The visuals on the Pelosi/Schumer rebuttal were terrible. And I don’t think that their argument that Trump is fearmongering is going to go over well when he lays out the stats and the stories of the families who lost loved ones.
Speaking of families losing loved ones; what happened with that massive opioid crisis? I do remember Trump saying it was something he wanted to do something about and he set up a special group to deal with it.
Has that improved in the last couple of years? I haven't seen anything in the news cycle about it for ages.
On January 09 2019 14:39 xDaunt wrote: The visuals on the Pelosi/Schumer rebuttal were terrible. And I don’t think that their argument that Trump is fearmongering is not going to go over well when he lays out the stats and the stories of the families who lost loved ones.
Did you come to the same conclusion that Trump did that calling a state of emergency was a dimwitted idea? Or are you disappointed he backed down?
On January 09 2019 14:39 xDaunt wrote: The visuals on the Pelosi/Schumer rebuttal were terrible. And I don’t think that their argument that Trump is fearmongering is not going to go over well when he lays out the stats and the stories of the families who lost loved ones.
He’s going to ruin this with a tweet in a couple hours, right?
From Stephen Miller: “This is the best night Trump has had in months so of course tomorrow he’s going to wake up and tweet about his dick or something. Seriously, Chuck & Nancy create meme of the year, Acosta had his coworkers laughing at him & AOC goes full “Mom give me back my IPAD” on Maddow. Strap him down, flush the phone and the shutdown ends in two days.”
They haven't been able to strap him down or flush his phone yet.
edit: Also, it is not lost on me that Miller thinks the best way to get the government functioning again is to take Trump out of the equation. I commend his realism at least.
On January 09 2019 14:39 xDaunt wrote: The visuals on the Pelosi/Schumer rebuttal were terrible. And I don’t think that their argument that Trump is fearmongering is not going to go over well when he lays out the stats and the stories of the families who lost loved ones.
He’s going to ruin this with a tweet in a couple hours, right?
From Stephen Miller: “This is the best night Trump has had in months so of course tomorrow he’s going to wake up and tweet about his dick or something. Seriously, Chuck & Nancy create meme of the year, Acosta had his coworkers laughing at him & AOC goes full “Mom give me back my IPAD” on Maddow. Strap him down, flush the phone and the shutdown ends in two days.”
Well if Miller said it...lol
Also funny in the context of Trump literally throwing a tantrum for his toy at the checkout counter (that they offered to buy him on the way in but he refused like a petulant child).
On January 09 2019 14:39 xDaunt wrote: The visuals on the Pelosi/Schumer rebuttal were terrible. And I don’t think that their argument that Trump is fearmongering is not going to go over well when he lays out the stats and the stories of the families who lost loved ones.
Did you come to the same conclusion that Trump did that calling a state of emergency was a dimwitted idea? Or are you disappointed he backed down?
What matters is whether Trump gets his wall funding. I'm willing to give him quite a bit of latitude in how he gets there. Obviously, the best result is to get Congress to cave.
On January 09 2019 14:39 xDaunt wrote: The visuals on the Pelosi/Schumer rebuttal were terrible. And I don’t think that their argument that Trump is fearmongering is not going to go over well when he lays out the stats and the stories of the families who lost loved ones.
Did you come to the same conclusion that Trump did that calling a state of emergency was a dimwitted idea? Or are you disappointed he backed down?
What matters is whether Trump gets his wall funding. I'm willing to give him quite a bit of latitude in how he gets there. Obviously, the best result is to get Congress to cave.
He's going to get the same funding he got offered before he had his tantrum though?
We'll see what he eventually gets. However, I do think that he has deliberately picked this fight with the aim of tarnishing the incoming democrat congress on the issue that they're weak on. Time will tell whether he's successful and whether it was a good idea.
On January 10 2019 01:19 xDaunt wrote: We'll see what he eventually gets. However, I do think that he has deliberately picked this fight with the aim of tarnishing the incoming democrat congress on the issue that they're weak on. Time will tell whether he's successful and whether it was a good idea.
Shutting down the government and threatening a state of emergency to get something congress was going to give you anyway is a pathetic way to "tarnish incoming democrats".
I've said this a dozen times but Democrats planned on building a barrier and spending billions on border security before Trump even got elected. His petulant manner and careless rhetoric is the only reason he didn't get it signed off on right away with bipartisan support.
The idea that whatever Trump gets out of this is a masterstroke of planning neglects the realities that preceded him.
yea i don’t think it reads at all like tarnishing the incoming congress, rather, having not gotten what he wanted from a republican controlled congress that this is really his last stand, and specifically due to it being his last opportunity, in getting what he wanted from a now dem controlled house.
this is as much leverage as he’ll have for the remainder of this term, is it not? lest he threaten more future shutdowns if he doesn’t get what he wants, which depending on how dems acquiesce or not will be a fairly good indicator of its success as a strategy, insofar as it is one.
which is all fairly nonsensical, because like GH said, the dems in congress want this. they just can’t agree on a number. and in typical trump fashion, if it’s not all, it’s nothing. three cheers for democracy.
It still seems a strange hill to die on to me. He's going to end up taking the 5 billion he was originally offered and calling it a win, which I'm sure will play well to the people who pay no attention beyond what Trump says and - for some reason I can't comprehend - actually believe him, but beyond that what's he gain?
It seems increasingly inevitable the Democrats are going to 'win' this, whatever that means, so the longer Trump holds out the worse it's going to look when he caves.
If he's so desperate for this shouldn't he go in there and, you know, start making deals? Offer them stuff they want in return for more wall money?
Doesn't seem like government shutdowns have worked well for Republicans. Both the shutdown during Obama's term and now were instigated by Republicans (first by Cruz/the Freedom Caucus and now by Trump). It was the idea of those Republicans that if they did not get concessions, they would decline to fund the government. Had the Republicans not wanted to get those particular concessions in exchange for funding the government, there would not have been shutdowns. In other words, Republicans "started it" - it was their idea. And I think that is something the American public can see clearly. Using the continued operation of the government as a negotiating tool is more like a child on a playground than an adult legislator. I don't think people are on board with the idea.
Don't confuse a poor execution with what is initially a good idea. Starting off a democratic legislature with a shutdown is a crude but effective move if you win. He starts the presidential campaign with a win and an issue he can reliably run on for his base. The gop that are still there need the base to not be against them, yes they need the moderates but this shutdown is reliably between trump and the Democrats not the gop and the democrats which is a unique opportunity.
As time goes on trump has the advantage as long as democrats don't organize and offer terms publicly for trump to accept that the can't accept. That would turn the impetus on trump to make a deal. Democrats don't present a united front well even before considering people are spoiling for a nomination fight for a presidency they believe they can win easy.
Trumps address is also smart as democrats lack the ability to interact with the country on a direct and widespread way. The result shows that someone on trumps team isn't actually incompetent and can playbook well.
Unfortunately whoever this operative is is saddled with what may be the worst pure politician to speak of. The 2017 trump is tired, bored, and frustrated. Hes chased out the best of his cabinet and burned any bridge he had with McConnell with vetoing the budget bill. He should never be put in front of a camera in the oval office again. The swamp he came to drain is the only thing keeping the wolves at bay anymore.
On January 10 2019 01:19 xDaunt wrote: We'll see what he eventually gets. However, I do think that he has deliberately picked this fight with the aim of tarnishing the incoming democrat congress on the issue that they're weak on. Time will tell whether he's successful and whether it was a good idea.
He should've gone for $50bil at the minimum. $5 bil worth of wall is best measured in yards if you ask me. Granted, it does bait Democrats into rooting in place against it, who would've been happy to take that in exchange for DACA renewal before the judge obviated that deal. So it's mostly a symbolic amount of money against a symbolic stand against immoral pennies.
The big question is how many Republican Senators will vocally or behind-the-scenes flinch when it matters for the paycheck. The second big question is how long Trump can stay on message without tweeting something cataclysmically stupid.
Whatever combination of forces within the white house that combined to craft & deliver that amazing speech is another unknown factor. I contrast that with Jared & Ivanka's likely agitation against standing firm on this issue.
If this is what continues to happen from Trump typifies major GOP Senators, it's a won fight. If more join Cornyn's/Capito's/Thune's skepticism, it's gonna be a harder outcome to predict.
Not surprising. But what Trump has now done is put the lie to Chuck and Nancy's rebuttal speech last night. He's making all of these negotiations public in a way that typically isn't done, and it's not looking good for his opposition.
Not surprising. But what Trump has now done is put the lie to Chuck and Nancy's rebuttal speech last night. He's making all of these negotiations public in a way that typically isn't done, and it's not looking good for his opposition.
EDIT: Why is the tweet not displaying properly?
The intractability of negotiations doesn't play well if democrats can protray trump as the one refusing to deal. Selling yourself as a dealmaker doesn't work well if you can't make a deal.