "" (f_internal [1] [4] [3]
-- fail
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [1] [] []
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [2] [5,3] [8,1]
)

testF = TestCase (do
assertBool "example1" (f [2,2]
assertBool "example2" (f [2,3,2,3]
assertBool "example3" (not $ f [2,3]
assertBool "example4" (f [5,2,3]
assertBool "example5" (not $ f [5,2,4]
assertBool "example6" (f [2,6,2,2]
)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tests = TestList [
TestLabel "testFinternal" testFinternal,
TestLabel "testF" testF
]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

main :: IO Counts
main = runTestTT $ tests




EDIT: Better solution:
f :: [Int] -> Bool
f xs = f_internal xs 0 0

f_internal :: [Int] -> Int -> Int -> Bool
f_internal [] y z = y == z
f_internal (x:xs) y z = f_internal xs (x+y) z || f_internal xs y (x+z)

It's not hard to translate that into Java. Nothing really changes, you just add a bit of syntax overhead.

The second version is a lot better since it should reduce the runtime complexity by a factor of n (runtime complexity for recursion is hard on my brain). Might not matter too much in the presence of exponential complexity though.

For me this also seems awfully similar to the knapsack problem, which is NP-complete.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-25 16:17:05
October 25 2016 16:16 GMT
#15729
Can we have a warning that pops up when I accidentally quote instead of edit the last post in the thread?
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Mr. Wiggles
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada5894 Posts
October 25 2016 18:28 GMT
#15730
You guys are looking for:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem
you gotta dance
raNazUra
Profile Joined December 2012
United States10 Posts
October 25 2016 18:37 GMT
#15731
On October 26 2016 03:28 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
You guys are looking for:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem


Ah, that was it! I knew I had seen this problem before.
Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18179 Posts
October 25 2016 19:23 GMT
#15732
On October 26 2016 03:28 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
You guys are looking for:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem

Aha! And now the real fun starts. I didn't spend enough time thinking about it, but Wikipedia says there is a DP solution in pseudo-polynomial time (my knowledge of complexity theory doesn't reach far enough to know what that means, but I'll assume it's something like polynomial for most cases, but there are corner cases where it fails?)

Anyway. More interesting than finding the obvious solution, let's find the DP solution without peeking at the reset if the Wikipedia article or the rest of the internet!
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
October 25 2016 19:34 GMT
#15733
On October 26 2016 00:40 Nesserev wrote:
This is quite trivial in Haskell via backtracking.
+ Show Spoiler [old solution] +
f :: [Int] -> Bool
f [] = True -- is this the intended behavior?
f xs = f_internal xs [] []

f_internal :: [Int] -> [Int] -> [Int] -> Bool
f_internal [] ys zs = sum ys == sum zs
f_internal (x:xs) ys zs = f_internal xs (x:ys) zs || f_internal xs ys (x:zs)


+ Show Spoiler [unit tests] +


import Test.HUnit


testFinternal = TestCase (do
-- base case
assertBool "" (f_internal [] [] []
assertBool "" (f_internal [] [4] [2,2]
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [] [1] []
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [] [2,7] [3,2,1]
-- success
assertBool "" (f_internal [1] [3] [4]
assertBool "" (f_internal [1] [4] [3]
-- fail
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [1] [] []
assertBool "" (not $ f_internal [2] [5,3] [8,1]
)

testF = TestCase (do
assertBool "example1" (f [2,2]
assertBool "example2" (f [2,3,2,3]
assertBool "example3" (not $ f [2,3]
assertBool "example4" (f [5,2,3]
assertBool "example5" (not $ f [5,2,4]
assertBool "example6" (f [2,6,2,2]
)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tests = TestList [
TestLabel "testFinternal" testFinternal,
TestLabel "testF" testF
]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

main :: IO Counts
main = runTestTT $ tests




EDIT: Better solution:
f :: [Int] -> Bool
f xs = f_internal xs 0 0

f_internal :: [Int] -> Int -> Int -> Bool
f_internal [] y z = y == z
f_internal (x:xs) y z = f_internal xs (x+y) z || f_internal xs y (x+z)

Thought I'd just add a Haskell solution to the previous problem since Nesserev already solved the above one so nicely.

star :: String -> String
star "" = ""
star (x:"") = (x:"")
star (x:y:rest)
| x == y = x:'*':star (y:rest)
| otherwise = x:star (y:rest)
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Mr. Wiggles
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada5894 Posts
October 25 2016 20:19 GMT
#15734
On October 26 2016 04:23 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2016 03:28 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
You guys are looking for:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem

Aha! And now the real fun starts. I didn't spend enough time thinking about it, but Wikipedia says there is a DP solution in pseudo-polynomial time (my knowledge of complexity theory doesn't reach far enough to know what that means, but I'll assume it's something like polynomial for most cases, but there are corner cases where it fails?)

Anyway. More interesting than finding the obvious solution, let's find the DP solution without peeking at the reset if the Wikipedia article or the rest of the internet!

Pseudo-polynomial is more that the algorithm appears to have polynomial running time based on the numeric value of the input, but actually has exponential running time based on the size of the input (i.e. how many bits it's represented by, though the particular base doesn't matter).

For example, consider primality testing by trial division for a number n. To check if n is prime, you will attempt to divide it by everything in the range [2, sqrt(n)]. In the numeric value of n, this looks polynomial, because we're doing sqrt(n) divisions, but in the actual input size, the number of bits to represent n, the amount of work is exponential.

I'm on my phone, so I can't get too detailed, but I hope this helps explain.
you gotta dance
raNazUra
Profile Joined December 2012
United States10 Posts
October 25 2016 21:21 GMT
#15735
On October 26 2016 05:19 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2016 04:23 Acrofales wrote:
On October 26 2016 03:28 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
You guys are looking for:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem

Aha! And now the real fun starts. I didn't spend enough time thinking about it, but Wikipedia says there is a DP solution in pseudo-polynomial time (my knowledge of complexity theory doesn't reach far enough to know what that means, but I'll assume it's something like polynomial for most cases, but there are corner cases where it fails?)

Anyway. More interesting than finding the obvious solution, let's find the DP solution without peeking at the reset if the Wikipedia article or the rest of the internet!

Pseudo-polynomial is more that the algorithm appears to have polynomial running time based on the numeric value of the input, but actually has exponential running time based on the size of the input (i.e. how many bits it's represented by, though the particular base doesn't matter).

For example, consider primality testing by trial division for a number n. To check if n is prime, you will attempt to divide it by everything in the range [2, sqrt(n)]. In the numeric value of n, this looks polynomial, because we're doing sqrt(n) divisions, but in the actual input size, the number of bits to represent n, the amount of work is exponential.

I'm on my phone, so I can't get too detailed, but I hope this helps explain.


As an additional note to the prime-checking pseudopolynomial example, consider what happens when you multiply a given input by 4. Your algorithm now needs to do twice as many checks, but the size of the input has only gone up by two bits (assuming base 2). When the work of the algorithm grows multiplicatively for a constant addition of input size, that's exponential.

If that doesn't help, ignore it, it just helps me to understand why pseudopolynomial solutions look like they're polynomial but are actually exponential. If it depends on the value of a variable itself, and not the number of values, then you're likely in trouble (without a log to cancel it out).
Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes
Djagulingu
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Germany3605 Posts
October 27 2016 13:04 GMT
#15736
Fuck Oracle Spatial
"windows bash is a steaming heap of shit" tofucake
Nesserev
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium2760 Posts
October 27 2016 17:44 GMT
#15737
--- Nuked ---
bangsholt
Profile Joined June 2011
Denmark138 Posts
October 28 2016 16:41 GMT
#15738
On October 28 2016 02:44 Nesserev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 27 2016 22:04 Djagulingu wrote:
Fuck Oracle

ftfy, efficiency matters


premature optimization is the root of all evil. :D
centirius
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden40 Posts
October 28 2016 21:47 GMT
#15739
C# solution (so probably works in Java with minimal changes I suppose) also O(n^2) obv


bool HasTwoSubArraysWithSameTotal(int[] values){
return HasTwoSubArraysWithSameTotal(values, 0, 0, 0);
}

bool HasTwoSubArraysWithSameTotal(int[] values, int sumA, int sumB, int index){
return values.Length == index ? sumA == sumB :
HasTwoSubArraysWithSameTotal(values, sumA + values[index], sumB, index + 1) ||
HasTwoSubArraysWithSameTotal(values, sumA, sumB + values[index], index + 1);
}

Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-29 00:39:12
October 29 2016 00:25 GMT
#15740
Anyone around good at java that can help me for a little bit? (maybe half hour or hour or something?)


edit: nevermind I finally got everything working. wow what a pain lol
Prev 1 785 786 787 788 789 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 132
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4562
Rain 4400
Horang2 1233
Shuttle 556
Hyuk 477
Mini 423
Stork 372
Larva 303
actioN 269
ZerO 264
[ Show more ]
Leta 198
Mong 176
EffOrt 163
Soma 147
Zeus 120
Hyun 104
Light 94
Nal_rA 94
ggaemo 90
Rush 83
JulyZerg 81
910 69
Killer 69
hero 46
Sharp 35
Mind 33
zelot 29
Free 23
Sexy 21
Terrorterran 18
soO 18
scan(afreeca) 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Noble 10
Bale 10
Sacsri 8
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm107
XcaliburYe107
ODPixel78
League of Legends
C9.Mang0458
JimRising 445
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1829
shoxiejesuss789
allub227
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King112
Other Games
summit1g7548
ceh9596
Pyrionflax273
Fuzer 173
ZerO(Twitch)9
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2971
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2311
• Lourlo1225
• Stunt523
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1h 22m
PiGosaur Cup
14h 22m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 23h
OSC
2 days
OSC
3 days
All Star Teams
3 days
INnoVation vs soO
sOs vs Scarlett
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
All Star Teams
4 days
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-12
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.