• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 07:41
CET 13:41
KST 21:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice4Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza1Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Soma Explains: JD's Unrelenting Aggro vs FlaSh It's March 3rd BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ CasterMuse Youtube
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement The Casual Games of the Week Thread [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Diablo 2 thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Just Watchers: Why Some Only…
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2143 users

[Civ 4] Game 4 - Team B - Page 2

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
July 19 2010 03:34 GMT
#21
OMG, if you guys axe rush I will seriously declare war on every single civ we meet. Axe rushing would be amazingly bad.

Looking at our land, even though we have more than we need, this looks like a super-easy cultural victory for us. Take the cow/elephant site for a decent second city. Capital + land to southwest of capital for cottages and gems that will pump tech --> culture, and take the cow/rice/fish in the northwest for a GP farm. EDIT: loaded the save and in 2 turns we're about to discover a plains hill with 2 fish and banana to the east of the cow/elephant city, THAT is the GP farm. Plenty of other land to settle some auxiliary cities to make temples and stuff.

Some of you are making strategy mistakes that come from single-mindedness. 'I must control the expansion opportunities of my opponents. Destroying an opponent early is good'. NOPE. Look at our land! We're at the end of a peninsula with a protective, easy-ish to get along with civ as our barrier to the outside world. Don't settle anywhere NEAR him, we don't need close borders sparking tensions or giving him ideas about backstabbing us. Be ultra-friendly with him, and he will accelerate our tech without ever being a threat. Nobody is going to invade us this entire game, and we're not going to invade anyone else, either. Cultural victory pre-1500 AD, guaranteed.


Even IF you wanted to beat Wang Kon 1v1 style, the way would be to wait for elephants and catapults, instead of blocking his early expansion ability by taking crappy jungle land that only prevents us from immediately taking the awesome land being handed to us on a platter.

Also, please don't steal his worker, he will likely make us his worst enemy, not worth it at all.
Nokarot
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1410 Posts
July 19 2010 03:49 GMT
#22
While I agree with you Keliah, the attitude of "I'm going to declare war on every civ" isnt really cool Also, maybe it's just me but I don't see the point in playing a succession game over the course of a month if the goal is just an easy hand-holding cultural victory.

Yes, if I were on your team, I'd want to expand and get some crazy good tech and be peaceful, but to spice things up I'd wage war with Wang after taking over the entire peninsula. But I'm not on your team so it doesn't matter.
beep beep boop
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 04:27:17
July 19 2010 04:23 GMT
#23
On July 19 2010 11:34 igotmyown wrote:
Since this is just general information, a well built axe/chariot rush is a pretty sure thing on immortal (normal speed), except in certain situations (skirmishers, they start with copper). You have to learn the window and not waste worker turns/production/build wasteful stuff. If you attack too early, you won't be able to overwhelm their free archers. If you attack too late, they've hooked up iron too long and pumped multiple axes. So the target attack size is about 10 axes/14 chariots vs 3 to 4 archers/axes, max of one axe, as fast as possible, chopping as much as you need to. You can also choose to whip the last round and even skip the barracks in the second city if your window looks too tight.

If you go writing right after bw/ah, then wheel, you can tech about halfway to alphabet/aesthetics, then use conquest gold to get the rest of the way (or save and go binary research after a library), and you've regained tech parity.

It will work in certain situations in deity, although you won't always be able to kill them outright.

I would love to see some screenshots of you pulling off an axe/chariot rush on immortal normal speed without you getting too far behind on tech. What about deity? I was under the impression that even War Chariot rushes on deity are pretty much not going to work unless the AI doesn't have iron, copper, or horse in any of their first 3 towns.

On July 19 2010 12:34 Keilah wrote:
OMG, if you guys axe rush I will seriously declare war on every single civ we meet. Axe rushing would be amazingly bad.

Looking at our land, even though we have more than we need, this looks like a super-easy cultural victory for us. Take the cow/elephant site for a decent second city. Capital + land to southwest of capital for cottages and gems that will pump tech --> culture, and take the cow/rice/fish in the northwest for a GP farm. EDIT: loaded the save and in 2 turns we're about to discover a plains hill with 2 fish and banana to the east of the cow/elephant city, THAT is the GP farm. Plenty of other land to settle some auxiliary cities to make temples and stuff.

Some of you are making strategy mistakes that come from single-mindedness. 'I must control the expansion opportunities of my opponents. Destroying an opponent early is good'. NOPE. Look at our land! We're at the end of a peninsula with a protective, easy-ish to get along with civ as our barrier to the outside world. Don't settle anywhere NEAR him, we don't need close borders sparking tensions or giving him ideas about backstabbing us. Be ultra-friendly with him, and he will accelerate our tech without ever being a threat. Nobody is going to invade us this entire game, and we're not going to invade anyone else, either. Cultural victory pre-1500 AD, guaranteed.


Even IF you wanted to beat Wang Kon 1v1 style, the way would be to wait for elephants and catapults, instead of blocking his early expansion ability by taking crappy jungle land that only prevents us from immediately taking the awesome land being handed to us on a platter.

Also, please don't steal his worker, he will likely make us his worst enemy, not worth it at all.

Well I agree with some of what you are saying, but not all.

We do not need to worry about pissing off Wang Kon with borders. As long as we trade with him and take his religion (if he gets one), he will be happy with us. Wang isn't a warlike leader. He isn't going to rush us unless we do something stupid like steal his worker or declare war.

I agree I might have been a bit overzealous when I recommended settling in that jungle belt. However, if there is any land we want in that direction, we need to take it sooner rather than later, especially if the land is close to Wang. The jungle belt isn't exactly far from us. However, we also need to think hard about getting a GP farm and that double gem to the west up and running. The order depends on how quickly we can get up writing.

I agree that elephants and catapults would make a lot more sense than axemen for a rush. I also agree that we shouldn't bother.

I'm personally not a huge fan of culture wins. I think they leave you rather vulnerable to attacks if you aren't careful. Either way, we don't have to worry about that quite yet. We should at least figure out who the other civs in the area are and see how the early religions shake out before we go too far in deciding on a strategy.
Uff Da
Lexpar
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
1813 Posts
July 19 2010 04:54 GMT
#24
OMG, if you seriously declare war on every civ we meet then we will seriously not play from your save game.

In other news I disagree (I'm a total noob) with doing the axe rush. We can just sit back and live off the fat of the land for an easy cultural victory, so why not?
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
July 19 2010 05:50 GMT
#25
OK, the 'declare war' statement was a little out of line. Just trying to get my point across =p

PS: you guys are fast, was in the midst of typing this and pressed ctrl+c, went back to page 1 to check the map, and another post against it. Whew!

Another option for city placement would be to use the far west gems (any good land in the blackness south of them?) as a third cottage city for the culture win. We could also use both of the sites I suggested for GP farms, regardless of if one of them becomes a legendary culture city or not.

How to win a culture victory: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=298093

To be completely honest, I think our start is such a guaranteed easy cultural win, that we should consider banning ourselves from using that victory condition. It would be an informative, but easy and boring game. If we decide to go anti-culture, worker-stealing becomes an option but axe rushing is still awful.
Lunaticman
Profile Joined November 2007
Sweden1097 Posts
July 19 2010 08:26 GMT
#26
We should play to win as soon as possible to show how dominating we can win.

Since we are actually playing against ourselfs our goal is to try and be more efficient every game.

PS: I don't know when my turn starts but I would love an tutorial about uploading screen shoots before my turn.
Failure is not an option
Zyphen[p]
Profile Joined May 2010
United States91 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 08:31:26
July 19 2010 08:31 GMT
#27
Lunaticman, just hit Print Screen in-game and it'll show up in your MyDocs / My Games / beyond the sword folder. (I think that's the right dir path, anyway.)

Edit: Screencapping doesn't work in window mode for some reason. :/
Without music, life would be a mistake.
Biochemist
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1008 Posts
July 19 2010 12:45 GMT
#28
I wouldn't mind doing culture. I've never won a culture victory before, and we've already done conquest/space
nosliw
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States2716 Posts
July 19 2010 13:16 GMT
#29
Hey guys, I tried opening the file, but it gave me "network socket error" "Network socket could not be created". I guess I can't play it w/o internet?
Lunaticman
Profile Joined November 2007
Sweden1097 Posts
July 19 2010 13:17 GMT
#30
I don't know, nosliw.

Either way we should go for what will win.
Failure is not an option
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 13:47:53
July 19 2010 13:26 GMT
#31
Never mind. It doesn't work without internet because it was created as a multiplayer game with 2 players.
Uff Da
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-19 13:46:16
July 19 2010 13:38 GMT
#32
try selecting the different MP modes? I assume you already tried double clicking the file
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
July 19 2010 13:44 GMT
#33
On July 19 2010 22:38 Keilah wrote:
try opening the game, selecting hot seat, and loading the game from there. I assume you already tried double clicking the file

This doesn't work because he would have to do Teamliquid A's turns as well.
Uff Da
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
July 19 2010 14:48 GMT
#34
The game was created using a LAN with two computers. Maybe check to see if there is a firewall or something?
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
July 19 2010 14:49 GMT
#35
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.
Liquipedia
nosliw
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States2716 Posts
July 19 2010 15:46 GMT
#36
I'll try again tonight by bringing my laptop to a free wireless hotspot.
igotmyown
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4291 Posts
July 19 2010 22:17 GMT
#37
On July 19 2010 23:49 Ver wrote:
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.


Your situational analysis is missing one of the most important elements: you're in semi-isolation, so you're zero sum with Wang Kon. Any land that he has, you will have to spend even more to take later. People do elephant catapult wars because it works and it gets land, not because it's cheap or transitions well techwise.
All the rest of the land is uncontested.
This is how it breaks down: I rush WK and gain the land around him and to the west via settling afterwards.
Or I do not rush WK, and gain the land to the west, and part of the land around WK.

The downfall of rushing isn't jungles or a capital a little over 10 tiles away on a large map. It is, like on the Julius Caesar attempt, the n-2 AIs sucking up the land you would have settled to. The AI could be 6 tiles away, but rushing would be a bad idea if you're land centered on a pangea map surrounded by land hungry AI. If there were an AI to the west, rushing would be a terrible idea because of the aforementioned reason.
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
July 19 2010 23:04 GMT
#38
On July 20 2010 07:17 igotmyown wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2010 23:49 Ver wrote:
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.


Your situational analysis is missing one of the most important elements: you're in semi-isolation, so you're zero sum with Wang Kon. Any land that he has, you will have to spend even more to take later. People do elephant catapult wars because it works and it gets land, not because it's cheap or transitions well techwise.
All the rest of the land is uncontested.
This is how it breaks down: I rush WK and gain the land around him and to the west via settling afterwards.
Or I do not rush WK, and gain the land to the west, and part of the land around WK.

The downfall of rushing isn't jungles or a capital a little over 10 tiles away on a large map. It is, like on the Julius Caesar attempt, the n-2 AIs sucking up the land you would have settled to. The AI could be 6 tiles away, but rushing would be a bad idea if you're land centered on a pangea map surrounded by land hungry AI. If there were an AI to the west, rushing would be a terrible idea because of the aforementioned reason.

And you're neglecting the most important reason NOT to rush. You said it yourself, we are in semi-isolation. At this point, we have not found anyone other than Wang. With this map type (fractal), we may not find anyone other than Wang before Astronomy.

You linked to civfanatics, so I assume you have read that forum a bit. Do you know why the top players hate isolated starts? It is really hard to compete when you don't have trading partners to help backfill your tech. Do you know why the top players there don't like playing Mansa as much as someone like Darius, Elizabeth, Pacal, or Huayna? A big reason (though not the only reason) is because he is the best AI techer in the game, and isn't stingy about trading, so they like to have a chance to have him in the game and trade.

You're advocating killing off someone who not only is unlikely to attack us, but is also a decent techer and the only AI we have found, which could basically turn our start into an isolated start. Bad idea.
Uff Da
igotmyown
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4291 Posts
July 20 2010 01:02 GMT
#39
On July 20 2010 08:04 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2010 07:17 igotmyown wrote:
On July 19 2010 23:49 Ver wrote:
Civ is like a card game where you are dealt a hand (starting position) and have to base your strategy around that hand. Trying to do an axe rush or praet rush (like last game) regardless of position is nonsensical because most of the time there will be better options. Yes it is Monarch and the start position is very good, meaning you can do anything and win, but there's no reason to justify a poor strategy because of that. If this position was the same, just on Deity, Axe rushing would be completely moronic and would certainly fail.

Wang Kon is hardly going to declare war on you unless you totally bungle diplomacy, so there's no need to be afraid. This looks to be a good position to use the most 'core' Civ strategy: Liberalism rush through bulbing -> Renaissance War (Rifles/Cav). As this is a huge map you will need 8 cities to get Oxford/Globe access; that means blocking off Wang with the initial cities somewhere near the visible resources between you and any available fresh water in the fog. There are plenty of commerce resources, with some food, and very little fresh water/no rivers. Later on the terrain is great for a hammer economy, while for now it seems hybrid is best.


Your situational analysis is missing one of the most important elements: you're in semi-isolation, so you're zero sum with Wang Kon. Any land that he has, you will have to spend even more to take later. People do elephant catapult wars because it works and it gets land, not because it's cheap or transitions well techwise.
All the rest of the land is uncontested.
This is how it breaks down: I rush WK and gain the land around him and to the west via settling afterwards.
Or I do not rush WK, and gain the land to the west, and part of the land around WK.

The downfall of rushing isn't jungles or a capital a little over 10 tiles away on a large map. It is, like on the Julius Caesar attempt, the n-2 AIs sucking up the land you would have settled to. The AI could be 6 tiles away, but rushing would be a bad idea if you're land centered on a pangea map surrounded by land hungry AI. If there were an AI to the west, rushing would be a terrible idea because of the aforementioned reason.

And you're neglecting the most important reason NOT to rush. You said it yourself, we are in semi-isolation. At this point, we have not found anyone other than Wang. With this map type (fractal), we may not find anyone other than Wang before Astronomy.

You linked to civfanatics, so I assume you have read that forum a bit. Do you know why the top players hate isolated starts? It is really hard to compete when you don't have trading partners to help backfill your tech. Do you know why the top players there don't like playing Mansa as much as someone like Darius, Elizabeth, Pacal, or Huayna? A big reason (though not the only reason) is because he is the best AI techer in the game, and isn't stingy about trading, so they like to have a chance to have him in the game and trade.

You're advocating killing off someone who not only is unlikely to attack us, but is also a decent techer and the only AI we have found, which could basically turn our start into an isolated start. Bad idea.

The AI will not trade with you if you're their only contact unless they hit friendly. One AI has the same problems as isolation only less land and more competition. You keep them alive if there are 2 AIs, in which case they will trade.

If it is indeed one on one in isolation, you're far better off killing them if possible so you don't have to aggressively block off high distance cities, or as someone put it, "expand at your leisure".

Some basic searches will confirm this. People dislike semi-isolated starts just as much as isolated starts, unless you can kill them and get double the usual land.

You can get WK to friendly if you adopt his religion, caste system, and gift him a city, I believe. Just religion and caste will still be a random event/demand crap shoot.
Keilah
Profile Joined May 2010
731 Posts
July 20 2010 01:45 GMT
#40
Any ideas on victory conditions if we don't do culture? I've actually never won a diplomatic/religious victory, could be interesting. Domination and conquest are not going to happen, unless people enjoy massive intercontinental wars on huge maps. Other than that it's culture or space race.

BTW, I endorse building a work boat to go explore. If it can't go anywhere, we're going to need it fairly soon for fish anyways.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko184
SC2Nice 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 41013
Britney 35134
Calm 8680
Hyuk 1588
Horang2 1228
GuemChi 823
Larva 338
Aegong 314
PianO 298
Mini 259
[ Show more ]
Soma 245
Light 204
Last 177
ZerO 171
Soulkey 110
Rush 104
Sharp 77
ToSsGirL 67
Backho 66
soO 44
sSak 34
sorry 30
Free 27
JulyZerg 23
Yoon 22
[sc1f]eonzerg 22
Hm[arnc] 22
Shine 20
910 17
GoRush 15
Sacsri 11
Noble 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
NotJumperer 2
Terrorterran 1
Dota 2
qojqva1451
XcaliburYe61
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1431
x6flipin448
allub188
Other Games
singsing2063
B2W.Neo1134
XaKoH 240
Fuzer 204
crisheroes180
ZerO(Twitch)13
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL118
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade405
Other Games
• WagamamaTV187
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 19m
The PondCast
21h 19m
KCM Race Survival
21h 19m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
23h 19m
Classic vs Nicoract
herO vs YoungYakov
ByuN vs Gerald
Clem vs Krystianer
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Ultimate Battle
1d 23h
Light vs ZerO
WardiTV Winter Champion…
1d 23h
MaxPax vs Spirit
Rogue vs Bunny
Cure vs SHIN
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-03
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.