EPTNSFW Policy @ Teamliquid.net - Page 5
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
SleepSheep
Canada344 Posts
| ||
|
konadora
Singapore66071 Posts
| ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
Using valuable space in my thread title and properly categorizing images that are explicit is ridiculous! I demand additional explanation quoted directly to me with several references to my posting history in various other unrelated discussions! | ||
|
538
Hungary3932 Posts
On February 13 2010 06:38 CharlieMurphy wrote: I use firefox and I don't recall images in spoilers loading before spoilers. I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but the point is that in Firefox an image already loads when its yet hidden by a spoiler tag. So even though you dont click on the spoiler tag when it says NSFW, the network traffic will still show you accessing xxxgirlwithadick.jpg. (Try spoilering some large image, and wait a little before opening the tag, you will see that it appears right away, as proof that its not starting loading only when you click the spoiler. Try the same from a different browser, you will not find the same.) | ||
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
| ||
|
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
On February 12 2010 07:07 larjarse wrote: Tired of switching browsers and just want to use the simple and safe Google Chrome browser? Would you like to fix it? Lets talk about it. I and quite a few others use Chrome and have no problems so I don't know what you want to talk about. We have a browser discussion thread going every now and then and It was never mentioned once. On topic, I love the moderators here and this rule is great. Btw I visited teamliquid every now and then on my first day at work. Day 2 it was blocked lol. | ||
MrHoon
10183 Posts
On February 14 2010 17:29 MasterOfChaos wrote: I think we should change the way the spoilers work, so FF doesn't preload. And demand that people put NSFW in the spoiler description. nuuuu I like that feature  Just make your monkies make a new NSFW code :D | ||
|
Golden Ghost
Netherlands1041 Posts
On February 13 2010 19:47 LowFlyingMeat wrote: add a [NSFW] shortcut button in the posting code? I think this is actually a good idea for the future but the coders have probably a lot more pressing things to do as implementing this. I assume this new policy will also be implemented shortly in the 10 commandments? | ||
zatic
Zurich15313 Posts
On February 16 2010 01:31 MrHoon wrote: nuuuu I like that feature Just make your monkies make a new NSFW code :D The monkeys work on TSL, TSLD, TLPD, SC2 Beta, and VODs. Making new code so you nerds can keep posting furry porn is a bit further down the priority list :-) | ||
|
Latham
9553 Posts
| ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
On February 16 2010 02:06 zatic wrote: The monkeys work on TSL, TSLD, TLPD, SC2 Beta, and VODs. Making new code so you nerds can keep posting furry porn is a bit further down the priority list :-) Open the spoiler code to the public, and maybe someone can fix it. | ||
|
illu
Canada2531 Posts
On February 16 2010 05:02 igotmyown wrote: Open the spoiler code to the public, and maybe someone can fix it. Agreed. I think this NSFW business can be easily solved with some fancy code. | ||
|
illu
Canada2531 Posts
On February 13 2010 20:00 {88}iNcontroL wrote: I demand additional explanation quoted directly to me with several references to my posting history in various other unrelated discussions! This. | ||
Chill
Calgary25963 Posts
On February 16 2010 05:11 illu wrote: Agreed. I think this NSFW business can be easily solved with some fancy code. no, just type NSFW as per every other website in the universe. thanks. | ||
|
Kim Jong Tassadar
United States44 Posts
On February 13 2010 20:00 {88}iNcontroL wrote: THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! Using valuable space in my thread title and properly categorizing images that are explicit is ridiculous! I demand additional explanation quoted directly to me with several references to my posting history in various other unrelated discussions! I haven't read your other posts, but I take it that they are explicit. But don't worry about taking up the title length; articles are more fun when the title is vague anyway. | ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On February 12 2010 05:09 ViruX wrote: I wonder how many people didn't open this thread because of the NSFW title I did...because I wanted to know the meaning of "NSFW". On February 12 2010 04:51 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: You shouldn't be reading TL at work anyway... This statement is supportable. | ||
|
jtype
England2167 Posts
Or, [PNSFWBDOYJ] (possibly not safe for work but depends on your job)? | ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
On February 20 2010 04:38 Chill wrote: no, just type NSFW as per every other website in the universe. thanks. How do you know other theoretical races in other galaxies doesn't use some kind of internet too? HUH | ||
|
jtype
England2167 Posts
On February 21 2010 23:24 Zoler wrote: How do you know other theoretical races in other galaxies doesn't use some kind of internet too? HUH Well, the Zerg are all connected by the overmind, so I guess that could count as such. Not too sure about the Protoss, but Archons probably have some stories to tell. | ||
| ||
