|
On April 23 2010 05:34 Perfect Balance wrote:
It seems the only change the UK has of regaining any kind of respect from the European people is a drastic political change. The british government have sold out their people on all all accounts for decades, and involved britain in an illegal war they can't get out of. The only way this can change is if the British National Party gains more votes, forcing a political change in the nation!
The mainstream political parties have no ideological willpower, and will continue to make britain darker and more involved with the EU. The only real political change in the UK is through the BNP or the UKIP (to a lesser extent).
I hope you can save your nation from its doom, and wish you the best of luck in the upcoming election. Friendly greetings from Scandinavia. =)
Your trolling right?
|
i was gonna post exactly the same thing xelin but opted to ignore
|
I lauged so hard. How to make every Briton / European on the forum rage hard. If it's trolling, it's a genius one.
|
|
|
Anyway the system is so complicated that you can get the less voices and still win the election (if you are the labour).
|
I loved that 3 of the reps for the parties were just arguing non stop and the reporter just sat back, that would never happen in American Political Television.
|
On April 23 2010 06:10 Biff The Understudy wrote:
I lauged so hard. How to make every Briton / European on the forum rage hard. If it's trolling, it's a genius one.
Good trolling is one or two sentences (minimum effort) getting lots of people to respond seriously with a larger size post. He failed to do that. Failed miserably. Firstly, he probably wasn't trolling, he probably is just retarded, and secondly that's a troll fail. Keep trolling and troll-encouraging out of this discussion too plz.
|
Browny wrecked face for me today, cameron just pissed me off every time he spoke as usual with his crappy ' i met so and so yesterday' line that comes out every five minutes.
|
Evens in my opinion, which is probably good for all them. Improvment for Cameron, Clegg only needs to hold his current position to have a amazing election and Brown engaged a hell of allot better than he did before. Interesting times.
Still don't like any of them though and still agree with so little that i can't bring myself to vote for any of them.
|
On April 23 2010 06:29 sc4k wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2010 06:10 Biff The Understudy wrote:
I lauged so hard. How to make every Briton / European on the forum rage hard. If it's trolling, it's a genius one. Good trolling is one or two sentences (minimum effort) getting lots of people to respond seriously with a larger size post. He failed to do that. Failed miserably. Firstly, he probably wasn't trolling, he probably is just retarded, and secondly that's a troll fail. Keep trolling and troll-encouraging out of this discussion too plz.
Point is, the guy was not trolling at all. I always prefer to laugh than to kill myself when I read stuff like that.
|
On April 23 2010 06:33 noddyz wrote:
Evens in my opinion, which is probably good for all them. Improvment for Cameron, Clegg only needs to hold his current position to have a amazing election and Brown engaged a hell of allot better than he did before. Interesting times.
Still don't like any of them though and still agree with so little that i can't bring myself to vote for any of them.
It happens so often in Democracy that you end up voting for the least horribad rather than for the best. Believe me, last French presidential election was like chosing between plague or cholera.
|
On April 23 2010 06:37 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2010 06:33 noddyz wrote:
Evens in my opinion, which is probably good for all them. Improvment for Cameron, Clegg only needs to hold his current position to have a amazing election and Brown engaged a hell of allot better than he did before. Interesting times.
Still don't like any of them though and still agree with so little that i can't bring myself to vote for any of them. It happens so often in Democracy that you end up voting for the least horribad rather than for the best. Believe me, last French presidential election was like chosing between plague or cholera.
If that debates to be believed then if we could just have the plague, cholera and cancer all working together we'll all be in perfect health.
|
United States44113 Posts
On April 23 2010 06:03 FireBlast! wrote:
i was gonna post exactly the same thing xelin but opted to ignore
|
Apparently most of the polls have Clegg winning and Cameron close behind, one major poll used by the Sun has Cameron slightly ahead of Clegg.
|
On April 23 2010 07:51 sc4k wrote:
Apparently most of the polls have Clegg winning and Cameron close behind, one major poll used by the Sun has Cameron slightly ahead of Clegg.
Yes you're right; the majority of the polls have now put Clegg ahead again.
I don't know why people ever thought Cameron was good at speeches, I've almost found him to be a bit of a twit when he tries to explain things. Clegg is better.
|
On April 23 2010 07:51 sc4k wrote:
Apparently most of the polls have Clegg winning and Cameron close behind, one major poll used by the Sun has Cameron slightly ahead of Clegg.
![[image loading]](http://stopthecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/murdoch.jpg)
Problem Britain?
|
On April 23 2010 07:55 Klive5ive wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2010 07:51 sc4k wrote:
Apparently most of the polls have Clegg winning and Cameron close behind, one major poll used by the Sun has Cameron slightly ahead of Clegg. Yes you're right; the majority of the polls have now put Clegg ahead again. I don't know why people ever thought Cameron was good at speeches, I've almost found him to be a bit of a twit when he tries to explain things. Clegg is better.
Have you seen him on PMQs? He's usually quite devastating and fast on his feet. Clegg is generally shit in PMQs even though he only gets 2 questions.
|
On April 23 2010 08:03 sc4k wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2010 07:55 Klive5ive wrote:On April 23 2010 07:51 sc4k wrote:
Apparently most of the polls have Clegg winning and Cameron close behind, one major poll used by the Sun has Cameron slightly ahead of Clegg. Yes you're right; the majority of the polls have now put Clegg ahead again. I don't know why people ever thought Cameron was good at speeches, I've almost found him to be a bit of a twit when he tries to explain things. Clegg is better. Have you seen him on PMQs? He's usually quite devastating and fast on his feet. Clegg is generally shit in PMQs even though he only gets 2 questions.
Yeah but PMQs is a farce. Cameron might look good attacking Brown's policies but then that's not exactly a difficult task.
I just watched Question time on the BBC, it was really good for a change. They had some decent politicians on the panel: Menzies Campbell, Yvette Cooper and William Hague. Watch it on Iplayer if you get chance.
|
Watched it live, as I often do  . It was okay, better than the fucking episodes when it was all bankers bankers bankers or expenses expenses expenses yarh yarh yarh.
In terms of PMQs, whatever you think about it, it requires fast wits and a lot of confidence. It seems that Cameron is better at playing the viper in debates rather than the lion.
Right now on BBC one they are discussing hung parliaments. I'm still not convinced that they are automatically a bad thing. Cases can be made for either way, it seems.
|
Cameron on Paxman just finished.
Interesting questions and answers. Cameron did decently well but not brilliant.
He tried to justify his inheritance tax lift which I think is pretty much undefendable. Of all the tax cuts you could make that one is just stupid. How can the Conservatives say they've changed when they still make stupid decisions like that?
He did well on the economy in general though, explaining how they laid out spending cuts during the 2005 election which were ignored and Paxman did seem to agree that the economy would be better off if the Conservatives had been in power.
He didn't rule out a VAT increase in the next budget though, which I thought was bizarre. I don't understand why he didn't give a straight answer, instead of just saying "no" he said "we have no plans to increase VAT in the next budget". But of course Paxman just jumped on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
