Thanks.
Trek banned - Page 2
Forum Index > Closed |
![]()
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
Thanks. | ||
![]()
Beyonder
![]()
Netherlands15103 Posts
On September 07 2003 22:51 Twisted wrote: Hey a person's bw skills should not give him priviledge of flaming or whatever. He should get same treatment as any forum poster. If he posts stupid shit, ye then he gets banned. God why are we still here | ||
![]()
mensrea
Canada5062 Posts
On September 07 2003 22:58 esk0 wrote: 90% of rekrul's posts contains shit, flaming and so on. why am i not seeing him getting banned? I don't agree with your statement. Rekrul's been very responsible in every way possible. I'm not sure I would be as nice about it if I had to take the amount of abuse he takes from forumers on a daily basis. You should see the kind of crap thrown Rek's way - often for no reason at all. It's just random sometimes, just because he's Rekrul and people think they can get away with it because it's become fashionable. It's also pretty fucked up. If Rek defends himself, people accuse him of abusing his admin privileges. If he does nothing and ignores, then suddenly the number of abusers increase. All things considered, Rekrul's been extremely understanding, I think. Regarding bans, we try to be nice about things, and banning is a last resort for us, but at the end of the day, none of us at TL.net should have to tolerate vistors we don't like. If Rekrul banned Trek, then it must have been for good cause. Thx for listening. (btw, esko, remove your signature please.) | ||
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
| ||