|
Germany3128 Posts
On August 05 2015 07:07 trifecta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2015 07:06 pyro19 wrote:On August 05 2015 07:03 Orome wrote:On August 05 2015 07:02 pyro19 wrote:On August 05 2015 06:58 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
So does the professor actually play dota a lot? He seems so out of place and only says obvious things. Considering he knows a shit load of stats about the scene , he's doing his job well. You don't ask Sports commentators and analysts whether they play the game at the level of pros. I don't get the hate , he's well spoken and knows his shit. He maybe a bit over the top flamboyant when he makes statements but I don't see how that makes him out of place. I find it more cringe to watch Kacy Aitchinson trying to induce fake hype in the interviews and walk arounds. Atleast Nahaz knows his shit. he doesn't know his shit. that's the point. But he does, he may make a lot of irrelevant stats and sometimes be outright wrong but he's right about what he says 95% of the time. Then he goes and calls someone the Roger Federer of Dota and it's cringe so people assume he doesn't know what he's talking about. The same people that love Lumi who would regularly make mistakes while being a play by play caster he claimed that navi vs vg was championship level play...........................................
that was a call of the 5 % 
|
On August 05 2015 07:07 trifecta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2015 07:06 pyro19 wrote:On August 05 2015 07:03 Orome wrote:On August 05 2015 07:02 pyro19 wrote:On August 05 2015 06:58 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
So does the professor actually play dota a lot? He seems so out of place and only says obvious things. Considering he knows a shit load of stats about the scene , he's doing his job well. You don't ask Sports commentators and analysts whether they play the game at the level of pros. I don't get the hate , he's well spoken and knows his shit. He maybe a bit over the top flamboyant when he makes statements but I don't see how that makes him out of place. I find it more cringe to watch Kacy Aitchinson trying to induce fake hype in the interviews and walk arounds. Atleast Nahaz knows his shit. he doesn't know his shit. that's the point. But he does, he may make a lot of irrelevant stats and sometimes be outright wrong but he's right about what he says 95% of the time. Then he goes and calls someone the Roger Federer of Dota and it's cringe so people assume he doesn't know what he's talking about. The same people that love Lumi who would regularly make mistakes while being a play by play caster he claimed that navi vs vg was championship level play...........................................
That's why I didn't say 100% :D
I find him a bit cringe too but I think he's doing his job fine.
|
On August 05 2015 07:07 Erandorr wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2015 07:06 stuchiu wrote:On August 05 2015 07:04 TheNewEra wrote:On August 05 2015 06:59 Erandorr wrote:On August 05 2015 06:58 IntoTheheart wrote:On August 05 2015 06:58 stuchiu wrote:On August 05 2015 06:57 IntoTheheart wrote:On August 05 2015 06:56 CosmicSpiral wrote:On August 05 2015 06:56 Elurie wrote:
lol I fell asleep during the pause, and now I woke up to.... Nahaz's voice? Ugh. Can't sleep, Nahaz will eat me. The real boogeyman. He makes stats to figure out who the biggest sleeper is so he can eat them. Yep. What a hero. Maybe we should have Nahaz be the doto gambler instead. He reminds me of the really shit NBA wanna be stats people on reddit etc. Ignore context and important variables, just post some stats, that should work Agreed. Now we need a person at the analyst desk who only makes gifs with players looking like super saiyans Hey that guy is awesome. Remember the Lebron super saiyan one? So sick
Curry one was better. Still holds nothing to harden's,
|
On August 05 2015 07:02 pyro19 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2015 06:58 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
So does the professor actually play dota a lot? He seems so out of place and only says obvious things. Considering he knows a shit load of stats about the scene , he's doing his job well. You don't ask Sports commentators and analysts whether they play the game at the level of pros. I don't get the hate , he's well spoken and knows his shit. He maybe a bit over the top flamboyant when he makes statements but I don't see how that makes him out of place. I find it more cringe to watch Kacy Aitchinson trying to induce fake hype in the interviews and walk arounds. Atleast Nahaz knows his shit.
'knows his shit' so like spewing out a bunch of pseudo intellectual insight into the game with college level verbiage
PLEASe
analysis and commentary is a lot more than just framing your words well
|
|
|
United States15275 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
must be zai bane right?
Just to stop gyro farm? :O
|
|
|
|
|
Russian Federation40190 Posts
Honestly, Secret should win this, but damn, EHOME don't disappoint with their drafts.
|
predicted correctly haters gonna hate
|
Nooooo Viper, antifun hero 
|
On August 05 2015 07:09 Zea! wrote:
EHOME draft looks good
Doesn't matter when they don't have the skill to back it up.
|
on paper they look good, but I've seen some rotk phoenix plays and... oh boy
|
On August 05 2015 07:06 pyro19 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2015 07:03 Orome wrote:On August 05 2015 07:02 pyro19 wrote:On August 05 2015 06:58 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
So does the professor actually play dota a lot? He seems so out of place and only says obvious things. Considering he knows a shit load of stats about the scene , he's doing his job well. You don't ask Sports commentators and analysts whether they play the game at the level of pros. I don't get the hate , he's well spoken and knows his shit. He maybe a bit over the top flamboyant when he makes statements but I don't see how that makes him out of place. I find it more cringe to watch Kacy Aitchinson trying to induce fake hype in the interviews and walk arounds. Atleast Nahaz knows his shit. he doesn't know his shit. that's the point. But he does, he may make a lot of irrelevant stats and sometimes be outright wrong but he's right about what he says 95% of the time. Then he goes and calls someone the Roger Federer of Dota and it's cringe so people assume he doesn't know what he's talking about. The same people that love Lumi who would regularly make mistakes while being a play by play caster
He's definitely not right 95% of the time when he talks about anything but stats.
I mean yesterday he interrupted 7ingmad talking about a possible Enigma he thought would be good to say the exact opposite...
|
yo nahaz with the viper call. dude knows something
|
On August 05 2015 07:08 andyrau wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2015 07:02 pyro19 wrote:On August 05 2015 06:58 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
So does the professor actually play dota a lot? He seems so out of place and only says obvious things. Considering he knows a shit load of stats about the scene , he's doing his job well. You don't ask Sports commentators and analysts whether they play the game at the level of pros. I don't get the hate , he's well spoken and knows his shit. He maybe a bit over the top flamboyant when he makes statements but I don't see how that makes him out of place. I find it more cringe to watch Kacy Aitchinson trying to induce fake hype in the interviews and walk arounds. Atleast Nahaz knows his shit. 'knows his shit' so like spewing out a bunch of pseudo intellectual insight into the game with college level verbiage PLEASe analysis and commentary is a lot more than just framing your words well
He's the stats guy. You don't expect the same level of analysis from him that a Merlini or winter provides.
|
Russian Federation1132 Posts
I kinda dislike Secret's draft, too gimmicky, while Ehome have everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
