• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:02
CEST 15:02
KST 22:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
2v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature2Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy8uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event17Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments7[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread 2v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature Is there a way to see if 2 accounts=1 person? uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
ASL 20 HYPE VIDEO! BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soma Explains: JaeDong's Double Muta Micro BW AKA finder tool ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking!
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI The year 2050
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Biochemical Cost of Gami…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2519 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7119

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
March 15 2017 00:57 GMT
#142361
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:02:02
March 15 2017 01:01 GMT
#142362
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35154 Posts
March 15 2017 01:03 GMT
#142363
On March 15 2017 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump

No, it's far too eloquent.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:08:12
March 15 2017 01:07 GMT
#142364
On March 15 2017 10:03 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump

No, it's far too eloquent.


"It is totally illegal" - "dishonest media".

It really isn't that much more eloquent. That being said, i actually agree partially with it. This is a publicity stunt by someone who seems very desperate.

They're a decade old. Who gives a shit.
On track to MA1950A.
Orome
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
Switzerland11984 Posts
March 15 2017 01:13 GMT
#142365
"Totally illegal" is pretty Trump.

The quest to oust Trump through any means possible while also garnering ratings continues. Not a fan, but I guess it's hard to live with him being your country's president day after day.
On a purely personal note, I'd like to show Yellow the beauty of infinitely repeating Starcraft 2 bunkers. -Boxer
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28674 Posts
March 15 2017 01:17 GMT
#142366
'desperate for ratings' is so trump too lol. And hasn't MSNBC been on a upswing rating wise anyway?
Moderator
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:37:08
March 15 2017 01:26 GMT
#142367
This doesn't seem to be that much of breaking news. From 2005... really?

edit: Yeah so far this is just seems like a stupid ploy, and Maddow may have even fell into a PR trap.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:36:51
March 15 2017 01:36 GMT
#142368
Doesn't seem like anything scandalous. He did a $100 million construction write down to lower his tax rate. So he only paid 24%.

The journalist who got the tax return, David Cay Johnston has had stuff leaked to him from Trump himself before. He has covered Trump for decades.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15690 Posts
March 15 2017 01:38 GMT
#142369
Am I the only one who feels like maddow is in a worse position now?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 01:40 GMT
#142370
Yea she is because this isn't news, unless she has a bombshell which I doubt otherwise she would have revealed at the start.

In short she fell into a PR trap.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Ayaz2810
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2763 Posts
March 15 2017 01:46 GMT
#142371
Why am i watching this?

"he made money and paid taxes on it"

"he wants to change the taxes to pay less taxes on his money.


no shit.
Vrtra Vanquisher/Tiamat Trouncer/World Serpent Slayer
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:49:12
March 15 2017 01:47 GMT
#142372
I didn't think Maddow would be this stupid, oddly enough she seems to be slowly realizing she just did Trumps work for him.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:05:00
March 15 2017 01:57 GMT
#142373
Kasparov called it earlier. albeit with a russian spin. I'm not a big fan of these announcement types. Just keep silent until you get enough and you know it's good. Haven't any of these people read transmetropolitan? Get something 100 percent airtight and pull it out at a press conference.

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42778 Posts
March 15 2017 02:02 GMT
#142374
Two pages of tax returns is a very odd way to describe the 1040. If you're unaware of what the 1040 is, it's the summary page of pretty much all of the other pages of your taxes. The 1040 is "work out all of your capital gains on schedule D, write the total here" etc. The information from hundreds of pages of tax returns is condensed onto the 1040, that's what it's for.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 02:03 GMT
#142375
Just a reminder how god damn stupid Rachel Maddow looks right now. Day off tomorrow I reckon.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:04:55
March 15 2017 02:04 GMT
#142376
this was certainly disappointing given all the hype beforehand
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
March 15 2017 02:06 GMT
#142377
In more important news

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:34:58
March 15 2017 02:24 GMT
#142378
On March 15 2017 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 02:02 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:54 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:51 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:47 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:30 KwarK wrote:
You're missing the point. This eagerness to insist that Hillary was a bad candidate and therefore America couldn't have been expected to vote for her over Trump is ridiculous. America could have been expected to vote for her over Trump. Hell, America could have been expected to vote for a return to British rule over Trump.


Nobody is saying that America couldn't have been expected to vote for her because of how bad she was. I did expect it, hell I'm pretty sure LL and GH expected it too. We're saying it's absurd to pretend that because Hillary lost to Trump, the conclusion is that America is so fucked up that a race between candidate x and an orange pussygrabing monkey is by definition close and that's the new reality of the country we have to accept.

Just because it happened is no reason to accept that it's reality? Is that genuinely your argument or are you pitching new slogans for Fox News?


Just cool down and read my sentence again. You're better than this.

It's absurd to pretend that just because there was a close race between Hillary (centrist candidate) and Trump (youtube comment section brought to life) we should accept the reality that what Trump says and does is popular?

Am I just not getting this? What are you trying to say here? That Trump getting as many votes as he did isn't reality? Or that it is reality but that we shouldn't accept it?

I believe he is trying to say that other candidates could have scored better then Hillary and could have won where she did not.

Trump does not beat all possible candidates.

(And while that might be factually correct I dont really agree with it. Trump's victory very much shows there is a lot more deplorable/stupid people in the US then we all though/hoped).


Well, let's say that the premise is right. Let's say that America is that fucked up and loves far right extremism just that much. We still want to win next time, right? So logically we should move our discourse even more to the right of where it was now, since we lost because America is fucked up, so we should become a little more fucked up ourselves to appeal to it.

Very schematically, that's what the democratic party has been doing for a while now, and it has lost what, 1000 seats, doing it? The results don't seem to corroborate the premise, so perhaps the premise is wrong.

On March 15 2017 02:36 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 02:25 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 02:02 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:54 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:51 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:47 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:30 KwarK wrote:
You're missing the point. This eagerness to insist that Hillary was a bad candidate and therefore America couldn't have been expected to vote for her over Trump is ridiculous. America could have been expected to vote for her over Trump. Hell, America could have been expected to vote for a return to British rule over Trump.


Nobody is saying that America couldn't have been expected to vote for her because of how bad she was. I did expect it, hell I'm pretty sure LL and GH expected it too. We're saying it's absurd to pretend that because Hillary lost to Trump, the conclusion is that America is so fucked up that a race between candidate x and an orange pussygrabing monkey is by definition close and that's the new reality of the country we have to accept.

Just because it happened is no reason to accept that it's reality? Is that genuinely your argument or are you pitching new slogans for Fox News?


Just cool down and read my sentence again. You're better than this.

It's absurd to pretend that just because there was a close race between Hillary (centrist candidate) and Trump (youtube comment section brought to life) we should accept the reality that what Trump says and does is popular?

Am I just not getting this? What are you trying to say here? That Trump getting as many votes as he did isn't reality? Or that it is reality but that we shouldn't accept it?

I believe he is trying to say that other candidates could have scored better then Hillary and could have won where she did not.

Trump does not beat all possible candidates.

(And while that might be factually correct I dont really agree with it. Trump's victory very much shows there is a lot more deplorable/stupid people in the US then we all though/hoped).


Well, let's say that the premise is right. Let's say that America is that fucked up and loves far right extremism just that much. We still want to win next time, right? So logically we should move our discourse even more to the right of where it was now, since we lost because America is fucked up, so we should become a little more fucked up ourselves to appeal to it.

Very schematically, that's what the democratic party has been doing for a while now, and it has lost what, 1000 seats, doing it? The results don't seem to corroborate the premise, so perhaps the premise is wrong.

What? The Democrats over the last 8+ years have tried the high road. They haven't gone 'be more fucked up then the Republicans'. And while doing that they have suffered those losses.

Is the solution to be worse then them? Short term maybe, long term I hope not.

But you can't educate a fool who doesn't want to listen that the stove is hot. You can just explain it to him and then wait for his hand to burn.


You watch the republican party become more and more extreme. Since it's a two party system, you can become a little more right wing and garner support among the right wing people who used to vote republican and think it's too extreme now. You don't go "as fucked up as them", cause there would be no point to do that, they're already doing it, you're not going to win anything with that strategy. Instead you just become a little more right wing and because there's no one else in a two party system, there is no drawback.

That has been the strategy.
It didn't work. I'd rather we give up on this strategy before we give up on America. Cause if we give up on America, better double down on that strategy as that's what's most likely to work if the premise that "America is just that fucked up" is right.

This is simply not true, actually. The increase of party polarization in the US over the last few decades has been extensively documented by political scientists; Democrats in Congress have overall become more liberal, and Republicans have overall become more conservative (to a greater extent than Democrats have become more liberal). Methods of measurement of course vary, but you can for example look at the work of researchers like Adam Bonica, Poole and Rosenthal with their DW-NOMINATE scores, or alternatively look at ADA voting records, etc. (if you're interested in learning more about party polarization and the factors behind it, I recommend Sean Theriault's Party polarization in Congress (2006), Poole and Rosenthal's Ideology and Congress (2007), or Voorheis et al.'s very interesting recent article "Unequal Incomes, Ideology and Gridlock: How Rising Inequality Increases Political Polarization" (2015) -- I can send it to you if you don't have access to it). Of course, you can always find anecdotal examples to suggest the opposite, such as the ACA being essentially the conservatives' answer to the reform the Clintons championed in the 1990s, yet this misses the point -- the Clinton plan didn't pass, and looking at congressional votes over a long period of time paints a much clearer picture.

With regards to the 2016 election, Clinton scored to the left of Obama as a senator, she campaigned on a progressive policy platform, and the Democratic party platform that was adopted at the convention was the most progressive ever. Of course, she still wasn't progressive enough for some in the US population, but in addition to the structural and other factors which impacted her candidacy (including her own campaign's strategic mistakes) -- many of which would have played a role regardless of who was the Democratic nominee --, what hurt her the most wasn't a lack of progressivism (the opposite could be argued) but rather the negative perceptions about her character and honesty (notably the result of years/decades of GOP smears, media negativity and focus on the e-mail story, character attacks from the Sanders camp, and her own reluctance to engage with the media and lack of charisma for certain crowds).

To sum up, the Democrats in Congress have overall been moving towards the left, and there is little to suggest that a candidate to the left of Clinton would have had a better shot at winning the election, all other things being equal.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 02:29 GMT
#142379
Turn MSNBC back on to see Rachel Maddow do gymnastics distancing herself from this story.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
March 15 2017 02:34 GMT
#142380
Seems like a silly move by Maddow. Gives Trump fuel for his dishonest media deflection technique and didn't really show anything.
Never Knows Best.
Prev 1 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
12:00
S2 Championship: Ro28 Day 2
3DClanTV 63
EnkiAlexander 39
Liquipedia
WardiTV Summer Champion…
11:00
Group Stage 1 - Group D
WardiTV950
IndyStarCraft 278
Rex114
Liquipedia
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #102
Percival vs TriGGeRLIVE!
CranKy Ducklings165
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 278
Hui .155
Rex 117
ProTech55
MindelVK 34
trigger 31
Codebar 28
EnDerr 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 53893
Calm 5241
Rain 2351
EffOrt 419
Pusan 413
firebathero 279
Last 199
ggaemo 185
Hyun 139
ToSsGirL 134
[ Show more ]
Shine 121
Killer 54
Sea.KH 53
sorry 49
JYJ38
sSak 34
Aegong 29
scan(afreeca) 25
Movie 22
yabsab 22
Hm[arnc] 17
Sacsri 17
SilentControl 14
zelot 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Dota 2
qojqva2892
XcaliburYe617
Gorgc599
febbydoto6
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
edward94
Other Games
singsing2146
B2W.Neo2044
DeMusliM416
XaKoH 218
RotterdaM135
crisheroes28
ArmadaUGS23
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 37
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 15
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2453
Other Games
• WagamamaTV413
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1h 58m
BSL Team Wars
5h 58m
Team Dewalt vs Team Bonyth
Afreeca Starleague
20h 58m
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
1d 1h
RotterdaM Event
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 20h
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 21h
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
SC Evo League
5 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-08-13
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.