On December 13 2006 13:29 ItchReliever wrote: I propose that incontrol be banned because he hates on asians wayyy too much. i'm pretty sure he's racist. whenever a topic that could be linked to asians comes up, incontrol is always there to make a deriding comment about asians. this is not acceptable and frankly it's very annoying. he tries sometimes to cover it up a bit and make it slightly less offensive by saying it is a "joke", but it's clear, at least to me, that he has a racist mind set. if incontrol is not going to be banned, then i want to ask incontrol to please cool it with the racist and/ or derogatory remarks that are obviously offensive and unpleasant to hear.
There is no brink for mocking someone and their stereotype. You realize you are being a fucking hippocrite? People call americans fat, peruvians poor, blacks dumb and asians short. Just because I happen to find humor in the angry ass asian defenders on this forum doesn't mean you need to ignore those who generalize americans (Smurg in this very thread) or the various other forms of immature generalizations previously mentioned. This is a bw forum. We are all relatively young adults / teenage kids. We are going to mock things and make off color remarks. As long as they are within reason and maybe even hold some merit they are tolerated. If you need further analysis on this read Cyric's comment or CharlieMurphy's short but wise statement.
Babo: I am sorry that my previous comments have compiled all to this. I honestly did not think anyone would follow my postings so closely to allow a theme in my humor to become a grudge. I will back off on the topic and realize some people are sensitive to it ok?
Smurg: You felt the need to act lap doggish and that is fine. I think you are really on to something with your theory on american accents.. do some research that could be the next big communication theory.
Cyric: I appreciate that you recognize I am abrasive yet refuse to ignore my logic just because of a tone I took earlier in the thread when the discussion was less serious.
On December 13 2006 15:24 {88}iNcontroL wrote: doesn't mean you need to ignore those who generalize americans (Smurg in this very thread)
Inc, I might be wrong but I think you've failed to realize that Smurg's been on a higher echelon of thinking than you this entire time. In other words, your jokes are/were being 3rd leveled by Smurg all along.
On December 13 2006 15:24 {88}iNcontroL wrote: doesn't mean you need to ignore those who generalize americans (Smurg in this very thread)
Inc, I might be wrong but I think you've failed to realize that Smurg's been on a higher echelon of thinking than you this entire time. In other words, your jokes are/were being 3rd leveled by Smurg all along.
Despite popular belief. Life isnt a fucking Dragon Ball Z episode. His "level" of joking was irrelevent and based on personal experience. He admits all of this. You seemed to have missed that. Before you take it upon yourself to bestow the faithful with your amazing intellect I suggest going to www.askjeeves.com and pondering the purpose of said questions and if further confusion should become apparent go to the "no" policy and just "no."
EPT
![[image loading]](http://s133702574.onlinehome.us/pictures/blog/evanomakeup.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://64.111.216.18/ul/1625-cd6.jpg)
