[Christian topic] Greg Laurie - Page 17

On April 19 2007 07:43 MaxdigsSoda wrote:

Well little boy, i said that because uh.. he's completely insane?

Then you say.. hardly being ridiculous? Well, He's doing a psychoanalysis on every atheist in the world. Which is impossible because we dont follow "evolution" in the same way chrisitans follow the bible, christians are often so ignorant that they think we are a bunch of sheep following the evolution theory just like you christians follow the bible.

We dont. You are the sheep, we are not.

Dumbass kids.

On April 19 2007 07:54 Lemonwalrus wrote:
I noticed that the low post count members are the ones that seem more adamant about defending their position. I bet it is because they have not yet learned, as the high post count members have, that everybody is going to walk away from this conversation with the exact same beliefs that they entered with.

On April 19 2007 07:56 Lemonwalrus wrote:
I didnt mean it as an insult, just that I have never seen a compromise come out of any of the threads like this.
EDIT: And I am kind of counting myself as a low post count member.
I guess you could say that I am good enough at god debate threads to know I am not very good at god debate threads.

On April 19 2007 00:05 evanthebouncy~ wrote:
Hey can god do anything? can some christian people answer?

On April 19 2007 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
are you posing this as a serious question?

On April 19 2007 07:48 XelNaga wrote:


Wait a second.. Did you just tell me that he's psychoanalyzing every atheist, an impossibility because every atheist is different and don't follow evolution the same. Then go on to say that every Christian is the same? You do realize that there are hundreds of different Christian denominations, different interpretations and opinions? Exegetical and hermenuetical differences? There are many more ways to view and understand and believe Christianity (Not saying they are all right) than there are ways to believe and understand evolution.

Funny.. you degrade him because he made a "generalization" according to you. Then you did the same thing... Why is it that Christians are considered hypocrites? Maybe some of you should start self examining (not meaning to be rude, but really..)

Sheep eh? Yeah, we really are. And God is our shepherd (Psalm 23). But seriously, you'd be appalled to learn that faith and belief can often be the height of intellectuality. We argue from what we believe and so far, except for a few people, everyone here has been arguing out of.. some opinion they were taught when they were younger and didn't question.

On April 19 2007 08:12 MaxdigsSoda wrote:
I didn't really mean to argue that all christians are the same, more like in COMPARISON to atheists/agnostics you are the same, and a bunch of sheep, also brainwashed.

And i don't want to argue any technical points in here about how made up religion is, cause on the internet thats kind of impossible, in real life its easier cause you can immidietly just debunk what they say. But the problem online is that a person can just write a really long message and just ignore you everytime you write a response that's making sense.

You xel naga always debunk our responses even if it makes perfect sense, probably cause you "know" it cant be true, and therefor dont even give it a fucking chance. You dumb piece of shit, intellectually inferior human with nothing but shit for brains and a pair of hands and a keyboard you use to spread your fucking idiocy, suck my balls.

// 666

On April 19 2007 08:16 XelNaga wrote:


I "debunk" your responses because I like to argue about everything. Then again.. Even when I say something that makes perfect sense you all try to debunk me? Odd.. That it goes both ways, that is.

I am glad though that you've learned how to string a sentence together using almost nothing but swears and insults etc. That's a real accomplishment. Maybe you'll evolve past Australopithecus in the near future.

On April 19 2007 08:18 MaxdigsSoda wrote:

ur shit doesnt make perfect sense cause it requires leaps of faith to make perfect sense, debunked. OWNEEEED

On April 19 2007 08:20 XelNaga wrote:


Yours takes just as much, if not more, faith than what I believe. There's no way around it, and to deny this reality shows a severe ignorance.. Seriously, I'm not trying to be mean, but if you don't think you take leaps of faith with science then you might want to go look at the assumptions science makes... Those are all leaps of faith.

On April 19 2007 08:28 MaxdigsSoda wrote:
Thats bullshit, i'm agnostic (but i dont mind calling myself atheist because of the probability of no god is so large) So i dont do leaps of faith.

On April 19 2007 08:28 MaxdigsSoda wrote:
And you moron, assumptions arnt leaps of faith you fool. Science thinks "the probability for this being correct is very high, therefor its quite possibly true" That's not leaps of faith you moron, it's merely percentages, theories, proof gathered which adds up into the probability being very high. But if something that debunks it comes up, then science GOES WITH THAT! unlike religion, which denies it and keeps to its 'leap of faith'.

On April 19 2007 08:28 MaxdigsSoda wrote:
DEBUNKED OWNEEEEEEED, i'm totally crushing you man, what now? isnt it like 5-0 to me? haha i shouldnt pick on kids on internet forums

On April 19 2007 08:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Maxdigs, please show some respect. Though I do agree with your statements, the insults really are just making you look like an ass. This goes for anyone simply flaming, by the way.

If you want to make your point clear, there is no need to call the person you are discussing to a fool, moron, dumb piece of shit, or say owned after every post. That's most likely the way to get banned, not achieve a discussion that leads anywhere.

As for the discussion ontopic, there three things that I'd like to mention.
1. How can you take the bible literal when it has been translated a million times? The only way, to me, seems to read the bible in it's original language (hebrew if I'm not wrong), so how can you call it the literal word of God?
2. There are a lot of fossils found, and the DNA matches between Humans and Chimpansees for example are almost identical. How do you explain this?
3. Logical thinking. To me, I don't think that a 2000 year old book saying how the world is 6000 years old, that adam and eve were the first two humans alive (thinking about that, wouldn't that require incest after the first time around to get more children?), that some guy built a giant wooden boat to save two of each animal, and so on. What is the logical reason behind your faith?
There was another thing, but I forgot it >_>.

On April 19 2007 08:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
As for the discussion ontopic, there three things that I'd like to mention.
1. How can you take the bible literal when it has been translated a million times? The only way, to me, seems to read the bible in it's original language (hebrew if I'm not wrong), so how can you call it the literal word of God?

On April 19 2007 08:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
2. There are a lot of fossils found, and the DNA matches between Humans and Chimpansees for example are almost identical. How do you explain this?

On April 19 2007 08:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
3. Logical thinking. To me, I don't think that a 2000 year old book saying how the world is 6000 years old, that adam and eve were the first two humans alive (thinking about that, wouldn't that require incest after the first time around to get more children?), that some guy built a giant wooden boat to save two of each animal, and so on. What is the logical reason behind your faith?
There was another thing, but I forgot it >_>.