EPTNo number groups, no rally points, no path finding, just raw clicking.
Great game.
Warcraft 2 - Purest RTS Ever
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Smuft
Canada318 Posts
No number groups, no rally points, no path finding, just raw clicking. Great game. | ||
|
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
| ||
|
GreenManalishi
Canada834 Posts
| ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
 But did seriously warcraft 2 not have control groups? I think it had but i'm too lazy to install just to check  | ||
|
Dataleif
Sweden252 Posts
On March 17 2010 18:19 Kaniol wrote: WarCraft 1 was even more pure, you had to issue commands by first clicking order icon. And max selection was 4, not 9 But did seriously warcraft 2 not have control groups? I think it had but i'm too lazy to install just to check I think bnet edition had groupds | ||
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
I do play WC2 with friends from time to time though, so sad that the AIs are retarded  | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
Music so epic. And I love how different the different Tiers of the main building looks, when I used to play it it was like whooooaaaaah now I can build these new units who are soooo badassss. ahhh being a child was awesome. Btw. did the addon add any new units at all? Can't really remember any added units | ||
|
Coulthard
Greece3359 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17257 Posts
On March 17 2010 17:57 Smuft wrote: No number groups, no rally points, no path finding, just raw clicking. Great game. There are control groups and rudimentary path finding. Don't remember if there are rally points or not. Some other awesome things about it you didn't list: - Only one playable race! - Perfect balance! (because of the above) Edit: Seriously, the 2 best RTS's among the oldschool ones would definitely be SC:BW and C&C:RA. | ||
|
morfyy
Romania593 Posts
oh the memories | ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
| ||
|
MamiyaOtaru
United States1687 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13005 Posts
| ||
|
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
| ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
| ||
|
fearus
China2164 Posts
| ||
|
valaki
Hungary2476 Posts
| ||
|
Bash
Finland1533 Posts
Edit: oh man the guy playing in that video makes so many mistakes. Doesn't his initial hall/rax, gets supplyblocked, late lvl3, didn't cancel the harass rax at 9 o clock. | ||
|
Smuft
Canada318 Posts
They are sickeningly bad manner too lol. http://war2.warcraft.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15782&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=120 Scroll 1/3 down and see how bad this warcraft2 player gets burned for posting his pic. | ||
|
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On March 17 2010 22:29 Smuft wrote: I found a warcraft2 forum that's very active. What a hardcore community they are still active after 15+ years. They are sickeningly bad manner too lol. http://war2.warcraft.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15782&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=120 Scroll 1/3 down and see how bad this warcraft2 player gets burned for posting his pic. Omg this thread is pure gold. ![[image loading]](http://www.freewebs.com/nate509/l_7ef1b65fb0137687ab7694c68bdf7153.jpg) xD | ||
|
LastWish
2013 Posts
Used to play it on my Pentium 166 with like 32mb ram and !!awe64 soundcard!!. This soundcard had special midi synth support which made those mids like 400% more awesome. The complete experience - GFX + music + gameplay was mindblowing. Similiar game experience goes from Heroes2 with all the fairy tale drawn graphics, great gameplay and again ingenious midi music with awe synth made it an out of body experience. Sadly, since then I've found no sound card that reaches the midi synch experience of AWE cards and ISA slots are like ancient history. Someone who had experienced this knows what I'm talking about. | ||
|
Sad[Panda]
United States458 Posts
| ||
|
Rebel_lion
United States271 Posts
| ||
|
Smuft
Canada318 Posts
Another game; this guys APM seems a lot higher and 1v1 dynamics are interesting with these early grunt walls, farming one of his flanks for vision, and KHB dividing his army early was cute. | ||
|
Smuft
Canada318 Posts
Same guy as last game except he turned bad manner and went forge first randomly scouting 6's gold mine to try and cannon it. Nice tracks too lol | ||
|
Bash
Finland1533 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
"your sound card works perfectly" | ||
|
Rothbardian
United States497 Posts
On March 17 2010 19:59 Manit0u wrote: There are control groups and rudimentary path finding. Don't remember if there are rally points or not. Some other awesome things about it you didn't list: - Only one playable race! - Perfect balance! (because of the above) Edit: Seriously, the 2 best RTS's among the oldschool ones would definitely be SC:BW and C&C:RA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb-gI_pFog0 HJK6 Best map ever made! Fucking right CNC RA95!!! Best RTS ever made bar none. That shit was about as pure APM RTS as you will ever get :p Played for 6 years. Boy do I miss Global Dominance ;/ Too bad none of the old Koven/Wegandi matches are on Youtube....If you thought Jaedong was fast...haha. My Q was beast. :p | ||
|
LordWeird
United States3411 Posts
| ||
NonY
8748 Posts
It looks like WC2 was more competitive but I don't know. I never played it. | ||
|
Rothbardian
United States497 Posts
On March 18 2010 06:01 Liquid`NonY wrote: Haha C&C:RA was good but not competitive enough. It took me about a month to get good enough to win the ladder. Then Aftermath was equally easy. Then even Dune 2k was somewhat different but still easy. SC:BW took me like 2 years of trying to be the best to finally get to the top. It looks like WC2 was more competitive but I don't know. I never played it. Tyler, the people who played on the ladder were hilariously bad. All the good players played @ Global Dominance/Cases Ladder/Kali/etc. Koven, Wegandi, Team DK, Nezz, Teslaaaa, Dadogenij, DADO, etc. You really missed out if you only played WW ladder I went something like 125-1 whenever I fucked around on the ladder lol, and I was barely in the top 10 in the world (Wegandi, Koven, Teslaaaa, etc. raped me so hard lol) in RA95. No one on the ladder even knew about Q, and ladder maps absolutely sucked! You had to play on the great custom maps that were made every week. HJK6 was the bomb. | ||
|
intrudor
Canada446 Posts
i never saw it because i mostly played single player back in 95 but i know the ogre's bloodlust made it way imbalanced for competitive play | ||
|
NonY
8748 Posts
On March 18 2010 06:07 Rothbardian wrote: Tyler, the people who played on the ladder were hilariously bad. All the good players played @ Global Dominance/Cases Ladder/Kali/etc. Koven, Wegandi, Team DK, Nezz, Teslaaaa, Dadogenij, DADO, etc. You really missed out if you only played WW ladder I went something like 125-1 whenever I fucked around on the ladder lol, and I was barely in the top 10 in the world (Wegandi, Koven, Teslaaaa, etc. raped me so hard lol) in RA95. No one on the ladder even knew about Q, and ladder maps absolutely sucked! You had to play on the great custom maps that were made every week. HJK6 was the bomb. I see, was there some really good prizes on the other ladders? I mean, what was the incentive to not play the WW ladder? But I was 12 years old at the time and that was my first online game so it really wouldn't have occurred to me that there were other ladders. Everyone in the top 50 or so used Q when I played the ladder. The game had been out a while when I picked it up though. I mean, I learned about it within the first few weeks of playing online. That video shows some pretty poor micro though from how I remember it. It looks like he targets the tank that is closest and makes no attempt at figuring out which tank is actually going to stop moving for a moment. Q was never perfect, like many tanks stop moving for moments here and there. Attacking a tank that has a good chance of stopping for a moment, but is out of range of some of your back tanks, was almost always better than attacking an in-range tank that is definitely going to be moving for the next few seconds. | ||
|
Rothbardian
United States497 Posts
On March 18 2010 06:16 Liquid`NonY wrote: I see, was there some really good prizes on the other ladders? I mean, what was the incentive to not play the WW ladder? But I was 12 years old at the time and that was my first online game so it really wouldn't have occurred to me that there were other ladders. Everyone in the top 50 or so used Q when I played the ladder. The game had been out a while when I picked it up though. I mean, I learned about it within the first few weeks of playing online. That video shows some pretty poor micro though from how I remember it. It looks like he targets the tank that is closest and makes no attempt at figuring out which tank is actually going to stop moving for a moment. Q was never perfect, like many tanks stop moving for moments here and there. Attacking a tank that has a good chance of stopping for a moment, but is out of range of some of your back tanks, was almost always better than attacking an in-range tank that is definitely going to be moving for the next few seconds. Yeah they aren't the greatest of players, but I'm sure they'd kick my ass if I picked it up again :p Boy, do I remember those days. Started playing when I was 8. Must have played 20,000 games lol. Q was exhausting.....coupled in with tanks building in .001 seconds, and no rally points.., Turrets building in .1 second and needing manual repairing...I remember three hour long games where at the end I was worn out like you wouldn't believe. As for prizes? Bragging Rights...This was back in the late 90's..All of the best players just congregated together mostly around Global Dominance, which was the most fun Gaming League ever. You either chose Allied or Soviet, and they had a Military Style system where the more points you won, the higher up the echelon you went. Every win gave your side x points to spend on infantry on the Global Map, and after the MOTW the Generals would make out their battle plans and the fight would be carried out with huge back stories, etc. Whenever one side won most of the world map, a new season would start over. They had medals for like 20 different statistics, and it was very in-depth. Very awesome to play. It was all voluntary, as you had to yourself go in (as the loser) and report the loss..Man, the days of honor...That would never fly today. What's your thoughts on Q micro vs SC micro? If you had to compare difficulty, APM requirements, and skill. | ||
520
United States2822 Posts
On March 18 2010 06:14 intrudor wrote: is the bNET edition of War2 balanced? i never saw it because i mostly played single player back in 95 but i know the ogre's bloodlust made it way imbalanced for competitive play It is if you only play Orc. | ||
|
DreaM)XeRO
Korea (South)4667 Posts
a burned out relicfuck | ||
|
intrudor
Canada446 Posts
damn thats a strike of genius from Blizzard to not even have thought about balancing it when they released that fuckin bnet edition all they needed to do was to bump down bloodlust so that people could actually play humanlame  | ||
|
ZaplinG
United States3818 Posts
| ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
On March 17 2010 22:29 Smuft wrote: I found a warcraft2 forum that's very active. What a hardcore community they are still active after 15+ years. They are sickeningly bad manner too lol. http://war2.warcraft.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15782&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=120 Scroll 1/3 down and see how bad this warcraft2 player gets burned for posting his pic. That Hamster dude is such an amazing troll. | ||
|
anotak
United States1537 Posts
| ||
|
Tenryu
United States565 Posts
On March 17 2010 19:59 Manit0u wrote: There are control groups and rudimentary path finding. Don't remember if there are rally points or not. Some other awesome things about it you didn't list: - Only one playable race! - Perfect balance! (because of the above) Edit: Seriously, the 2 best RTS's among the oldschool ones would definitely be SC:BW and C&C:RA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb-gI_pFog0 Omg i love that music. Red Alert was my first RTS, and the soundtrack was ridicolously good. Used to jam to that shit on my CD Player :D | ||
|
flip
Portugal5 Posts
Yes this is gold indeed, I laughed my ass off, multiple times. | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
| ||
|
neobowman
Canada3324 Posts
| ||
|
SilentCrono
United States1420 Posts
reminds me of red alert 2 | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
EAGER-beaver
Canada2799 Posts
| ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
| ||
|
gaizka
United States991 Posts
On March 18 2010 09:06 anotak wrote: rts players overrate balance Balance is imba. | ||
|
hammeronetime
United States64 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/2926/khb1.jpg) | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32051 Posts
| ||
|
ChApFoU
France2982 Posts
| ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
On March 19 2010 12:43 CharlieMurphy wrote: There is a poster that comes and makes a post for wc2 like every month. war2combat - he advertises his own site. I was surprised this wc2 thread was not by him when I saw it - but it includes videos mentioning war2combat anyways. | ||
|
War2Combat
United States276 Posts
Yes Warcraft II is the purest RTS ever. | ||
|
Smuft
Canada318 Posts
| ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
Are there even any strategy sites or anything? Controls are fucking hideous lolol Wondering if anyone good wants to DL wc1 with me and just try out some basic shit and then we can make some 1v1 videos lol also lol and who remembers DC? DC was actually pretty freakin good but the problem with it was that it came out the same time as sc did. | ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
Nostalgia ~ one of the games that I played as a kid....I remember watching that dune worm eat up my harvesters ez mode and I'll be like wtf where are my spices? | ||
Liquid`Ret
Netherlands4511 Posts
| ||
|
kAra
Germany1374 Posts
| ||
|
Kim_Hyun_Han
706 Posts
| ||
|
Bash
Finland1533 Posts
I must have watched this intro like a million time . | ||
|
ooni
Australia1498 Posts
To avoid confusion, this isn't analogy of ppl's thoughts between SC1 and SC2; this video was made before SC2. I really enjoyed Wc2. It was quite fun, I do not miss the old mechanics, it was just bad. Will we be thinking about SC this way in the future? Guess we will find that out in 15 years time. | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
| ||
|
JohannesH
Finland1364 Posts
On March 21 2010 19:27 ret wrote: sc2 is sad compared to most of these games, so unchallenging i have to force myself to play cuz 'everyone else is doing it'. yeah I wish there was big playerbases for non-Blizzard rts's too... Theres some really good ones but if you cant reliably get games vs good players gameplay cant completely make up for that. | ||
|
Tracil
Australia505 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.abandonia.com/files/games/216/NetStorm%20-%20Islands%20at%20War_8.jpg) Pipe dream mixed with tower defence, and a totally awesome win condition- sacrificing an enemy priest to your evil gods! It's totally another APM-dependant game, since the whole thing is about how much better you are at building bridges than your opponent. >.> | ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
On March 21 2010 22:19 JohannesH wrote: yeah I wish there was big playerbases for non-Blizzard rts's too... Theres some really good ones but if you cant reliably get games vs good players gameplay cant completely make up for that. AoX is what happens to non bliz games (despite being awesome they die abruptly and even the publishers abandon them) | ||
|
Chrispy
Canada5878 Posts
On March 21 2010 19:27 ret wrote: sc2 is sad compared to most of these games, so unchallenging i have to force myself to play cuz 'everyone else is doing it'. Screw SC2, stream some Brood war man! :D :D | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
On March 21 2010 22:28 Tracil wrote: The oldschool RTS that's dear to my heart is Netstorm. Pipe dream mixed with tower defence, and a totally awesome win condition- sacrificing an enemy priest to your evil gods! It's totally another APM-dependant game, since the whole thing is about how much better you are at building bridges than your opponent. >.> woah, is that screenshot the whole map? If so that's pretty cool, reminds me of Rampart which was like a turn based RTS (if that makes sense). | ||
|
Tracil
Australia505 Posts
| ||
|
BaltA
Norway849 Posts
| ||
|
Navane
Netherlands2748 Posts
On March 21 2010 19:57 ooni wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Mxypu9WC8c To avoid confusion, this isn't analogy of ppl's thoughts between SC1 and SC2; this video was made before SC2. I really enjoyed Wc2. It was quite fun, I do not miss the old mechanics, it was just bad. Will we be thinking about SC this way in the future? Guess we will find that out in 15 years time. To avoid confusion, this IS analogy of ppl's thoughts between SC1 and SC2; alltough this video was made before SC2 beta came out, it was posted during heated debates over sc2 MBS when nobody had ever played with it. Netstorm was great. To bad indeed that the real skill needed to win this game was build bridges quickly using only random bridge components | ||
|
ploy
United States416 Posts
On March 21 2010 19:27 ret wrote: sc2 is sad compared to most of these games, so unchallenging i have to force myself to play cuz 'everyone else is doing it'. It's so unchallenging... so why haven't you won anything you've entered? I don't really understand people saying this kind of stuff who aren't that great. More on topic: Does anyone know if KHB is only playing wc2? Is he already done playing sc2? | ||
|
d_so
Korea (South)3262 Posts
On April 06 2010 13:14 ploy wrote: It's so unchallenging... so why haven't you won anything you've entered? I don't really understand people saying this kind of stuff who aren't that great. More on topic: Does anyone know if KHB is only playing wc2? Is he already done playing sc2? i don't understand people who mock those that fail at the highest level when they themselves are the peons slurping for leftovers at the high-level strategy table. oooorr in other words stfu | ||
|
ploy
United States416 Posts
Wouldn't you think it'd be funny if J.J Reddick said basketball was too easy of a game and only played it for the money? Yea he is in the top 0.01% of all basketball players...but that's not nearly good enough for him to call the game he plays unchallenging. | ||
|
d_so
Korea (South)3262 Posts
On April 06 2010 13:28 ploy wrote: Don't get your panties in a bundle man ... you are clearly a great arguer with all the assumptions you make. Ret is much better than me at sc2. However, you don't see me saying it's an easy game. Wouldn't you think it'd be funny if J.J Reddick said basketball was too easy of a game and only played it for the money? Yea he is in the top 0.01% of all basketball players...but that's not nearly good enough for him to call the game he plays unchallenging. actually, you're the one assuming things by 1.) misconstruing the definition of "challenging" as being depenendant on one's ability compared to his/her peers, and 2.) by saying ret called the game "easy" when he never did (Hint: challenging doesn't always mean difficult -- look it up). | ||
|
ploy
United States416 Posts
| ||
|
d_so
Korea (South)3262 Posts
On April 06 2010 14:28 ploy wrote: Trying to fall back on semantics huh? You are something else. What was I thinking assuming that by the use of the word 'challenging' he was implying something that was difficult. After all, he could have meant to halt and prove identity of, or to confront or defy boldly, or to demand as due, or all the other definitions that wouldn't have made sense in that context? As to your first point I'll use an example - In high school I thought batting in baseball was pretty easy, but in college it became pretty damn challenging. I don't want to derail this thread any more and you're slowly bringing me down to your level of idiocy so I digress and am done here. god how blind are you Main Entry: chal·leng·ing Pronunciation: \-lən-jiŋ\ Function: adjective Date: 1842 1 : arousing competitive interest, thought, or action <a challenging course of study> 2 : invitingly provocative : fascinating <a challenging personality> challenging: Listen: US - UK Adapted From: WordNet 2.0 Copyright 2003 by Princeton University. All rights reserved. challenging A adjective 1 ambitious, challenging requiring full use of your abilities or resources; "ambitious schedule"; "performed the most challenging task without a mistake" 2 challenging, intriguing disturbingly provocative; "an intriguing smile" 3 challenging, thought-provoking stimulating interest or thought; "a challenging hypothesis"; "a thought-provoking book" Overview of adj challenging The adj challenging has 3 senses? (first 1 from tagged texts) 1. (3) ambitious, challenging (requiring full use of your abilities or resources; "ambitious schedule"; "performed the most challenging task without a mistake") 2. challenging, thought-provoking (stimulating interest or thought; "a challenging hypothesis"; "a thought-provoking book") 3. challenging, intriguing (disturbingly provocative; "an intriguing smile") HINT: do you see the word "difficult" anywhere? Your personal inferences are your own but don't mistake your misplaced notions for the intent of what someone else is saying. There is no correlation between challenging and your ability to beat the competition, and as such your first post is retarded. He never said the game was easy so your second post is equally retarded. You didn't look up the definition like i told you to do so your third post is also retarded, this time due to misinformation. sorry yo | ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
| ||
|
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
Great to see some love for Dark Colony in this thread... I just loved how the aliens had machine guns. Dune 2 was the first RTS I ever got into and I just loved it. I also used to play the Warhammer table top games and I remember thinking how awesome it would be if they came out with a strategy game like Dune 2 but with Orcs, then soon after a friend gave me a pirated floppy disk of Warcraft 1. I remember I was so keen to play I spent an entire afternoon guessing the secret word from the manual they made you type in in order to launch the installer (back in the days when DRM was fun). When Warcraft 2 came out, me and one of my friends would play it directly over the modem, we used to have to sneak in games at 4am because his dad wouldn't let him use the computer. Eventually I ended up getting a thing called the internet and discovering Kali, a multiplayer client which emulated a LAN network over the net, at the time it was the single most awesome thing ever created. Good times, good times. | ||
|
Latham
9560 Posts
KKND, Age of Empires I and II were fun as hell. Dune 2000 kicked so much ass. Warcraft II was fun, but the imba bloodlust sucks the fun out of it, even though invisibility has no counter humans get raped before they get to tier 3. And there are a hell of a lot more fun RTSes out there than WCII | ||
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
| ||
|
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
Some of you may remember that Starcraft was originally based off of the Warcraft 2 engine, and was pretty close to completion. It was only after the backlash from the community - i.e. Blizzard has just gone and made "orcs in space" without any substance - that Blizzard completely redesigned the game to what we have now. there's some screenshots of what it looked like here: http://sclegacy.com/editorials/34-general/270-starcraft-evolution | ||
|
thezanursic
5479 Posts
Installed Warcraft II and running it via DOSBOX everything except for control groups work fine, on my previous computer I could set up my control groups easily, soo I don't know why it doesn't work on my current computer, any ideas? | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On March 17 2010 18:19 Kaniol wrote: WarCraft 1 was even more pure, you had to issue commands by first clicking order icon. And max selection was 4, not 9 But did seriously warcraft 2 not have control groups? I think it had but i'm too lazy to install just to check There were shortcuts for move and attack as i remember. Dune 2 didn't have shortcuts for exemple and selection was 1 unit only :p EDIT : Fuck me i quoted a 6year old posts because the new color doesn't show you how old the post is >< On February 22 2016 19:14 thezanursic wrote: Necroing this thread because I need help. Installed Warcraft II and running it via DOSBOX everything except for control groups work fine, on my previous computer I could set up my control groups easily, soo I don't know why it doesn't work on my current computer, any ideas? It might be a Keyboard layout issue; LIke Control Groups were on 1 instead of & or something like that | ||
|
thezanursic
5479 Posts
On February 22 2016 19:18 FFW_Rude wrote: It might be a Keyboard layout issue; LIke Control Groups were on 1 instead of & or something like that Any chance you could be a bit more specific I don't quite understand. Also I tried other commands such as alt-M for turning music on and off, all of that works, control groups don't. I dunno what's up. Did WC2 only have control groups in the latter editions and I accidently downloaded the wrong one? | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On February 22 2016 19:21 thezanursic wrote: Any chance you could be a bit more specific I don't quite understand. Also I tried other commands such as alt-M for turning music on and off, all of that works, control groups don't. I dunno what's up. Did WC2 only have control groups in the latter editions and I accidently downloaded the wrong one? I think it's only in the Battle.net edition. Not the vanilla one. | ||
|
lestye
United States4163 Posts
On February 22 2016 19:27 FFW_Rude wrote: I think it's only in the Battle.net edition. Not the vanilla one. How did that work? Did you have to REBUY the game/expansion to get on battle.net back in the day? | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On February 22 2016 20:57 lestye wrote: How did that work? Did you have to REBUY the game/expansion to get on battle.net back in the day? Yes. Warcraft II got two editions. One is Warcraft II : Tides of Darkness and the other is Warcraft II : Tides of Darkness Battle.net edition (iirc). I think the Battle.net edition includes "Beyond the dark portal" | ||
|
thezanursic
5479 Posts
On February 22 2016 21:19 FFW_Rude wrote: Yes. Warcraft II got two editions. One is Warcraft II : Tides of Darkness and the other is Warcraft II : Tides of Darkness Battle.net edition (iirc). I think the Battle.net edition includes "Beyond the dark portal" I downloaded the Warcombat version, and the hotkeys work perfectly now. | ||
|
ishmoks
Philippines50 Posts
Haven't been playing sc2 , War2 really got my attention and I wanna get good. For those interested, you guys should give it a go its still an amazing game you can download Warcraft 2 combat edition here: http://en.war2.ru/ | ||
|
azmarco
France5 Posts
On March 17 2010 19:28 Coulthard wrote: Warcraft 2 is my second most favorite rts ever and in my opinion the best blizzard ost so far Same here. | ||
|
rotta
5586 Posts
| ||
|
B-royal
Belgium1330 Posts
It's still one of the classic RTS games out there, but once you've played brood war all the others tend to become stale (aside from wc3 tft). | ||
|
Goolpsy
Denmark301 Posts
And getting from Grunts to Ogres without getting killed or getting them later than your opponent is quite the challenge. Building placement matters a lot! they can help create chokes or concaves (buildings have relatively high hp, and not many units can attack them at the same time) game is not dead at all | ||
|
ishmoks
Philippines50 Posts
I play war2 more than sc2 now haha | ||
|
Probemicro
3708 Posts
| ||
| ||
