EPTlike kupo said, 3.5 is dota, succesors are superiormobas. But I generally like 5e because it's more focused on RP than combat so it turns out okay. adnd is basically aeon of strife, gg.
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion - Page 2480
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
|
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
like kupo said, 3.5 is dota, succesors are superiormobas. But I generally like 5e because it's more focused on RP than combat so it turns out okay. adnd is basically aeon of strife, gg. | ||
|
ahswtini
Northern Ireland22213 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
In the 3rd they added a shitton of feats and classes and allowed so many options that it impossible to balance it. In the 5th they went back to the early system where your character progress is mostly railroaded, plus they cut down the multiclassing. I also haven't played that much with it, but it's hard to imagine it being nearly as broken as the 3rd. On July 03 2015 06:43 ahswtini wrote: why not play warhammer instead aka tabletop moba 4th edition is almost a tabletop moba. Without all the money spent with miniatures and painting (sometimes). | ||
|
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
It's like people who pick lesh/bs/sb/undying in pubs, fuck. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 03 2015 06:38 Shaella wrote: Guys its not worth it p6s game mastery of pf is so low he cant be reasoned with because he is actually just oblivious Its not my fault you didn't learn shit we knew in the 90s. | ||
|
ahswtini
Northern Ireland22213 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 03 2015 07:06 Shaella wrote: P6 I know u think you're smart but your understanding is rudimentary at best much like your understanding of dota Not my fault you failed to read the section on change the rules on page 11 of the 3rd edition DMs guide. And every other table top RPG ever made. You should get like at least 15 pages in before you claim other peoples understanding is rudimentary. | ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
On July 03 2015 07:10 Plansix wrote: Not my fault you failed to read the section on change the rules on page 11 of the 3rd edition DMs guide. And every other table top RPG ever made. You should get like at least 15 pages in before you claim other peoples understanding is rudimentary. I'm not claiming it is just a fact. houserules are good but they cannot fix a system that at its core has deep problems, a player that understands a wizard can break the game a number of ways that require a more skilled and prepared gm than a fighter ever can. these are just facts about the pf system The fighter hits things that's all he really does the wizard has nearly unlimited options to overcome basically any obstacle because of how the game is designed | ||
|
misirlou
Portugal3319 Posts
I proceed to create a thiefling monk and be like "hey fuck hermit I wanna be a sailor". Proceed to roll traits n shit. Sailor CHAOTIC EVIL Deal with the fkin pirate now! bond: avenge my captain. flaw: follow orders even if I disagree. After the flaw roll I talk to the DM "yo this makes no sense, how can a chaotic evil pirate follow orders he doesn't agree with?", some minutes of discussion and he comes up "dude you followed your captains orders that u disagreed with, they made you a bad guy and now that he is dead you don't have to follow any orders" YEAHHH MOST OP LORE!!!! proceed to die in the first fight with a single axe swing. Was fun. The DM was kinda of an ass though, he could have let me live, all the DnD people, him included, said that what I did was according to my character story so why kill me for it. | ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
the dota equivalent of p6 did is basically he said 'hey every hero can reassign all their skillpoints on level up because this would let them #scoutingahead #strategicdiversity #unapprovedspells | ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
On July 03 2015 07:24 Kupon3ss wrote: the problem isn't in changing the rules, its the fact that your changing of the rules actually has the exact opposite effect as your intentions but you're too oblivious to understand the basic gameplay mechanics of core classes the dota equivalent of p6 did is basically he said 'hey every hero can reassign all their skillpoints on level up because this would let them #scoutingahead #strategicdiversity #unapprovedspells Right he buffed wizards like hahaha | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10666 Posts
Never again. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
|
misirlou
Portugal3319 Posts
| ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
| ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On July 03 2015 07:47 IntoTheheart wrote: What music does Zai play? he was saying he showed rtz how to rtz music earlier then played rtz style music | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 03 2015 07:22 Shaella wrote: I'm not claiming it is just a fact. houserules are good but they cannot fix a system that at its core has deep problems, a player that understands a wizard can break the game a number of ways that require a more skilled and prepared gm than a fighter ever can. these are just facts about the pf system The fighter hits things that's all he really does the wizard has nearly unlimited options to overcome basically any obstacle because of how the game is designed I've DMed games for over 20 years and I've never found a system that I could adjust to make more interesting or challenge my players. And I have not had the problem with OP wizards or really anything that you describe in a very long time. There is no table top system that is perfect and if your players get out of control or don't have fun its your fault. Players only get OP if you let them. | ||
| ||
