• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:51
CEST 01:51
KST 08:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy2GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding3Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info
Tourneys
GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. BW General Discussion Gypsy to Korea Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The China Politics Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Electronics
mantequilla
Any Web Designers Out there?…
sob3k
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2380 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7119

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
March 15 2017 00:57 GMT
#142361
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:02:02
March 15 2017 01:01 GMT
#142362
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35172 Posts
March 15 2017 01:03 GMT
#142363
On March 15 2017 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump

No, it's far too eloquent.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:08:12
March 15 2017 01:07 GMT
#142364
On March 15 2017 10:03 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump

No, it's far too eloquent.


"It is totally illegal" - "dishonest media".

It really isn't that much more eloquent. That being said, i actually agree partially with it. This is a publicity stunt by someone who seems very desperate.

They're a decade old. Who gives a shit.
On track to MA1950A.
Orome
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
Switzerland11984 Posts
March 15 2017 01:13 GMT
#142365
"Totally illegal" is pretty Trump.

The quest to oust Trump through any means possible while also garnering ratings continues. Not a fan, but I guess it's hard to live with him being your country's president day after day.
On a purely personal note, I'd like to show Yellow the beauty of infinitely repeating Starcraft 2 bunkers. -Boxer
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28784 Posts
March 15 2017 01:17 GMT
#142366
'desperate for ratings' is so trump too lol. And hasn't MSNBC been on a upswing rating wise anyway?
Moderator
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:37:08
March 15 2017 01:26 GMT
#142367
This doesn't seem to be that much of breaking news. From 2005... really?

edit: Yeah so far this is just seems like a stupid ploy, and Maddow may have even fell into a PR trap.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:36:51
March 15 2017 01:36 GMT
#142368
Doesn't seem like anything scandalous. He did a $100 million construction write down to lower his tax rate. So he only paid 24%.

The journalist who got the tax return, David Cay Johnston has had stuff leaked to him from Trump himself before. He has covered Trump for decades.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
March 15 2017 01:38 GMT
#142369
Am I the only one who feels like maddow is in a worse position now?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 01:40 GMT
#142370
Yea she is because this isn't news, unless she has a bombshell which I doubt otherwise she would have revealed at the start.

In short she fell into a PR trap.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Ayaz2810
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2763 Posts
March 15 2017 01:46 GMT
#142371
Why am i watching this?

"he made money and paid taxes on it"

"he wants to change the taxes to pay less taxes on his money.


no shit.
Vrtra Vanquisher/Tiamat Trouncer/World Serpent Slayer
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:49:12
March 15 2017 01:47 GMT
#142372
I didn't think Maddow would be this stupid, oddly enough she seems to be slowly realizing she just did Trumps work for him.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:05:00
March 15 2017 01:57 GMT
#142373
Kasparov called it earlier. albeit with a russian spin. I'm not a big fan of these announcement types. Just keep silent until you get enough and you know it's good. Haven't any of these people read transmetropolitan? Get something 100 percent airtight and pull it out at a press conference.

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43867 Posts
March 15 2017 02:02 GMT
#142374
Two pages of tax returns is a very odd way to describe the 1040. If you're unaware of what the 1040 is, it's the summary page of pretty much all of the other pages of your taxes. The 1040 is "work out all of your capital gains on schedule D, write the total here" etc. The information from hundreds of pages of tax returns is condensed onto the 1040, that's what it's for.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 02:03 GMT
#142375
Just a reminder how god damn stupid Rachel Maddow looks right now. Day off tomorrow I reckon.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:04:55
March 15 2017 02:04 GMT
#142376
this was certainly disappointing given all the hype beforehand
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
March 15 2017 02:06 GMT
#142377
In more important news

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:34:58
March 15 2017 02:24 GMT
#142378
On March 15 2017 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 02:02 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:54 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:51 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:47 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:30 KwarK wrote:
You're missing the point. This eagerness to insist that Hillary was a bad candidate and therefore America couldn't have been expected to vote for her over Trump is ridiculous. America could have been expected to vote for her over Trump. Hell, America could have been expected to vote for a return to British rule over Trump.


Nobody is saying that America couldn't have been expected to vote for her because of how bad she was. I did expect it, hell I'm pretty sure LL and GH expected it too. We're saying it's absurd to pretend that because Hillary lost to Trump, the conclusion is that America is so fucked up that a race between candidate x and an orange pussygrabing monkey is by definition close and that's the new reality of the country we have to accept.

Just because it happened is no reason to accept that it's reality? Is that genuinely your argument or are you pitching new slogans for Fox News?


Just cool down and read my sentence again. You're better than this.

It's absurd to pretend that just because there was a close race between Hillary (centrist candidate) and Trump (youtube comment section brought to life) we should accept the reality that what Trump says and does is popular?

Am I just not getting this? What are you trying to say here? That Trump getting as many votes as he did isn't reality? Or that it is reality but that we shouldn't accept it?

I believe he is trying to say that other candidates could have scored better then Hillary and could have won where she did not.

Trump does not beat all possible candidates.

(And while that might be factually correct I dont really agree with it. Trump's victory very much shows there is a lot more deplorable/stupid people in the US then we all though/hoped).


Well, let's say that the premise is right. Let's say that America is that fucked up and loves far right extremism just that much. We still want to win next time, right? So logically we should move our discourse even more to the right of where it was now, since we lost because America is fucked up, so we should become a little more fucked up ourselves to appeal to it.

Very schematically, that's what the democratic party has been doing for a while now, and it has lost what, 1000 seats, doing it? The results don't seem to corroborate the premise, so perhaps the premise is wrong.

On March 15 2017 02:36 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 02:25 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 02:02 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:54 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:51 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:47 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:30 KwarK wrote:
You're missing the point. This eagerness to insist that Hillary was a bad candidate and therefore America couldn't have been expected to vote for her over Trump is ridiculous. America could have been expected to vote for her over Trump. Hell, America could have been expected to vote for a return to British rule over Trump.


Nobody is saying that America couldn't have been expected to vote for her because of how bad she was. I did expect it, hell I'm pretty sure LL and GH expected it too. We're saying it's absurd to pretend that because Hillary lost to Trump, the conclusion is that America is so fucked up that a race between candidate x and an orange pussygrabing monkey is by definition close and that's the new reality of the country we have to accept.

Just because it happened is no reason to accept that it's reality? Is that genuinely your argument or are you pitching new slogans for Fox News?


Just cool down and read my sentence again. You're better than this.

It's absurd to pretend that just because there was a close race between Hillary (centrist candidate) and Trump (youtube comment section brought to life) we should accept the reality that what Trump says and does is popular?

Am I just not getting this? What are you trying to say here? That Trump getting as many votes as he did isn't reality? Or that it is reality but that we shouldn't accept it?

I believe he is trying to say that other candidates could have scored better then Hillary and could have won where she did not.

Trump does not beat all possible candidates.

(And while that might be factually correct I dont really agree with it. Trump's victory very much shows there is a lot more deplorable/stupid people in the US then we all though/hoped).


Well, let's say that the premise is right. Let's say that America is that fucked up and loves far right extremism just that much. We still want to win next time, right? So logically we should move our discourse even more to the right of where it was now, since we lost because America is fucked up, so we should become a little more fucked up ourselves to appeal to it.

Very schematically, that's what the democratic party has been doing for a while now, and it has lost what, 1000 seats, doing it? The results don't seem to corroborate the premise, so perhaps the premise is wrong.

What? The Democrats over the last 8+ years have tried the high road. They haven't gone 'be more fucked up then the Republicans'. And while doing that they have suffered those losses.

Is the solution to be worse then them? Short term maybe, long term I hope not.

But you can't educate a fool who doesn't want to listen that the stove is hot. You can just explain it to him and then wait for his hand to burn.


You watch the republican party become more and more extreme. Since it's a two party system, you can become a little more right wing and garner support among the right wing people who used to vote republican and think it's too extreme now. You don't go "as fucked up as them", cause there would be no point to do that, they're already doing it, you're not going to win anything with that strategy. Instead you just become a little more right wing and because there's no one else in a two party system, there is no drawback.

That has been the strategy.
It didn't work. I'd rather we give up on this strategy before we give up on America. Cause if we give up on America, better double down on that strategy as that's what's most likely to work if the premise that "America is just that fucked up" is right.

This is simply not true, actually. The increase of party polarization in the US over the last few decades has been extensively documented by political scientists; Democrats in Congress have overall become more liberal, and Republicans have overall become more conservative (to a greater extent than Democrats have become more liberal). Methods of measurement of course vary, but you can for example look at the work of researchers like Adam Bonica, Poole and Rosenthal with their DW-NOMINATE scores, or alternatively look at ADA voting records, etc. (if you're interested in learning more about party polarization and the factors behind it, I recommend Sean Theriault's Party polarization in Congress (2006), Poole and Rosenthal's Ideology and Congress (2007), or Voorheis et al.'s very interesting recent article "Unequal Incomes, Ideology and Gridlock: How Rising Inequality Increases Political Polarization" (2015) -- I can send it to you if you don't have access to it). Of course, you can always find anecdotal examples to suggest the opposite, such as the ACA being essentially the conservatives' answer to the reform the Clintons championed in the 1990s, yet this misses the point -- the Clinton plan didn't pass, and looking at congressional votes over a long period of time paints a much clearer picture.

With regards to the 2016 election, Clinton scored to the left of Obama as a senator, she campaigned on a progressive policy platform, and the Democratic party platform that was adopted at the convention was the most progressive ever. Of course, she still wasn't progressive enough for some in the US population, but in addition to the structural and other factors which impacted her candidacy (including her own campaign's strategic mistakes) -- many of which would have played a role regardless of who was the Democratic nominee --, what hurt her the most wasn't a lack of progressivism (the opposite could be argued) but rather the negative perceptions about her character and honesty (notably the result of years/decades of GOP smears, media negativity and focus on the e-mail story, character attacks from the Sanders camp, and her own reluctance to engage with the media and lack of charisma for certain crowds).

To sum up, the Democrats in Congress have overall been moving towards the left, and there is little to suggest that a candidate to the left of Clinton would have had a better shot at winning the election, all other things being equal.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 02:29 GMT
#142379
Turn MSNBC back on to see Rachel Maddow do gymnastics distancing herself from this story.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
March 15 2017 02:34 GMT
#142380
Seems like a silly move by Maddow. Gives Trump fuel for his dishonest media deflection technique and didn't really show anything.
Never Knows Best.
Prev 1 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
20:15
Best Games of SC
Rogue vs TriGGeR
Maru vs MaxPax
Rogue vs herO
Clem vs herO
Rogue vs Maru
PiGStarcraft556
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft556
JuggernautJason50
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 10927
Shuttle 425
NaDa 21
Dota 2
canceldota301
capcasts228
monkeys_forever223
Counter-Strike
C9.Mang0311
taco 116
minikerr2
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox431
Other Games
gofns21024
summit1g15593
ViBE77
Maynarde63
PPMD15
ROOTCatZ14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick638
StarCraft 2
angryscii 23
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 42
• musti20045 32
• OhrlRock 1
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 47
• blackmanpl 29
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV888
League of Legends
• Doublelift3886
Other Games
• imaqtpie1002
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
10h 9m
WardiTV Team League
11h 9m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
15h 9m
IPSL
16h 9m
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
BSL
19h 9m
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 10h
WardiTV Team League
1d 11h
OSC
1d 13h
BSL
1d 19h
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
1d 19h
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Escore
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-09
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.