• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:06
CEST 04:06
KST 11:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors7[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists17[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers19Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid25
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers INu's Battles#14 <BO.9 2Matches> GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 523 Firewall Mutation # 522 Flip My Base Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors FlaSh: This Will Be My Final ASL【ASL S21 Ro.16】 Leta's ASL S21 Ro.16 review BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro16 Group D Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro16 Group C
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1461 users

[Civ 4] Game 4 - Team B - Page 2

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
July 19 2010 03:34 GMT
#21
OMG, if you guys axe rush I will seriously declare war on every single civ we meet. Axe rushing would be amazingly bad.

Looking at our land, even though we have more than we need, this looks like a super-easy cultural victory for us. Take the cow/elephant site for a decent second city. Capital + land to southwest of capital for cottages and gems that will pump tech --> culture, and take the cow/rice/fish in the northwest for a GP farm. EDIT: loaded the save and in 2 turns we're about to discover a plains hill with 2 fish and banana to the east of the cow/elephant city, THAT is the GP farm. Plenty of other land to settle some auxiliary cities to make temples and stuff.

Some of you are making strategy mistakes that come from single-mindedness. 'I must control the expansion opportunities of my opponents. Destroying an opponent early is good'. NOPE. Look at our land! We're at the end of a peninsula with a protective, easy-ish to get along with civ as our barrier to the outside world. Don't settle anywhere NEAR him, we don't need close borders sparking tensions or giving him ideas about backstabbing us. Be ultra-friendly with him, and he will accelerate our tech without ever being a threat. Nobody is going to invade us this entire game, and we're not going to invade anyone else, either. Cultural victory pre-1500 AD, guaranteed.


Even IF you wanted to beat Wang Kon 1v1 style, the way would be to wait for elephants and catapults, instead of blocking his early expansion ability by taking crappy jungle land that only prevents us from immediately taking the awesome land being handed to us on a platter.

Also, please don't steal his worker, he will likely make us his worst enemy, not worth it at all.
Nokarot
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1410 Posts
July 19 2010 03:49 GMT
#22
While I agree with you Keliah, the attitude of "I'm going to declare war on every civ" isnt really cool Also, maybe it's just me but I don't see the point in playing a succession game over the course of a month if the goal is just an easy hand-holding cultural victory.

Yes, if I were on your team, I'd want to expand and get some crazy good tech and be peaceful, but to spice things up I'd wage war with Wang after taking over the entire peninsula. But I'm not on your team so it doesn't matter.
beep beep boop
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 04:27:17
July 19 2010 04:23 GMT
#23
On July 19 2010 11:34 igotmyown wrote:
Since this is just general information, a well built axe/chariot rush is a pretty sure thing on immortal (normal speed), except in certain situations (skirmishers, they start with copper). You have to learn the window and not waste worker turns/production/build wasteful stuff. If you attack too early, you won't be able to overwhelm their free archers. If you attack too late, they've hooked up iron too long and pumped multiple axes. So the target attack size is about 10 axes/14 chariots vs 3 to 4 archers/axes, max of one axe, as fast as possible, chopping as much as you need to. You can also choose to whip the last round and even skip the barracks in the second city if your window looks too tight.

If you go writing right after bw/ah, then wheel, you can tech about halfway to alphabet/aesthetics, then use conquest gold to get the rest of the way (or save and go binary research after a library), and you've regained tech parity.

It will work in certain situations in deity, although you won't always be able to kill them outright.

I would love to see some screenshots of you pulling off an axe/chariot rush on immortal normal speed without you getting too far behind on tech. What about deity? I was under the impression that even War Chariot rushes on deity are pretty much not going to work unless the AI doesn't have iron, copper, or horse in any of their first 3 towns.

On July 19 2010 12:34 Keilah wrote:
OMG, if you guys axe rush I will seriously declare war on every single civ we meet. Axe rushing would be amazingly bad.

Looking at our land, even though we have more than we need, this looks like a super-easy cultural victory for us. Take the cow/elephant site for a decent second city. Capital + land to southwest of capital for cottages and gems that will pump tech --> culture, and take the cow/rice/fish in the northwest for a GP farm. EDIT: loaded the save and in 2 turns we're about to discover a plains hill with 2 fish and banana to the east of the cow/elephant city, THAT is the GP farm. Plenty of other land to settle some auxiliary cities to make temples and stuff.

Some of you are making strategy mistakes that come from single-mindedness. 'I must control the expansion opportunities of my opponents. Destroying an opponent early is good'. NOPE. Look at our land! We're at the end of a peninsula with a protective, easy-ish to get along with civ as our barrier to the outside world. Don't settle anywhere NEAR him, we don't need close borders sparking tensions or giving him ideas about backstabbing us. Be ultra-friendly with him, and he will accelerate our tech without ever being a threat. Nobody is going to invade us this entire game, and we're not going to invade anyone else, either. Cultural victory pre-1500 AD, guaranteed.


Even IF you wanted to beat Wang Kon 1v1 style, the way would be to wait for elephants and catapults, instead of blocking his early expansion ability by taking crappy jungle land that only prevents us from immediately taking the awesome land being handed to us on a platter.

Also, please don't steal his worker, he will likely make us his worst enemy, not worth it at all.

Well I agree with some of what you are saying, but not all.

We do not need to worry about pissing off Wang Kon with borders. As long as we trade with him and take his religion (if he gets one), he will be happy with us. Wang isn't a warlike leader. He isn't going to rush us unless we do something stupid like steal his worker or declare war.

I agree I might have been a bit overzealous when I recommended settling in that jungle belt. However, if there is any land we want in that direction, we need to take it sooner rather than later, especially if the land is close to Wang. The jungle belt isn't exactly far from us. However, we also need to think hard about getting a GP farm and that double gem to the west up and running. The order depends on how quickly we can get up writing.

I agree that elephants and catapults would make a lot more sense than axemen for a rush. I also agree that we shouldn't bother.

I'm personally not a huge fan of culture wins. I think they leave you rather vulnerable to attacks if you aren't careful. Either way, we don't have to worry about that quite yet. We should at least figure out who the other civs in the area are and see how the early religions shake out before we go too far in deciding on a strategy.
Uff Da
Lexpar
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
1813 Posts
July 19 2010 04:54 GMT
#24
OMG, if you seriously declare war on every civ we meet then we will seriously not play from your save game.

In other news I disagree (I'm a total noob) with doing the axe rush. We can just sit back and live off the fat of the land for an easy cultural victory, so why not?
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
July 19 2010 05:50 GMT
#25
OK, the 'declare war' statement was a little out of line. Just trying to get my point across =p

PS: you guys are fast, was in the midst of typing this and pressed ctrl+c, went back to page 1 to check the map, and another post against it. Whew!

Another option for city placement would be to use the far west gems (any good land in the blackness south of them?) as a third cottage city for the culture win. We could also use both of the sites I suggested for GP farms, regardless of if one of them becomes a legendary culture city or not.

How to win a culture victory: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=298093

To be completely honest, I think our start is such a guaranteed easy cultural win, that we should consider banning ourselves from using that victory condition. It would be an informative, but easy and boring game. If we decide to go anti-culture, worker-stealing becomes an option but axe rushing is still awful.
Lunaticman
Profile Joined November 2007
Sweden1097 Posts
July 19 2010 08:26 GMT
#26
We should play to win as soon as possible to show how dominating we can win.

Since we are actually playing against ourselfs our goal is to try and be more efficient every game.

PS: I don't know when my turn starts but I would love an tutorial about uploading screen shoots before my turn.
Failure is not an option
Zyphen[p]
Profile Joined May 2010
United States91 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 08:31:26
July 19 2010 08:31 GMT
#27
Lunaticman, just hit Print Screen in-game and it'll show up in your MyDocs / My Games / beyond the sword folder. (I think that's the right dir path, anyway.)

Edit: Screencapping doesn't work in window mode for some reason. :/
Without music, life would be a mistake.
Biochemist
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1008 Posts
July 19 2010 12:45 GMT
#28
I wouldn't mind doing culture. I've never won a culture victory before, and we've already done conquest/space
nosliw
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States2716 Posts
July 19 2010 13:16 GMT
#29
Hey guys, I tried opening the file, but it gave me "network socket error" "Network socket could not be created". I guess I can't play it w/o internet?
Lunaticman
Profile Joined November 2007
Sweden1097 Posts
July 19 2010 13:17 GMT
#30
I don't know, nosliw.

Either way we should go for what will win.
Failure is not an option
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 13:47:53
July 19 2010 13:26 GMT
#31
Never mind. It doesn't work without internet because it was created as a multiplayer game with 2 players.
Uff Da
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 13:46:16
July 19 2010 13:38 GMT
#32
try selecting the different MP modes? I assume you already tried double clicking the file
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
July 19 2010 13:44 GMT
#33
On July 19 2010 22:38 Keilah wrote:
try opening the game, selecting hot seat, and loading the game from there. I assume you already tried double clicking the file

This doesn't work because he would have to do Teamliquid A's turns as well.
Uff Da
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
July 19 2010 14:48 GMT
#34
The game was created using a LAN with two computers. Maybe check to see if there is a firewall or something?
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
July 19 2010 14:49 GMT
#35
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.
Liquipedia
nosliw
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States2716 Posts
July 19 2010 15:46 GMT
#36
I'll try again tonight by bringing my laptop to a free wireless hotspot.
igotmyown
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4291 Posts
July 19 2010 22:17 GMT
#37
On July 19 2010 23:49 Ver wrote:
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.


Your situational analysis is missing one of the most important elements: you're in semi-isolation, so you're zero sum with Wang Kon. Any land that he has, you will have to spend even more to take later. People do elephant catapult wars because it works and it gets land, not because it's cheap or transitions well techwise.
All the rest of the land is uncontested.
This is how it breaks down: I rush WK and gain the land around him and to the west via settling afterwards.
Or I do not rush WK, and gain the land to the west, and part of the land around WK.

The downfall of rushing isn't jungles or a capital a little over 10 tiles away on a large map. It is, like on the Julius Caesar attempt, the n-2 AIs sucking up the land you would have settled to. The AI could be 6 tiles away, but rushing would be a bad idea if you're land centered on a pangea map surrounded by land hungry AI. If there were an AI to the west, rushing would be a terrible idea because of the aforementioned reason.
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
July 19 2010 23:04 GMT
#38
On July 20 2010 07:17 igotmyown wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2010 23:49 Ver wrote:
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.


Your situational analysis is missing one of the most important elements: you're in semi-isolation, so you're zero sum with Wang Kon. Any land that he has, you will have to spend even more to take later. People do elephant catapult wars because it works and it gets land, not because it's cheap or transitions well techwise.
All the rest of the land is uncontested.
This is how it breaks down: I rush WK and gain the land around him and to the west via settling afterwards.
Or I do not rush WK, and gain the land to the west, and part of the land around WK.

The downfall of rushing isn't jungles or a capital a little over 10 tiles away on a large map. It is, like on the Julius Caesar attempt, the n-2 AIs sucking up the land you would have settled to. The AI could be 6 tiles away, but rushing would be a bad idea if you're land centered on a pangea map surrounded by land hungry AI. If there were an AI to the west, rushing would be a terrible idea because of the aforementioned reason.

And you're neglecting the most important reason NOT to rush. You said it yourself, we are in semi-isolation. At this point, we have not found anyone other than Wang. With this map type (fractal), we may not find anyone other than Wang before Astronomy.

You linked to civfanatics, so I assume you have read that forum a bit. Do you know why the top players hate isolated starts? It is really hard to compete when you don't have trading partners to help backfill your tech. Do you know why the top players there don't like playing Mansa as much as someone like Darius, Elizabeth, Pacal, or Huayna? A big reason (though not the only reason) is because he is the best AI techer in the game, and isn't stingy about trading, so they like to have a chance to have him in the game and trade.

You're advocating killing off someone who not only is unlikely to attack us, but is also a decent techer and the only AI we have found, which could basically turn our start into an isolated start. Bad idea.
Uff Da
igotmyown
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4291 Posts
July 20 2010 01:02 GMT
#39
On July 20 2010 08:04 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2010 07:17 igotmyown wrote:
On July 19 2010 23:49 Ver wrote:
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.


Your situational analysis is missing one of the most important elements: you're in semi-isolation, so you're zero sum with Wang Kon. Any land that he has, you will have to spend even more to take later. People do elephant catapult wars because it works and it gets land, not because it's cheap or transitions well techwise.
All the rest of the land is uncontested.
This is how it breaks down: I rush WK and gain the land around him and to the west via settling afterwards.
Or I do not rush WK, and gain the land to the west, and part of the land around WK.

The downfall of rushing isn't jungles or a capital a little over 10 tiles away on a large map. It is, like on the Julius Caesar attempt, the n-2 AIs sucking up the land you would have settled to. The AI could be 6 tiles away, but rushing would be a bad idea if you're land centered on a pangea map surrounded by land hungry AI. If there were an AI to the west, rushing would be a terrible idea because of the aforementioned reason.

And you're neglecting the most important reason NOT to rush. You said it yourself, we are in semi-isolation. At this point, we have not found anyone other than Wang. With this map type (fractal), we may not find anyone other than Wang before Astronomy.

You linked to civfanatics, so I assume you have read that forum a bit. Do you know why the top players hate isolated starts? It is really hard to compete when you don't have trading partners to help backfill your tech. Do you know why the top players there don't like playing Mansa as much as someone like Darius, Elizabeth, Pacal, or Huayna? A big reason (though not the only reason) is because he is the best AI techer in the game, and isn't stingy about trading, so they like to have a chance to have him in the game and trade.

You're advocating killing off someone who not only is unlikely to attack us, but is also a decent techer and the only AI we have found, which could basically turn our start into an isolated start. Bad idea.

The AI will not trade with you if you're their only contact unless they hit friendly. One AI has the same problems as isolation only less land and more competition. You keep them alive if there are 2 AIs, in which case they will trade.

If it is indeed one on one in isolation, you're far better off killing them if possible so you don't have to aggressively block off high distance cities, or as someone put it, "expand at your leisure".

Some basic searches will confirm this. People dislike semi-isolated starts just as much as isolated starts, unless you can kill them and get double the usual land.

You can get WK to friendly if you adopt his religion, caste system, and gift him a city, I believe. Just religion and caste will still be a random event/demand crap shoot.
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
July 20 2010 01:45 GMT
#40
Any ideas on victory conditions if we don't do culture? I've actually never won a diplomatic/religious victory, could be interesting. Domination and conquest are not going to happen, unless people enjoy massive intercontinental wars on huge maps. Other than that it's culture or space race.

BTW, I endorse building a work boat to go explore. If it can't go anywhere, we're going to need it fairly soon for fish anyways.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
00:00
TLMC #22: The Finalists
CranKy Ducklings58
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SpeCial 248
RuFF_SC2 185
ProTech147
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 5438
Artosis 774
Horang2 581
Mind 126
HiyA 73
NaDa 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 16
Pusan 0
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1221
NeuroSwarm204
League of Legends
Doublelift5308
JimRising 668
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1892
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King214
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor173
Other Games
summit1g12922
C9.Mang0703
Maynarde120
-ZergGirl82
ToD36
ViBE35
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick912
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 33
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1383
• imaqtpie1142
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 54m
Afreeca Starleague
7h 54m
Soma vs hero
Wardi Open
8h 54m
Monday Night Weeklies
13h 54m
Replay Cast
21h 54m
Replay Cast
1d 6h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 7h
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Escore
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
BSL
6 days
IPSL
6 days
eOnzErG vs TBD
G5 vs Nesh
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W4
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
KK 2v2 League Season 1
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.