US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8887
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
and to lighten the mood: fortunately, i'll never be elected have to put my money where my mouth is. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
Biff The Understudy
France7811 Posts
On September 30 2017 21:29 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: You must compliment our dear leader fully. Major natural catastrophe, dead people, thousand without a home or electricity, but ye, it's ALL about that clown's ego and if he received the right amount of compliments. This is fucking pathetic. | ||
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
On October 01 2017 02:47 Biff The Understudy wrote: Major natural catastrophe, dead people, thousand without a home or electricity, but ye, it's ALL about that clown's ego and if he received the right amount of compliments. This is fucking pathetic. No one can genuinely be surprised by any of this anymore right? Any hope of him ever acting presidential was gone ages ago. It's all more of the same, just on a grander scale. | ||
![]()
micronesia
United States24579 Posts
I mean, if a goat was elected president but had trouble getting any major legislation pushed through since all it does is eat plants, we wouldn't blame the goat, we'd blame the people who thought it was a good idea to elect the goat, and even more so, we'd blame the people who give the goat high marks and plan to re-elect the goat for its role in rescuing Puerto Rico from the ongoing disaster over there (not that we should blame the goat either, but you get the idea). Kind of the same thing here... Trump didn't do much to hide what he was before he was elected. People voted for him, and they are predominantly the problem. Other parties (e.g., Hillary) are also at fault for the way things turned out, but the most fundamental blame, in my opinion, points at people who voted for the person doing things like today's tweets. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
On October 01 2017 03:16 micronesia wrote: The main concern is not with Trump acting the way he is, but with people still supporting him. I mean, if a goat was elected president but had trouble getting any major legislation pushed through since all it does is eat plants, we wouldn't blame the goat, we'd blame the people who thought it was a good idea to elect the goat, and even more so, we'd blame the people who give the goat high marks and plan to re-elect the goat for its role in rescuing Puerto Rico from the ongoing disaster over there (not that we should blame the goat either, but you get the idea). Kind of the same thing here... Trump didn't do much to hide what he was before he was elected. People voted for him, and they are predominantly the problem. Other parties (e.g., Hillary) are also at fault for the way things turned out, but the most fundamental blame, in my opinion, points at people who voted for the person doing things like today's tweets. Even RealityisKing has been critical of Trump's demeanor. It's no secret to even his hardest supporters that he can be an abhorrent person. The issue is making them see why the president's poor character matters more than the other issues they care about, which can frankly be an impossible task. As long as the goat is pledging to limit abortion and preserve gun rights and his opponent is not, he's already locked 30% of the vote right there. The U.S. voting population has some messed up priorities to which there is no solution. | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On October 01 2017 03:16 micronesia wrote: The main concern is not with Trump acting the way he is, but with people still supporting him. I mean, if a goat was elected president but had trouble getting any major legislation pushed through since all it does is eat plants, we wouldn't blame the goat, we'd blame the people who thought it was a good idea to elect the goat, and even more so, we'd blame the people who give the goat high marks and plan to re-elect the goat for its role in rescuing Puerto Rico from the ongoing disaster over there (not that we should blame the goat either, but you get the idea). Kind of the same thing here... Trump didn't do much to hide what he was before he was elected. People voted for him, and they are predominantly the problem. Other parties (e.g., Hillary) are also at fault for the way things turned out, but the most fundamental blame, in my opinion, points at people who voted for the person doing things like today's tweets. I don’t think the President retains support for his brilliant job at passing legislation or his vocal response to Puerto Rico. I do have a problem with people that think Trump is performing in his role well (or will drain the swamp and pass great tax reform). Don’t conflate that with the original decision to vote for him. Nobody listened when Americans were fed up with Obamacare, immigration policy, and legislation by technocratic elite. We (They) sent Trump to office to send the message that the status quo must end, this kind of bipartisan DC consensus in rejection of campaign promises to the contrary. It’s not an endorsement of the messenger or all the misdeeds and harm he will do in office. It’s that you didn’t get the message and still refuse to see why Trump got elected, preferring to engage in defamation of his base. I really wish it didn’t come down to this. We learned that the fiction of a ‘United’ states was only indulged if you voted the way elite opinion wanted you to vote. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
also, you're not representative of the typical trump voter anyways. the base deserves to be defamed; because they willingly chose an obviously worse choice, to the detriment of themselves adn the world. and people's real lives are being hurt because of it. you're also explicitly pushing against policy being made by people who know what they're doing; and favoring people who don't know what they're doing flailing blindly and often being wrong. that's a really dumb viewpoint to hold. it's also not the case that policy was ever all that technocratic anyways. | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On October 01 2017 04:33 zlefin wrote: voting to hurt everybody out of spite is still not a good reason. you still have to own your actions. also, you're not representative of the typical trump voter anyways. the base deserves to be defamed; because they willingly chose an obviously worse choice, to the detriment of themselves adn the world. and people's real lives are being hurt because of it. you're also explicitly pushing against policy being made by people who know what they're doing; and favoring people who don't know what they're doing flailing blindly and often being wrong. that's a really dumb viewpoint to hold. it's also not the case that policy was ever all that technocratic anyways. You’re illustrating basically exactly what I’m talking about in the bolded. It’s very reassuring that everybody didn’t learn their lesson the week after. Then I might’ve been more regretful that we have to endure four years when people acknowledged the mistakes that created the Trump victory week 1 and sought to correct them. So go talk to whatever Trump voters are in your area of New England and seek more understanding. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
You don't like being called out on the facts; you don't like facts at all; because the reality and facts are, that you were wrong, and you chose evil, and it was obvious that you chose evil. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
The sun rose Wednesday morning in the low mountains of north-central Puerto Rico, near the town of Corozal, to reveal the world that Hurricane Maria has made: shattered trees, traffic lights dangling precipitously from broken poles, and, here on the face of a weedy hill, a gushing spring, one of the few places where people from miles around could find fresh water. At 6 a.m., about a dozen trucks and cars had parked nearby. People brought rain barrels, buckets, orange juice bottles. Some men clambered up the steep face of the hill, placing plastic pipes or old pieces of gutter underneath the running spring, directing the water into massive plastic tanks, then hauling them away. Others crouched at a spot where the water trickled down to the pavement. Jorge Díaz Rivera, 61, was there with 11 Clorox bottles. He lives in a community a few minutes’ drive away where there is no water, no food, and no help. The National Guard helicopters have been passing overhead, and sometimes he and his neighbors yell at them, pleading for water. But so far he has seen no help. “They have forgotten about us,” he said. Puerto Rico has not been forgotten, but more than a week after Hurricane Maria hit, it’s a woozy empire of wreckage; of waiting in line for food, water and gas and then finding another line to wait in some more. A team of New York Times reporters and photographers spent 24 hours — from dawn Wednesday to scorching afternoon heat, to a long uneasy night and Thursday morning without power — with people trying to survive the catastrophe that Hurricane Maria left behind. The storm for many was not just something to be endured. It was also a message that it was time to leave Puerto Rico. In front of the pink and green, art deco facade of the Telégrafo building in Santurce, dozens of people checked their phones. The section of the street is one of the few spots on the island where residents can connect to free Wi-Fi. People try to reach family members abroad or those left isolated in island towns. Many check their emails for any word from their employer. It’s common to see people break down after making contact with a loved one for the first time since the hurricane. And for Raymond Hernández, the strip of sidewalk was a way to book his ticket out of Puerto Rico. “I'm going to Tampa to find work for a couple of months,” Mr. Hernández, a personal trainer, said. “And who knows if I end up staying over there.” For Mr. Hernández, 46, Hurricane Maria was perhaps the final straw in a decision he’s been reluctant to make for 17 years. Over the years, the island's economic recession forced him to close down several gyms he owned. Then his personal training business dried up after Hurricane Irma hit. After Maria blasted out the windows of his apartment in San Juan, he spent two hours during the height of the storm barricading the door with his body. Now, people are thinking about survival, not working out. “This hurricane has been the cause of many important decisions for a lot of people,” Mr. Hernández said, shaking his head. Maritza Giol waited in line at the Plaza Loiza supermarket, a flimsy curtain protecting her from the rain. She needed food for her frail 96-year-old mother, Inocencia Torres, who has been stuck in bed for so long she has bed sores. Their cupboards are mostly empty and her mother can only eat liquids and soft food. Every 15 or 20 minutes, a security guard would allow people in five to 10 at a time to control the crowd. She shuffled forward little by little, and was grateful the line was not too long. Once inside, she hoped to grab basic staples, like rice and some canned goods. She hoped to see vegetables or viandas, like yucca or plantains, that she could mash for her mother. If not, she will move on to the next line. “I’ll go to another supermarket, and then the next, if I have to, until I find what I need,” Ms. Giol said. “I can’t leave Mami without food.” She is not beyond begging. She ran after a fuel truck and pleaded with the driver to sell her some diesel for the generator to help her mom. She didn’t walk away with enough, but she walked away with something. “We lived through Hugo and George,” she said, naming two powerful hurricanes that hit Puerto Rico in recent times, “but none of those storms was like this.” Source | ||
RealityIsKing
613 Posts
On October 01 2017 04:51 zlefin wrote: There's no lesson to be learned by us, you're the one who needs to learn the lesson: don't choose to hurt people; you willingly chose to cause suffering to others and yourself out of spite and foolishness; that's entirely on you. You don't like being called out on the facts; you don't like facts at all; because the reality and facts are, that you were wrong, and you chose evil, and it was obvious that you chose evil. Let's go back to logic shall we instead of posting here only to piss people off. The dems and GOP were both trying to get the White House. GOP got it and DNC didn't. So by reasoning, ofc the DNC needs to reflect on themselves in comparison to the GOP. Its common sense. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On October 01 2017 05:04 RealityIsKing wrote: Let's go back to logic shall we instead of posting here only to piss people off. The dems and GOP were both trying to get the White House. GOP got it and DNC didn't. So by reasoning, ofc the DNC needs to reflect on themselves in comparison to the GOP. Its common sense. If the goal is to win at all costs, regardless of the suffering it causes to the world or to yourself; then yes that's true. But there's a larger questoin of whether the stance of winning regardless of the suffering you cause is appropriate or not. Do you have an opinion on that question? | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On October 01 2017 04:51 zlefin wrote: There's no lesson to be learned by us, you're the one who needs to learn the lesson: don't choose to hurt people; you willingly chose to cause suffering to others and yourself out of spite and foolishness; that's entirely on you. You don't like being called out on the facts; you don't like facts at all; because the reality and facts are, that you were wrong, and you chose evil, and it was obvious that you chose evil. If you refuse to learn the lesson, you choose to repeat the pain. I'd really prefer the situation I described in the original post. You call it spite. You say the base deserves to be defamed. You say my policies are against policies made by people who know what they're doing. You can't be reasoned with and much of the country shares in that political psychosis (though maybe they'd soften it just a little). The political options that remain involve making the choice knowing the left isn't coming back to the table, or never was at the table originally. Sorry. Divided states of America and all. Colonial overlords over the natives that are too dumb to pick well for themselves. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
So he wasn't briefed. | ||
| ||