EPTPC Games Sales Thread - Page 304
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Uhh Negative
United States1090 Posts
| ||
|
Infernal_dream
United States2359 Posts
On May 18 2013 20:42 Miragee wrote: From all what I saw it is far worse than 1.6 from gameplay and competetive point of view. I will try it out this weekend but I doubt playing it will make it look better. Seems pretty much comparable with Source (expecially the mindset behind it). And 1.6 was worse than 1.3 yet everyone is all over 1.6 being the best. Aside from some odd balance changes (looking at you deagle) it's much better than source. | ||
|
Lemstar
United States387 Posts
On May 20 2013 03:02 Uhh Negative wrote: Good find.... This is so borderline for me. $10 less and I would buy for sure. Still thinking about it though. It looks a lot like Dishonored which was really fun. You can already get them for that cheap. Fair warning, though - it's absolutely nothing like Dishonored outside of being first-person. | ||
|
Terranist
United States2496 Posts
On May 20 2013 03:37 Infernal_dream wrote: And 1.6 was worse than 1.3 yet everyone is all over 1.6 being the best. Aside from some odd balance changes (looking at you deagle) it's much better than source. the 5v5 competitive matchmaking and ELO system alone makes it very much worth the price. it's not too far from classic cs but it does have some differences like the mag-7 and decoy grenades. | ||
|
Klipsys
United States1533 Posts
On May 20 2013 03:37 Infernal_dream wrote: And 1.6 was worse than 1.3 yet everyone is all over 1.6 being the best. Aside from some odd balance changes (looking at you deagle) it's much better than source. Actually 1.5 was the best. 1.3 had weird issues with pump shotguns being op and bunnyhopping being rampant. But I agree that GO is really good and valve is the best developer in PC gaming right now. They've fixed SO MUCH since launch | ||
|
AnomalySC2
United States2073 Posts
On May 20 2013 03:37 Infernal_dream wrote: And 1.6 was worse than 1.3 yet everyone is all over 1.6 being the best. Aside from some odd balance changes (looking at you deagle) it's much better than source. 1.6 was considered the best version of counter strike because they made the AWP more balanced. 1.3 was a lot of fun because bunny hopping was still semi useful, but other than that there wasn't much of a reason to prefer that version over 1.6. Not to mention they added a bit more variety to the gun selection for competitive play with 1.6. It wasn't just mp5, ak, m4, and awp. | ||
|
ThreeAcross
172 Posts
Today only. Amazon has bioshock infinite for $35 | ||
|
Lemstar
United States387 Posts
On May 20 2013 06:26 ThreeAcross wrote: http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=xs_gb_A29LYMOCDFR6KX?ie=UTF8&docId=1001215541&pf_rd_p=441937901&pf_rd_s=right-1&pf_rd_t=701&pf_rd_i=20&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1EAJBSC3W45QNZ79E8JR Today only. Amazon has bioshock infinite for $35 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18642955 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18644276 | ||
|
Miragee
8690 Posts
On May 20 2013 05:18 AnomalySC2 wrote: 1.6 was considered the best version of counter strike because they made the AWP more balanced. 1.3 was a lot of fun because bunny hopping was still semi useful, but other than that there wasn't much of a reason to prefer that version over 1.6. Not to mention they added a bit more variety to the gun selection for competitive play with 1.6. It wasn't just mp5, ak, m4, and awp. I didn't play nor watched 1.3 so I can't compare. The only thing I heared a lot was 1.5>1.6. Probably 1/3 of the discussions were 1.5>1.6, 2/3 the other way around. I honestly don't know which game is truly better but 1.6 deserves the place it is in (that doesn't mean that 1.5 and 1.3 wouldn't deserve that place, too. I personally think they don't get the recognition because competetive esports evolved/grew a little bit later because of the technic). | ||
|
Purpose88
Germany137 Posts
On May 17 2013 06:29 xDaunt wrote: Absolutely. The gameplay in ME1 is kinda crappy, but the story is awesome. ME2 does much better. ME1 has by far the best Gameplay. Of course the combat is a bit worse, but at least it has still some RPG-Elements. Finding and customizing your Weapons/Armor is alot of fun. I have no idea why they removed this. ME2 would so much better with the RPG-Elements of ME1. ME2 is obviously still the better Game, because it has much more content. I just played ME1 through and have 30hrs of time in my ME2 playthrough, so I know what I'm talking about. | ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On May 22 2013 18:38 Purpose88 wrote: ME1 has by far the best Gameplay. Of course the combat is a bit worse, but at least it has still some RPG-Elements. Finding and customizing your Weapons/Armor is alot of fun. I have no idea why they removed this. ME2 would so much better with the RPG-Elements of ME1. ME2 is obviously still the better Game, because it has much more content. I just played ME1 through and have 30hrs of time in my ME2 playthrough, so I know what I'm talking about. I disagree, I personally don't feel like the RPG elements added anything to ME1 and was just a nuicance "Oh, there's enemies of type X here, lets switch ammo to type Y which is more effective against them". "Oh my HP is low, let's switch to the regen module for a while". About as fun as switching cards between deck and sideboard in magic. That said, it was sad that the RPG element was diminished in ME2. Instead of removing it they should have created a new system so we could have actual depth. | ||
|
Purpose88
Germany137 Posts
And this switching between Weapons for different opponents is still the same. In ME2 I have used the same weapon from start to finish, in ME1 I always looked for the Weapon with most DPS/Sockets and that was way more fun. How many vendors I searched to find a Good Armor for my Warden in ME1... in ME2 you just use the same gear from start to finish - thats even terrible for a Shooter. At least I play a Expert now in ME2, so who cares about Weapons/Armor. ^o^ | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
| ||
|
Purpose88
Germany137 Posts
And who the fuck plays Mass Effect for the Gameplay??? Whats wrong with you?! Mass Effect has terrible gameplay/combat in all three games. Its like Bioshock - all about the story, characters! | ||
|
AnomalySC2
United States2073 Posts
On May 22 2013 19:40 Purpose88 wrote: ...I have invested 30hrs in ME2 THIS MONTH! I obviously played through all of the three Games, LOL! I was just telling that I played through ME1 lately and playing ME2 right now. And who the fuck plays Mass Effect for the Gameplay??? Whats wrong with you?! Mass Effect has terrible gameplay/combat in all three games. Its like Bioshock - all about the story, characters! The combat was terrible in ME1, not so for ME2 (haven't played three yet myself). Bioshock also has fun gameplay, and often times it can be quite intense. I'm thinking of some of the "revolution" sections during Infinite where you're zip lining all over the place while ships explode and rockets are flying everywhere. That said, I do agree that the story and characters are the main draws to both games, but saying the gameplay is throwaway is underselling the two series. | ||
|
Murdco
United States745 Posts
| ||
|
Purpose88
Germany137 Posts
On May 23 2013 03:09 Murdco wrote: New Humble Weekly Alan Wake it contains both Alan Wake Collector's Editiona and Alan Wake's American Nightmare, this is the best weekly since Darksiders 2 imo, such great games for such a low price. Go get it if you like horror/action games Steam Keys? | ||
|
Murdco
United States745 Posts
yes | ||
|
Purpose88
Germany137 Posts
Still waiting for a Deal that beats the Humble Bundle V. | ||
|
puppykiller
United States3137 Posts
Also wtf is wrong with the story in either Me2 and Me3? | ||
| ||
