EPTso if you want to discuss it or post recent news, by all means, please.
BP oil spill
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
so if you want to discuss it or post recent news, by all means, please. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
this shit is why i am a "conspiracy theorist". Who doesn't think corporations don't rule the world? | ||
micronesia
United States24506 Posts
| ||
|
Sadistx
Zimbabwe5568 Posts
| ||
|
neVern
United States115 Posts
On May 31 2010 01:43 travis wrote: You know, the worst part is, that BP repeatedly lied and covered up the actual facts on what was happening, and yet THEY ARE STILL IN CHARGE OF IT. this shit is why i am a "conspiracy theorist". Who doesn't think corporations don't rule the world? Sounds kind of like the federal government in everything they do. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On May 31 2010 01:44 micronesia wrote: I agree with you that we have several reasons to be pissed at BP and possibly at how they have been regulated... but I don't think the fact that they are or are not making money during this fiasco is anywhere near as big a deal as the others. really so you think it's fine that they are profiting during their fuckup, while tons of livelihoods are destroyed? would it be fair if there was gold under your house that they were entitled to, so they burn down your house. then they take the gold and rebuild your house HALFWAY, leaving with massive profits? this is the best analogy I can come up with but come on don't you see what i am saying? this is bp's fuckup(in conjunction with the other invested interests), they should be paying for EVERYTHING. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On May 31 2010 01:45 neVern wrote: Sounds kind of like the federal government in everything they do. what is your point? | ||
|
micronesia
United States24506 Posts
On May 31 2010 01:48 travis wrote: really so you think it's fine that they are profiting during their fuckup, while tons of livelihoods are destroyed? would it be fair if there was gold under your house that they were entitled to, so they burn down your house. then they take the gold and rebuild your house HALFWAY, leaving with massive profits? this is the best analogy I can come up with but come on don't you see what i am saying? this is bp's fuckup(in conjunction with the other invested interests), they should be paying for EVERYTHING. Yes I think it's fine that they are profiting during their fuckup while tons of livelihoods are being destroyed, just like I said. In fact I'm going to wire them some money to increase their proceeds for the next few days. | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
Not that it's okay what people in the wrong location, or the wrong generation will have to deal with, but I'm basically doing all I can about it. People are irresponsible... It's just that the world only seems to notice when it's on a large scale like this. Social change must be encouraged. | ||
|
RaGe
Belgium9943 Posts
| ||
|
Sadistx
Zimbabwe5568 Posts
On May 31 2010 01:53 RaGe wrote: Yeah I fully agree they should be held 100% accountable. But they won't be. | ||
|
eSen1a
Australia1058 Posts
Who doesn't think corporations don't rule the world? doesn't/don't? i think it shouldn't have happened in the first place, i probably should have followed this more closely as it is very related to my degree but TBH i been lazy ... but i thought BP DO have to pay for the entire cost of spill and its aftermath? i got no idea if they have to pay for existence value like exxon had to? | ||
|
ggrrg
Bulgaria2715 Posts
As the largest oil company in the world there are many people who are interested that BP does well no matter what the circumstances are. I agree that the US governmet should be harsher on them and make them pay big time for this mess, but this ain't gonna happen... yeah, life is unfair; pisses me off sometimes... | ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
| ||
|
johanes
Czech Republic2227 Posts
| ||
|
micronesia
United States24506 Posts
On May 31 2010 02:02 johanes wrote: What about Obama? Originally i laughed about comments like this will be Obama's Katrina, but now it's actually happening. Why isn't the supposedly most advanced and powerful nation able to stop simple oil spill? Incompetence and corrupcy anywhere you look. Prevent, perhaps. This only happened because of a long chain of events driven by greed and incompetence (just like the sinking of the Titanic or the Challenger disaster)... but once an oil spill like this has happened it is no longer simple. | ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
deep water drilling has always been bad news, the breach is a mile under water... | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On May 31 2010 01:58 ggrrg wrote: Because if they go bankrupt the Western world will collapse... no it wouldn't, what are u talking about? the oil is there whether or not BP is there. BP going bankrupt will not make the oil disappear. but regardless, they could clean all of this up with fishing boats and they wouldn't go bankrupt. (im exaggerating for emphasis. but i wouldn't be surprised if they really could) On May 31 2010 02:01 Catch]22 wrote: What I want to know is how you can be so undoubtedly sure that BP is fully responsible. The Oilplatform was the responsibility of 4 parties, Halliburton, BP, Transoceanic and the goverment inspectors. BP is just the face I am attaching. I agree with you, there are other responsible parties. And after writing my OP i edited to reflect that by saying "other invested interests". It just seemed like too much work to include them all. | ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
| ||
