• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:08
CEST 09:08
KST 16:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)10[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June4Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0
StarCraft 2
General
TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview Updates to The Core/Core Lite for v5.0.16? RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 2026 Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested
Tourneys
GSL CK #4 20-21th June Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 530 One For All The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion vespene.gg — BW replays in browser Where is EffOrt? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals [BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Total War: Warhammer 40K Path of Exile
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Does Workplace Frustration D…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7185 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 592

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 590 591 592 593 594 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
February 22 2015 18:08 GMT
#11821
Just for fun I implemented it in Haskell:
sort []  = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort $ take halfLength l) (sort $ drop halfLength l)
where halfLength = length l `div` 2

merge a1 [] = a1
merge [] a2 = a2
merge (x:a1) (y:a2)
| x >= y = y:(merge (x:a1) a2 )
| x < y = x:(merge a1 (y:a2))
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Ropid
Profile Joined March 2009
Germany3557 Posts
February 22 2015 19:14 GMT
#11822
There's a 'splitAt' that outputs a (,), and what's neat is Haskell understands (,) on the left side of a '=', so this works:

sort [] = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort a) (sort b)
where (a,b) = splitAt (length l `div` 2) l
"My goal is to replace my soul with coffee and become immortal."
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 19:32 GMT
#11823
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Nesserev
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium2760 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 19:41:43
February 22 2015 19:41 GMT
#11824
--- Nuked ---
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 19:49 GMT
#11825
On February 23 2015 04:41 Nesserev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

Well, something could be wrong with your implementation ... or, it could be Java. It's probably Java. I'm pretty sure it's Java. It's Java.

Yeah the implementation was actually given to us by the teacher so I doubt its that . I get what theyre trying to make us see, but really trying to produce the 'desired' results on your own machine with java seems to be impossible. With the java garbage collector and all the other behind the scenes magic in the compiler and such.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Ropid
Profile Joined March 2009
Germany3557 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 20:09:21
February 22 2015 20:03 GMT
#11826
On February 23 2015 04:41 Nesserev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

Well, something could be wrong with your implementation ... or, it could be Java. It's probably Java. I'm pretty sure it's Java. It's Java.

The same happens in C/C++.

There's rules for the alignment of the various data types. Things that are 4 byte sized have to start at 4 bytes boundaries, 1 byte at 1 byte, 8 byte at 8 bytes, etc. If you group one char or two chars or three chars etc. in one struct, the whole struct will snap to 8 bytes size by adding empty space after the chars.

In Java, the references are 4 bytes size it seems. In the single-linked list, there's then one reference and one empty 4 byte space. The doubly-linked list has two references and no empty space.
"My goal is to replace my soul with coffee and become immortal."
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 20:21:19
February 22 2015 20:16 GMT
#11827
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

What exactly is in those lists? 7 kb for 10 items seems quite generous. That's 700 bytes per item. Subtract a couple of pointers and you're still well beyond 600 bytes. If your items are 600 bytes each, having one pointer more or less really doesn't matter a whole lot, so that would hardly be a useful analysis.

Also, even a linked list can be implemented with an array holding the list elements. And such an array would usually be doubled in size once it runs out of unused elements. So if it is implemented in that way, you usually wouldn't see a difference in size unless you increase the number of items beyond the next power of 2.

Furthermore, there's also the issue of how you're measuring the size. Depending on the language, there can be more or less accurate methods. Sometimes you could be measuring extra space because of memory fragmentation and what not.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 20:25 GMT
#11828
On February 23 2015 05:16 spinesheath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

What exactly is in those lists? 7 kb for 10 items seems quite generous. That's 700 bytes per item. Subtract a couple of pointers and you're still well beyond 600 bytes. If your items are 600 bytes each, having one pointer more or less really doesn't matter a whole lot, so that would hardly be a useful analysis.

Also, even a linked list can be implemented with an array holding the list elements. And such an array would usually be doubled in size once it runs out of unused elements. So if it is implemented in that way, you usually wouldn't see a difference in size unless you increase the number of items beyond the next power of 2.

Furthermore, there's also the issue of how you're measuring the size. Depending on the language, there can be more or less accurate methods. Sometimes you could be measuring extra space because of memory fragmentation and what not.

Youre right actually. These lists store integers so the size is way off. The memory is calculated just subtracting the runtime free memory from the runtime totalmemory. A lot of those KBs are not the lists. Then again it keeps producing the same results, so memory thats not the list should be about the same every time as well.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
February 22 2015 20:46 GMT
#11829
On February 23 2015 05:25 solidbebe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 05:16 spinesheath wrote:
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

What exactly is in those lists? 7 kb for 10 items seems quite generous. That's 700 bytes per item. Subtract a couple of pointers and you're still well beyond 600 bytes. If your items are 600 bytes each, having one pointer more or less really doesn't matter a whole lot, so that would hardly be a useful analysis.

Also, even a linked list can be implemented with an array holding the list elements. And such an array would usually be doubled in size once it runs out of unused elements. So if it is implemented in that way, you usually wouldn't see a difference in size unless you increase the number of items beyond the next power of 2.

Furthermore, there's also the issue of how you're measuring the size. Depending on the language, there can be more or less accurate methods. Sometimes you could be measuring extra space because of memory fragmentation and what not.

Youre right actually. These lists store integers so the size is way off. The memory is calculated just subtracting the runtime free memory from the runtime totalmemory. A lot of those KBs are not the lists. Then again it keeps producing the same results, so memory thats not the list should be about the same every time as well.

That method of measuring memory probably is quite inaccurate due to memory fragmentation and other factors. I don't know how the runtime free/total memory are calculated in detail, but my guess is it really is only an estimate.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
windzor
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark1013 Posts
February 22 2015 21:42 GMT
#11830
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?


First of, it is impossible to measure memory consumption of data structures in java. With the way garbage collection works, you cannot do any trustworthy measurements which you can base any conclussion on, I've tried.

But, if you want to make any conclussion, first of you need more than two measurements. 7 kB to 400 kB is always linear. The memory consumption of the JVM is just 7 kB then... You are remembering to enforce GC like 10 times before printing the memory usage?

For the double linked vs single linked lists, 10000 pointers are is approximatly the size og 10 kB. With 400 kB and java this is within the error margin of +-90%

Furtmorefor memory usage bigger is better. You need more than 10,000 objects to measure anything. You need like 1,000,000 objects if you want to have anything realistic. Remember each pointer is about 4-8 bytes so with 1,000,0000 objects the links will only be around 4 MB which is not alot.

Yeah
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19221 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 22:00:36
February 22 2015 22:00 GMT
#11831
I love these dances, they show spring algorithms in a neat way that makes them ready to understand:
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
February 22 2015 22:06 GMT
#11832
wunderbar!
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 23:11 GMT
#11833
Thanks for all the replies everybody! The more I read the more I realise the premise of this experiment is a bit silly, and the given implementation a bit lackluster at that. Ill try to make of it what I can
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
February 23 2015 06:09 GMT
#11834
On February 23 2015 04:14 Ropid wrote:
There's a 'splitAt' that outputs a (,), and what's neat is Haskell understands (,) on the left side of a '=', so this works:

sort [] = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort a) (sort b)
where (a,b) = splitAt (length l `div` 2) l

Nice, forgot about that one.
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17768 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-23 08:40:21
February 23 2015 08:10 GMT
#11835
On February 23 2015 15:09 Prillan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:14 Ropid wrote:
There's a 'splitAt' that outputs a (,), and what's neat is Haskell understands (,) on the left side of a '=', so this works:

sort [] = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort a) (sort b)
where (a,b) = splitAt (length l `div` 2) l

Nice, forgot about that one.


PHP to the rescue


$arr = [ 8, 0, 7, 2, 1, 3, 5, 9, 6, 4 ];

sort($arr);

print_r($arr);

/* output */
Array
(
[0] => 0
[1] => 1
[2] => 2
[3] => 3
[4] => 4
[5] => 5
[6] => 6
[7] => 7
[8] => 8
[9] => 9
)


I know it's not the same... Here's a full merge-sort:


/* props to Tobias Baldauf for this */

$data = [ 8, 0, 7, 2, 1, 3, 5, 9, 6, 4 ];

function mergesort($data) {
if (count($data) > 1) {
$data_middle = round(count($data)/2, 0, PHP_ROUND_HALF_DOWN);

$data_left = mergesort(array_slice($data, 0, $data_middle));
$data_right = mergesort(array_slice($data, $data_middle, count($data)));

$counter_left = $counter_right = 0;

for ($i = 0; $i < count($data); ++$i) {
if($counter_left === count($data_left)) {
$data[$i] = $data_right[$counter_right];

++$counter_right;
} elseif (($counter_right === count($data_right)) || ($data_left[$counter_left] < $data_right[$counter_right])) {
$data[$i] = $data_left[$counter_left];

++$counter_left;
} else {
$data[$i] = $data_right[$counter_right];

++$counter_right;
}
}
}

return $data;
}

$data = mergesort($data);

print_r($data);
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Khalum
Profile Joined September 2010
Austria831 Posts
February 23 2015 09:12 GMT
#11836
I like the SML version from http://www.codecodex.com/wiki/Merge_sort


fun mergesort [] = []
| mergesort [x] = [x]
| mergesort lst =
let fun merge ([],ys) = ys (*merges two sorted lists to form a sorted list *)
| merge (xs,[]) = xs
| merge (x::xs,y::ys) =
if x<y then
x::merge (xs,y::ys)
else
y::merge (x::xs,ys)
;
val half = length(lst) div 2;
in
merge (mergesort (List.take (lst, half)),mergesort (List.drop (lst, half)))
end
;
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-23 16:09:09
February 23 2015 16:05 GMT
#11837
wild stab at template metaprogram version (sorts a sequence of types by size):

+ Show Spoiler [preamble] +
#include<iostream>
#include<seq/seq.hpp>
#include<jeh/select_if.hpp>

using namespace seq;

+ Show Spoiler [merge] +
namespace detail
{

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out=sequence<>,class=void>
struct
merge_impl;

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<
sizeof(first<lhs>)<=sizeof(first<rhs>) and
not empty<lhs>() and
not empty<rhs>()
>
>:merge_impl<
remove_first<lhs>,rhs,insert_last<out,first<lhs>>
>
{};

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<
not (sizeof(first<lhs>)<=sizeof(first<rhs>)) and
not empty<lhs>() and
not empty<rhs>()
>
>:merge_impl<
lhs,remove_first<rhs>,insert_last<out,first<rhs>>
>
{};

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<empty<lhs>()>
>
{ using output=concat<out,rhs>; };

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<empty<rhs>()>
>
{ using output=concat<out,lhs>; };

}

template<class lhs,class rhs>
using merge=typename detail::merge_impl<lhs,rhs>::output;

+ Show Spoiler [merge sort] +
namespace detail{

template<class in,class=void>
struct
merge_sort_impl;

template<class in>
struct
merge_sort_impl<in,select_if<count<in>()<=1>>
{ using output=in; };

template<class in>
struct
merge_sort_impl<in,select_if<not (count<in>()<=1)>>
{
using output=
merge<
typename merge_sort_impl<sub_seq<in,0,(count<in>()>>1)>>::output,
typename merge_sort_impl<sub_seq<in,(count<in>()>>1),count<in>()>>::output
>;
};

}

template<class... type>
using merge_sort=typename detail::merge_sort_impl<sequence<type...>>::output;

+ Show Spoiler [compile time invocation] +
using in=sequence<int[3],int[5],int[2],int[1]>;
using out=merge_sort<in>;

int
main()
{
std::cout<<out()<<std::endl;
}

+ Show Spoiler [run time print] +
[jeh@gimli tl2]$ make
g++ -c -std=c++14 -I. -I../ -fdiagnostics-color -Wfatal-errors tl.cpp
g++ -o tl tl.o
[jeh@gimli tl2]$ ./tl
{

int [1]
int [2]
int [3]
int [5]

}
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
February 23 2015 17:37 GMT
#11838
if I used serialization to save data from my program to a file, will that file be readable/editable in some way that would allow users to manipulate the saved states? because I don't want that.

do I specifically need to find a way to save my files as encrypted to avoid it?
windzor
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark1013 Posts
February 23 2015 17:46 GMT
#11839
On February 24 2015 02:37 travis wrote:
if I used serialization to save data from my program to a file, will that file be readable/editable in some way that would allow users to manipulate the saved states? because I don't want that.

do I specifically need to find a way to save my files as encrypted to avoid it?


If the user have access rights to edit the file he can do it. There is nothing you can do about that.

What you can do is create a checksum of the file and use that to detect if the user has changed the file. If so, you can yell at the user and say to stop editing that file.
Yeah
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
February 23 2015 18:26 GMT
#11840
nunez, is there a reason you name your libraries seq and jeh?
There is no one like you in the universe.
Prev 1 590 591 592 593 594 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech135
Nina 119
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 24883
Sea 3137
Rain 2536
Mind 108
NaDa 34
ZergMaN 33
Noble 21
Leta 17
Icarus 8
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King204
Other Games
summit1g7203
WinterStarcraft565
ceh9440
Happy219
RuFF_SC238
crisheroes26
Trikslyr22
Dewaltoss16
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2208
Other Games
gamesdonequick833
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1376
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 52m
The PondCast
1d 2h
OSC
1d 5h
OSC
1d 16h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
GSL
3 days
Maru vs ShoWTimE
Classic vs Reynor
herO vs Lambo
Solar vs Clem
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
3 days
XuanXuan vs Jaystar
Mihu vs Messiah
eOnzErG vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs Jaystar
TerrOr vs Messiah
XuanXuan vs Mihu
eOnzErG vs Jaystar
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL
4 days
Patches Events
4 days
[ Show More ]
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
4 days
Dewalt vs Messiah
Bonyth vs Mihu
TerrOr vs XuanXuan
eOnzErG vs Messiah
Jaystar vs Mihu
Dewalt vs XuanXuan
Bonyth vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-16
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
Murky Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.