US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8266

On August 01 2017 08:55 Plansix wrote:

Any law firm I have worked at would have fired even our most senior attorney if they ever acted close to how that clown acted. That is not how the majority of the professional world functions and not how Washington functions.

And no one should have that job and not know that all discussions with reporters are on the record unless the reporter says otherwise. Straight up, that is the most amateur mistake possible.

On August 01 2017 08:59 xDaunt wrote:

Not to burst your bubble, but what Scaramucci did wasn't enough to deep-six a partner who brings home the bacon at a law firm.

On August 01 2017 08:58 Introvert wrote:
Flake is a flaky as needs be, he ran AS a Tea Party senator. But he's up for re-election in a more and more purplish state with a large Hispanic population. This is full-on CYA mode. And his tone at time reminds me of some of the more pretentious never-trumpers.

On August 01 2017 09:03 LegalLord wrote:
I agree with the message but not the messenger regarding Flake.

New White House chief of staff John Kelly was so upset with how President Donald Trump handled the firing of FBI Director James Comey that Kelly called Comey afterward and said he was considering resigning, according to two sources familiar with a conversation between Kelly and Comey.

Both sources cautioned that it was unclear how serious Kelly, then the secretary of homeland security, was about resigning himself.

"John was angry and hurt by what he saw and the way (Comey) was treated," one of the sources said.

Comey learned of his dismissal on May 9 from televisions tuned to the news as he was addressing the workforce at the FBI office in Los Angeles, law enforcement sources said at the time. Comey made a joke about it to lighten the mood and called his office to get confirmation.

Comey, who took Kelly's call while traveling back from Los Angeles to Washington, responded to Kelly by telling him not to resign, one of the sources said.

The sources said Comey and Kelly are not close friends but that they had a professional relationship and a deep mutual respect for each other.

Comey declined to comment for this story. The White House and the Department of Homeland Security have not responded to requests for comment.

Trump announced Friday that Kelly would replace Reince Priebus as chief of staff, the latest in a series of staff moves aiming to reset the White House's communications and agenda efforts.

A permanent replacement for Comey as FBI director is expected soon when the full Senate votes on the nomination of Christopher Wray, who cleared the judiciary committee with unanimous support.

On August 01 2017 08:06 Nevuk wrote:

Rasmussen uses a likely voter model, which heavily amplifies GOP voters.

On August 01 2017 10:08 zlefin wrote:
So, from what I've heard on Flake, he voted in favor the skinny repeal, is that right?
Trained politicians are skilled at using pretty words, but his voting record doesn't seem to backup the rhetoric he used there.
while I still appluad the rhetoric for its good tone; if he's not backing it up with his votes in the Senate is not so good.

Political strategists, take note: For the first time, millennials and Gen Xers outvoted their elders in 2016, according to data from the Pew Research Center.

Fully 69.6 million millennials (defined as people who were 18 to 35 in 2016) and members of Generation X (ages 36 to 51) cast votes in 2016, according to a Pew analysis of data from the Census Bureau. By comparison, 67.9 million baby boomers and members of older generations voted.

This is the culmination of a steady march of the young electorate slowly catching up to the middle-aged and elderly electorates in terms of size.

It's not exactly surprising news — more and more millennials have been hitting voting age all the time, while boomers and older Americans are dying off.

But it is nevertheless an important reminder to parties and politicians that a shifting electorate could mean shifting strategies for future campaigns.

For now, the growing number of younger voters may seem like a problem for Republicans. Younger voters are significantly more likely to identify as Democratic than older cohorts, according to 2016 data from Pew. That year, 55 percent of millennials identified as Democratic or leaned Democratic. That share dropped off in each successive older generation — and the share of Republicans grew in each successive generation.

But then, there could be a bright spot or two for conservatives. For example, a 2016 study found that at high school graduation, millennials (defined in this study as being born between 1980 and 1994, so this wouldn't include 2016's youngest voters) were more likely to identify as conservative than Generation X or baby boomers were at the same age.

If anything, millennials may be more polarized than their parents and older siblings were when they were young. "Fewer 12th graders and entering college students identified as moderates in the 2010s compared to the late 1970s and 1980s and more identified as radical, very liberal, or very conservative," researchers wrote in that 2016 paper.

That kind of polarization may only intensify in coming years. In a blog post today at Demos, a left-leaning think tank, Sean McElwee points out that young Democratic primary voters and donors are both more liberal than other Democrats their age and more liberal than older primary voters and donors. All of that means that the Democratic Party will soon be pulled further left, McElwee predicts.

That liberalism was on display in 2016, when young voters in particular responded strongly to Bernie Sanders' socialist message. Indeed, some 2016 polls showed that millennials were more likely than older voters to view socialism favorably.

Political ideologies aside, a few other millennial traits will indubitably shape future politics.

For one thing, they're more diverse, according to a 2016 Brookings analysis — in particular, the younger the generation, the less white it is and the more Hispanic it is.

Millennials are also less religious than their elders, meaning that candidates who make their faith central to their political campaigns (think Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee) might find winning votes increasingly difficult in the future.

But longer-term, the question is how young voters' political preferences will change as they age. Conventional wisdom says that voters grow more conservative as they get older, and there is some evidence to back this up — by some polling, Gen X and baby boomer voters became less supportive of bigger government as they aged. But it's not clear to what degree the idea of conservatism growing with age is true — indeed, some recent research has called that into question on social issues in particular.

Not only that, but research has shown that events in Americans' early voting years tend to affect them for the rest of their voting lives (though this is more true for white than minority voters, according to a 2014 paper). If that's true, a deeply unpopular President Trump — particularly among today's young voters — might have lasting, negative reverberations for future Republicans.

One other major question for how millennials shape future elections is whether they increase their voting rates. Perhaps the most striking thing about Pew's new finding is that it didn't come sooner. In 2016, there were far more eligible young voters — 126 million in Gen X and millennials — than older voters, with nearly 98 million eligible between the boomer and silent generations.

But younger voters have only just now overtaken their elders because younger generations — and especially millennials — have lower voting rates than older generations, Pew also found. Only around half of millennials voted in 2016, compared with about two-thirds of older cohorts.