• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:49
CEST 08:49
KST 15:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy7[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple1BSL Season 235Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder Guide To Watching Ancient Brood War Replays Oldest replay file. new ranked ladder hack? New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27! [BSL23] SM: Ret vs TerrOr -> DragOn vs StRyKeR
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7717 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 592

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 590 591 592 593 594 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
February 22 2015 18:08 GMT
#11821
Just for fun I implemented it in Haskell:
sort []  = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort $ take halfLength l) (sort $ drop halfLength l)
where halfLength = length l `div` 2

merge a1 [] = a1
merge [] a2 = a2
merge (x:a1) (y:a2)
| x >= y = y:(merge (x:a1) a2 )
| x < y = x:(merge a1 (y:a2))
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Ropid
Profile Joined March 2009
Germany3557 Posts
February 22 2015 19:14 GMT
#11822
There's a 'splitAt' that outputs a (,), and what's neat is Haskell understands (,) on the left side of a '=', so this works:

sort [] = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort a) (sort b)
where (a,b) = splitAt (length l `div` 2) l
"My goal is to replace my soul with coffee and become immortal."
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 19:32 GMT
#11823
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Nesserev
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium2760 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 19:41:43
February 22 2015 19:41 GMT
#11824
--- Nuked ---
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 19:49 GMT
#11825
On February 23 2015 04:41 Nesserev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

Well, something could be wrong with your implementation ... or, it could be Java. It's probably Java. I'm pretty sure it's Java. It's Java.

Yeah the implementation was actually given to us by the teacher so I doubt its that . I get what theyre trying to make us see, but really trying to produce the 'desired' results on your own machine with java seems to be impossible. With the java garbage collector and all the other behind the scenes magic in the compiler and such.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Ropid
Profile Joined March 2009
Germany3557 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 20:09:21
February 22 2015 20:03 GMT
#11826
On February 23 2015 04:41 Nesserev wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

Well, something could be wrong with your implementation ... or, it could be Java. It's probably Java. I'm pretty sure it's Java. It's Java.

The same happens in C/C++.

There's rules for the alignment of the various data types. Things that are 4 byte sized have to start at 4 bytes boundaries, 1 byte at 1 byte, 8 byte at 8 bytes, etc. If you group one char or two chars or three chars etc. in one struct, the whole struct will snap to 8 bytes size by adding empty space after the chars.

In Java, the references are 4 bytes size it seems. In the single-linked list, there's then one reference and one empty 4 byte space. The doubly-linked list has two references and no empty space.
"My goal is to replace my soul with coffee and become immortal."
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 20:21:19
February 22 2015 20:16 GMT
#11827
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

What exactly is in those lists? 7 kb for 10 items seems quite generous. That's 700 bytes per item. Subtract a couple of pointers and you're still well beyond 600 bytes. If your items are 600 bytes each, having one pointer more or less really doesn't matter a whole lot, so that would hardly be a useful analysis.

Also, even a linked list can be implemented with an array holding the list elements. And such an array would usually be doubled in size once it runs out of unused elements. So if it is implemented in that way, you usually wouldn't see a difference in size unless you increase the number of items beyond the next power of 2.

Furthermore, there's also the issue of how you're measuring the size. Depending on the language, there can be more or less accurate methods. Sometimes you could be measuring extra space because of memory fragmentation and what not.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 20:25 GMT
#11828
On February 23 2015 05:16 spinesheath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

What exactly is in those lists? 7 kb for 10 items seems quite generous. That's 700 bytes per item. Subtract a couple of pointers and you're still well beyond 600 bytes. If your items are 600 bytes each, having one pointer more or less really doesn't matter a whole lot, so that would hardly be a useful analysis.

Also, even a linked list can be implemented with an array holding the list elements. And such an array would usually be doubled in size once it runs out of unused elements. So if it is implemented in that way, you usually wouldn't see a difference in size unless you increase the number of items beyond the next power of 2.

Furthermore, there's also the issue of how you're measuring the size. Depending on the language, there can be more or less accurate methods. Sometimes you could be measuring extra space because of memory fragmentation and what not.

Youre right actually. These lists store integers so the size is way off. The memory is calculated just subtracting the runtime free memory from the runtime totalmemory. A lot of those KBs are not the lists. Then again it keeps producing the same results, so memory thats not the list should be about the same every time as well.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
February 22 2015 20:46 GMT
#11829
On February 23 2015 05:25 solidbebe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 05:16 spinesheath wrote:
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?

What exactly is in those lists? 7 kb for 10 items seems quite generous. That's 700 bytes per item. Subtract a couple of pointers and you're still well beyond 600 bytes. If your items are 600 bytes each, having one pointer more or less really doesn't matter a whole lot, so that would hardly be a useful analysis.

Also, even a linked list can be implemented with an array holding the list elements. And such an array would usually be doubled in size once it runs out of unused elements. So if it is implemented in that way, you usually wouldn't see a difference in size unless you increase the number of items beyond the next power of 2.

Furthermore, there's also the issue of how you're measuring the size. Depending on the language, there can be more or less accurate methods. Sometimes you could be measuring extra space because of memory fragmentation and what not.

Youre right actually. These lists store integers so the size is way off. The memory is calculated just subtracting the runtime free memory from the runtime totalmemory. A lot of those KBs are not the lists. Then again it keeps producing the same results, so memory thats not the list should be about the same every time as well.

That method of measuring memory probably is quite inaccurate due to memory fragmentation and other factors. I don't know how the runtime free/total memory are calculated in detail, but my guess is it really is only an estimate.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
windzor
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark1013 Posts
February 22 2015 21:42 GMT
#11830
On February 23 2015 04:32 solidbebe wrote:
I have a question for you guys. For a course on algorythms and data structures in java we have to run an experiment on memory usage of linked lists. My output is as follows. A singy linked list of size 10 used about 7 kilobytes, and a singly linked list of size 10000 used about 400 kilobytes. Clearly this is not linear space complexity, yet the space complexity of a linked list is supposed to be O(n). Does anyone have an idea of what is going on?

Another interesting tidbit. There seems to be no difference in size between a singly linked list of size 10000 and a doubly linked list of size 10000 (both about 400 KB), yet the doubly linked list obviously stores an extra pointer for each node. Why isnt this showing up in the test results?


First of, it is impossible to measure memory consumption of data structures in java. With the way garbage collection works, you cannot do any trustworthy measurements which you can base any conclussion on, I've tried.

But, if you want to make any conclussion, first of you need more than two measurements. 7 kB to 400 kB is always linear. The memory consumption of the JVM is just 7 kB then... You are remembering to enforce GC like 10 times before printing the memory usage?

For the double linked vs single linked lists, 10000 pointers are is approximatly the size og 10 kB. With 400 kB and java this is within the error margin of +-90%

Furtmorefor memory usage bigger is better. You need more than 10,000 objects to measure anything. You need like 1,000,000 objects if you want to have anything realistic. Remember each pointer is about 4-8 bytes so with 1,000,0000 objects the links will only be around 4 MB which is not alot.

Yeah
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19257 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-22 22:00:36
February 22 2015 22:00 GMT
#11831
I love these dances, they show spring algorithms in a neat way that makes them ready to understand:
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
February 22 2015 22:06 GMT
#11832
wunderbar!
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
February 22 2015 23:11 GMT
#11833
Thanks for all the replies everybody! The more I read the more I realise the premise of this experiment is a bit silly, and the given implementation a bit lackluster at that. Ill try to make of it what I can
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Prillan
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden350 Posts
February 23 2015 06:09 GMT
#11834
On February 23 2015 04:14 Ropid wrote:
There's a 'splitAt' that outputs a (,), and what's neat is Haskell understands (,) on the left side of a '=', so this works:

sort [] = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort a) (sort b)
where (a,b) = splitAt (length l `div` 2) l

Nice, forgot about that one.
TheBB's sidekick, aligulac.com | "Reality is frequently inaccurate." - Douglas Adams
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17843 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-23 08:40:21
February 23 2015 08:10 GMT
#11835
On February 23 2015 15:09 Prillan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 04:14 Ropid wrote:
There's a 'splitAt' that outputs a (,), and what's neat is Haskell understands (,) on the left side of a '=', so this works:

sort [] = []
sort [x] = [x]
sort l = merge (sort a) (sort b)
where (a,b) = splitAt (length l `div` 2) l

Nice, forgot about that one.


PHP to the rescue


$arr = [ 8, 0, 7, 2, 1, 3, 5, 9, 6, 4 ];

sort($arr);

print_r($arr);

/* output */
Array
(
[0] => 0
[1] => 1
[2] => 2
[3] => 3
[4] => 4
[5] => 5
[6] => 6
[7] => 7
[8] => 8
[9] => 9
)


I know it's not the same... Here's a full merge-sort:


/* props to Tobias Baldauf for this */

$data = [ 8, 0, 7, 2, 1, 3, 5, 9, 6, 4 ];

function mergesort($data) {
if (count($data) > 1) {
$data_middle = round(count($data)/2, 0, PHP_ROUND_HALF_DOWN);

$data_left = mergesort(array_slice($data, 0, $data_middle));
$data_right = mergesort(array_slice($data, $data_middle, count($data)));

$counter_left = $counter_right = 0;

for ($i = 0; $i < count($data); ++$i) {
if($counter_left === count($data_left)) {
$data[$i] = $data_right[$counter_right];

++$counter_right;
} elseif (($counter_right === count($data_right)) || ($data_left[$counter_left] < $data_right[$counter_right])) {
$data[$i] = $data_left[$counter_left];

++$counter_left;
} else {
$data[$i] = $data_right[$counter_right];

++$counter_right;
}
}
}

return $data;
}

$data = mergesort($data);

print_r($data);
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Khalum
Profile Joined September 2010
Austria831 Posts
February 23 2015 09:12 GMT
#11836
I like the SML version from http://www.codecodex.com/wiki/Merge_sort


fun mergesort [] = []
| mergesort [x] = [x]
| mergesort lst =
let fun merge ([],ys) = ys (*merges two sorted lists to form a sorted list *)
| merge (xs,[]) = xs
| merge (x::xs,y::ys) =
if x<y then
x::merge (xs,y::ys)
else
y::merge (x::xs,ys)
;
val half = length(lst) div 2;
in
merge (mergesort (List.take (lst, half)),mergesort (List.drop (lst, half)))
end
;
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-23 16:09:09
February 23 2015 16:05 GMT
#11837
wild stab at template metaprogram version (sorts a sequence of types by size):

+ Show Spoiler [preamble] +
#include<iostream>
#include<seq/seq.hpp>
#include<jeh/select_if.hpp>

using namespace seq;

+ Show Spoiler [merge] +
namespace detail
{

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out=sequence<>,class=void>
struct
merge_impl;

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<
sizeof(first<lhs>)<=sizeof(first<rhs>) and
not empty<lhs>() and
not empty<rhs>()
>
>:merge_impl<
remove_first<lhs>,rhs,insert_last<out,first<lhs>>
>
{};

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<
not (sizeof(first<lhs>)<=sizeof(first<rhs>)) and
not empty<lhs>() and
not empty<rhs>()
>
>:merge_impl<
lhs,remove_first<rhs>,insert_last<out,first<rhs>>
>
{};

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<empty<lhs>()>
>
{ using output=concat<out,rhs>; };

template<class lhs,class rhs,class out>
struct
merge_impl<
lhs,rhs,out,
select_if<empty<rhs>()>
>
{ using output=concat<out,lhs>; };

}

template<class lhs,class rhs>
using merge=typename detail::merge_impl<lhs,rhs>::output;

+ Show Spoiler [merge sort] +
namespace detail{

template<class in,class=void>
struct
merge_sort_impl;

template<class in>
struct
merge_sort_impl<in,select_if<count<in>()<=1>>
{ using output=in; };

template<class in>
struct
merge_sort_impl<in,select_if<not (count<in>()<=1)>>
{
using output=
merge<
typename merge_sort_impl<sub_seq<in,0,(count<in>()>>1)>>::output,
typename merge_sort_impl<sub_seq<in,(count<in>()>>1),count<in>()>>::output
>;
};

}

template<class... type>
using merge_sort=typename detail::merge_sort_impl<sequence<type...>>::output;

+ Show Spoiler [compile time invocation] +
using in=sequence<int[3],int[5],int[2],int[1]>;
using out=merge_sort<in>;

int
main()
{
std::cout<<out()<<std::endl;
}

+ Show Spoiler [run time print] +
[jeh@gimli tl2]$ make
g++ -c -std=c++14 -I. -I../ -fdiagnostics-color -Wfatal-errors tl.cpp
g++ -o tl tl.o
[jeh@gimli tl2]$ ./tl
{

int [1]
int [2]
int [3]
int [5]

}
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
February 23 2015 17:37 GMT
#11838
if I used serialization to save data from my program to a file, will that file be readable/editable in some way that would allow users to manipulate the saved states? because I don't want that.

do I specifically need to find a way to save my files as encrypted to avoid it?
windzor
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark1013 Posts
February 23 2015 17:46 GMT
#11839
On February 24 2015 02:37 travis wrote:
if I used serialization to save data from my program to a file, will that file be readable/editable in some way that would allow users to manipulate the saved states? because I don't want that.

do I specifically need to find a way to save my files as encrypted to avoid it?


If the user have access rights to edit the file he can do it. There is nothing you can do about that.

What you can do is create a checksum of the file and use that to detect if the user has changed the file. If so, you can yell at the user and say to stop editing that file.
Yeah
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
February 23 2015 18:26 GMT
#11840
nunez, is there a reason you name your libraries seq and jeh?
There is no one like you in the universe.
Prev 1 590 591 592 593 594 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft524
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2180
GuemChi 1388
sorry 59
zelot 20
yabsab 14
Noble 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
Icarus 7
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm160
League of Legends
JimRising 628
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr33
Other Games
summit1g10557
Happy250
Maynarde150
Livibee107
Mew2King74
ceh98
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream1587
Other Games
gamesdonequick741
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream179
Other Games
BasetradeTV51
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile110
• Letter142
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2261
League of Legends
• Rush1472
• Stunt553
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3h 11m
Afreeca Starleague
3h 11m
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
5h 11m
PiGosaur Cup
17h 11m
Kung Fu Cup
1d 4h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
GSL
5 days
[ Show More ]
Yamato Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.