|
On October 09 2009 19:25 Velr wrote: Arafat has one.
If Arafat could get one, everyone can get one. This. Nobel peace prize is a joke. They even gave one to Al Gore for making up a doomsday religion and guilting little kids for "wasting" resources on their own life.
|
Just a side note about the Nobel Peace Prize - The nomination deadline is Feb 1, Obama had only been in office about 3 weeks by then YET he has been given (unearned I feel) the Nobel Peace Prize - over other, more deserving people, who have actually done something.
|
has he even done anything yet.. like on southpark, he was supposed to bring chaaaange, but nothing happened lol
|
I agree that this is way to early, but saying he has achieved nothing is a stretch. He has completely changed the tone of international diplomacy. Some quick examples
*He was one of few people to speak out against the war in Iraq from the get-go *When Russia invaded Georgia, the media and politicians flew into cold war mode. Obama said we needed to wait and gather all the facts, in which he was widely criticized for. It was later revealed that Georgia instigated the war. McCain, if president, would have probably dropped troops into Moscow *On week 1 of his presidency, he announced closing Gitmo, and personally reached out to middle eastern leaders to try to change the tone of our relationship. *He has been pushing Israel to freeze settlements, a key issue to a peace deal. * During the Iranian meltdown following the Iranian elections, most politicians would have utilized the events to take a strong public stance against Iran. Obama, in my belief in interest if uranium negotiations and security in Afghanistan, stayed out of it. At least publicly. *Currently, he is reviewing the strategy in Afghanistan. The population centric counter insurgency strategy that has been taking shape since his presidency, has been threatened by a fraudulent election and a severely corrupt government. This is an important step back, regardless of the end decision, as to not get stuck in our own momentum, as we did in Vietnam.
I would consider all of those things accomplishments, some more so than others, and some with more lasting effects than others. It is to early to win a prize, but to say Obama hasn't done anything is ignorant of our foreign policy and current international conflicts.
|
I feel suddenly compelled to purchase a cherry-picker.
|
Wow this really surprised me.... I mean like others have said he just hasn't been in office that long. If I had been old enough to vote I would've voted for him and I'm glad he won (edit clarificatino: the US presidency) but this Nobel Peace Prize seems really weird and out of place. Has a standing president ever won one before? Much less during not only their first term but their first year in office.
|
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
Even as a supporter of the president, I think this is premature. watch Obama hit the nail on the head with a very humble and smart speech though.
|
doubt it, its pretty impressive
btw its cause hes + Show Spoiler +an intelligent guy, what did you think i was going to say? lol
|
YO OBAMA, I'M GONNA LET YOU FINISH, BUT I JUST WANNA SAY THAT MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAS THE BEST NOBEL PRIZE WINNER OF ALL TIME.
Some twitter user... LMAO
|
ahhh..the nobel peace price has been a joke the past couple of outings..its more of popularity contest now. Obama hasn't done anything to receive it. A more likely candidate would of been Bill Clinton.
man..what is up with the world lately.
|
United States20661 Posts
Fucking ridic. Obama has 0 accomplishments.
|
On October 10 2009 00:33 TeCh)PsylO wrote: I would consider all of those things accomplishments, some more so than others, and some with more lasting effects than others. It is to early to win a prize, but to say Obama hasn't done anything is ignorant of our foreign policy and current international conflicts.
Policy changes not accomplishments. Any new president is going to make a bunch of initial policy changes.
|
On October 10 2009 00:54 omnigol wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2009 00:33 TeCh)PsylO wrote: I would consider all of those things accomplishments, some more so than others, and some with more lasting effects than others. It is to early to win a prize, but to say Obama hasn't done anything is ignorant of our foreign policy and current international conflicts. Policy changes not accomplishments. Any new president is going to make a bunch of initial policy changes.
Policy changes in the interest of peace that have been widely welcomed around world. I am not making the argument that he deserves the thing yet, but the idea that he hasn't done anything in the interest to make peace is not correct.
|
On October 10 2009 01:00 TeCh)PsylO wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2009 00:54 omnigol wrote:On October 10 2009 00:33 TeCh)PsylO wrote: I would consider all of those things accomplishments, some more so than others, and some with more lasting effects than others. It is to early to win a prize, but to say Obama hasn't done anything is ignorant of our foreign policy and current international conflicts. Policy changes not accomplishments. Any new president is going to make a bunch of initial policy changes. Policy changes in the interest of peace that have been widely welcomed around world. I am not making the argument that he deserves the thing yet, but the idea that he hasn't done anything in the interest to make peace is not correct.
It is correct. He has plans to do these things, but nothing has actually happened yet. What nuclear weapons has he retired? What significant treaties has he signed?
He has an "outline", but he hasn't started the final draft. You can't turn the outline in for credit as the paper.
|
|
|
I'm happy he got it -- I think he deserves it for all the hate he gets.
I mean, I've never seen such ridiculous evaluation of a president on a day to day basis.
|
I think it's an incredibly brilliant political move, and if it works out it might even be remembered as like a modern-day Pope-crowning-the-emperor.
Think about it: a big part of Obama's foreign policy has centered around changing the image of America from that of a belligerent country to that of one that pushes for peaceful negotiations and such. Obviously he has not entirely lived up to that billing yet, but it's also tough to enact such a wide change in just a year. That said, this peace prize FORCES Obama to follow through on these acts. For a decent amount of time he'll be under intense scrutiny to live up to the award... if the award has any meaning to people. (Personally I'm cynical about the award, and I think people will forget he won it in two days, but...) If there's any sort of influence the Award (and the award-givers) wanted, this is it.
I'm almost certain Obama can't really be pleased about this. Now it's tough for him to do any sort of about-face on his stance on foreign policy, and there's a good chance he'll be held to even higher expectations because of it. This is NOT what he would have liked to wake up to.
|
On October 09 2009 23:47 hifriend wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2009 23:38 diggurd wrote: hey swedish brothers, why are you home in poor sweden and not over here living the norwegian dream like the 2 mill others? i can see two of them working the neighbours ceiling as we speak, they look so happy. : D thats pretty much exactly what im doing >.< except ive an appartment in stockholm as well as tönsberg
Swedes going to Norway to work are traitors and should not bother coming back...
+ Show Spoiler +...rich bastards 
OT: Rethorics should not be enough to score you the peace prize but on the other hand I'm not sure if there were any good contenders for the prize atm. Maybe the Human Rights Watch? They seem decent enough.
|
8751 Posts
On October 09 2009 23:17 Hawk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2009 23:03 Liquid`NonY wrote: Work is recognized in two ways: popular opinion and expert opinion. Popular opinion usually precedes expert opinion. A contrary expert opinion can be a tool for changing popular opinion. The Nobel Prize is usually awarded long after popular opinion and most expert opinions have been expressed so that it's easy to align with those opinions, but it's capable of having its own. Rather than wait 10 years to see how Obama's career pans out to make an easy choice, they're seizing a more useful role by opining on an active thing. While it goes against their normal method, it doesn't undermine the integrity of the award or their reasons for awarding it.
As far as I know, TL.net has no political experts. At best, we have people that have majored in political science and digest a lot of political media. Nobody is in a position to say that (1) "created a new climate in international politics" (2) "Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play" (3) "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples" are overstated. If his role in those things are not overstated, then they're perfectly excellent reasons to receive an award. The body of work they're judging is 2-3 weeks worth of presidency. By sheer virtue of Bush not being able to seek a third term, #1 is filled by anyone who got nominated, since they couldn't possibly be as craptastic as him. I don't see how #2 was satisified then, or even now. And same with #3, that might only be partially applicable now, and it certainly wasn't two or three weeks into his term. You don't need to be a 'political expert' to conclude that there's no way that anyone should be nominated with such a little body of work. Of course people conclude things that they have no sound argument supported by evidence for whether they're a political expert or not. Political discussion hardly ever proceeds scientifically so the conclusions have nothing to do with knowledge. There is simply no way for anyone here to know whether or not Obama deserved the award. Your reasoning for dismissing their claims about Obama's work is laughably far from infallible. Yeah, it's at the standard of popular political discussion, but I'm pointing out the fact that that standard is low.
|
fuck that. He hasn't done jack shit. He ran on the platform that he would withdraw troops first thing in office, but troops are still in Iraq AND Afghanistan, in fact afghanistan is kicking so much ass USA might have to do a troop surge again. Where the fuck is peace in any of that? Giving him the award because they like what he is TRYING to do is like giving me an A while i'm completing an exam beacuse they would like to encourage me to do well. What the fuck backwards logic is this?
Obama might be "an international symbol of hope and peace", but he is only that beacuse Bush fucked up so badly, and because he has good oratory skills and looks completely different. His name has been well marketed to the public, but he has yet to answer to even one of his promises made so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|