| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Zocat
Germany2229 Posts
On October 15 2011 18:12 znag wrote: Dice and EA presented the multiplayer maps for BF3. This link is in German, but the pictures alone will do it. These maps look awesome. Especially Damavand Peak sounds interesting... BFcom.org English source | ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
| ||
|
soullogik
United States1171 Posts
| ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
| ||
|
KaoReal
Canada340 Posts
| ||
|
kineticSYN
United States909 Posts
does it really matter? what in the world could they possibly do with your information u_u people get overhyped about this privacy shit you have no privacy on the internet, get used to it | ||
|
Rybka
United States836 Posts
On October 15 2011 23:40 KaoReal wrote: Does anyone know if the Origin info-grabbing shit has been resolved yet? Latest news I could find still said either surrender your privacy or play on a console. I really don't want to have to play this on console, but I'm not surrendering my PC privacy either T_T The latest buzz is that BF3 might be available on steam after all. Let's keep our fingers crossed! | ||
|
KaoReal
Canada340 Posts
As for the Steam thing, there's still speculation that Origin will be required to run the game, no matter who you get it from. | ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
On October 15 2011 23:49 kineticSYN wrote: man i didn't know people could be so anal about that shit does it really matter? what in the world could they possibly do with your information u_u people get overhyped about this privacy shit you have no privacy on the internet, get used to it they whine about it so they can have a reason to a) pirate it b) not buy it c) say mw3 is better or maybe their comp is full of child porn in any case I dont think anyone truly gives a shit about the privacy stuff | ||
|
Latham
9568 Posts
Guess it's time to give up on the hardcore gamer mentality and become one of the casuals. This game and D3 seem perfect for that role with progress saving like unlocks and leveling. | ||
|
msc
Malaysia18 Posts
Geforce Gts 250 Quad core Q6600 2.4ghz 3gb ram Windows 7 ultimate 64bit Thanks alot | ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
On October 16 2011 00:55 msc wrote: it would be so nice if someone can tell me if my system can play bf3 nicely. would be better if someone can tell on which graphical settings i can play on smoothly. Geforce Gts 250 Quad core Q6600 2.4ghz 3gb ram Windows 7 ultimate 64bit Thanks alot http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/ | ||
|
KaoReal
Canada340 Posts
On October 16 2011 00:28 Assault_1 wrote: they whine about it so they can have a reason to a) pirate it b) not buy it c) say mw3 is better or maybe their comp is full of child porn in any case I dont think anyone truly gives a shit about the privacy stuff I'd just like to have a reason to trust the software I'm installing. I don't plan on pirating it, and MW has lost this battle as far as I'm concerned. I had a friend whose computer got seized for CP, but no, that's not for me. No software needs to have such an invasive EULA. I don't see how people don't have a problem with it when this is the only software yet to have this problem, other than blatantly invasive software - like spyware. There's just no reason to have to give up the rights to your privacy to play their game. They're asking too much in my opinion. I, for one, won't give it up. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:10 KaoReal wrote: I'd just like to have a reason to trust the software I'm installing. I don't plan on pirating it, and MW has lost this battle as far as I'm concerned. I had a friend whose computer got seized for CP, but no, that's not for me. No software needs to have such an invasive EULA. I don't see how people don't have a problem with it when this is the only software yet to have this problem, other than blatantly invasive software - like spyware. There's just no reason to have to give up the rights to your privacy to play their game. They're asking too much in my opinion. I, for one, won't give it up. Yet steam is the exact same way lol. Thats what makes it so confusing on why people complain about privacy yet steam does the exact thing xD. | ||
|
soullogik
United States1171 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/OGJEm.jpg) | ||
|
Fruktsoda
Sweden206 Posts
| ||
|
Slegg
Czech Republic75 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:10 KaoReal wrote: I'd just like to have a reason to trust the software I'm installing. I don't plan on pirating it, and MW has lost this battle as far as I'm concerned. I had a friend whose computer got seized for CP, but no, that's not for me. No software needs to have such an invasive EULA. I don't see how people don't have a problem with it when this is the only software yet to have this problem, other than blatantly invasive software - like spyware. There's just no reason to have to give up the rights to your privacy to play their game. They're asking too much in my opinion. I, for one, won't give it up. Assuming you're not on Facebook etc., are you fine with Steam having the ability to close your account for no reason? I understand why you are reluctant to accept origin, but people make just try and assign the worst possible thing to it, ignoring the fact they are dealing with alot of shit from Steam aswell. | ||
|
FlamingForce
Netherlands701 Posts
 Cos from what that build showed us, BF3 is pretty terrible atm, if DICE doesn't fix the netcode it's pretty much unplayable. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:35 FlamingForce wrote: Did anyone here actually play the beta? Cos from what that build showed us, BF3 is pretty terrible atm, if DICE doesn't fix the netcode it's pretty much unplayable. Yes, a lot of people did. It's an older build that's why it is not the greatest. | ||
|
FlamingForce
Netherlands701 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:50 Torte de Lini wrote: Yes, a lot of people did. It's an older build that's why it is not the greatest. Yes, that doesn't take away the fact that it very much failed as a beta Betas are supposed to be tests to look for problems and bugs, this beta was full of bugs and problems that DICE was well aware of. On top of that, It takes about 3 weeks to go from gold copy, to hitting store shelves. That means they had to stop working on the game around Oct 5th and get it ready for manufacturing, this means there was VERY little time to actually implement any of the feedback from the beta. I'm not saying you don't make a valid point, ofcouse we can't draw conclusions from a beta, it's just that when you put the facts together it draws a very grim foresight. | ||
| ||
|
|
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
Replay Cast
The PondCast
OSC
Demi vs Mixu
Nicoract vs TBD
Babymarine vs MindelVK
ForJumy vs TBD
Shameless vs Percival
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
BSL 21
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
