EPT*a jump forward in time*
"FUCK YOU TESTIE YOU BDING FAGGITY FAGGOT FAGFAG FUCKASDKASDF"
<3 you bly.
Bigtime:
Yours truly.
[HoN/DotA] Let's Play~!! - Page 251
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Naib
Hungary4904 Posts
*a jump forward in time* "FUCK YOU TESTIE YOU BDING FAGGITY FAGGOT FAGFAG FUCKASDKASDF" <3 you bly. Bigtime: Yours truly. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
As of now me and bhp on the moral highroad of TL. Edit: DC can come too. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
On December 05 2008 03:02 Naib wrote: "I won't criticize anyone personally anymore, just in general" *a jump forward in time* "FUCK YOU TESTIE YOU BDING FAGGITY FAGGOT FAGFAG FUCKASDKASDF" <3 you bly. Bigtime: Yours truly. criticize them for their play, i wasn't criticizing testie for his play, his meepo is really good, i was flaming him for being a backdooring ass | ||
|
DevAzTaYtA
Oman2005 Posts
oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... game time fegz | ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
But I have done it in CW's and pubs. | ||
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
Testie was always agains BD's. I remember awhile back Ryugie or someone did that and Testie was all upset about it. Then he goes and does a BD to win the game and pretends it's all good? Sorry Nick, but that just doesn't seem to add up. Your excuse is that the "game was dragging on too long". I have to say that is a sad excuse. If it's dragging on too long then coordinate your team for a stronger push. If that's not possible then get your carries fat. With the entire jungle at your disposal it's not that hard. If you don't have strong enough carries than them then it's your team's fault for not picking the right heroes, or not pushing and winning when you had the chance. Either way, you were the one most adamant about banning BD, so I think you're being a little hypocritical here. Of course, I understand your point in saying you only care about BD in inhouses, and don't care about CWs and pubs, but really, that's just being overly technical and just hands down gay. I would understand if Ryugie did it, because I remember he and myself were for allowing BD. But if I remember correctly, you were completely against it, so for you to pull this on the reason that "it's just a CW" or "dragging too long" is just complete disrespect and well, just not cool. Also, if any of you are wondering why I'm poking my nose in, is because I wanted to give a more unbiased opinion, as someone who was not there. I've read bly's complaint, and I've seen testie's explanation, and I have to admit that in my opinion, testie's wrong. | ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
| ||
|
bhp255
United States600 Posts
 i like BD as a last resort tho.... i cant say i have never BD'd or that i havent been BD'd i actually find BDing kinda cool... it means that u are able to BD without getting urself killed and suffering a counterpush or smth but anyways, im with L2W and roogy in allowing BDs then again, i wonder what would become of dota if suddenly ppl started BDing 1st and 2nd towers too... cuz after all when ppl say BD i usually think BDing throne only btw, is it considered BD if u were attacking tower and all creeps died, but yet u still attack tower? | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
no? then bitch to icefrog. edit: i'm also impartial as L2W is, since I wasn't there. except other side. edit2: im on the pro-BD side, not on testie's side. that was just a cheap cop-out on his part but you can't blame it on him because the game allows it. so once again, either agree pre-game or bitch to icefrog. assumptions aren't good enough edit3: @bhp, no that's not BD. but nobody has a precise definition of backdoor anyway so it's a stupid argument. "attacking when creeps aren't there" isn't precise, and is, in fact, done all the time in TL IHs, except it's okay because it's only for a few hundred HPs or something. | ||
|
nitram
Canada5412 Posts
On December 05 2008 06:42 bhp255 wrote: i like BD as a last resort tho.... i cant say i have never BD'd or that i havent been BD'd i actually find BDing kinda cool... it means that u are able to BD without getting urself killed and suffering a counterpush or smth but anyways, im with L2W and roogy in allowing BDs then again, i wonder what would become of dota if suddenly ppl started BDing 1st and 2nd towers too... cuz after all when ppl say BD i usually think BDing throne only btw, is it considered BD if u were attacking tower and all creeps died, but yet u still attack tower? No, you can attack a tower even if all the creeps have died. Aso i dont consider it BD when u attack a hero from behind a tower. That being illegal is just retarded. Also, imo, I don't agree with testie BDing that game, but I also think bly should not have lost his cool over some meager cw. That game we played was really frustrating for everyone. Our team was really weak early game because we were almost all caries vs a strong nuking team. Yet we managed to persevere and farm up till the Chinese team would just turtle for 30+ minutes prolonging a losing game. That game should not have gone longer then 60 minutes yet because of the Chinese teams tactics, they were able to keep defending while our team farmed enough for buybacks. It was a lame game and we should put it behind us instead of fighting about it. | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On December 05 2008 07:13 nitram wrote: No, you can attack a tower even if all the creeps have died. Aso i dont consider it BD when u attack a hero from behind a tower. That being illegal is just retarded. /bd rant on ?? unless i'm misreading your post, that's just a towerdive and afaik always been considered legal? here's food for thought - you dive a hero, kill him, tower's there with 50hp. do you kill it? is it BD? What if you would die to the tower by running but are capable of killing it? you MUST die then? BD is such a fucking stupid concept in dota. i can't believe something so imprecise is actually trying to be enforced. ridiculous /bd rant off. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
On December 05 2008 07:19 JeeJee wrote: /bd rant on ?? unless i'm misreading your post, that's just a towerdive and afaik always been considered legal? here's food for thought - you dive a hero, kill him, tower's there with 50hp. do you kill it? is it BD? What if you would die to the tower by running but are capable of killing it? you MUST die then? BD is such a fucking stupid concept in dota. i can't believe something so imprecise is actually trying to be enforced. ridiculous /bd rant off. You can kill a tower if it's below 10% health, common knowledge, check the rules of every league to see if BD is allowed, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On December 05 2008 07:22 zulu_nation8 wrote: You can kill a tower if it's below 10% health, common knowledge, check the rules of every league to see if BD is allowed, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. k if tower is 130/1300 and you would die by running? and i wasn't aware this was a league game. wait, it wasn't. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
Because Testie does not allow BD in TL IHs, he is against it and we are against it when we play CWs together. But somehow he thought it was okay just because the game was dragging on for too long or some retarded excuse. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On December 05 2008 07:29 zulu_nation8 wrote: yes if it's 131/1300 you have to die, most importantly testie wasn't backdooring our towers, he was backdooring our raxes. There are common rules in Dota like pooling and backdooring raxes that are disallowed by mutual consent, allowing them would be the exception. These rules are written in text for leagues, but because pub games don't have rules they are generally agreed upon. All of that has nothing to do with what we're talking about anyway. actually, 130/1300 is what i'm asking. also this has everything to do with what we're talking about you just said non-league games don't have rules. this game was a non-league game. thus, any additional rules (beyond those enforced by dota itself) must be agreed upon. like i said earlier, assumptions aren't good enough. generally agreed upon doesn't imply 100% agree. | ||
|
Dark.Carnival
United States5095 Posts
who the fuck cares, if the game was going for 80+mins you should be thanking him for ending it. at that point in the game neither side won, the only goal should be to end the fucker and move to the next game. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On December 05 2008 07:34 zulu_nation8 wrote: if you're arguing that its ok to backdoor raxes if both teams didnt specifically state otherwise beforehand, then please stop talking because I will just assume you are a dumbass. way to dodge the questions. care to try again? ah.. dota.. the people are much more entertaining than the actual game. | ||
| ||
