EPTTL Minecraft PvP/Factions Server - October 11th - Page 37
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
| ||
|
Zachris
Sweden26 Posts
| ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
| ||
|
ChineseWife
United States373 Posts
| ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
You can now attack and build blocks on enemies territory, only if theyre online, and never their chests, as they are still protected. Possible uses include placing ladders to scale walls, or digging your way into an enemy wall. Cost: 9 hearts worth of damage, each and every block.So ask yourself, is attacking that guy really worth it? | ||
|
zalz
Netherlands3704 Posts
But 9 hearts of damage per block seems like a proper counter balance. I am assuming that's also 9 hearts of damage for every block you place? | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
On October 07 2011 17:09 zalz wrote: I was reading it and i started thinking how utterly pointless defense would be if people could do that. But 9 hearts of damage per block seems like a proper counter balance. I am assuming that's also 9 hearts of damage for every block you place? Yes. 2 blocks without a minute rest will get you killed. Plus you can only do it when theyre online. | ||
|
irninja
United States1220 Posts
Respawning will now take you back to spawn. (you may still use /f home) | ||
|
Glull
Germany404 Posts
the pvp is both challenging and thrilling, the volunteer-made neutral cities are beautiful and fun to discover and the admins are really doing their best at improving and expanding the available content while solving actual conflicts with integrity. and while i may not always agree with their decisions, i believe i agree with their overall ideas (vision sounds even more cheesy, trust me.) and can see that these are right on the mark - and thus making playing on this server a blast. the only reason why i would not absolutely recommend anyone with a hint of love for minecraft to play here is that they would increase the chances of my login being thwarted by overpopulation. that is all. | ||
|
Josri
Netherlands219 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7V1W0.jpg)  | ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
Mafia invaded the castle of wtf, poked around, said hi to their leader, didn't kill him, and left without taking anything. A good day. | ||
|
RetZ
Australia67 Posts
On October 07 2011 19:04 BrownBear wrote: Battle Report: Mafia invaded the castle of wtf, poked around, said hi to their leader, didn't kill him, and left without taking anything. A good day. A++ Would be invaded again. | ||
|
NikonTC
United Kingdom418 Posts
On October 07 2011 15:34 irninja wrote: Major patch: You can now attack and build blocks on enemies territory, only if theyre online, and never their chests, as they are still protected. Possible uses include placing ladders to scale walls, or digging your way into an enemy wall. Cost: 9 hearts worth of damage, each and every block.So ask yourself, is attacking that guy really worth it? Uhm, A couple of concerns: A) Doors can be destroyed by knocking down the block underneath them right? so one square is all you need. B) What if I'm mining? I'm online, but not within sight of my keep? How is it fair that they can raid me and I know nothing about it? In that case you may as well set it to allow them to raid when offline... Is it not possible to have a rule stating that the defender has to be online AND has to be within his territory? C) You realise europeans can't win vs an american using swords because of the lag right? they can hit me from 10 blocks away. How am I supposed to defend myself now? | ||
|
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
B) What if I'm mining? I'm online, but not within sight of my keep? How is it fair that they can raid me and I know nothing about it? In that case you may as well set it to allow them to raid when offline... Is it not possible to have a rule stating that the defender has to be online AND has to be within his territory? At the health cost per-block, it'd take even a tunneling/raiding party a while to breach well-placed defenses, or at least force them to use a LOT of food to get it done quickly. | ||
|
Josri
Netherlands219 Posts
| ||
|
NikonTC
United Kingdom418 Posts
On October 07 2011 19:48 Cedstick wrote: Can we make it so Obsidian can only be destroyed by the person who owns the land? I think that would really increase the value of it and peoples' will to seek it out as true strong-hold defenses. Iron Door with an obsidian frame? Indestructible! At the health cost per-block, it'd take even a tunneling/raiding party a while to breach well-placed defenses, or at least force them to use a LOT of food to get it done quickly. Who the hell will bother tunneling? Just walk up to the door and knock it down with 1 block, or failing that, 4 people can breach my walls instantly because it's only 2 layers thick (I started building before this change and it's too late to fix it now). | ||
|
GigaFlop
United States1146 Posts
On October 07 2011 12:27 protentus wrote: It's a PvP server and you were in a warzone.... As i stated in the server i asked the members to stop killing you after the 1st or 2nd time, But i take full responsibility for my factions actions. If you wish to exact revenge, you are more than welcome to amass your armor and weapons and try to take on the strongest alliance on the server. Have a nice day. It wasn't specifically a war zone, it was Wilderness. As it just so happens, since I was unaffiliated at that point, I had no weapons and no armor whatsoever, let alone on my person. I was simply building a small fortress for myself, and I noticed a group of armored + armed players holding out in a dirt fortress. Because of my lack of arms and armor, and the fact that a fight sounded imminent, I decided to wait for a little while, and see what happened. I had plans to loot the corpses of either side with equal fervor. Even so, regardless of what you say, I view your faction as a mass of brutes who care not for the life and well-being of the innocent. I was only trying to get things rolling for myself, so I could live in a somewhat peaceful manner. No longer. | ||
|
Tantaburs
Canada1825 Posts
On October 07 2011 20:46 GigaFlop wrote: It wasn't specifically a war zone, it was Wilderness. As it just so happens, since I was unaffiliated at that point, I had no weapons and no armor whatsoever, let alone on my person. I was simply building a small fortress for myself, and I noticed a group of armored + armed players holding out in a dirt fortress. Because of my lack of arms and armor, and the fact that a fight sounded imminent, I decided to wait for a little while, and see what happened. I had plans to loot the corpses of either side with equal fervor. Even so, regardless of what you say, I view your faction as a mass of brutes who care not for the life and well-being of the innocent. I was only trying to get things rolling for myself, so I could live in a somewhat peaceful manner. No longer. I've nade a faction for people who wan't to stay safe while being independant. Join the Heretics and protect yourself from those who would harm you. We have iron to arm ourselves and bread to eat | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
Nationality Canada I've nade a faction for people who wan't to stay safe while being independant. Quite reassuring :p | ||
|
RQShatter
United States459 Posts
| ||
| ||
